) and a PhD (from the University of Victoria) in Computer Science, and she has developed and taught over a dozen courses at the university level. Beyond her teaching experience, she also has over a decade of industry experience as a software developer. In industry, she has a history of solving ’unsolvable’ problems. She enjoys a great deal of personal satisfaction when her analytical and problem solving skills can be applied to solve complex technical problems and when she can find creative new ways to pass the things she has learned on to the next generation. Her first teaching experience was at Ozanam Sheltered Workshop teaching adults with mental and physical disabilities. The experience gave her the
model. They both have takenmultiple BME courses with the IBL structure since the Fall of 2022. All these courses usedMOOCIBL's blockchain-based tokens.MOOCIBL tokens as student outcome evidence In these IBL courses the students are tasked with keeping track of their core principle andproject progress through an online proprietary learning management system called MOOCIBL.These tokens were comprised of links to documents, project research, and presentationsshowcasing the students' knowledge of the core principle. The platform allows for easy 4collaboration and shared documentation of student's efforts. These tokens are archived in theLMS for
, mentoring program, andAccess For All training to determine if they have altered how they teach their courses to be moreinclusive for students with disabilities. These same faculty members will also be asked if theyhave noticed an increase in interest of students with disabilities in STEM fields.Assessment Method G: Syllabuses from Access For All training Professors’ CoursesThe faculty that are to attend the Access For All training will be required to submit their currentsyllabus for each course that they actively teach along with a description of the modes andmethods of instruction used. Six months after the training the faculty will again submit theircurrent syllabus for each course that they actively teach along with a description of the modesand
. Cook, K., T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “WIP: IntegratingElectrical Engineering Fundamentals with Instrumentation and Data Acquisition in anUndergraduate Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,” 2020 Frontier in Education (FIE)Conference, Uppsala, Sweden: IEEE 2020.[39] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, J. Turns, G. Mason, and T. R. Shuman, “Students’ Experience of anIntegrated Electrical Engineering and Data Acquisition Course in an Undergraduate MechanicalEngineering Curriculum” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 65, Issue 3, August 2022, Pages331-343, 10.1109/TE.2022.3178666[40] Award Abstract #1629875, “ADVANCE Institutional Transformation at SeattleUniversity”. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, [Online]. Available:https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch
(synthesizing). Writing their responses to math journal assignments that involve the higher cognitive skills of evaluating, analyzing, and synthesizing. Creating ideas and projects in response to math assignments.The complete list of course objectives was included in the syllabus given to all students on theirfirst day of class. The professor reviewed the objectives with the students in class along with theother university policies and procedures and the course information in the syllabus. Super Links. During the first week of the semester, the writing instructor cameinto the class to explain briefly and to administer two tests for determining students‟ preferredlearning styles and
disciplinary contexts arestandards on academic integrity found in course syllabi. These statements about plagiarism,cheating, and intellectual property have been standardized and are practically copied and pastedinto each new syllabus. These principles are perceived as being so common sense that manyinstructors no longer attend to them when going over the syllabus with students. Such “common-sense” ethics are not unique to higher education contexts but can be found in almost anyorganization. Yet, just as students still get in trouble for plagiarism under the guise of ignorance,engineering professionals can participate in ethical missteps which might be labeled as implicit,understood, or common-sense. Therefore, it is important we do not work under the
host institutes Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval number. The questions were prepared by the project’s external evaluator and an expert in assessments. Institutions are requested to customize this file to include their institution and course names. The survey is to be assessed as soon as the delivery of the active learning tool is complete.In addition the kit consists of sample syllabus, pre-tests/post-tests and answer key, and samplesof midterm/ final exams. Figure 1: Assessment InstrumentThe active learning tools are available through the project website www.rmu.edu/nsfvv (depictedin Figure 2) and ENSEMBLE, a Computing Portal connecting Computing Educators, accessiblethrough
