students into engineeringprograms. Hoit and Ohland showed, with statistically significant evidence, that presenting the realengineering content, in the first-year itself, helps retain women students31. They changed theintroduction to engineering course to a laboratory format, where they employed active learningwith smaller class sizes, and rotated students through laboratories in each undergraduateengineering department. They studied three different cohorts, wherein students could chooseeither the new laboratory format, which 42 women students did; or traditional lecture basedformat, which 92 women students did. The authors found women retention (remaining in theprogram till the third year of study) in the lecture-based format was at 16
participants’ return to the U.S., follow-on projects were offered to leverage their newly formed professional and personal network.Over the lifetime of the grant, the program supported a total of 18 undergraduate and graduatestudent research projects in 10 Korean host laboratories at Seoul National University, KAIST,Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, and CJ Group. Despite challenges posed by COVID-19 that led to two no-cost extensions, every cohort in the program traveled to Korea and was ableto have an immersive experience. The participants were diverse in ethnicity (3 African Americans,1 Native American, and 4 Hispanics) and gender (7 female students). The program has catalyzedcontinuing and new collaborations in the smart systems field
. He was co-PI of two international EU-FIPSE funded grants. His scholarship agenda focuses on techno- logical innovation, technological literacy, workforce development, and international dimensions of these fields. Increasingly, he has turned his attention to the field of technological innovation and the assessment of technological capability, understanding and innovation. Internationally he has worked in Germany, South Africa, Poland, the USSR, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Ire- land, Scotland, England, France, Czech and Slovak Republics, Finland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Taiwan His early experience involved teaching in Alberta and at universities in North Dakota and New Jersey. Immediately before coming to
learning skills and behaviors.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21724 Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor
., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., Rugarcia, A., “The Future of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods that Work,” Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 26-39.6. Bonwell, C. C., and Eison, J. A., “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom,” ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1991.7. Hake, R., “Interactive-Engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 66, 1998, p. 64.8. Redish, E., Saul, J., Steinberg, R., “On the Effectiveness of Active-Engagement Microcomputer-Based Laboratories,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 65, 1997, p. 45.9
education throughout his life. With a bachelor's degree in industrial engineering and a certification to teach high school mathematics in Puerto Rico, Kevin has shaped his path to empower others in his learning process. He is currently a Ph.D. student at Purdue University studying Engineering Education. Social causes Kevin cares about are bringing more awareness about the diversity within the LGBTQ+ community in engineering, Belonging and deconstructing what Latinx actually means for communities like Puerto Rico. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Where are the Gays? A Systematized Literature Review of Lesbian, Gay
profits organizations (Halverson & Sheridan, 2014).These spaces “modify the conception of traditional sites of production and recast the notions ofstudio, workshop, laboratory, gallery, and atelier into new settings for the integrated design,production, and distribution of products” [17, p, 6] (Dougherty, 2013).The presence of makerspaces in university campuses can be traced to the creation of FabLabs atthe Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) by professor Neil Gershenfeld (Halverson &Sheridan, 2014). Today, the FabLab foundation supports the creation of new FabLabs around theworld and work to provide resources for users of the space to generate designs and transformthem to products with-in house fabrication tools (Halverson &
networked- model, the traditional analysis, laboratory, and design components would be deeply interrelated: engineering knowledge remains central but is configured to include both technical and contextual knowledge; competencies of practice, laboratory, and design experiences are integrated into the whole, as are professionalism and ethics.”With a continued focus on expanded access and curricular innovation, this decade of innovationlead to increased recognition of the program's successful curricular elements, yet for the facultyit served to only increase the recognition of the need for expanded innovation in both thedirection of upper division curriculum and the direction for expanding the active and application-based
cognitive considerations.Dr. Cameron J. Turner, Clemson University Cameron J. Turner, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering, is the founder of the DICE (Design Innovation and Computational Engineering) Laboratory, a part of the CEDAR Group (Clemson Engi- neering Design Applications and Research) at Clemson University. Dr. Turner earned his doctorate (Engineering Design) and masters (Robotics and Automation) at The University of Texas at Austin, and his BSME (Thermal-Fluids and Solid Mechanics) at The University of Wyoming. Dr. Turner previously was an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and a Research and Development Engineer and Subject Matter Expert at Los Alamos
. Cain Center for Scientific, Technological, Engineering and Mathematical Literacy. She is responsible for developing and implementing continuing education programs for K-12 science teachers. Dr. Nixon has been teaching for over 20 years and currently works in the redesigned high school teacher preparation program. Dr. Nixon has Master and Doctorate of Philosophy in Curriculum and Instruction in Science Based courses.Warren Waggenspack, Louisiana State University Warren N. Waggenspack, Jr. is currently the Associate Dean for Engineering Undergraduates and holder of the Ned Adler Professorship in Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana State University. He obtained both his
