as follows: The deformation and wave propagation should be uniform and uniaxial so that the strain rate and compressive stress wave could be determined accurately based on the technique introduced by Kolsky. The maximum strain rate of 5000 should be attained by the apparatus.The design constraints are as follows: Due to limitation of the laboratory space, the apparatus size should be limited to 2 meters in length. Due to budget limitation, the total cost of the prototype should not exceed $1000.Initial Design:As shown in Figure 2, the major components of a generic Split Hopkinson Pressure Barapparatus are as follows: Nitrogen Tank / Compressor is the pressure source that the striker projectile is provided in
been met. This evidence can include term papers, tests,laboratory reports, homework or other class assignments, presentations given, and letters fromemployers or professors. The ITA is the most significant aspect of ensuring that programoutcomes are achieved by all graduates.The student must satisfactorily address each program outcome by developing appropriatelearning statements and providing supporting evidence. The learning statements for eachprogram outcome are graded on the following scale: 0 – Not Responsive to Outcome (Evidence not provided for relevant courses or experiences. Coursework and other examples not demonstrative of required knowledge. The student will need to improve the learning statement and/or supporting
Paper ID #43413Green Roofs and their Carbon FootprintCaitlyn Blaine Christian, EIT, Oklahoma State University Caitlyn Christian, EIT is a recent graduate from the Architectural Engineering program at Oklahoma State University. She graduated with honors and with a graduate certificate in Integrative Design of Building Envelopes. She is currently working as a structural engineer at Thornton Tomasetti in Kansas City, MO. Her work focuses on steel connection design, complex geometrical structures, and construction engineering.Prof. Christina McCoy, Oklahoma State University Christina McCoy, SE, RA teaches Architectural
2014 report indicate thatneurodiverse individuals make up only around 3% of science and engineering doctoral degreerecipients [10].Graduate students face a unique set of challenges when compared to undergraduate students,with faculty advisors playing a large role in student success. Several studies have noted specificchallenges related to advisors, including work-life balance, which may be impacted by facultyexpectations, and hierarchical faculty-student relationships [11]-[13]. Satterfield et al.’s [14]literature review focused on the experiences of graduate students during their studies andexplored how individual factors (the influence of the student’s advisor), programmatic factors(isolation and teaching assistantships), and external
developmentinitiative. What emerged was a year-long positive leadership development program that inspiredour leaders to learn, experiment with, and reflect on positive leadership approaches, which inturn initiated a culture shift in the College. This paper defines positive leadership and supplies arationale for its use in our context; describes the program model that we implemented; identifiesdata-gathering mechanisms; and discusses key findings and recommendations for deliveringpositive leadership-based training to engineering faculty and staff leaders.Background and MotivationSTEM professors rarely pursue or receive formal leadership education even though theyregularly direct laboratory groups, develop research collaborations, and manage teaching teams[1
agenda of seminars, workshops, and groupprojects designed to develop the leadership, communication & presentation skills of SPSD students.The summit fosters a community of engineers/physical science students who utilize the skills learnedas they navigate their home campus and share these skills by teaching others (peers and pre-collegestudents) what they've learned.StrengthsQuest - A personal strengths assessment of SPSD students is taken using the nationallyrecognized StrengthsQuest tool developed by the Gallup Organization. The strengths assessment isused to adapt the activities to the strengths and needs of the students. In particular, the use of theStrengthsQuest assessment is integral to the activities of the Leadership Summit and to
Cincinnati, College of Engineering. This survey used the same formatand gathered results for 10 distinct disciplines in the undergraduate program. Canale & Duwartconducted parallel studies at Northeastern University. Results from both sets of studies areconsistent. They indicate that the students’ perceptions of the learning that occurred throughcooperative education has a direct and significant impact on their development in the elevenABET attributes. Within all engineering disciplines surveyed, and without special treatment,cooperative education shows itself to be a strong partner, along with traditional academiccoursework and laboratories, in the development of these attributes in the engineering graduate.The authors propose that colleges who
Engineering Sustainable Systems Program. He is Chief Science Officer of Fusion Coolant Systems. Professor Skerlos has gained national recognition and press for his research and teaching in the fields of technology policy and sustainable design. He has co-founded two successful start-up companies (Accuri Cytometers and Fusion Coolant Systems), co-founded BLUElab, served as Director of the Graduate Pro- gram in Mechanical Engineering (2009-2012), and served as associate and guest editor for four different academic journals. His Ph.D. students in the Environmental and Sustainable Technologies Laboratory have addressed sus- tainability challenges in the fields of systems design, technology selection, manufacturing, and water
- cation with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. With the goal of improving learning opportunities for all students and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities, Dr. Zastavker’s re- cent work involves questions pertaining to students’ motivational attitudes and their learning journeys in a variety of educational environments. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from science to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and
