academic settinghelped to solidify their engineering identity and impact their future career decisions. It is alsoevident that the relationships students developed and the accessibility of resources served asprotective factors against several of the challenges they experienced. Students who were able toform study groups, seek out tutoring, and/or receive mentorship from engineering professionals feltsupported and grounded in their engineering identity.Implications The preliminary results suggest the importance of relationships, social capital, andagency on the development of students’ engineering identity. The results also indicate howstudents navigate academic and personal challenges based on the amount of social capitalwealth they possess
also teaches courses in Computer Engineering for the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Sys- tems Engineering at Arizona State University Page 26.259.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessment of Communication, Teamwork, and Engineering Motivation in Inter-Disciplinary Projects Implemented in an Introduction to Engineering CourseIntroductionInter-disciplinary project teams are a fact of engineering careers. Inter-disciplinary thought andaction are required to solve many of today’s technological and social challenges
Paper ID #11853Using an Instrument Blueprint to Support the Rigorous Development of NewSurveys and Assessments in Engineering EducationMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a
Network (KEEN), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and serves on the First-Year Engineering Education (FYEE) Conference Steering Committee.Qin Zhu (Assistant Professor) Dr. Zhu is Assistant Professor of Ethics and Engineering Education in the Department of Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences and an affiliate faculty member in the Department of Engineering, Design & Society and the Robotics Graduate Program at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Zhu is Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, Associate Editor for Engineering Studies, Chair of American Society for Engineering Education's Division of Engineering Ethics, and Executive Committee
Education, 2021 Training University Staff and Faculty in Motivational Interviewing: Advancing Diversity, Equity and InclusionAbstractMany minority and under-represented minority University engineering students are experiencinga chilly climate, which is partially a result of experiencing higher levels of micro-aggressions,harassment, discrimination and unkind acts. It can be challenging to address these issueseffectively through formal University discipline procedures. This paper discusses an informalapproach to addressing such acts as an early intervention and education approach. Specifically, 17University staff and faculty in engineering were trained to use Motivational Interviewing forchange conversations around
homogeneous intentions geared toward studentsuccess. Some of these programs focus on increasing undergraduate internships [3] or onunderstanding career options [4], while others aim to increase student success in first-yearprograms [5] and improve student retention [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. All these categories have variouslevels of mentorship tailored to meet the primary needs of the respective program. For example,an industry mentor might provide career guidance while a faculty mentor could advise ondegrees paths and options for graduate work. More recent programs have focused on peermentoring, especially for first year programs concerned with increasing retention rates [11, 12],but which are also applied to higher level academics and teaching related
. He is also interested in improving STEM+CS education for minorities. He has been volunteering in many education outreach programs including Science Fair and Robotics programs such as First Robotics competitions. Areas of research interest include engineering education, STEM+CS, and robotics in K-12 education. Kaya advocates his view that research, teaching and learning are best practiced as a unified enterprise that benefits students and society. He has received numerous teaching awards as well as grants for his research from several foundations. Kaya is an active member of AERA, ASEE, ASTE, NARST, and NSTA, has presented at over 15 conferences, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal of College Science
what they deeply care about, because, according to Beth Noveck, “we’re learning withstudents that, building off their interests and the things they care about, to then learn skills usingthat subject matter has a much more powerful effect than trying to force them to be interested insomething else.”1 Page 26.791.7In addition, there is an attitudinal shift especially in American students who are now thinkingmore about the philosophical aspects of their professional lives. From the perspective of religiousscholar Varun Soni, the exploration of social problems is now inherently a personal endeavor forstudents. Therefore, inspiring students
