Paper ID #21956Impact of Sustainable Study Abroad Course on StudentsProf. Patricia Fox, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Professor Patricia Fox is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue Uni- versity Indianapolis (IUPUI). Pat has been a member of the faculty for over 35 years. She has previously served as Associate Chair and Associate Dean in the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of leadership roles in
instructor provided quantitative estimations of threeaspects of the student experiences in the design class. These were: 1) How much time theyexpected the students to spend on design activities, 2) Where do students might facedifficulties within the design process and 3) The change between the student entry and exitself-efficacy questionnaires.The third section of the interview consisted of reviewing the instructor’s estimations and thedata collected by DEFT on each of the three aspects of the student experiences, anddeveloping modifications for the class in the subsequent year. All data collected wasapproved by the Harvard University Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Researchand the University College Dublin Human Research Ethics
wherever we may send humans in the future. This system thus needsto be integrated to our modern day agricultural techniques in order to be perfected and thusimplemented in outer space missions were human beings are involved.Results:Multicultural interactions within engineering is a topic rarely covered in conventional classes,along with an ethical class with regards to engineering benefitting the entire community.According to Martin, “The main idea is that migrants go through fairly predictable phases inadapting to a new cultural situation. They first experience excitement and anticipation, followedby a period of shock and disorientation. “This can be shown by the interactions experienced bythe students participating in this project.At first the
of individuals.Understanding these value similarities and dissimilarities may help to identify and inform betterdesign practices in industry or engineering preparation. For example, a further investigation mayilluminate that idealistic design methods may not be retained by students as they move into theworkplace and become practicing engineers. Alternatively, it may be possible that classroomenvironments need additional support to authentically mimic the engineering workplace andmore closely align with industry perceptions and expectations. It is also possible that theinstructors’ evaluations may have been influenced by factors beyond the artifact such as theteam’s work ethic and other insights the instructors may be privy to about the team
in the Professional Development Seminars thathave been offered to LSU College of Engineering undergraduates served by the DiversityInitiatives Office. The topics varied from general student networking to career skills. Each winterthe Pathway Scholars were included in the required book club reading that supports developing astrong work ethic, leadership and overall success. The selections were, EntreLeadership by DaveRamsey, QBQ! The Question behind the Question by John Miller, and It Worked for Me by ColinPowell, and roundtable discussions were held during the first seminar of the spring semester. Thegraduate assistant who is in the cogitative psychology PhD program also conducted a “How toStudy Better” session with the scholars. This
components, Erik has applied his creativity to a va- riety of mediums including 3D Video Mapping, Rear Projection, App User Interface, and Arduino based projects among others. With the contribution of his fellow coworkers, Erik discovered new tools in the media development field in his first year as an employee of Academic Technologies. The cooperative en- vironment in Academic Technologies has improved Erik’s ethical, professional and personal involvement during the past years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #20255Deena Mustin, UTEP Academic Technologies Deena Mustin
Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Cassandra M Degen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Cassandra Degen received her B.S. degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2007. She received her Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering in 2012
academic year with a huge success [2]. Our two courses wereoffered as technical elective courses. The two courses are the only two project-based courses oncutting-edge computer technologies in our curriculum. These courses provided students with theopportunities to learn and practice real-world software engineering, and gain experiences insolving multidisciplinary practical problems. Furthermore, these courses help students to attainseveral ABET student outcomes that are difficult to accomplish via traditional lecture-based andlab-based courses, such as (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (i) arecognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge ofcontemporary issues.These
conversations about equity anddiversity in the classroom. The engineering curriculum is not neutral, and knowledge is producedwithin a power-driven social and cultural system [3, 4]. ABET student outcomes are not entirelytechnical and include that students must have an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility, the broad education necessary to understand engineering impacts in a global andsocietal context, and knowledge of contemporary issues. Nevertheless, discussing the societaland ethical implications of engineering and technology is often a daunting task for bothengineering students and instructors [5].At our university, as part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) Revolutionizing Engineeringand Computer Science Departments (RED
with an assigned professor was also beneficial. Astedious as some people may have thought it was, it definitely made me feel like I had someonelooking over me and like I had guidance for future college semesters. The financial assistancewas also valuable because it provided me with extra money in case of a school emergency or tospend towards a summer/winter course…. Overall, the NSF S-STEM scholarship gave me theopportunity to be part of all these beneficial workshops, trips, and gatherings. It also gave memore confidence in myself and my work ethic. I would like to thank all the professors that cametogether to create this amazing scholarship program and I would also like to thank the NationalScience Foundation for funding this program with a
