necessarily reflect the views of the USEPA.References[1] https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Brookings-Metro-Renewing-the -Water-Workforce-June-2018.pdf Accessed March 1, 2021]2] https://www.njfuture.org/2020/06/12/bolstering-the-water-workforce-during-covid-19-rec overy-current-programs-in-new-jersey/[3] https://www.awwa.org/Resources-Tools/Resource-Topics/Workforce[4] Khatri, Punit & Gupta, K. & Gupta, Raj. (2019). “Raspberry Pi based Smart Sensing Platform for Drinking Water Quality Monitoring System: A Python Framework Approach.” Drinking Water Engineering and Science Discussions. 1-17. 10.5194/dwes-2018-35.[5] http://www.camden.k12.nj.us/[6] http://www.ccmua.org/[7] http
at Hispanic-serving institutions,” in 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings, 2020.[19] J. W. Creswell and T. C. Guertterman, Educational research: Planning, conducting, andevaluating quantitative and qualitative research, vol. 6. Saddle River, NJ, 2019.[20] T. A. Lucey and E. S. White, “Mentorship in Higher Education: Compassionate ApproachesSupporting Culturally Responsive Pedagogy,” Multicultural Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 11–17,2017.[21] K. A. Santora, E. J. Mason, and T. C. Sheahan, “A model for progressive mentoring inscience and engineering education and research,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 427–440, 2013.[22] C. L. Colbeck, “Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching andresearch,” J
,Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning, School of Education andHuman Development, University of Virginia: da3tm@virginia.eduSuggested citation:Hulleman, C. S., Totonchi, D. A., Davis, J., Francis, M., Huelskoetter, E., Smith,A., & Tibbetts, Y. (2023, June 23-25). Educational Contexts that Support StudentMotivation Lead to Better Academic Outcomes in STEM: The Role of MathematicsInstructors in Student Motivation [Paper presentation]. ASEE 2023: Baltimore,MD, United States.IntroductionInstructors play a critical role in creating educational contexts that can support or thwart studentmotivation and success [1]-[3]. This impact can be explained by the cue hypothesis [4]-[5],which posits that students will look to situational cues in
Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development and in ASEE conference proceedings.Dr. Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan Dr. Heidi Sherick has worked in higher education for 30 years. Currently, Heidi is the Director of Leader- ship Development in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She provides one-on-one coaching for faculty in new executive leadership roles and for Associate level faculty in Engineering, facilitating career advancement, fostering connections, and providing leadership development opportu- nities. Heidi served as the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Diversity in the College of Engineering at Montana State University from 2001-2012. She also served as
]. Likert items, Select-All-That-Apply, and open-ended questions were utilized inthe final disseminated survey. Cluster analysis will be performed on the results to determineemerging themes and factors from survey responses. Further details regarding Phase I’smethodology can be found in our ASEE paper published this year documenting the developmentof our survey instrument [9].In Phase II, we will conduct a series of individual interview-based case studies as part of ourmixed-methods approach for this study. Based on the findings from Phase I, we will choose threeinstitutions as sites for these case studies. At each of these sites, we will conduct interviews witha series of stakeholders: students, alumni, administrators, faculty. Semi-structured
. Ralston and C. Bays, "Refining A Critical Thinking Rubric For Engineering," in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 2010.[12] J. Newell and K. Dahm, "Rubric Development For Assessment Of Multidisciplinary Team Projects," in 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.[13] J. A. Enszer, "Developing Reliable Lab Rubrics Using Only Two Columns," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[14] N. M. Hicks and H. A. Diefes-Dux, "Grader Consistency in using Standards-based Rubrics," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[15] C. Chan, "Rubrics for Engineering Education," in Engienering Education Enhancement and Research Asia (E3R Asia), 2015
Engineering and Science (www.craftofscientificwriting.com) and the Assertion-Evidence Approach (www.assertion-evidence.com).Mrs. Melissa G. Kuhn, Old Dominion University Melissa G. Kuhn is a PhD Student in Educational Psychology and Program Evaluation at Old Dominion University. Additionally, she works at the Batten College of Engineering and Technology in educational projects and program coordination. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1Work In Progress (WIP): Common Practices in Undergraduate Engineering Outreach Joanna K. Garner The Center for Educational
dimensions materials and the characterization and modeling of their material properties. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: The Attributes of a Prototypical Leader As Viewed by Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe professional development of leadership skills by undergraduate engineering students is keyto a successful long-term career. Increasing diversity and inclusion in leadership is also criticalfor technology companies as they become global enterprises. Within engineering education, theNational Science Foundation funded a multiyear research project lead by the American Societyof Engineering Education beginning in 2014 on “Transforming
