, thencreating a future state map to create an ideal process, and finished with the implementation of 5Sin the laboratory. Results showed an improved process and a cleaner, safer, more organizedlaboratory (Sreedharan & Liou, 2007). Using these published works as a guide, this case studyattempted to provide a solid foundation of knowledge on lean manufacturing to students and thenhave them implement those teachings in small scale prototype projects.MethodsThis case study took place during the fall and spring semesters of the 2016-2017 academic year.The subjects of this research study were students enrolled in the Mechanical Engineer SeniorDesign Practicum - MECH 486 which included senior engineering students from both theMechanical Engineering (ME
2007 he received the ”Distinguished Researcher Award” from Kettering Uni- versity for contributions in the area of industrial communication systems and automotive systems. During the last few years he has been involved with wireless sensor networks (WSNs), telemetry systems using tv white spaces, software define radios (SDR), and platforms for deploying IoT technologies.Dr. Mehrdad Zadeh, Kettering University Dr. Zadeh is an associate professor and an advisor of AutoDrive ChallengeTM competition at Kettering University, MI. From Sept. 2015 to January 2017, he served as a visiting associate professor at Johns Hop- kins University, Laboratory for Computational Sensing + Robotics (LCSR), MD, where he collaborates on
traditionalrequired engineering calculus sequence as it offers a one-semester laboratory-based immersioninto the ways mathematical concepts—including trigonometry, vectors, derivatives, integrals,and differential equations—are actually used by engineers. Research from Wright State, as wellas other implementation sites, has robustly demonstrated that completing the WSM courseduring the first semester of college leads to boosts in retention rates and engineering persistence,desirable outcomes motivating nationwide replication [1]–[3].As administrators and instructors of the WSM course pilot at the University of Colorado Boulder(CU), we are interested in understanding the change processes wherein the WSM becomesinstitutionalized and integrated into the
vascular smooth muscle cells. His current research interests focus on mechanical stimulation effects on cellular differentiation, natural tissues as bioscaffolds, and tissue engineering mechanically sensitive tissues.Dr. Steven Schreiner P.E., The College of New JerseyProf. Bijan Sepahpour P.E., The College of New Jersey Bijan Sepahpour is a registered Professional Engineer and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the College of New Jersey (TCNJ). He has served as the Chairperson of the ME department at TCNJ from 2006 through 2015. Prof. Sepahpour has been actively involved in the generation of design-oriented exercises and development of laboratory apparatus and experiments in the areas of mechanics of mate- rials
, which is rooted in the concept of providing a hands-on learning experience tostudents. As hands-on learning is the prevalent way of education in ET programs throughout theworld, a majority of the courses taught in the programs have a laboratory component. On theother hand, capstone design projects (senior design projects) are a common hands-on course forfinal year undergraduate students across all engineering and technology disciplines.The capstone design courses provide an opportunity for undergraduate students to get involvedin open-ended real-world problems. The courses help students explore the societal need to applytheir knowledge gained over the years of undergraduate engineering or engineering technologyeducation. Starting with the
idea of doing research on one’s ownteaching [18] are both relevant. This idea has also been taken up (independently) in the US byAngelo and Cross [22], and Cross and Steadman [23]. The former concerning ClassroomAssessment Techniques (CATS), and the latter, classroom research. We are strongly influencedhere by the position of Patricia Cross, who claimed that teaching in higher education would notacquire status until teachers treated their classrooms as laboratories for research. The “new”discipline of engineering education research, the question of who should be doing it, and how itcan be accomplished with rigor has been discussed at FIE and ASEE since 2000 [24]. Takentogether, these essays argue that there is such a thing as a “scholarship of
capstone design (72%). Other course types believed to include ESI educationwere: sophomore/junior engineering science/ engineering courses (49%), design-focused coursesin sophomore to senior year (non-capstone; 45%), first-year introductory courses (43%),humanities and/or social science courses (35%), first-year design focused courses (26%),professional issues courses (24%), full course on ethics (15%), or “other” courses/co-curricularactivities (13%). Course types written in as “other” included: laboratory courses, safety course,inter-professional team project course, and “students are required to take a "Technology inSociety" course chosen from a list of ~15 courses that meet this category”.There was a median of three different course types that
coursemodel traverses from one location in time and space to another.Background: Replication vs. Mutation of the Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics EducationThe Wright State Model (WSM) is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamentalconcepts of Calculus 1, 2, 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-on laboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by decoupling mathematicsprerequisites from engineering coursework—introducing undergraduates to sufficientmathematical tools in the one-semester course to enable them to get started and make progress intechnical engineering coursework, regardless of
provide PD that aligns to The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Since 2008 she has provided teacher PD to science teachers in the tri-state area, including international visiting teachers and scholars. Dr. Borges’ research interests include: building STEM professional-teacher relationships, diversity and equity, and enhancing urban science teaching and learning.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project
Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol system technology. Under a Research Experience for Teachers Site, a DR K-12 project, and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six phil- anthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education
like “What does this mean?”, “How doesthis impact what I’m doing?”, and “How do I use this?”. These students are not only conversantin the theoretical knowledge, but also enjoy developing the skills needed to make a designphysically come to life.There are multiple tools utilized by Purdue to develop successful graduates. Third partyvalidation through either ABET and the FAA provides constant evaluation to ensure the programis providing graduates with desired successful outcomes. The program itself is filled withopportunities for learning through multiple methods such as hands-on laboratories andcollaborative learning. The program does not stop with only the technical training of itsgraduates, but also includes multiple opportunities for
Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY. She is serving as a research assistant under an NSF-funded DR K-12 project.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and con- trol
facultymember from these disciplines who are actively involved in each weekly class session. Theweekly 3-hour class sessions are taught as a “laboratory” experience with students mainlyinvolved in active learning of fundamental principles for effective interdisciplinary collaboration.Students work in mixed teams toward a tangible solution to a community health challenge as partof the course project for the duration of the semester. The class is taught in a MakerSpace; anovel instructional space developed according to constructivist learning principles26 in whichparticipants co-learn and co-create27. The MakerSpace is an essential element of the course, as itfacilitates students’ problem solving through prototyping and testing a solution with
Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Statics. Her teaching interests include development of solid communication skills and enhancing laboratory skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Curing the cheating epidemic? A multi-site, international comparison of perspectives on academic integrity and the way we “cure” by teaching———————————————————————————AbstractPlagiarism became an issue in both the scientific and political communities in Germany at thebeginning of the decade. The former German Minister of Defense and the Minister of Educationand Science lost their Ph.D. titles due to plagiarism and subsequently resigned. In response, aGerman
Activities to keep a writing support learning community engagedThere are four activities described below, a Peer Review Service, Writing and ReviewingContests, Writing Blitzes, and Writing Support Groups; these make up the core activities that areregularly offered at our institution at large, as writing support in our learning community. Wehave also launched an initiative of establishing these activities (and others) within a singleengineering laboratory setting; the particulars of this laboratory initiative are discussed in aseparate paper at this conference [14]. With a librarian committing about 10 hours per week, theReview and Writing Support person 14 hours per week, and otherwise the goodwill of the threeprofessors as well as motivated
them to beworthwhile educational experiences through which students achieved specific outcomes. It wasessential to structure the projects with milestones, align with lecture classes and providecontinuous technical support and guidance. This has led to NEET creating a full-time budgetedproject instructor role termed the Lead Laboratory Technical Instructor who in collaboration withthe faculty and other teaching staff, is responsible for tactical execution and operational oversightof all the project-centric aspects of the thread. The outcomes from these mini-workshops arebeing aggregated to create the NEET Projects Handbook. This will help inform design of theprojects that are being planned in the NEET threads during 2018-19.To summarize, the
laboratories [5, 6, 7, 8]. By building complete working devices in lab(often with a small amount of open-ended design), students more readily see the connectionbetween the theoretical work they are doing and its practical application in the “real world”.Course evaluation results, surveys of student interest in EE, statistics of final grades, andperformance in subsequent classes all indicate that this approach does in fact increase motivationfor non-majors and pique interest in those who might otherwise not pursue EE as a major.As we redesigned ENGR 40 to create a new course, ENGR 40M (‘M’ for “making”), we alsodrew heavy inspiration from CS 106A, the introductory computer science class at Stanford. Morethan 80% of undergraduates at Stanford take CS
Turbulent Era.Dr. Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute Comas Lamar Haynes is a Principal Research Engineer / faculty member of the Georgia Tech Research In- stitute and Joint Faculty Appointee at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research includes modeling steady state and transient behavior of advanced energy systems, inclusive of their thermal management, and the characterization and optimization of novel cycles. He has advised graduate and undergradu- ate research assistants and has received multi-agency funding for energy systems analysis and develop- ment. Sponsor examples include the National Science Foundation, Department of Energy and NASA. Dr. Haynes also develops fuel cells and alternative
studentoutcomes with the community outcomes and impacts. Parallel studies are being conducted withthe program’s community partners to assess the impact on the community and the quality of thepartnerships developed with the program. This paper focuses on the plethora of self-reportedstudent evaluation data over 23 years.Program OverviewThe EPICS Program was initiated in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering atPurdue University in 1995 [51] The program has grown steadily in size and breadth to where it isrecognized as an independent academic program within the College of Engineering withdedicated laboratories. The program has experienced growth over the 23 years as shown inFigure 1. In the recent years, the growth rate has been very rapid and