Paper ID #31189A Summer Program Focused on Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset intheContext of the NAE Grand Challenges for EngineeringDr. Jared Schoepf, Arizona State University Jared Schoepf is the Director of Operations for Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Arizona State University. Jared received his PhD in Chemical Engineering at ASU, developing a tiered approach to rapidly detect nanomaterials in the environment and consumer products. Jared has been a lecturer of EPICS for 6 years, mentoring over 300 teams. Currently he teaches introduction to engineering, EPICS, and chemical engineering courses
,Assimilating, Converging, and Accommodating. Project-based experiential learning ideallyharnesses a student’s natural interest and motivation to navigate an iterative path of evolvingexperiences, each of which enhance learning in different ways. Figure 1: Kolb's Experiential Learning Conceptual ModelImplementation of the experiential learning model is commonly done through project-basedlearning. Blumenfeld et al. defined project-based learning as, “A comprehensive perspectivefocused on teaching by engaging students in investigation.” 23 Within this framework, studentspursue solutions to nontrivial problems by asking and refining questions, debating ideas, makingpredictions, designing plans and/or experiments, collecting and
Paper ID #26015Design and Development of Compressed Air Controller Tire Inflation System(CACTIS) Using a System Engineering Approach and Elements of the KEENFrameworkProf. John M. Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 18 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and undergraduate courses in electrical
Paper ID #37385A Rubric-Based Assessment of Information Literacy in Graduate CourseTerm PapersDr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Dr. Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering department at North- eastern University.Jodi Bolognese, Northeastern University Jodi Bolognese is the Engineering Librarian at Northeastern University, where she serves as liaison to the College of Engineering. Previously, she worked in product management for STEM learning technologies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Rubric-Based Assessment of
discuss the implementation and student learning outcomes of the ML course. Ifalternative methods were incorporated in the course (i.e., flipped classroom and project-basedlearning) the article was removed from further analysis. If the course was a Massive Open OnlineCourse (MOOC), if it had online lecture components or if it was a mobile game learning system itwas eliminated from the screening. If data for the study was collected for only part of the semesterthe study was eliminated from the list. If ML was applied to only a portion of a course, for examplea laboratory, the study was removed from the list. If the study was performed on non-humansubjects, like mice, the study was removed. Other criterions used to eliminate articles
data scientist, having worked in both the semiconductor industry as well as several since-acquired startups. His research interests include Secure Distributed Systems, Security and Resilience of Autonomous Systems, Continuous and Adaptive Authentication, Cyber-Physical Systems and Applications, and Hardware-Level Security for Lightweight Agents. He and his students have published over 46 journal and conference publications. He is a senior member of the IEEE, ACM, and IET. His research has been funded (~$6.2M since 2018) by federal, national, state, and industrial entities, including the NSF, NSA, Idaho National Laboratories, State of Wyoming, IOHK and Kraken. © American Society for
engineering degree studies. Extensive surveys ofthe current practices related to senior projects, as well as of engineering teaching through seniorprojects are available in the literature [1, 2]. For their senior projects, students apply thebackground and skills accumulated through coursework in researching a problem, for whichthen a solution is investigated, designed and implemented. A significant part of the knowledgeand skills needed for the projects are straightforward learning from the actual courses taken inthe program, but often new skills are needed, specific to the project topic selected, and studentsneed to apply their learning skills in researching a new subject, or getting familiar with a newpiece of hardware or software platform
of the compounding errors that yield catastrophic results. Morerecently, a second approach has emerged in the teaching and scholarship and stands in starkcontrast to aspirations for greater control. This approach seeks to foster reflexivity and learningabout one’s own context and broader societal implications of engineering practice. Robbins [8]offers the notion of the “reflexive practitioner” as an emergent theme in engineering ethics.However, there are few examples for how such reflexivity can be demonstrated in the educationand maturation of engineers. This project aims to address that knowledge gap in a small, but important way, byassessing reflective writing by engineers in an undergraduate program. This paper offers datafrom 65
prevented more students). This course coverstopics in adversarial modeling, cryptology, side-channel analysis, Hardware Trojan Horses, andmore, all related to hardware cybersecurity. Similar to previously discussed courses, students hadto complete quizzes and assignments. Hardware Security has a project and an exam, as well. Theproject is chosen by the students with guidance from the instructor, and could hardware, software,or a combination of both. The exam was also subject to multiple submissions, with an 80% beingrequired to pass, similar to an exit exam. This course’s details have been discussed in previouslypublished work [8, 10].4.3 Administrative ConsiderationsAt Wentworth Institute of Technology, there are no teaching assistants, and thus
leadershipnetworks should be considered in addition to communication networks to understand teamdynamics.Limitations include the sample size and the frequency of observation. The nature of the casestudies construct limits the ability to determine the impact of specific design stages or activitiesthat can be controlled in laboratory experiments. Future observational studies can address theselimitations.Future research is recommended to determine if these networks develop or change through thelifecycle of the project team and the role of project design team size on network characteristics.Additional similarity measures can also be applied for additional insights. Research is alsorecommended to determine if the degree (leadership) and frequency of influence