prototyping, testing, and ongoing ideation of programmatic changes andimprovements.IntroductionInternships have been shown to be of great value for both student learning and career attainment.They allow students to build the real-world skills and perspective necessary to engage effectivelywith their own education [1]. There is also evidence to show that they contribute to greater careerengagement later in life [2] and that having an internship is one of the top qualifications thatemployers look for in new graduates [3]. At the University of Colorado Boulder specifically,87% of AY 15-18 Mechanical Engineering graduates who completed an internship rated theirexperience as “extremely useful,” “very useful,” or “useful” [4]. Despite those clear benefits
Career Award (2020), the Sloan Research Fellowship (2023), the Google Daydream Award (2019), the Amazon Research Award (2020, 2022), and the MIT AeroAstro Vickie Kerrebrock Faculty Award (2020). He is an IEEE senior member and an AIAA associate fellow. At MIT, he teaches ”Robotics: Science and Systems,” the introduction to robotics for MIT undergraduates, and he created the graduate-level course ”Visual Navigation for Autonomous Vehicles”, which covers mathematical foundations and fast C++ implementations of spatial perception algorithms for drones and autonomous vehicles.Siyi Hu, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMarcus Abate, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyZeyad Awwad, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMr
choice, involvement, retention,graduation, and even post-graduation outcomes [3-4]. These studies have explored sense ofbelonging both as an antecedent to important socio-academic outcomes, as well as an outcome ofstudents’ socio-academic experiences within the college community [5-7].Existing research often examines college students’ sense of belonging as a global construct,positioning students to respond about their sense of belonging to institutions, disciplines, ordepartments [8-9]. However, recent research suggests that students’ development of sense ofbelonging may differ across contexts in the university community [7, 10]. Thus, how one’s senseof belonging in one space on campus (e.g. a classroom) may not be indicative of their sense
AC 2011-683: INTEGRATING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE INTO THEENGINEERING CURRICULUM: A PROPOSED MODEL AND PROTO-TYPE CASE WITH AN INDUSTRY PARTNERRichard T. Schoephoerster, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Schoephoerster is the Dean of the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso, where he leads a College of over 3000 students (including approximately 500 graduate students) in 17 different BS, MS, and PhD degree programs, and 80 faculty members in six different departments with approximately $25 million in research funding from local, state, and national agencies and companies. Dr. Schoephoerster received his B.S. in Biomedical Engineering in 1985, and his M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (1989) in Mechanical
, graduate, and faculty member socialization in the academic environment[20-24]. Fewer researchers have utilized the framework in an industry environment or academic-industry partnership context. Although, few researchers have examined the engineering contextdirectly, we highlight one example to illustrate the utility of the framework.Cech et al. [25] used professional socialization to argue that experiences that occur duringprofessional training, e.g. co-op or internship experiences, cause men and women to developdifferent confidence levels about participating in the engineering community. Authors analyzedsurvey responses from 288 students at four institutions to examine behavioral and intentionalpersistence among students who enter an engineering
their challenges and contexts. The exemplar faculty advisor mustalso reflect on their practice, and deeply understand all aspects of the baccalaureate curriculum.Advising must help the student look beyond a semester-to-semester roadmap of isolatedcoursework and should help the student plan his or her trajectory through the program in terms ofacademic work, career planning, workplace engagement, and community involvement, all ofwhich are critical steps on the way to becoming an engineer. In this paper, the theoreticalframeworks for academic advising are presented; the concept of an advising syllabus isdescribed, and results from our own professional development program for engineering facultyadvisors are discussed.The Need for Improved
electrical engineering at the University of North Dakota. Prof. Johnson has been an electrical engineering faculty member at the University of North Dakota since 1988, and he served as the department chairperson from 1999 through 2005. Prof. Johnson earned his B.S.E.E. at UND in 1959 and his M.S.E.E. at Iowa State University in 1962. His teaching experience varies from numerous MBA courses to a variety of engineering courses including circuits, electronics, robotics, image processing, and senior design.Douglas Olsen, University of North Dakota Doug Olsen is a Project Manager for the Center for People and the Environment at UND, where he has led the student and faculty development
