opportunity evaluation and venture planning course/workshop called Corporate Intrapreneurship Training (CIT).The ISP features the development, piloting, and assessment of three types of student projectstructures and will be led by the other two HHDN institutions (University of Dayton andVillanova University): Identical projects run in parallel at each participating school Projects where the team members themselves are distributed Projects that distribute tasks among teams at each schoolTogether, these objectives cover most of the experience of turning an unrecognized market needinto a product within an established company. In particular, they impart in the students the skillsassociated with need identification, ideation
developing an effective outcomes assessment system is the institutionalculture of the faculty.” Ewell also concluded that implementation of an assessment plan in whichfaculty provide and respond to feedback is a difficult task.4 Shaeiwitz5 states the challenge asfollows: “Implementation of an assessment plan in which faculty provide and respond to feedback will be a difficult task. At most institutions, it will require a significant paradigm shift in faculty behavior. It is unclear how to effect such changes; there are conflicting opinions on whether faculty are motivated by intrinsic or extrinsic factors. But, if this problem is not dealt with forthrightly at the outset, implementation of an
Session 2263 On Development of a New Manufacturing Engineering Program at Washington State University Jack Swearengen*, Hakan Gürocak Washington State University 14204 NE Salmon Creek Ave. Vancouver, WA 98686-9600Abstract: A new Bachelor of Science degree program in Manufacturing Engineering atWashington State University branch campus in Vancouver is described. We discuss industrialparticipation in curriculum and program development, and review cooperation with communitycolleges. A planned center for
Session 3209 Some Assessment Tools for Evaluating Curricular Innovations Outcomes Lueny Morell de Ramírez, José L. Zayas-Castro, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho University of Puerto Rico-MayagüezAbstractOne of the most critical aspects of the new ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) is theexistence of an outcomes assessment plan for program evaluation and continuous improvement.Outcomes assessment requires the generation of assessment tools or instruments to gather datathat will document if a program’s stated goals and objectives
Session 3232 Some Assessment Tools for Evaluating Curricular Innovations Outcomes Lueny Morell de Ramírez, José L. Zayas-Castro, Jorge I. Vélez-Arocho University of Puerto Rico-MayagüezAbstractOne of the most critical aspects of the new ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) is theexistence of an outcomes assessment plan for program evaluation and continuous improvement.Outcomes assessment requires the generation of assessment tools or instruments to gather datathat will document if a program’s stated goals and objectives
Safety, Human-robot Interaction, and Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Teamwork Skills in STEM Education: A Behavioral Theory-Based Approach AbstractThe ability to work in a team is one of the most important skills a college graduate can acquirefrom an educational institute. However, some students do not appropriately participate in courseprojects, making teamwork more challenging than it needs to be for others. As a result, manystudents fail to develop teamwork skills, and some become frustrated with course projects. Thisstudy adopted the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to develop tools
, the increased specialization of practice afterW.W.II, or even the Industrial Revolution of the mid 1800s), the changes being wrought byelectronic information are moving at blinding speed. Practitioners must embrace these tools, orothers will be doing their jobs - by the year 2000. 10 The long-heralded electronic-informationrevolution actually began in 1985 when inexpensive software and hardware becamesophisticated enough for architects, engineers, contractors, and owners. You no longer need toknow how to draft to make perfectly drawn drawings. Today’s software can assist you inmaking renderings, calculating duct sizes, drawing framing plans, calculating building assemblyand energy use. Talent and knowledge are necessary to make good designs
of meeting it. If it iscapable of meeting the need, it must construct a plan and begin securing resources required fordeveloping such a program. The University of Cincinnati Clermont College has undergone sucha process many times in its effort to provide its service area with up-to-date and substantial newprogram offerings. This paper chronicles the birth, growth, and projected future development ofone of UC Clermont College’s new technical programs: “Computer Systems Support (CSS).”For those considering development of a new, or significantly revised, technology-drivenprogram, this article can provide a framework for planning and implementation.UC Clermont College was founded in 1972 as an open-access two-year branch campus of theUniversity