tools under uncertainty. He has organized and taught continued courses on Risk assessment of nanomaterials for staff of the European Chemical Agency and since 2004 he has taught and coordinated courses at Mas- ter level in 1) Nanotechnology and the Environment and 2) Environmental Management and Ethics and has guest-lectured at Roskilde University, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Northeastern University, and Harvard University.Dr. Redante Delizo Mendoza c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Comparative Analysis of Two Teaching Methods for Large Classes (Research paper)Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen1, Redante Mendoza2, Jason Bazylak3
(classroom scale) Discuss the application of STEM strategies as part of the implementation of engineering problem-based learning experiences. The engineering process as the application of scientific and mathematical knowledge to obtain a solution. Examine STEM issues from a6 scientific vs. engineering Effectively address controversial STEM issues within the local perspective. community (e.g. addressing sociocultural, moral and ethical aspects of the STEM solution). Discuss the importance of an economic
associated, Bias/Variance Classification Tree based approaches, Neural Networks, Bayes Classifier, Classification modeling, Discriminative Classifications Ethics Privacy, Security, Data Leaks, Biases, Confidentiality, Societal consequences Error measure Evaluation of Models, Confusion Matrices, ROC Graph Association Rules Association Rule Mining, Patterns in frequent
-based education, engineering ethics, and process safety education.Prof. Hadi Bozorgmanesh, University of Connecticut Professor of Practice, School of Engineering A director with over 20 years of nonexecutive and executive board of director’s experience, with deep knowledge of enterprise and academic entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship. Board of governance experience includes audit & risk management committees, finance and M&A committees, and executive compensation committeesMs. Manisha Srivastava, SurePath Evaluations LLC Ms. Manisha Srivastava is the founder and president of SurePath Evaluations LLC. Her experience in- cludes implementing program assessments at the federal level and serving as the principal
advised them to design a fuel cell stack system that would meet desired power output,conduct experiments, analyze and interpret data, and solve engineering problems. Before thestudents started the course, the project advisor selected the project topic which was thecontinuation of the 2017 REU summer internship project.The course advisor instructed students once a week on topics including: how to write a projectproposal, share responsibilities, design realistic constraints and marketing requirement, maptimeline, identify professional and ethical responsibilities, present collected data, andcommunicate effectively. Once a week, the course advisor assessed students’ performance oncourse assignments and the project advisor evaluated students’ project
engineering practiceAccurate understanding of the 4.04 (0.96) 3.12 (1.06) 6.22 *** effects of engineering practice on the substantial development of environment and societyStrong work ethics and social 4.19 (0.87) 3.51 (1.04) 4.79 *** responsibilitiesAwareness and skills in 4.59 (0.75) 3.40 (1.15) 8.33 *** teamworkCapability of communication 4.55 (0.80) 3.31 (1.03) 9.16 *** and coordinationAbilities in management of 4.25 (0.81) 2.99 (1.01) 9.45 *** engineering projectsAwareness and abilities in 4.27 (0.88) 3.21 (1.15) 6.99 *** lifetime learningNote: *** denotes P < .001.As shown in this table, based on
leadershipexperience.Sample InfluencesAll participants in Focus Group 0 and one participant in Focus Group 2 were either currentlytaking or had previously taken a course on basic engineering management and ethics principlesfrom one of the interviewing researchers. These participants had a preexisting student-professorrelationship with the interviewer and a preexisting knowledge of leadership developmentprocesses, which were covered in the course.The researchers were cognizant of this influence on the participants’ responses in the LeadershipDevelopment and Engineering Leadership Development sections of the focus group protocol.Specific instances of this influence were identified in an effort to minimize the threat to thevalidity of the study. More importantly, the
particular, the open-ended responses indicate that college students are thinking critically abouthow to improve the program, are engaging with the younger kids on engineering topics, and aregetting benefits from the experience even when they themselves do not see the benefits.Certainly, a case could be made that the students are exhibiting many of the ABET Criteria a-k,including (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (f) an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility, and (i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engagein life-long learning. Table 2: Sample Responses to Question 4: General Observations/Experiences. Geographic Identifiers have been removed. ID Response from Engineering Student
; Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30865 [8] Jack, H. (2010, June), A Risk Assessment Tool For Managing Student Design Projects Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/15672 [9] DeBartolo, E. A., & Robison, W. L. (2018, June), Board 86: Risk Management and Ethics in Capstone Design Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30123[10] Hoffman, T., & Zappe, C., & Shooter, S., & O'Donnell, M. (2002, June), A Study Of Risk Communication In Engineering And Management Curricula Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. https
their own interest, high school studentsregard their parents as having the greatest influence on their thinking regarding future career options.Our survey was therefore developed to understand the parent’s perspective, and interpret any additionalfactors unique to the community that contribute to parental attitudes, habits and expectations. Theresearch protocol was reviewed and approved by the university’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). TheAmerican Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines for research with human participantswere strictly adhered to. Participation was voluntary for all participants. The opportunity to enter adrawing to win a restaurant gift card was provided as an incentive to complete the survey, and there wereno