mentors participating in the program. • Official Program Documentation: grant proposal submitted to NSF, courses syllabus, program webpage, Individual Development Plan (IDP), CRM, Scholar Selection and Continuity Criteria Protocol, IRB Consent Form, and meeting minutes, among others. • Direct Observations during project team meetings, workshops, and co-curricular activities.Sample Description and Sample SizeThe population for the assessment consisted of trainees and mentors participating in PEARLS inyears one and two (2018-19 and 2019-20 academic years), respectively. Participation in theassessment process was voluntary. A complete description of the selection process followed inthis study is provided in [10].Trainees
. Do one of the following. a. Individuals will identify a course they will teach within one year of the event and will: i. Create a syllabus for the class, ii. Identify an educational hypothesis that they can test while teaching the course, iii. Outline a next step process for accomplishing the study of their hypothesis, such as: 1. Literature review 2. Review assessment literature 3. Look for funding sources b. Individuals will identify an Undergraduate research project they will supervise within the next year and will: i. Indicate what prior
organized fairly consistently across departments. Faculty memberstake on one or more teams and supervise them through a year-long experience to projectcompletion. The projects, spread across two semesters, earn the students 4 credits and arerequired to involve construction of a novel device/system which meets appropriate engineeringstandards and multiple realistic constraints. Over the course of the academic year, students honetheir skills through team meetings, brainstorming sessions, designing, simulating, fabricating andassembling their concepts as well as reviewing, researching and validating their designs. Projectsin the Electrical and Computer Engineering department are organized along broad categoriesincluding Computer Engineering (Advanced
department also emphasizes service in the formof providing the materials necessary for everyday life.The statistically significant changes consistently noted in the Marietta classes deserve specialattention. While it could be partially due to the relatively lower scores with which studentsbegan, the course was different from the others in the study in substantive ways. It serves as aFirst Year Seminar (FYS), and the 2019 syllabus describes the course to students as encouraging“self-discovery and an awareness of your strengths and interests. It provides opportunities foryou to reflect on and make connections between your General Education classes, coursework inyour major(s) and minor(s), and your lives beyond the classroom. The FYS challenges you
Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018. He is serving as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET). He is interested in conducting engineering education research, and his interests include student retention in online and in-person engineering courses/programs, data mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive
your company use to break the barriers to applying BIM? Q.2 Which dimensions of BIM does your company use? Q.3 Which BIM software and platforms does your company use? Q.4 Which methods are you using to make your employees understand BIM and its benefits? Q.5 Does your company provide any BIM training? Q.6 Which suggestions do you have to improve our current syllabus on Senior Design Class?Questionnaire for the Senior Design ClassThe second section of this study was a 10-minute questionnaire survey that was provided tostudents by the end of the semester, using an online survey software called Qualtrics. The goal ofthis questionnaire was to assess students’ feedback about the Senior Design
. (1999). We are teaching, but are they learning: accountability, productivity, and assessment. Journalof Academic Librarianship, 25(4), 304-5.8 Hunt, F., Birks, J. (2004). Best practices in information literacy. Libraries and the Academy, 4(1).9 Malenfant, C., Demers, N. (2004). Collaboration for point-of-need library instruction. Reference ServicesReview, 32(3), 264-273.10 Emde, J., Emmett, A. (2004). Assessing information skills in the real world: the good, the bad and the literate”Brick and Click Libraries: An Academic Library Symposium, 4th Annual 2004, 83-89. Retrieved 21 November2005 from https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/handle/1808.11 Carr, D. (2005). Information resources in the humanities. Course syllabus. University of
work is aimed at strengthening the security of Operating Systems and the Internet via auditing the existing code with the aid of mathematical verification tools, and redesigning with security as the primary goal. I regularly teach, among others, a course on Security that was developed with funding from NSF. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 CUTE Labs: Low-Cost Open-Source Instructional Laboratories for Cloud Computing Education Abstract Compared to the fast development of cloud-based applications and technology, higher education on cloud computing is seriously lagging behind. Built upon our ex