-nology.com 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.teach- nology.com/tutorials/teaching/rubrics3. S. M. Blanchard, M. G. McCord, P. L. Mente, D. S. Lalush, C. F. Abrams, E. G. Loboa, H. T. Nagle, Rubrics Cubed: Tying Grades to Assessment to Reduce Faculty Workloads, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. V. L. Young, D. Ridgeway, M. E. Prudich, D. J. Goetz, B. J. Stuart, Criterion-Based Grading for Learning and Assessment in Unit Observations Laboratory, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.5. What is a Rubric? Relearning by Design, Inc., 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.relearning.org
Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to
University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in
Accounting from the Universidad Aut´onoma de Baja California (UABC) in Mexico. She has over 5 years of experience as a Financial Auditor for the Mexican Congress. She has had the opportunity to participate as part of the PROMISE community to enhance the preparation of graduate and postdoctoral fellows in STEM. Her research interests focus on bridging the disparity of availability of information that improves programs that enforce participation in STEM careers.Miss Amanda Lo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County I am a current Master’s student in the Biological Sciences Department of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. I work in Dr. Jeff Leips’ research laboratory where I spend my time researching about
Paper ID #24603The AutoDrive Challenge: Autonomous Vehicles Education and Training Is-suesDr. Jennifer Melanie Bastiaan, Kettering University Jennifer Bastiaan received her Ph.D. in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering from the University of Waterloo. She is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Kettering Univer- sity, where she is focused on teaching and research in ground vehicle systems. She is a veteran of the U.S. automotive industry with two decades of experience, including modeling and physical testing programs. Her technical research interests include vehicle dynamics, tire
Cornell University (1999). Prior to coming to UPRM, Papadopoulos served on the faculty in the department of civil engineering and mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in Structural Mechanics, Appropriate technol- ogy, Engineering Ethics, and Mechanics Education. He is a PI on the NSF-sponsored project Full-culm Bamboo as a Full-fledged Engineering Material and is developing community bamboo projects in Puerto Rico and Haiti. He is also co-author of the book Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis and served as the Chair of the ASEE Mechanics Division in 2015-16. c American Society for Engineering
), founder of The Design & Entrepreneurship Network (DEN), and Division I rower. In her spare time, Bre teaches design thinking workshops for higher education faculty/administrators at the Stanford d.School, coaches a global community of learners through IDEO U, and fails miserably at cooking.Dr. Elizabeth A. Reddy, University of San Diego Elizabeth Reddy is a post-doctoral research associate at the University of San Diego’s Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering. She is a social scientist, holding a PhD in cultural anthropology from the Univer- sity of California at Irvine and an MA in Social Science from the University of Chicago. She is Co-Chair of the Committee for the Anthropology of Science, Technology and
the program. There must be a suf- ficient number of faculty and they must have sufficient responsibility and authority to improve and implement the program.7. Facilities All facilities (classrooms, offices, laboratories, and associated equipment) must be adequate to support the attainment of the student outcomes. Modern tools, equip- ment and resources must be available to the students, and they must be systemati- cally maintained and upgraded.8. Institutional Institutional support and leadership must be adequate to ensure the continuity of the Support program. Institutional resources provided to the program must be
methodologies.Ms. AVA Butler, Oregon State University Ava is a sophomore in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. She is a well regarded trans- gender activist & leftist organizer in Corvallis, Oregon. Her research is in water desalinization in low infrastructure areas.Ms. Naya Selene Pelzl, Naya is a member of the greater Oregon State University community. She is currently taking a leave of absence from her undergraduate program. She has completed three years of undergraduate studies towards a B.S. in Computer Science.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social
regular set-up funds for the faculty position. 2. Major Support for Current Faculty (original program, 2001) Supplemental funding for major research projects through WiSE offers a way to offset barriers and life-cycle related obstacles that have been shown to slow or interrupt the careers of women faculty. Some of these barriers are subtle and can range from difficulties in meeting teaching and research demands while simultaneously raising a small child, to a reduced chance a new funding opportunities because of a lack of access to a network group. Funds may also be requested to take advantage of opportunities that arise unexpectedly and therefore are not funded through regular agencies and programs. Any USC faculty member in
several book chapters. All his research and book publications are in several areas mainly in computational science. He has been teaching several courses in areas such as stochastic and deterministic operations research, applied statistical analysis, and computational mathematics since late sixties. Further, he has been a member of the editorial board of international journals such as Computer Science and Informatics (India), and Neural, Parallel and Scientific Computations (USA). He has also been cited in Marquis Whos Who (Sep 2005).Gholam Ali Shaykhian, NASA Gholam "Ali" Shaykhian is a Software Engineer with Application, Simulation and Support Software Branch, Shuttle Processing