2513 Assessment Process at a Large Institution P. David Fisher Michigan State UniversityAbstract - This presentation focuses on the challenges encountered at a large, diversifiedinstitution as it organized itself, developed strategies, and implemented plans for continuousimprovement through outcomes assessment of its undergraduate engineering programs. Severalquestions are addressed, including the following. What have been the respective roles of thefaculty and administration? What has been Michigan State University's critical path intransforming itself to
at the end of first year to continue in an ABET-accredited engineeringdiscipline).The survey analysis yielded several broad conclusions. First, certain aspects of a student’s pre-college experiences and preparation are statistically significant predictors of retention into thesophomore year. Second, students who enter the program with settled plans to pursueengineering-related goals after college are much more likely to be retained in the program than arestudents with unsettled or non-engineering-related goals.These findings indicate the importance of prior experiences to continued engineering study, andindicate that exposure to pre-college programs that support or complement engineering, such asparticipation in science fairs, robotics teams
disadvantages of modified process are discussed.We hope this paper serves as a guideline for course instructors who are considering going agilefor a capstone design course for computer engineers, software engineers, or multi-disciplinaryteams.Crystal Clear ProcessCrystal Clear is designed specifically to work with small to medium sized teams. Some of theproperties of this process include: frequent delivery via 2–4 week iterations; processimprovement via reflection workshops at the end of each iteration; osmotic communication byco-locating teams, and utilizing charts and boards to share information; personal safety; focusthrough a flexible plan that identifies fixed deliverables per iteration; and a technicalenvironment capable of supporting automated
models and embedding them into thedepartmental culture to maintain effectiveness and sustainability3. This is especially true forthose technology programs that have undergone accreditation review under the TC2K criteria bythe Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET and the engineering programs that havebeen reviewed using the Engineering Criteria (EC 2000)4,5,6.Outcomes-based assessment requires ongoing program-level assessment. Most often this is theresponsibility of the faculty in the program being accredited. The planning and documentationrequirements can require significant investment of time on the part of faculty if not carefullymanaged. This can cause issues with faculty which can place the outcomes assessment plan injeopardy7.Even
xResume and cover letter x xBiographical sketch x x Memo x x Executive summary x x Cover letter for a report or proposal x x Technical-based Briefing paper x x business Business plan x x communications Consultant's report to a client x x Expert
RCS sessions students are often asked to verbalizehow they learned something. This helps the student monitor their understanding and learning.They are also required to write a reflection on what they learned and what they are going to donext after each weekly session. This helps them hone their metacognitive skills.At the beginning of the semester, the students are required to develop a task plan with the help oftheir advisor. This task plan spells out the specific deliverables that are to be completed beforethe end of the semester. These deliverables are then evaluated by the University of SouthCarolina’s Office of Program Evaluations (OPE). The OPE staff uses a rubric that was createdspecifically for this purpose.8 For each meeting
developed with the students. They were learning to be engineers atthe same time that a former engineering manager was learning to become an effective teacher.Both learned a great deal from each other and together.Then the second academic year began bringing with it an entirely new set of challenges andopportunities. Instead of the activities becoming easier and perhaps somewhat routine, they wereeven more complicated and time consuming. New obligations required extra time and effortincluding committee involvement, starting a new series of courses, implementing new programs,planning for an additional new academic program, the pursuit of tenure, and of course teaching afull load of classes. How could all of this be accomplished?The second year
