Paper ID #21989Keeping a Prospect on the Line and Then in the Boat: Recruitment and Re-tention Efforts that Make a DifferenceDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well
InteractiveApplication (CATIA) was used for aircraft parts modeling and statics analysis in designedscenarios. CATIA is a software for computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aidedmanufacturing (CAM), computer-aided engineering (CAE), developed by Dassault Systems [1].In CATIA, finite element analysis (FEA) is used for approximating the statics analysis. Studentsin this class must meet the pre-requisite courses of: basic aircraft science, graphicalcommunication and spatial analysis, mathematics, and physics.Engineering technology courses typically consist of lecture and lab components. However, theoriginal lab of statics course was designed to be implemented in a computer lab, where studentsare using CATIA to conduct static analysis. CATIA is widely used by many
abilitiesfor graduates (see Table 1). Yet these skills are rarely part of an engineering curriculumthat is typically focused on technical topics. Anecdotally, many graduates starting out inengineering firms report that they need knowledge on fundamental business functions tobetter understand the role of engineering in helping a business organization be profitable.Table 1. Attributes Employers Seek on a Candidate’s Resume [1] PERCENTAGE OF ATTRIBUTE RESPONDENTS 1 Ability to work in a team 78.0% 2 Problem-solving skills 77.3% 3 Communication skills
valuable to our peers in engineering education. Given these goals, werecognize that some terms we use are new to the engineering education community; therefore,Table 1 serves to introduce common vocabulary.Table 1. Key definitions of terms associated with Lean LaunchPad® and Customer Discovery. Term Definition Customer An individual or group who will buy or use the product or service Stakeholder An individual or group who has a vested interest in the product or service (e.g., customer, manufacturer, regulator, gatekeeper, etc.) Opportunity Space The area of interest for the entrepreneur, program developer, researcher, etc. (e.g., green housing, student
of educational efficacy, the molecular basis of cell movement, and the mitigation of infectious diseases. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Learner Satisfaction and Quality of Student-Faculty Interactions in Traditional vs. Blended ClassroomsThe effectiveness of active learning methods to improve learning in STEM higher education hasbecome an area of national interest, in part because of a perceived need to increase retention ofstudents in STEM careers and support their career development in a global economy [1]. Supportfor designing courses with a variety of activities to increase student engagement is based onevidence of increased test scores and reduced failure
of trigonometry asstudents construct an arch bridge using specific mathematic formulas and approaches. In thisunit, a team of students will design an arch bridge using provided pieces of wood. Beforebuilding an arch bridge, students will learn the way to calculate the length of both the bottom andtop panels of each piece through the application of a trigonometry formula. Then, students willcut out designated pieces of wood using the results from their mathematical calculations; thesepieces will be assembled to make an arch bridge. Through this design activity, students will learnconcepts of trigonometry in a practical hands-on activity which incorporates an authentic designtask. Lesson Information 1. Time: 3 hours 2. Lesson Objectives
spanning a period of four academic semestersbetween 2014 and 2017 were analyzed using two approaches. Projects were analyzed(1) for the degree of integration of non-technical considerations and (2) by term frequencymining and term frequency-inverse document frequency (tf-idf). The integration of socio-economic and cultural considerations into the course project increased in 2016 and 2017,with five of twelve student teams in 2014 and eight of ten student teams in 2016 and 2017integrating non-technical considerations in their analysis. Gender demographics andgraduate standing were not correlated with the degree of integration of non-technicalconsiderations. Term frequency analysis and tf-idf showed that key terms in the “social”and “energy
Paper ID #21826Learning Building Sciences in Virtual EnvironmentsDr. Debra Lee Davis, Florida International University Dr. Debra Davis is an Instructor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida Interna- tional University. Her research interests emphasize interdisciplinary topics including understanding and improving: (1) Computer Science education, including increasing participation of women; (2) educational applications and techniques for online STEM learning; and (3) complex human-machine interactions. She has a Ph.D. and M.A., in Cognitive Developmental Psychology from the University of Texas at
microwave circuitry.Dr. Diane L Zemke Diane Zemke is an independent researcher and consultant. She holds a Ph.D. in leadership studies from Gonzaga University. Her research interests include teamwork, small group dynamics, dissent, organiza- tional change, and reflective practice. Dr. Zemke has published in the International Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of Religious Leadership, and various ASEE conference proceedings. She is the author of ”Being Smart about Congregational Change.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Learning to Read and Take Notes in DynamicsIntroductionABET criterion 3i states the need for students to become life-long learners [1