Paper ID #7491Going big: scaling up international engineering education to whole collegeinitiativesDr. Eck Doerry, Northern Arizona University Eck Doerry is an associate professor in Computer Science at Northern Arizona University. His re- search interests fall mainly within the areas of Groupware Systems, focusing on computer support for widely-distributed research and learning communities; and in Engineering Pedagogy, focusing on inter- disciplinary and international teaming approaches to teaching engineering design. Internationalization of engineering education has been a particular passion for Dr. Doerry. He has been
LibGuides were maintained at each institution; next, specific electrical ormechanical engineering LibGuide links were determined. Any institutional website with specificsubject LibGuides (electrical or mechanical) were further examined to determine the graduatelevel offerings; those that have at least a Master's degree offering were selected. Randomsamples were used to make the sample more manageable, and the geographical location waslimited to United States institutions.The methods for the assessment of the LibGuides was done by following the approach presentedin two chapters of the book published by Dobbs, Sittler, and Cook.12 In this work, Bielat, Befus,and Arnold13 discussed the integration of LibGuides into the teaching and learning process
Paper ID #41273Exploring Engineering Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Creativity in Academicand Research EnvironmentsAutumn R. Deitrick, Pennsylvania State University Autumn Deitrick is a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State). She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying creativity in graduate-level engineering education. She earned her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Penn State and her S.M. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, andengage in highly structured “cookbook” type laboratory activities, PBL is open-ended andcontextualized, where student learning is driven by the problem itself.While a number of different approaches to PBL have been described in the literature since firstbeing introduced in medical schools in the 1970s, they all share the same basic learningprocess10. Working in small teams, students learn “how to learn” by engaging in a recursiveprocess that includes problem analysis, independent research, brainstorming, and solutiontesting. Figure 1 – Problem solving cycleIn PBL, students are presented with an open-ended problem with little or no content preparation.Working in small teams, they collaboratively reflect upon prior
Aerospace Engineering which he hopes to complete by 2015. Fabian has been working in the Integrated Product Lifecycle Engineering (IPLE) Laboratory and has been involved in a variety of research as an undergraduate. Some of his research includes leading a team of undergraduate students from three universities, testing multi-user CAx tools developed under a NSF grant. Fabian has also been involved in the MENTOR project funded by DARPA which is designed to engage and interest high school students in the STEM areas. Fabians research interests include fixed-wing and rotorcraft design as well as the inclusion of Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) tools in the systems engineering process. He is also studying the impact of global
Paper ID #10389Quantitative Assessment of All-Class Project-based Undergraduate Courseon Graduates CareerDr. Emil H Salib, James Madison University Professor in the Integrated Science & Technology Department at James Madison University. Current Teaching - Wire-line & Wireless Networking & Security and Cross Platform Mobile Application Devel- opment. Current Research - Mobile IPv6 and Design for Motivation CurriculumMr. Eric Vincent Walisko, James Madison University Page 24.1028.1 c American
Department Head of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Prairie View A&M University. He is also the Associate Director of SECURE Cybersecurity Research American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Paper ID #35792Center. He has over 25 years of research/teaching experience in wireless communications and RF engi-neering at Motorola, University of Victoria, Air Force Research Laboratory, Virginia Tech and PVAMUand have co-authored over 250 peer-reviewed publications and 6 book chapters. He has also directed 15Ph.D. dissertations and 25 M.S.E.E. theses to completion as Chair at
procedures and skills. Moreover, engineering students inBangladesh need a conducive learning atmosphere. They should have access to a library,laboratory, and other resources. This can contribute to an environment that is favorable tolearning. The expanding economy of Bangladesh has afforded students the chance to obtainexpertise in engineering [18], which has also served as a significant motivation for the students.Engineering students recognize that their education and experience may give them a competitiveedge in the job market. As a result, they are encouraged to work diligently and achieve success.In Bangladesh, the combination of enhanced educational resources, a competitive job market,family and peer support, and a booming economy might all
research methods such as (ethnographic observations, interviews, analysis ofartifacts and sometimes protocol analysis), these methods are always used to iteratively constructthe emerging design, which itself simultaneously constitutes and elicits the research results...” (p.164).In our research project, we sought to understand how best to design initiatives with a particularfocus on understanding what sites should be focused on (classrooms? Laboratories? Officehours? Gathering spaces?) and what populations to engage (TAs? Faculty? Staff? Otherstudents?). These narrow design parameters were used to elicit narratives and stories about bothpositive and negative experiences, or as the researchers put it to the participants, places whereand people who