forms of content suchas text, code, images, and more. Unlike traditional AI, generative AI is not limited to predefinedrules and patterns, but rather creates new content based on machine learning algorithms. Whilethere are various examples of generative AI like Bard, DALL-E, Midjourney, and DeepMind,only one example gained popularity seemingly overnight: ChatGPT. OpenAI launched ChatGPTon November 30, 2022. Social media users immediately posted about the uses of the applicationincluding travel planning, writing short stories, and creating code. ChatGPT attracted over onemillion users in the first five days of going public [1]. With the instant popularity also camequestions of ethical use and implementation. Could ChatGPT create job displacement
of the program scholarship.The difference between an Honors College and the Academic Success Program is that we do notprimarily seek only the top academic students. Although we welcome top students, the minimumcriteria for receiving a scholarship is as follows: Minimum 3.0 GPA Full-time engineering or computer science major U.S. Citizenship, Permanent Resident, or refugee Unmet financial need as defined by FAFSAIn addition, we focus on females and underrepresented minority students. We have maintained aprogram representation of about 60% female and/or underrepresented minority students.1The ASAP class is based on the “Guaranteed 4.0 Plan” by Donna O. Johnson.2 Basic to this planis a detailed time management system
Knowledge Skills Abilities Coastal engineering, Risk assessment, oceanography, modeling, adaptation Problem-solving, critical hydrology, climate planning, infrastructure thinking, communication,Sea Level Rise science design collaboration Risk assessment,Extreme Meteorology, hydrology, disaster management,Weather structural engineering, emergency planning, Adaptability, leadership,Events geotechnical engineering infrastructure resilience decision-making, teamworkDamage
engineering, system thinking, system mindset, master’s programsIntroductionThe paper describes the implementation of system engineering concepts for an electrical orcomputer engineering capstone course for CTU’s Master’s programs. Course deliverables helptrack student progress during the 11-week course and assess the degree of meeting courseobjectives. A student must frame a vague engineering problem and define requirements for theirproposed solution to an identified need. Following a systematic engineering process, studentsmust design and model a system, and then develop a test plan and protocol to verify their designthat meets their system requirements. The student must communicate regularly with the facultymentor and present their project through
Head of Undergraduate Studies and Service in the Nuclear Engineering department at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Her research interests expand on past work in nuclear system monitoring and prognostics to incorporate system monitoring and remaining useful life estimates into risk assessment, operations and maintenance planning, and optimal control algorithms.Dr. Anahita Khojandi, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Anahita Khojandi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and the director for the Reliability and Maintainability Engineering program at University of Tennessee- Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Pittsburgh. Her
development). These projects have included Robotics Platforms, Planning, Monitoring and Control algorithms, Sensor Interface, User Interfaces, Wireless communication, Signal Processing, etc. All of this involves direction and teaching teams to use the required tools and apply en- gineering skills to transform a concept into a product. She also manages interdisciplinary senior design projects in collaboration with other engineering departments such as Textiles Engineering, mechanical en- gineering, etc. Beyond senior design, she has also created and teaches undergraduate and graduate-level classes in ECE (Python in Engineering, Practical Engineering Prototyping (PrEP). She also has designed and taught ECE Robotics summer
Paper ID #35349Teaching Construction Management Capstone as a Remote CourseProf. Eric Anderson R.A., Farmingdale State College Eric Anderson is an architect and educator with more than thirty years in educational and non-profit facil- ities planning and management. He has overseen the planning and/or construction of over $ 1 billion of capital improvement for non-profit and educational institutions in New Mexico, West Virginia, Nevada, and New York. He is a registered architect in New York and West Virginia. Professional memberships in- clude the American Institute of Architects and the American Society of Engineering
Meeting #1 – ECA 228 A) Icebreaker – How did the summer 1) Email a copy of your official spring class schedule go? 2) Email a copy of your full weekly time management Thurs., Jan. 17, 12:40-2:30pm schedule including BPR, BPN, BPC, POH, and HW time 1:40-2:30pm B) Guaranteed 4.0 Plan for each class. The completed Check List must 2:40-3:30pm accompany the schedule. 3) Complete a Time Estimate Chart that matches your
