Economic Forum published a report on how workforce dynamics will changeover the next five years, including what skillsets will be most important for employees to have. 1Table 1 below illustrates this change by comparing the current top three skills, identified in a2015 survey, with research-supported predictions for 2020. While complex problem solving willremain a necessary skill, critical or systems thinking and creativity will both become more andmore important in solving complex system problems. As new technologies transform industries,these skills will enable the mental flexibility needed to interact with increasingly complexsystems. Table 1: Top Three Skills for Employees1 In 2015
based on the real-time data from the devices(DEVS models simulation representation).This cloud-manufacturing environment is fully functional and will allow to use this examplefor research and education of postgraduate students and industry clients and forunderstanding the important trends in future manufacturing. IntroductionOne of the most ambitious and distinctive international future manufacturing projects is theGerman Government program Industry 4.0 [4]. As a part of its long term strategy, the mostimportant expected project achievement is the development of next generation cyber-physical systems, M2M communications based on real data analysis, cloud basedengineering [1] and manufacturing environments. Despite the positive outcomes of
-effective.1 That which seems lacking in all thepresently described design paradigms is reference to the value system of the designer. Thereseems no place for questioning the designer’s bias or prejudice. Is the designer open-minded?Nor does it seem possible to ask the following question—am I all right with going forward orcan I state that I cannot do this kind of work anymore. Lastly the question of impact on the Earthand all that entails seems vague at best, at least from my perspective.A recent conference on climate change cautioned against overuse of generalizations about tribesbut acknowledged common issues and priorities.2 Two characteristics fundamental to indigenouspeople grow out of their place-based values: their close relationship with
interesting, to face prioritization of certainfabrication techniques that appear to them more exotic in the context of their prior education.Nanotechnology ModulesA new nanotechnology module was implemented by Dr. Koshka in ECE 4293-01/ 6293-01,Nano-electronics in the spring 2015 semester. This split-level technical elective was populatedby 1 graduate and 8 undergraduate students. The Medici 2D Device Simulator from Synopsiswas used in 2014 to develop templates of simulation scripts for modeling performance of micro-/nano-electronic devices to be covered in this class. In this course, limited-scope simulationassignments were given to the students as an experiment. Such assignments were not present inthe previous offerings of this course. Graduate
groupactivity. Students learned about the various steps of the engineering design process through aguided activity. Students were introduced to the concept of constraints and limitations whenasked to build a tower of a specific height that could hold a certain weight. They utilizedinformation from Physical Science in deciding what type of structure would allow them to havesuccess in their design.Cardboard Roadways Activity: During the unit on Force and Motion, students worked in groupsof 3-5 to design a roadway that would allow a small die cast car to remain in motion for 10seconds and not run over their track by more than 1 foot. Students were first introduced to theactivity following the first few classes on force and motion, then as their knowledge
of a business model to support a sustainable fundingmechanism, and some accomplishments.IntroductionAmerica must ensure that our citizens have access to high quality and affordable educational,learning, and training opportunities throughout their lives.1 Today’s students and tomorrow’sgraduates are likely to value access to lifelong learning opportunities more highly than jobsecurity, which will be elusive in any event. They understand that in the turbulent world of aknowledge economy, characterized by outsourcing and offshoring to a global workforce,employees are only one paycheck away from the unemployment line unless they commit tocontinuous learning and re–skilling to adapt to changing work requirements.2One vision of the evolving need
group of students. These students further developed themechanical, electrical, and computer designs this past summer (2015), combining the bestaspects of the two prototype designs. These students will construct two bike racks (spring 2016)for implementation. We intend to place one bike rack on campus and the other in downtownYork when they are complete.1. IntroductionFrom their inceptions, the York College of Pennsylvania Mechanical, Electrical, and ComputerEngineering Programs have always prided themselves on being “hands-on” engineeringprograms. Lab experiences are used heavily throughout the academic curricula to reinforcelecture material, and all students are required to complete three separate terms of co-opexperience as a graduation