co-creation are at the heart of her teaching approaches, whether in lecture, work- shop, and laboratory settings. She has been actively involved in ethics, equity and leadership education in engineering since 2011.Dr. Aleksander Czekanski , CEEA-ACEG Dr. Aleksander Czekanski is an Associate Professor and NSERC Chair in Design Engineering in Lassonde School of Engineering at York University, Toronto. Before beginning his academic career in 2014, Dr. Czekanski worked for over 10 years in the automotive sector. Dr. Czekanski attention is dedicated to newly established Lassonde School of Engineering (York). He devotes his efforts towards the enrichment of Renaissance Engineering program by including interdisciplinary
classroom and laboratory curricula including online course platforms, and integrated technologies. She has been involved in both private and government grants as author and project director, and is currently PI of an NSF ATE grant, ”Increasing the Number of Engineering Technicians in Southeastern Pennsylvania.” A major goal of this collaborative effort with Drexel University is to connect for-credit, occupational technician education to workforce development certification programs. She was the faculty advisor to two student teams that made the final round of the NSF AACC Community College Innovation Challenge (CCIC) in 2016 and 2017. She and her students have been involved in STEM related outreach to local community
Paper ID #19838Benefits for Undergraduates from Engagement in an Interdisciplinary Envi-ronmental Monitoring Research and Education LabDebarati Basu, Virginia Tech Ms. Debarati Basu is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (VT), advised by Dr. Vinod K. Lohani and working in the Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) lab. She holds BS and MS in Computer Science and Engineering. For her dissertation, she is interested in understanding students’ learning and engagement within a cyberlearning system. She has three years of experiences in teaching problem solving and design process to
developing strong leaders within the section. The officer team and executiveboard gives the students a great opportunity to learn and practice extensive leadership skills thatthey then carry with them into the rest of the campus and later into the work place.The entire officer team is given training at the three officer retreats during the year. The trainingis not limited to information about SWE and the section, but also includes leadership training andteam building activities. Being a part of the officer team teaches members to haveresponsibilities outside of academics, to interact on a one to one basis with other members of thesection and to manage their time and activities.Another integral part of the officer retreats is strategic planning for
and collection of surveys in person is eliminated. Since eachstudent can access the Internet at their own convenience, there are no restrictions with respect tothe time or location to reach students, in contrast to past studies in our program1 that used fixeddistribution and collection points. Additionally, online surveys allow geographically distantrespondents to be reached, increasing the population available to be surveyed. This is importantin graduate programs where it is not uncommon for students to leave for days or weeks to go toconferences or perform research in the field or distant laboratories and hence, making it difficultto reach out to these students if survey distribution were done in the traditional way. An onlinesurvey
knowledge building activities associated with there goals.This review of the literature provides the background for the design of this study and therationale for the data collection and analysis methods for a self-report study. Literature ReviewCooperative Learning Model in Engineering Classroom According to the Undergraduate Teaching Faculty 2010-1011 survey results from theHigher Education Research Institute, the Cooperative Learning Method was one of the mostfrequently used approaches in STEM instruction when comparing group projects and studentinquiry (Undergraduate Teaching Faculty National Norms for the 2010-2011 HERI FacultySurvey (Hurtado et al., 2012). In addition, the cooperative learning model addresses one of thecentral ABET
Paper ID #20397Fourth-Year Engineering Students’ Descriptions of the Importance of Im-proving Society Through their Engineering CareersDr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches sustainable community development in Humanitarian Engineering at CSM. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD research at CU Boulder
has worked in the areas of construction of infrastructures and buildings, failure assessment of buildings and bridges, construction accident investigations, forensic engineering, ancient buildings, ancient bridges, and the ancient history of science and engineering for over 40 years. The tools he uses include fault tree analysis, fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.Dr. Michael Parke, The Ohio State University Dr. Parke has over twenty years experience in satellite based earth science research. He has been teaching first year engineering for the past eighteen years, with emphasis on computer aided design, computer programming, and project design and documentation.Ms. Olga Maria Stavridis, Ohio
theMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Radiation Laboratory, and many other researchinstitutions. In the mid-1940s, the library was also designated as a depository for the Army MapServices. In 1950, the Georgia Tech Library was made a Depository for the Atomic EnergyCommission (AEC), together with fifty or so other research libraries. Reports from AEC weremade available to engineers, scientists, industrialist and others to help foster scientific researchand industrial development in Georgia and the southeast region. Under Crosland’s direction, theLibrary also added reports from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), theOffice of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD), which was superseded by the NationalDefense Research