universities around theworld. According to the USGBC website [1], “LEED Lab is a multidisciplinary immersioncourse that utilizes the built environment to educate and prepare students to become greenbuilding leaders and sustainability-focused citizens. In the course, students assess theperformance of existing facilities on campus and choose one building where they will facilitatethe LEED for Building Operations and Maintenance (LEED O+M) process with the goal ofcertifying the facility.” As of Fall 2016, there are two compliance paths for achieving this goal,the traditional path within the LEED v4 rating system, and the new path, Arc Platform, aperformance-based approach. There are advantages and disadvantages to each. Our LEED Labclass at Ball State
the Appendix. The best received implementation wasobserved when: 1) scaffolding of the activity was done along the semester and was aligned withthe pre-existing course activities (such as test, HW assignments, etc.), 2) the eP project was madeoptional for extra credit, 3) detailed instructions were provided, and 4) a website template wasprovided. Introduction Although there is a generalized consensus of the positive outcomes of ePortfolios andABET has identified portfolios as a way for documenting and assessing student outcomes since2000, there are still discussions related to storage and administration, time and effort fromfaculty, assessment, and student participation especially among engineering students (there isevidence that
) provides an extensive analysis of the practices thatengineering mentors or postdoctoral researchers use when mentoring undergraduate studentsparticipating in an engineering or science undergraduate research experience. The purpose ofAhn’s study was to identify mentors who were effective instructors and to develop a survey toassess mentoring abilities in an undergraduate research setting. Based on results of anexploratory factor analysis of the survey data, four main effective mentoring strategies wereidentified: 1) the mentor’s willingness to work with the mentee in a research setting; 2) thementor’s ability to identify the mentee’s research knowledge and skills, and provideindividualized support; 3) the mentor being attentive to the daily tasks
, 2018 Lessons Learned from a Radio Spectrum Coexistence Competition: A Road Map to Engagement in Informal Education of Wireless Communication1. IntroductionThe U.S. Government is in the process of implementing 2012 recommendations by thePresident’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) [1] to share federalspectrum with non-federal users, a process that is projected to result in a Trillion dollars insocietal benefits as well as related employment for millions. Related competitions such asDARPA’s Spectrum Challenge and Spectrum Collaboration Challenge [2] encourage innovativeapproaches and help prepare the STEM professionals who will develop effective spectrumsharing radios and networks as
need to writeG-code for each machining job. However, understanding G-code is still valuable, especiallywhen a machining job does not run smoothly. Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) have beenshown to be successful in helping students to learn about math and physics subjects. However,relatively few ITS have been used to teach engineering subjects. The objectives of the paper areto (1) create an intelligent tutoring system to teach basic understanding of G-code, and (2)evaluate the learning gains from the system, and (3) summarize lessons learned from theimplementation. The system has been evaluated by 91 undergraduate students. Results suggestthat the CNC Tutor design is instructionally effective and that students’ subjective impressionsof the
(hardcopy, digital, etc.) from any sourcehave made it more challenging to enforce the textbook policy. Additionally, the explosion in e-book availability and the pitfalls of sharing eBook passwords and access that may violatecopyright laws makes the situation even more complex.From a pedagogical standpoint, research shows that student learning improves when they cometo class having completed the assigned reading, which allows a student to achieve the “primaryintellectual objective is to cover course content – the specific facts, theories, or procedures understudy”.[1] Time in the classroom can then be spent working on the “higher-order intellectualobjectives of application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, it is more important that
learningoutcomes on the ASCE Body of Knowledge 2 (BOK2)[1]. This process, with the roots on theASCE Body of Knowledge 2, inherently included an emphasis to move beyond “what coursesdoes a civil engineering major take” to “what can a civil engineering student major do” and whatskills are needed to carry out these tasks [2]. This project also aimed to address gaps andredundancies in the curriculum, to ensure consistent student development in learning outcomes,and to engage faculty in holistic thought on the curriculum through tools such as curriculummapping and learning outcome rubrics.The curriculum map (see appendix) identifies the required courses in the program and thecorresponding program learning outcomes as part of the grid [2]. The grid can also