understand certain important concepts in the fluid and thermal sciences. Theinitial stage of this development consists of eight exercises that were identified by the authors asdifficult concepts for the mechanical engineering technology students at Penn State Erie - TheBehrend College in thermodynamics, heat transfer and fluid power. Some of these exerciseshave a basis in a previous project by Gerald Recktenwald and Robert Edwards (Engineering ofEveryday Things (EET))1 which had a focus on laboratory exercises. Since these are for use in aclassroom, the existing exercises needed to be scaled back in both size and duration. Others arenew to this project. The overall project is in the early stages. Some of the exercises are welldeveloped with only a
Foundataion as a Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education from January 2007 through August 2009. Prior to her appointment as Associate Dean, Dr. Sorby served as chair of the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Tech. She received a B.S. in Civil Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, all from Michigan Tech. Dr. Sorby has a well-established research program in spatial visualization and is actively involved in the development of various educational programs.Dr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for
Paper ID #14858Development of Professional Science Master’s Degree Program in Manufac-turing SustainabilityDr. Ahmed H. Elsawy, Tennessee Technological University Dr. Ahmed ElSawy joined Tennessee Technological University (TTU) as a Professor and Chairperson, Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Technology since July 1, 1999. He holds B.Sc., M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering with emphasis on Materials processing and Manufacturing engineering. Prior joining TTU. Dr. ElSawy held several industrial and academic positions in the USA and abroad. He was a professor and graduate program coordinator at the
Mastery of Course OutcomesIntroductionThis paper describes the development and evolution of interdisciplinary, experiential-learningwith carefully crafted reading assignments and an interactive activity that was usedsimultaneously in two different courses surrounding the same theme. The authors undertook thisproject because educational pedagogy suggests that experiential learning and interdisciplinarylearning should results in greater student-learning.1-4 Although the authors describe theirexperience with specific courses at their institution, the idea that experiential learning andcreating connections between classes from different disciplines can improve learning andenhance learning experiences could be employed at other institutions
course style and content. In the United States, retention of underrepresentedminorities including women continues to be significantly lower than non-underrepresented men.[1] Our engineering college continues to have a large gender and ethnicity gap, with just 19.9 %female, 3.5% Latino, 1.8 % African American, 0.8 % American Indian/ Alaskian Native, and 0.2% Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander as of Fall 2014. Our engineering college is concerned aboutthis lack of diversity and we are hoping to make significant improvements in retention of URMsincluding women.History of Introduction to Engineering CoursesOur first introduction to engineering course was introduced in 1986 (Intro 101), and wasessentially a survey course that covered various
) fields to meet the demands of an expandingSTEM workforce.1 A large part of this struggle is that a large percentage of the population,including women, African Americans, Hispanics and Native Americans, are underrepresented inSTEM fields.2,3 Over the past few decades, there has been a steady increase in the representationof women and minorities in STEM fields post-college, but the demographics of these fields hasremained largely unchanged and unbalanced.4,5 This is due in large part to limited supply offemale and minority graduates from STEM fields of study, which arises from the differences inpreparation and educational experiences of these students.6 Many interested in reducing thisdisparity have recommended focusing on increased teaching
students spend 19 hours on coursework and 12 hours on self-study per week. 1 Dolton et al. studied the relationship between students’ study time allocation andexamination performance, and found that time spent on lectures is more productive than time spent on self-study. 2 Inglis et al. observed how often students attended live face-to-face lectures, accessed onlinerecorded lectures, and visited a mathematics learning support center during a multivariate calculus course. 3Krause et al. have developed an instrument to understand use of resources for self-study. 4 We have adaptedthat with some modifications for our experiment.We found that undergraduate engineering students from an Indian college prefer going through theirclassroom notes, reading
channels.Through collaboration among the three participating institutions (Wright State University, MiamiUniversity (a mostly undergraduate serving institution), and Central State University (anHBCU)), the developed SDR based general modulation/demodulation platform will be integratedin undergraduate curricula of all three institutions. 1. IntroductionNeed and Motivation: We are living in a world of wireless communication and networking.More than 90% of the US population use wireless services such as cell phones and WiFi everyday [1][2]. Communication and networking has become an integral part of the ElectricalEngineering, Computer Science, and Computer Engineering curricula. Additionally, thisexplosion of wireless technology poses a new promising