incorporates performance, projects, portfolios, laboratory results, and application of knowledge to better assess the capabilities and placement of tracked students. The ETW also encourages using a variety of assignments based on the time available, the purpose of the assessment, and the cognitive level of the learning objective as part of the Planning a Class seminar and the development of in- class and out-of-class activities. The ETW should, as a minimum, include the added benefit of assessing a wider diversity of students by using a variety of assignments in this discussion. Of course, this wider variety of assignments will be more successful in smaller class sizes where the student-faculty interaction is greater and effective
. Define the term research. 2. Describe examples of research being conducted in STEM fields and the potential impact of that research on society. 3. List examples of career opportunities available in various STEM fields. 4. Collect scientific data in a laboratory setting. 5. Analyze and interpret simple scientific data generated in the laboratory. 6. List and describe the steps of the scientific method. 7. List and describe the steps of the engineering design process. 8. Compare and contrast the scientific method and the engineering design process. 9. Describe the difference between quantitative and qualitative data and provide examples of situations where each is used. 10. Demonstrate knowledge of the
University of British Columbia, Chemistry Teaching Laboratory Optimization with CWSEI, 2008—2011 Assistant Professor, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, August 2011—2017 Lecturer, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, January 2018 – presentDr. Pauline Entin, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, 2018-present, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Vice Provost for Academic Affairs, 2014-2018, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Associate Dean for Aca- demic Affairs, 2010-2014, College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Assist/Assoc/Full Professor, Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 2001-2018
Transportation Engineering in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University and is the Director of the OSU Driving and Bicycling Simulator Laboratory. Dr. Hurwitz conducts research in transportation engineering, in the areas of traffic operations and safety, and in engineering education, in the areas of conceptual assessment and curriculum adoption. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Factors Contributing to the Problem-Solving Heuristics of Civil Engineering StudentsIntroductionProblem solvers vary their approaches to solving problems depending on the context of theproblem, the requirements of the solution, and the ways in
. He obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich- Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for his theoretical work on transparent conducting oxides. Before he started at UIUC he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on a project that aimed at a description of non-adiabatic electron ion dynamics. His research revolves around excited electronic states and their dynamics in various materials using accurate computational methods and making use of modern super computers in order to understand, for instance, how light is absorbed in photo-voltaic materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Measuring Student Learning of
Manufacturing and Quality Engineering. His current work primarily investigates the effects of select emergent pedagogies upon student and instructor performance and experience at the collegiate level. Other interests include engineering ethics, engineering philosophy, and the intersecting concerns of engineering industry and higher academia.Mr. Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nick A. Stites is the Co-Director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program and Laboratory at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is also an instructor in the Engineering Plus Program. His research interests include the development of novel pedagogical methods to teach core engineering courses and leveraging technology to enhance
engineering ethics dilemma.27 And in a related study, Loui usedinterview data to show how formal instructional interventions can help reinforce and expandstudent awareness of, and commitments to, social and ethical responsibility.28 Clancy, Quinn, &Miller similarly used focus groups and surveys to assess their “case study laboratory” approach,finding significant improvements in students’ awareness of ethical issues.29However, very different results emerged from Drake et al.’s comparison of two kinds of ethicsinstruction, namely a full semester ethics course and an engineering course that included anethics module.30 Their results, based on DIT-2 scores, showed that neither approach resulted insignificant improvement in students’ moral development
the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook.Dr. Doug E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery
manual assembly operations within a laboratory setting, there was a PFRthat specified that the components had to be appropriately configured and sized to be easilymanipulated by robots. There was a PFR that specified the component swapping, rather thanscaling product family differentiation would be used for the product family. This PFR wasnecessary to ensure that the developed product family would have a significant impact on theperformance of the WeRMST. The remaining PFRs specified that the product family needed tobe cost effective and aesthetically pleasing.Following the specification of the PFRs, the next step involved the search for candidate PFs thatmet the PFRs. This search was performed in four (4) sub-steps. First the team identified
public policy, assessing stakeholder needs and desires, resource analysis, and collective impact engagement. Currently, he is working closely with several local and national organizations to research and rally opposition against the transfer of federal public lands to state governance.Dr. Steven J. Burian P.E., University of Utah Dr. Steven J. Burian is an associate professor in the Urban Water Group in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans more than a decade during which he has worked in design engineering, as a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a profes- sor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a director of