, 12. This papercontributes an evaluation of what teachers perceive to be the long-term affects of participating inthe University of South Carolina’s GK-12 program. Two components of this program engageteachers: the Teacher Partner Program and the GK-12 Institute for Teachers.The Teacher Partner Program has been in place since the 2001-2002 academic years. Theprogram consists of assigning a graduate level engineering student, called a GK-12 Fellow, to aK-12 teacher’s classroom for one full school year. GK-12 Fellows enroll in a one-hour graduatecourse that focuses on teaching strategies for two semesters, work in the assigned K-12classroom ten hours per week, spend one hour per week planning with their assigned teacher(Teacher Partner), and
promote students’ learning andperformance, and to help students develop increasingly higher levels of development andsophistication, entrepreneurship programs must organize their curricula, programs, andservices to create a coherent, meaningful, powerful educational experience for students.This paper provides a research-based approach, plan, and process for helpingentrepreneurship programs make the vision become a reality at their institution.Introduction Building a successful entrepreneurship program involves more than creating anddelivering a series of courses that meet accreditation or institutional requirements.Programs focused on teaching entrepreneurship demand and require students to developsophisticated skills and abilities that
. Kenneth A. Bright, University of Delaware, College of EngineeringDr. Rachel Davidson, University of Delaware Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Associate Dean for Diversity, College of Engi- neering Core Faculty Member, Disaster Research Center University of Delaware Newark, DE c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering (verb) Diversity: Using the Engineering Design Process to Develop and Implement a Strategic Plan of Action for Undergraduate Diversity at the Institution LevelJenni M. Buckley, PhD1; Amy Trauth-Nare, PhD2; Kenneth Bright, BA1; Michael Vaughan, PhD1; Rachel Davidson, PhD1 1
of BIM. This paperpresents a newly-developed BIM course which aims to help CM students better understand theBIM workflow and focuses on advanced uses of BIM in construction projects. The course isdivided into three modules: BIM workflow, basic BIM applications, and advanced BIMapplications. The BIM workflow module discusses how BIM is addressed in project deliverymethod, contract, the execution plan, and team building. The basic BIM applications moduleexplains the typical BIM applications in 3D coordination, 4D scheduling, 5D estimating,logistics, visualization, etc. The advanced BIM applications module demonstrates the latesttechnology advances in the AEC industry that utilize BIM applications, including laser scanning,virtual reality, and
Tennessee atChattanooga--that this positive evaluation took place in the first semester in which the new criteriawere effective is regarded as particularly notable. While an earlier version of this work describedthis process as a partially implemented strategy [1], the plan has now been completely detailed,implemented, and validated by the ABET visit which found no shortcomings. This paper describesthe assessment processes, along with the two-year cycle of the assessment schedule, and givesexamples of assessment artifacts and rubrics. The paper also describes some common assessmenterrors and misconceptions, and recommendations on how to avoid them. While each programshould thoughtfully develop its own assessment plan based on its curriculum, its
experience of the new doctoral students and postdoctoralresearchers. Given the high attrition rates in graduate education, the retreat was also designed tofoster retention by integrating attributes of the Workforce Sustainability model.The retreat was framed around four objectives: (1) build community, (2) communicate groupnorms and expectations, (3) develop individual strategic plans, (4) and introduce research skills.The retreat encouraged individual and collective reflection on goals, deliverables, andexpectations. The experience was guided by the notion of beginning with the end in mind and, inthis case, meant aligning individual professional development plans with that individual’s long-term career goals and vision of the research group. The
mission and goals.Next, the students spent several weeks drawing the existing building in a building informationmodeling software program, while also completing a thorough building code study. Studentswere tasked with completing a building design that was both functional and aestheticallypleasing. Students also had to develop a one word concept, which could be seen in alldimensions of the project. Figure 2 provides an example of a concept board, as created by onestudent.Figure 2: Example of Student Conceptual WorkOnce the students completed a building code study, to ensure code compliance, the class metwith the community partner to present preliminary color plans. Students received critique fromthe client regarding both positive and negative