charts (Plots A and C in both figures)reflect Anatomy course scores and the bottom bar charts (Plots B and D in both figures) reflectStatics course scores. Data is initially presented with regards to the MCT instruments applicationin a pre- and post-testing format for both classes and then data is presented for the PSVT:R in thesame fashion. Kurtosis and skewness will be discussed as relevant descriptive statistical data foreach bar chart and comparisons can then easily be made between the Anatomy and Statics preand post-performance on both instruments. A typical bell curve centered on the mean has beenprovided to aid visual confirmation of data normality.MCT ResultsBased on the pre-MCT results, the Anatomy course (Fig. 1, Plot A) had kurtosis
. It’s not only crucial to comprehend and understandcomplex research, it’s vital to be able to communicate that information to individuals who maynot possess equivalent scientific intelligence.6 The curriculum is structured to give students acompetitive edge in the global market by creating a new breed of scientist that is able to bridgethe gap between science and business. Many students find that searching for a job aftergraduation can be daunting, and they lack the experience necessary for hiring. However, earninga MSPS degree is comparable to having 1-2 years of experience before even entering theworkplace. With 21 hours of core classes and 15 hours of business and managerial classes,students are able to expand upon their science education
science teachers’ integration of the engineering design process to improve science learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Systematic Review of the Funds of Knowledge Framework in STEM EducationIntroductionFor over two decades, there have been significant and consistent calls to increase the quantity anddiversity of engineering graduates to not only support the workforce demand but also to improveengineering solutions to better reflect the demographics of the U.S. population.1–4 However, thecall to increase the diversity of engineering often has been centered on simply increasing thepercentages of underrepresented groups in engineering. Once these
progresses to foster social resiliencyAdapting from this, role-playing, public speaking and interpersonal scenarios and practice with aset of positive, coping behaviors that can be drawn upon in many different types of professionalsettings (and to do so in an accepting, low-stress environment) has been shown to be effectivewith shy children and is applied in the seminar. Audience connection is emphasized from theoutset, stressing the notion that the student must convince the audience of their position beyondsimply presenting data, and that can only be done if the student knows the audience.A series of stepped class sessions has been created as a series of modules that build uponprevious material (Figure 1). Each module covers a set of topics
molecular diagnostics, polymer science and engineering, along with advanced manufacturing technologies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Flipped Laboratories in Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringAbstractImportant learning objectives for experiential, or hands-on, courses include (1) development ofskills pertaining to statistical experimental design and analysis of data, (2) utilization of standardoperating procedures (SOPs), and (3) understanding and employment of laboratory safetyprocedures. As the complexity of laboratory equipment increases, so does the length of writtenSOPs and safety considerations. Furthermore, students are often asked to follow these writtenstandardized documents
course in digital electronics is a prerequisite for themicroprocessors class, so all students who take the course in microprocessors have been exposedto number systems, combinational and sequential logic, and the concept of registers.When the course was first implemented in the Fall 2013 semester, it was designed with threeweekly 50-minute lectures and a weekly 2-hour laboratory session. The lectures were designedto introduce the theory that the students would practice in the lab each week. The QL200 trainerkit (QL200, 2016) was selected as the platform for laboratory exercises and featured a PICmicrocontroller. Depicted in Figure 1, this trainer kit features a 40-pin PIC microcontroller, anLCD panel, a 4x4 keypad, 7-segment displays, pushbutton
in amanner they’re used to. The hope behind this effort is that new associations with engineering candevelop with the tools we provide or even simply with the maker carts presence. If the cart beingin the room making new tools with more overt engineering associations available to the studentsleads to students initially engaging in engineering without prompting, similar resources in otherschools may be capable of doing the same.Overall DesignThe Novel Engineering Maker Cart is constructed from a commercial of the shelf (COTS)mobile cart with a variety of drawers to organize the various components (See Figure 1).Attached to the cart are two COTS 7-gallon trash bins and a custom tape dispenser. The binsserve as receptacles for a variety of