aimed at improvingthe engagement, retention, and graduation of students underrepresented in engineering. Thesecomponents include: “intrusive” academic advising and support services, intensive first-yearacademic curriculum, community-building (including pre-matriculation summer programs),career awareness and vision, faculty mentorship, NSF S-STEM scholarships, and second-yearsupport.This work in progress paper describes the implementation of the Redshirt program2 at each of thesix Redshirt in Engineering Consortium institutions, providing a variety of models for how an1 For brevity, we will use the acronyms listed in this table in place of the full names of theinstitutions throughout the paper.extra preparatory year or other intensive academic
25.530.9Upper division and graduate students served as educational role-models. “Just as freshman teams were able to learn from each other, the opportunity to learn from upper division students became important. Being able to see upperclassmen and even graduates present at the TSGC Design Challenge Showcase gave the freshmen a firsthand experience as to what to aspire to in their projects. It also gave the freshman teams a general view of what the next few years of an engineering career can look like. The encounter provided motivation and inspired the participants to achieve more in the project” (Ivan).ProfessionalWorking on the projects reinforced the student’s decisions to pursue a career inengineering
, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). She served the NSF ADVANCE grant initiatives as a co-Principal Investigator, working to improve practices to recruit and retain women of color in STEM and enhance institutional climate at USD. Other current research grants support pathways for veterans in higher edu- cation, and the NSF program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.” Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty of Color, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate Students of Color. She is past-Vice President (2017) of the Pacific Sociological Association, and an appointed consultant to the American Sociological
after graduation? Explain. Feel free to include what career you are interested in. Question 10** -- Are aesthetics important in your non-professional life? Explain. Question 11 – How important are aesthetics to your studies? II. Motivated Use Question 7 **-- What motivates you when choosing an aesthetic while designing something? Question 12 – Presurvey wording: What influenced your decision to enroll in this course? Postsurvey wording: What motivated you to achieve in this course? III. Affective Value Question 5 – Rate your agreement with the following statement: I am interested in a career that is predominantly focused on design. Question 8** – How does making things on your own make you feel at the beginning of the
receivedday-to-day mentorship under an English-speaking Japanese graduate student or post-doctoral researcher. The goal was to allow the NanoJapan students to experience workingas part of a true international research collaboration and, over the course of the summer,to learn to successfully navigate not only differences in approaches to research in the U.S.and Japan but also language and cultural barriers within their research laboratories inJapan. In addition, students had to develop the skill sets necessary to overcome logisticalbarriers, such as time differences, to enable them to remain responsive and engaged withall members of the PIRE international research team. Throughout the summer,NanoJapan students completed weekly reports on topics
areas for change” and initiate assessment of the impact of said changes [3]. Thisthematic finding by the authors resulted from a systematic literature review on the assessmentcycle of broadening participation in engineering and computer science. The authors additionallydiscuss the prevalence of various types of data, the types of findings communicated, focus onpre-college programming at predominantly white institutions (PWI), and focus on program-levelassessment.Program Theory and OverviewDISTINCTION offers an opportunity to explore engineering at a high-research university whilelearning about college life. Rising junior and senior high school students are split into fourgroups of 12-15 member cohorts, each with a distinct name, specific
are nowthirteen ASEE student chapters, more than any previous year.8 Additionally, in the coming year,another eight chapters will begin the process of applying for chapter status with diverse goalsand objectives unique to each campus. Each of the active and prospective chapters are committedto promoting the field of engineering education and providing opportunities for undergraduatesand graduate students to learn more about graduate school and academic careers.8 While many ofthe events organized by these student chapters have remained the same since 1993 (e.g., lunchseminars with faculty members, workshops on paper writing), new events have focused primarilyon engaging K-12 students in engineering.6,9,10 The full effect of these chapters
potential to increase theirengagement in engineering and to strengthen their pathways to professional engineering practice.Advisory Board meetingOur distinguished External Advisory Board (EAB) includes a recent student veteran engineeringgraduate, an engineering faculty member who has done research on supporting student veterans,a researcher from the Purdue Military Family Research Institute, a retired Marine Corps MajorGeneral who has been active in the national leadership of the Student Veterans of America(SVA), and a retired Marine Corps veteran who has been involved in various educationalprograms including the Voluntary Education Programs, Transition Assistance Programs, and theState of California Governor’s Troops to College Program. The EAB