scavenger hunt. We also provided lunch andgave freebies to students. The BSC mentors gave a presentation as the initial event for the first day of the orientation. Itwas designed to help incoming students succeed at our university. Throughout the presentation,the BSC mentors discussed different personal techniques used to succeed at UHCL, gainedthrough practical and personal experience. Apart from the main ethical and professional points ofavoiding cheating, laziness, and procrastination, we shared very specific tips for various courses.We believe that with this presentation, we were able to give the students an insight as to what lifeas a university student is like. They learned about their professors before meeting them, aboutwhat courses to take
flexible and having multidisciplinaryskills in basic technology and application technology, were covered. The Societal codebook included many of the condition aspects and societal issues inengineering. Constructs included "scholarly" atmosphere, respect principles, interactivecommunication and business elements during the engineering process. Relationships betweenengineering and social responsibility, politics, ethics, and global issues were identified associetal issues. According to the data of survey, 65% of interviewers selected "scholarly"atmosphere and only 8% selected the hardware condition among societal issues. Survey datashows that the interactive communication is the main method to cultivate the leadership in theengineering field. 85
including coordinating community service for engineering students. • Presenter for the Greensboro Area Mathematics and Science Education Center (GAMSEC) Summer Program • Speaker/presenter at various K-12 institutions. Professor Alford currently teaches Introduction to Engineering Design and Ethics as well as Statics and Mechanics of Materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 After School Matters: Expanding the time to engage Minority Middle School Girls in STEM through Informal learning outside of the classroomAn increase in the diversity of the U.S. pipeline for students entering STEM fields is significantlyneeded. This is especially true for minority and female students
teams.1,2,3,4This has largely been driven by industry’s needs and requirements to become more multi-disciplinary and remain competitive in the workforce. This is also seen in the accreditationrequirements of ABET where student outcomes are implicitly and/or explicitly collaborative innature, e.g. general criterion 3: student outcomes (c) “an ability to design a system, component,or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,” (d) “an abilityto function on multidisciplinary teams,” and (g) “an ability to communicate effectively.”5Providing opportunities for students to work in cross-disciplinary teams is a desired
research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore, he was a recipient of the Texas Tech University President’s Excellence in Diversity & Equity award in 2014 and was the only graduate student to have received the award, which was granted based on outstanding activities and projects that contribute to a better understanding of equity and diversity issues within Engineering Education. Additional projects involvement
of teaching.1. IntroductionSkills such as communication, professionalism, ethics, and project management are notspecifically taught within the engineering graduate curriculum. These skills, referred to as softskills or professional skills, are often assumed to be acquired as a result of performing academictasks and “constant” communication with other graduate students and faculty members [1]. TheCanadian Association of Graduate Studies (CAGS) recognizes the duty and responsibility ofuniversities to train these soft skills. CAGS defines professional development as knowledge thatmust be provided along with practice and continuous coaching within the graduate programs [2].During their first year of graduate studies, many engineering students
Paper ID #17132Civil Engineering at Purdue University. In that role, Dr. Lawley worked directly with Industry to placestudents in internship/co-op positions, recruited students to Civil Engineering, and managed marketingand communication efforts for the School. Dr. Lawley has taught courses in Technical Communicationsfor Engineers and Law and Ethics at Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Enriching the Diversity of the Engineering Workforce: Addressing Missed Opportunities to Support Student Transition from a Two- to a Four-Year InstitutionI. IntroductionEducators across the State of Texas and nation are engaged in efforts to answer calls including:(a
in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore, he was a recipient of the Texas Tech University President’s Excellence in Diversity & Equity award in 2014 and was the only graduate
, Human Factors, Ergonomics and Safety. Category 10 has the most relevanceto an ergonomics course, although as discussed earlier, some IE programs may combine topicsfrom Categories 10 and 11 in one course. There are 8-12 exam questions drawn from Category10 (7-11% of the FE Exam). The relationship between this list of topics and IE curricular contentwill be further discussed in the next section of this paper. 1. Mathematics: 6–9 questions 2. Engineering Sciences: 5–8 questions 3. Ethics and Professional Practice: 5–8 questions 4. Engineering Economics: 10–15 questions 5. Probability and Statistics: 10–15 questions 6. Modeling and Computations: 8–12 questions 7. Industrial Management: 8–12 questions
the instructional scaffolds usedin the treatment condition. Participants were recruited from 13 classes over 4 consecutivesemesters. During the first two semesters data was collected under the control condition for allthe courses, while the last two semesters data was collected under the treatment condition. Theundergraduate courses included Project Management, Engineering Ethics, Introduction toEngineering Management and the graduate course included Project Management and SystemsAnalysis. All courses have a team project that accounts for at least 45% of the total course grade.The students in the treatment condition received an in-class 30-minute training module on theuse of the tool and they were also given access to a training video