semiclassical asymptotics, scattering theory and Maslov operator theory, as well as academic integrity in international engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Moral Foundations of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary InvestigationAbstractTechnology-related disasters and scandals have resulted in concerns regarding the safety and ethicsof Chinese companies and practitioners. Although China now graduates and employs more science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors than any other country in the world,ethics is not yet a central component of engineering education. Simply importing foreign curricula,however, would be
courses.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Experimental evidence regarding gendered task allocation on teamsAbstractStudent teams negotiate many aspects of collaboration, including task division on teams. Somestudies
of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include inclusive pedagogies, electronics, optoelectronics, materials sci- ence, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She
women in engineering. Her technical work and research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, mixed integer nonlinear programing, and multicriteria decision making. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Epistemic Beliefs of Chemical Engineering Faculty (Work in Progress)This paper is a work-in-progress for proposed research. The purpose of this paper is to introducethe engineering education community to the field of epistemic beliefs research and to seekfeedback concerning a planned research study.BackgroundEngineering education researchers frequently call for improving students’ critical thinking as aprimary skill to
initial inductive coding ofthe pilot data from the DAETT completed on the first day of the semester, as well as describesnext steps of the project.Participant DemographicsThe instrument is being piloted with 71 pre-service elementary teachers at Montana StateUniversity who are enrolled in a K-8 science methods course during the 2018-2019 academicyear. Participant demographics are presented in Table 1. Students enrolled in the class were atleast Junior level standing and were required to have completed nine college level science credits(3 life, 3 physical, 3 earth/space) prior to enrollment in the methods course. Three of the studentswere classified as post-baccalaureate, one was an army veteran working toward her first degree,and the rest were
Paper ID #28743Engineering Service Learning at Children’s Museum: A Decade ofEmpowering the STEM Education PipelineDr. Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College Dan G. Dimitriu has been practicing engineering since 1970 and taught engineering courses concurrently for more than 20 years at various institutions. In 2001, he joined San Antonio College full-time as the Coordinator of its Engineering program. He has been involved with several engineering societies and became a member of the Two-year College Division of ASEE in 2002. His research interests are in engineering graphics, 3-D Visualization, fuel cells, plastics, and
Faculty Mentor of the Year.Dr. Daina Briedis, Michigan State University DAINA BRIEDIS is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University and Assistant Dean for Student Advancement and Program Assessment in the College of Engineering. Dr. Briedis is involved in several areas of education research including student retention and the use of technology in the classroom. She has been involved in NSF-funded research in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ASEE, ABET
Paper ID #31500A First-Year Career Development Course: Securing and Succeeding in anEngineering JobDr. Jennifer Sinclair Curtis, University of California, Davis Jennifer Sinclair Curtis is Distinguished Professor of Chemical Engineering and Dean of Engineering at University of California, Davis. She is a Fellow of ASEE, AAAS and AIChE. She is recipient of AIChE’s Particle Technology Forum’s Lifetime Achievement Award, a Fulbright Senior Research Scholar Award, AIChE’s Thomas-Baron Award in Fluid-Particle Systems, ASEE’s Chemical Engineering Lec- tureship Award, ASEE’s CACHE Award for Excellence in Computing in Chemical
engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Publication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala. Dina was a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate
GSSM, Dr. Sims was the Dean of Engineering and Technology at the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics. She has 25 years of experience as an industry engineer and K-20 researcher, educator, and administrator; she was also a DEI practitioner across all of those positions. Dr. Sims holds a BSE in BME from Duke University and PhD in BME from the UNC at Chapel Hill. She is a lifetime member of the National Society of Black Engineers as well as a member of several other professional associations including ASEE and BMES. Dr. Sims serves her community through multiple boards including the Florence-Darlington Technical Col- lege Area Commission, Columbia College Board of Trustees, and Cypress Adventures Board of
inequities and would argue since this is aWomen in Engineering presentation, the audience will be well-aware of those. We alsoacknowledge that mentoring falls into Frame 1 of the Four Frameworks Model forCreating Inclusive Organizations of explained on the next slide.References:National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. The Science ofEffective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.https://doi.org/10.17226/25568.Wu, D.J., Thiem, K.C. & Dasgupta, N. Female peer mentors early in college have lastingpositive impacts on female engineering students that persist beyond graduation. Nat 3Commun 13, 6837 (2022). https