, successfully accomplish and reflect upon an activityreferred to as a compassion practicum. The compassion practicum sought to begin thedevelopment of a critical consciousness in students. Students’ projects fall into two categories:(1) a service learning type project which must in some way improve the quality of life of othersand involves a minimum of 15 hours of actual service; and (2) a guided, extensive visit of ananimal rescue society farm in which students confront animals typically used in biomedicalresearch projects and reflect on the entire experience.IntroductionBiomedical engineering is the application of engineering principles and techniques to medicine.It combines expertise in engineering with expertise in medicine and human biology to
prepare them with the knowledge and skills necessary for the next generation ofgraduates to compete in the global market and contribute to the NSNT field.The outcomes of the project are: 1) creation of two courses that expose STEM students tonanoscience and nanotechnology, 2) development of several hands-on activities to train the futureworkforce and increase its expertise in nanoscience and nanotechnology, and 3) Facilitation ofoutreach activities for underrepresented groups to expose students from tribal colleges in the stateof North Dakota to NSNT. The first course was taught in the fall 2015 semester and the secondcourse is being taught in the spring 2016 semester. The two courses cover basic nanoscience andnanotechnology concepts and the
the research participants. Whenstudents were probed to relay their understanding of engineers and engineering the most popularanswer is that engineers improve lives, and a combination of engineers invent, design, and createthings. Each of these responses were mentioned eight times in the descriptions provided bystudents, the next most frequent answer was that engineers fix things and build stuff, tallying sixmentions. Consider the following excerpt of one student that displayed a generic understandingof engineering (I=Interviewer, P=Participant). While the student does not provide any falseinformation, the answer given follows the trend of generality and lack of diversification in therole of the engineer:1 I: It was SEW ok alright good now
impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 WORK IN PROGRESS: Design, Creation and Assessment of Innovation Spaces Across an Engineering CampusIntroductionThe Maker movement has expanded over the last several years from the garages of at-home tinkerers to university engineering programs. A “maker” identity has beenassociated with specific attitudes and abilities, such as creativity, the ability to createphysical models, and the embracing of failure, which engineering educators are nowstriving to foster in their students and throughout curricula.1-3 Over the past ten years,makerspaces, or innovation spaces, have been developed
case studies to give the technical content appropriate context.This paper is intended to stimulate discussion in an innovative approach to the development ofskeleton notes that incorporate the following key characteristics: 1. The handouts consolidate the technical material into a single unified and concise message. Multiple streams of information (lecture, supplementary handouts, slides, reading assignments) are avoided; the handouts are complementary with and integrated into the oral lecture. Discussion of the underlying concepts accompanies the detailed technical content. 2. The handouts are hand-written (on a tablet computer), highly graphic, colorful, and even “cartoonish” in
their thinking, and respond to support their disciplinary work.Describing this approach in science classrooms, Hammer, Goldberg, and Fargason write:1 “A responsive approach [to teaching]… is to adapt and discover instructional objectives responsively to student thinking. The first part of a lesson elicits students’ generative engagement around some provocative task or situation (or, perhaps, by discovering its spontaneous emergence). From there, the teacher’s role is to support that engagement and attend to it — watch and listen to the students’ thinking, form a sense of what they are doing, and in this way identify productive beginnings of scientific thinking.” (p. 55)There are several proposed
is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Dis-tinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior FacultyFellow of NYU Tandon’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have in-cluded 3 edited books, 8 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 126 conferencepapers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 17 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research studentsand 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 300 K-12 teachers and 100 high school studentresearchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 60 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di-rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of
-week course was held in 2015. The evaluation results presentedin this paper are primarily based on the second round results. In the following, the courseconcept will be described more in detail. Afterwards, we will explain the evaluation conceptwe intentionally designed for this course, discuss the evaluation results and will end with afinal summary.Course conceptThe course concept is based on two core course objectives and three instructional tools forcourse delivery and interaction (see figure 1). We will start by explaining the course objec-tives first, followed by a review of the instructional resources.On the one hand the course aims for preparing students for their time in Germany. Based onour and the students’ reported experiences from