, each state has a federally-funded SmallBusiness Development Center (SBDC) that provides free business consulting and low-costtraining services. The SBDC is often located at or near a university, and often works closely withthe corresponding university technology transfer office and/or the entrepreneurship center. Whatfollows is a brief summary of the services and resources often offered by each [1].Technology Transfer OfficeThe main thing the Bayh-Dole Act did was allow transfer the ownership of inventions resultingfrom federally-funded research from the government to the university. This stimulated manyuniversities to create offices of technology transfer (often referred to as tech transfer) tasked withlicensing or otherwise facilitating the
instance, fossil fuel is a convenient energy resource, but it is causingproblems to air quality and the global climate. It seems almost obvious that these problemswould need to be addressed by collaborations and integrated solutions. The famous wordsfrom Einstein in 1946 seem to be very well in place: "We can't solve problems by using thesame kind of thinking we used when we created them [1].” The sustainability problemsobviously need a more multidisciplinary type of thinking strategy.Circular Economy is becoming widely accepted strategy for integrating solutions to providefor humanity’s needs, while creating profit in a sustainable manner [2]. The Ellen MacArthurFoundation is one of world’s leading promoters of Circular Economy. They have used
goal is student–educator partnerships around learning, where both partiestake conscious ownership over their respective capacities and responsibilities for successfullearning. Accordingly, we conduct SGIDs in a way that fosters responsive, reciprocal student–educator communication around teaching and learning.IntroductionSmall-Group Instructional Diagnosis (SGID) is a longstanding method for informing courseimprovements [1], [2] that is especially effective when integrated with instructional consultation[3]. We introduced a standard SGID formative assessment process to engineering faculty in2005. Up to that time, the only experience that the majority of faculty members had with courseor teaching assessments were the end-of-quarter course
structured than FLCs, our TLC is committedto grounding our work in the scholarly literature and using “evidence-informed approaches”(Vajoczki, Savage et al. 2011) to produce peer-reviewed publications/ presentations. Our TLCalso differs from FLCs and teaching circles as our TLC resides in one department, CivilEngineering.Our TLC is an outgrowth of curriculum reform where we recognized that without changes inhow we teach, we were likely to not make the curricular changes we were envisioning. The goalof the group is to establish a robust culture of SoTL in the department. The specific objectivesare to 1) identify active learning teaching practices of interest to the group through collectivereading and discussion of books like “Small Teaching” (Lang
, little or no prior teaching experience. Instruction in effectivecourse design and classroom instruction is, therefore, of particular importance for faculty that areselected largely for high level skills in their discipline and a promising agenda of research. Asnoted by Felder [1]: As everyone knows, skilled professionals routinely receive training before being certified to practice independently. Electricians, machinists and chefs get preliminary instruction and then serve for months or years as apprentices. Accountants, psychologists and physicists and physicians spend years earning degrees in their fields, and the physicians spend additional years in supervised internships and residencies. It would be unthinkable
program.According to Kolb [1], students learn best if they are exposed to a four steps/axes learningcycle/spirals, namely, 1- experiencing (concrete experience), 2- watching (reflective observation),3- thinking/modeling (abstract conceptualization), and 4- applying/doing (active experimentation).Various engineering education programs, such as mechanical, industrial, manufacturing, and civilengineering, adopted this learning cycle into their curriculum [2]–[6]. Many educational institutions have implemented robots of some kind, e.g. industrial robotarms, mobile robots, educational robot kits, etc. to support their science and engineering program[2]–[4]. Laboratory exercises and tutorials, educational robotics projects, and open-sourcesoftware and
pursued byengineers to gain visibility, achieve relevance, and influence the public. The profession ofnursing offers three advantages as compared to the profession of engineering in terms ofeffective public engagement, including: 1) trust (i.e., Gallop shows nursing as the “most trusted”profession for 15 years running); 2) gender bias (i.e., the profession of nursing is primarilycomposed of females, which the engineering profession claims is an important target audiencefor marketing efforts); and 3) professionalism (i.e., the canons of ethics for nurses emphasize theimportance of the patient – and hence the value of the individual – while the canon of ethics forengineers emphasize the importance of the nameless “public” – and hence looses the