who gave a student who had a failing grade a citation for consistently trying to learn in the class and not giving up. The citation tells a different story.” [student]*Citation - Statement (indicated by an asterisk after a letter grade) entered by faculty members toprovide an official record of information about undergraduates who have made particularlyfavorable impressions on members of the faculty because of their unusual talents, dependability,initiative, resourcefulness, or other meritorious characteristics that are not indicated adequatelyby academic grades.Opportunities to comment on a student’s qualities or progress thus helps to provide contextbeyond a letter grade. However, this kind of feedback, though extremely useful, is not
studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She runs the erstwhile Research in Feminist Engineer- ing (RIFE) group, now renamed the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the website http://feministengineering.org/. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Purdue University, West Lafayette Canek Phillips is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University-West Lafayette and works as a graduate assistant in Dr. Alice Pawley’s Feminist Research in Engineering Ed- ucation lab. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rice University and an M.S. in Mechanical
completed including an inventionthat was recognized as one of the nation’s best in 2005 and a product that is being sold across thenation. Finally, we will reveal ways that K-State is realizing an economic benefit from theseactivities that goes beyond licensing intellectual properties and includes the production and salesof products.The program described in this paper enhances the education of university students whilesimultaneously deriving economic benefits for both university programs and private enterprise.This model increases the readiness of graduates for professional work, increases the likelihood offinancial returns to the university, transforms university intellectual property into market-readyproducts, and provides a resource to
, and AutoCAD. Without confidencein math, students may fail these courses and drop out of college9. Therefore, fundamental mathskills should be developed before students reach upper level courses. Students must be able toconfidently solve construction-related math problems by the time they graduate.Research Purpose and Method Page 24.161.2The main purpose of this study is to explore different pedagogies and identify an effective one toteach math-related content knowledge in construction education. This study investigated threepedagogical approaches to teach math-related CM courses: the traditional lecture model, theproblem-based learning model
participation and degreecompletion.”2Studying socioeconomic inequalities in education presents unique challenges in terms ofdefinition and measurement. The U.S. Department of Education’s definition of socioeconomicstatus (SES) as an individual or family’s relative economic and social ranking is influential, andmeasurements encompass a numerical scale of family income and levels of parents’ educationand type of occupation, and student self-reports, all of which present their own limitations.2-3 Forexample, nine out of ten Americans identify themselves as members of the middle class,although the federal poverty rate hovers around 15 percent. This phenomenon is partiallytraceable to the pervasive popular assumption that class is not a salient force in
properties of bamboo. Bamboo was chosen based on recent interest inAlabama as a product with potential for economic benefit. Faculty mentors were brought together duringthe proposal phase of the program to discuss ways of getting involved in bamboo research. Our team’sadvisory board is invested in marketing, distributing, and commercializing bamboo products. The boardincludes members of a non-profit group, a small business, and the owner of a bamboo nursery. Theyprovide inspiration and support for our REU Site. Students engage with the board members during a fieldtrip to observe a fully developed bamboo nursery. A student from our 2017 program worked on seismicperformance of bamboo framing systems and found an opportunity to work on a project in
Doctorate in Educational from Wilmington University, Delaware. His dissertation used discriminant analysis meth- ods to explore the factors which affect the persistence of Engineering Technology students attending a two-year college. Melvin is also a Registered Professional Engineer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering Technology Education in the United States: Findings and Recommendations from an NAE StudyPolicymakers, employers, researchers, and educators have focused considerable attention duringthe past decade on the adequacy of the US engineering education system to meet the demands ofan increasingly “flat” world in which competencies that go beyond