and Academic Unit(UNIDA) for its mentoring and guidance in developing scientific articles in higher educationresearch.References [1] OECD, Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. In Education at a Glance. OECD, 2023. doi: 10.1787/e13bef63-en [2] S. Banchefsky, K. L. Lewis, and T. A. Ito, “The Role of Social and Ability Belonging in Men’s and Women’s pSTEM Persistence,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 2386, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02386. [3] L. Benson, C. Bolding, J. Ogle, C. McGough, J. Murphy, and R. Lanning, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belongingness in Civil Engineering,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa
our excellence in science teaching. She was the national recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching in 2014. Since that time, Celena was also recognized as the 2014 HEB Excellence in Education ”Rising Star” Recipient, 2014 University of Texas - RGV Outstanding Teacher of the Year, 2015 ATPE Educator of the Year, 2015 Texas Academy of Science - Outstanding Texas Educator, and the 2019 HEB Excellence in Education ”Leadership” Recipient. She is a NASA Solar System Ambassador, NASA MAVEN Ambassador, a SCH Space Education Educator Crew Member, a Space Foundation Teacher Liaison, and a Rio Grande Valley Science Association Board Member. Additionally, she also participated in
access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Easing Students’ Transitions to University Via a Summer Bridge and Outdoor Experience ProgramIn this Complete Evidence-based Practice paper, we describe the development and evolution of acombined academic summer bridge program and outdoors experience program designed to support theacademic success and development of incoming STEM majors at Boise State University. First-time,first-year students’ transitions to university can be challenging for a wide variety of reasons, includingincreased independence, leaving behind parents and friends
. Becerra-Cid, M. Quezada-Espinoza, M. E. Truyol. (2023). Belongingness of Chilean Engineering Students: A Gender Perspective Approach. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 37306. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383- 0179[2] S. Cwik y C. Singh. “Students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics course for bioscience majors predicts their grade.” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. vol. 18. n.o 1. p. 010139. May 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010139. Available in: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010139.[3] L. Ainscough, E. Foulis, K. Colthorpe, K. Zimbardi, M. Robertson-Dean, P. Chunduri, and L. Lluka. “Changes in Biology Self-Efficacy during a First-Year University
-relatedfigures, ET programs had over 30,000 students and 10,000 graduates in 2021 (American Societyof Engineering Education [ASEE], 2022). Significant proportions of Bachelor of Science (BS)ET programs have articulation agreements that allow transfer of students with Associate ofApplied Science (AAS) and Associate of Science (AS) in ET (NAE, 2017). A recent survey ofET leaders for the 2019 ET Leadership Institute indicated that serving community collegetransfer students was among the top perceived opportunities for the future of ET programs (Foxet al., 2020). National data show that ET programs attract students from certain marginalized andminoritized groups, including neotraditional age (24 and older) and Black/African Americanstudents (NAE, 2017
Associate Dean for Research with the Herff College of Engineering and a Professor with the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Memphis. She directs the U of Mˆa C™s Southeast Transportation Workforce Center and thDr. Karen D Alfrey, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Karen Alfrey is a Clinical Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering and Associate Dean for Un- dergraduate Academic Affairs and Programs in the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. She has been a member of ASEE since 2003.Prof. Tom Altman Tom Altman received his B.S. degrees in Computer Science and in Mathematics, and M.S. and Ph.D. (1984) in Computer Science, all from the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Altman
engineering students derive a sense of belonging from engineering,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013, pp. 23–674.[2] T. L. Strayhorn and R. M. Johnson, “What underrepresented minority engineering majors learn from co-ops & internships,” in 2016 ASEE International Forum, 2016.[3] M. M. Fifolt and G. Abbott, “Differential experiences of women and minority engineering students in a cooperative education program,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 14, no. 3, 2008.[4] J. B. Main, B. N. Johnson, and Y. Wang, “Gatekeepers of Engineering Workforce Diversity? The Academic and Employment Returns to Student Participation in Voluntary Cooperative Education Programs,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 448–477
prepared to perform systemintegration tasks. For example, recent studies by Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute notethat the U.S. faces a need for nearly 2.4 million manufacturing positions to be filled by 2028 [1].In addition, in May 2019, Deloitte surveyed 523 executives in a range of industries in 26countries across the globe on their intelligent automation strategies and the impact on theirworkforces. Results suggest that over the next three years, executives expect automation toincrease their workforce capacity by 27%, which is equivalent to 2.4 million additional full-timeemployees [2]. Needed are methods for helping students to develop system integration skillsreliably and efficiently.What is system integration?System integration
activities to increase the awareness of potential college students about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of the ASEE Electrical and Com- puter Engineering Division, a member of the ASEE Engineering Technology Division, a senior member of the Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Choose Ohio First – IMProving REtention and Student Success in Computing (COF