statistical software is strongly dependingon the context where we have to undertake the decision. Constraints like the budget,the surrounding IT infrastructure, the level of programming knowledge and skills ofend user, the extent to which the statistical analysis has to be addressed, and manyother context-based elements are much more than factors, they open to differentscenario and require more than a reflection.Table 1 is a partial comparative list of different statistical software used at ouruniversity by undergraduate and graduate students. It is not complete but gives aglimpse of its capabilities.Table 1. Which Statistical Software to be used DataSoftware Learning
ofcreative ideas within the EERB. A makerspace provides a location for students to explore ideas,complete class projects, or pursue an entrepreneurial innovation. As a general concept,university makerspaces present both formal and informal learning opportunities to students.From an educational perspective, makerspaces espouse constructivism and constructionism aslearning philosophies, incorporating collaborative and problem-based activities. Essentially, theexpertise and tools provided in makerspace facilities foster a hands-on approach to learningbased upon individual interests, building upon intrinsic motivation (Kurti, Kurti, & Fleming,2014) [1]. Whether a student wants to learn a new skill to improve classroom performance orparticipate just
truck relies on 150 million lines of code [1]. Our everyday lives areshaped by smart phones providing a multitude of social media platforms, a secure banking sys-tem which moves trillions of dollars electronically, a vast array of industrial control systems topurify water, operate street lights, produce diapers, and much more. This large and growing needfor software development expertise must be met by educating more students in computer science,computer engineering, software engineering, and related disciplines. At the same time, persistentproblems in effective instruction of introductory computer science courses (CS1) [2] demonstratea need for innovative methods to effectively instruct these students. To improve this situation,this paper
monitored and adjusted by instructors to prepare studentsfor engineering environments outside of school. As recommended by Merriam, Caffarella, andBaumgartner, the course intentionally provides authentic opportunities for communication withtechnical and and non-technical audiences that promote holistic skill integration [1].Co-instructors/researchers set out in this study to support students’ educational success bydeveloping and transformative evidence-based instructional best practices (EBIPs). The first stepin development was reviewing literature to identify transformative experiential education bestpractices for engineering design that are research-supported, responsive, and can be shown toconsistently improve students’ preparedness to
occurring when analyzing theparticipation of disabled individuals in the engineering field. A discussion of the results ispresented along with potential reasoning as to why disabled individuals’ involvement andparticipation within the engineering field remained underrepresented.Background Traditionally, the engineering field has comprised of mainly white, middle class,typically functioning men [1]. Through the historic integration of the civil rights movement insociety starting within the 1970s, the picture of engineering has slowly begun to change toinclude more racially diverse people along with women [2]. However, these populations remainunderrepresented within the engineering field [3, 4]. Only recently has there been pushes withinthe
CD-ROMs, the engineering librarians have decided toinitiate a comprehensive data preservation project. These CD-ROMs are not companion data toprint books, but rather proceedings, standards, technical reports, data from federal agencies, andmore. The library no longer actively seeks out CD-ROMs to add to its collection. Anecdotalevidence shows circulation for the CD-ROM collection, which has never been very high, hasdropped precipitously in the past two years.In addition to not being actively collected or used by students, the format of CD-ROM media isdying. Apple was the first computer company to remove optical disk readers from consumercomputer models starting in 2008 [1], stating that disk readers are “anchors” weighing downsmaller and
. InterpersonalRapport is as much about promoting positive emotion as it is about avoiding the stimulation ofnegative emotion. As noted previously, although the development of Interpersonal Rapport isone of the two key elements of the model, Lowman indicated that it is not nearly as essential tooutstanding teaching as developing Intellectual Excitement.Lowman’s Two-Dimensional Model of Effective College Teaching was developed by combiningIntellectual Excitement (IE) and Interpersonal Rapport (IR) into a three-by-three matrix whereeach element is rated as low, moderate, or high. Figure 1 shows Lowman’s Two-DimensionalModel, and includes each of the corresponding terms used to identify the different teachingstyles encountered and a brief description about the