tried to revise howshe gave feedback, taking cues from Haswell’s “minimal marking’ paper [36].In Spring 2019, Alice learned about Kristen’s work on visualizing arguments. Simultaneously,Alice was revising the course to be able to be presented online pre-COVID (although withsynchronous components). Alice and Kristen worked together over spring 2019 to incorporatesome of the ideas Kristen had been developing into the course. Kristen advised on a structure tointroduce the content, suggested papers, modeled graphical page forms on papers my studentswere reading, and Kristen’s graduate student, Kehinde, produced 4 introductory videos forAlice’s students to watch.Casey, as a scholar in chemistry education, took a different course with Alice on race
entries, we learned that it is a best practice inBE to communicate their design activities and results in a written form for continual analysis anderror tracing. The BE-G1 used the technical journal to determine their mistakes; they wrote: “To move forward, we need to locate the DNA sample, determine where we went wrong, and move forward from that step. Look through DNA samples and our lab notebook to see where things may have been mixed up.” – BE-G1’s entry 12Unlike BE, MAE groups engaged in design communication activities because they have tocommunicate their design to the other team members, the instructor, various experts, and theclient. These needs are apparent in their eJ entries, course syllabus, and the groups
ensure class consistencyand quality, in preparing the class syllabus, the instructor set a goal to deliver approximately75% existing, validated course materials balanced with 25% new, experimental course materials.The assessment process selected for the first trial activity was a Kirkpatrick Scale 2 pre- andpost- test measuring “delta-learning.” Here, specifically, the learning was tied to sentence-levelcorrectness, with the key metric being Andrea Lunsford’s well-known, published, and juried listof Twenty Common Errors (see Table 1 and corresponding source link in Results, next section).The instructor decided not to test for concision and clarity during the first trial, in order to avoidconfounding factors, but did so with the intention to add
extracurricular learning opportunities and hands-on supplements to traditional courseinstruction. The following paper describes the integration of a Formula SAE (FSAE) teamproject into a junior-level mechanical engineering experimentation course; it represents one ofnine projects in this course.The first half of the course is divided into modules that, for all students, progressively address: 1)the measurement chain and laboratory best practices using pre-existing experiments, 2) sensordesign, selection, and calibration, 3) statistical data analysis and uncertainty limits, and 4)technical communication skills. The second half tasks student teams to propose, design, build,and carry out an original experiment to an engineering problem they perceive can
; ● Outcome 5: An ability to function effectively as a member of a technical team.Project Specifications: In addition to a course syllabus, a detailed document specifying theproject requirements is provided to the students in the first semester of the project. The projectchallenges have gradually increased over the past three years and are described in the followingparagraphs.In spring 2018, as a pilot project, three teams consisting of EET and MET students were formed.The teams were assigned to procure an off-the-shelf RC car and integrate autonomous navigationcapability with obstacle avoidance as part of the capstone project. The duration of the projectwas for one semester. The design challenge was to include “high speed” as the main
ebrary have conducted their own studies to learn more about howstudents use e-books. These studies cannot be considered an analysis of their respectiveplatforms, but both provided information about students’ thoughts regarding e-books. Springerfound that users “value the ability to access eBooks anytime and anywhere and appreciate thataccess is fast and easy.” They also found that “Full-text searching was also named as a topeBook advantage.”16 ebrary’s survey asked students how important certain features are to e-books and they found that searching was the most important, followed by “anytime access” andoff-campus access.5Rojeski conducted a study to gather student perceptions and preference relating to e-books usedas textbooks in library course
School District, Ashland, PA Biology, Life Science, Honors Biology, Anatomy and Physiology grades 7-12 2003 Our Lady of Lourdes Regional High School, Coal Township, PA Biology, Honors Biology, Ecology grades 9-12 2002-2003 Developed syllabus and overall course structure of honors Biology courses EDUCATION Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA Ed. D. Education Leadership and Management 2016 Concentration: Higher Education Administration Dissertation: Examining the personal nature of the K-14 engineering pipeline for young women University Of Scranton, Scranton, PA M.S. Ed. Leadership 2009 Principal K-12 Certification, Education Leadership Honors: Deans List Susquehanna University Teacher Intern Program; Secondary
emphasizethat consideration is a necessary component in order to solve the complex problems faced inthe field of engineering.The initial implementation of the class was in the Spring semester of 2020. The class is asophomore level course required for integrated engineering students moving forward. TheSpring class consisted of 18 students, 17 being second year students, one being a third-yearstudent. The class included6 women and 12 men taught primarily by a White male professorwho has conducted research on socio technical dualisms that exist in engineering in the past.The course description stated in the syllabus: Ever wonder what “energy” really is? In this course you will learn the engineering behind both energy production and consumption
. For quantitative analysis, some survey questionson both the pre- and post-course surveys as well as weekly post-class surveys distributed online,included Likert-scale questions and an average was calculated from student submissions. Open-ended reflections of journal entries and the weekly post-class surveys were analyzed to identifycommon themes which categorize the students’ experiences with coaching. Excerpts and quoteswhich are representative of the entire class are presented to illustrate these themes and commonexperiences.Additional procedures employed in the class which relate to coaching but the results of which arenot discussed in this particular study include: (1) Examples of questions which are stellar orweak coaching questions
of 25 and interpretedthe research topics based on the visualization of the LDA results.In conclusion, our experiment with the LDA approach helped us quickly develop an understanding offaculty research interests, would provide good evidence from which to make decisions on collectionmanagement, reference and library instruction, and show the possibility of academic libraries to make useof data and data science techniques in the era of big data.IntroductionLiaison librarians face the challenge of learning faculty research and teaching needs in a timely manner.Wood and Griffin gave an overview of the current approaches including website analysis, interview,course syllabus analysis and large-scale surveys [1]. Department websites, especially
Page 8.1175.11[2] P. W. Young, O.L. de Weck and C. Coleman,” Design and Implementation of an Aeronautical Design-Build-Fly Course”, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE 2003-868, 2003 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education[3] E. F. Crawley, “The CDIO Syllabus: A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education”, MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, January 2001.[4]: http://www.balloonhq.com/faq/deco_releases/release_study.html[5] Crawley, E. F., Greitzer, E.M., Widnall
. 384-395.9. Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K., Greene, B. A., Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), pp. 250-261, 1999.10. Husman, J. & Hilpert, J., The intersection of students’ perceptions of instrumentality, self-efficacy, and goal orientations in an online mathematics course. Zeitschrift fűr Pädagogische Psychologie. 21(3/4), pp. 229-239, 2007.11. Seginer, R., Future Orientation: Developmental and Ecological Perspectives. New York: Springer., 200912. Authors, Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: steps toward improving engineering education. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
AC 2007-2219: STUDENT/TEACHER TEAM BIOTECHNOLOGY/GENETICSWORKSHOPVirgil Cox, Gaston College Virgil G. Cox, OE , Dean of Engineering and Industrial Technologies at Gaston College for almost twenty years Dean Cox has taught courses in a broad range of engineering disciplines, has evaluated many programs and courses and published over 10 articles dealing with technology and education in refereed journals. Dean Cox was also an Associate Professor of Ocean Engineering at Maine Maritime Academy. Dean Cox is a retiree of the US Navy and a Veteran. Dean Cox received his B.S., MSEE, and Ocean Engineers degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Mary Beth Ross, Gaston College
research obligations • Part-time positions with the same titles, who teach one or more courses on an as-needed basisSome schools advocate multi-year contracts for full-time non-tenure track faculty, and someschools have criteria in place to allow these faculty to advance through the ranks (from assistantprofessor to associate professor to professor) with satisfactory service. Full-time teachingfaculty may teach as many as eight classes per year, many more than their tenure trackcolleagues.It is clear that full-time teaching faculty (hereafter called clinical faculty) need to be qualityteachers because they will be major contributors to the teaching mission of a university, now andin the future. But, as Ambrose and Norman4 note, “when
complex problems, evaluate alternativesolutions, and make informed decisions. AI-driven support mechanisms challenge students to thinkcritically, question assumptions, and consider multiple perspectives. This holistic approach toproblem-solving encourages students to address both technical and ethical dimensions of engineer-ing challenges, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the issues they face.To further evaluate the impact of Generative AI on student performance, ABET outcomes wereassessed for projects listed in the syllabus. Projects from the previous year served as a controlgroup. In lower-level courses, students were required to develop fundamental technical writingskills applied to practical problems, while in higher-level