highschool students have about engineering. [Students graduate from high school in late May andenter college in early August].The author of this manuscript taught an FYOS course section “Engineering Is Part of a LiberalEducation” where the learning objectives were to help students understand that developingsolutions to complex problems require the integrative nature of engineering. In this coursesection, lectures focused on a case study that will be called herein as the Farming Subdivision.The following outlines the case study. Urban sprawl from the Atlanta-metro area is a concern of Jackson County Georgia. In 2002, agricultural census data indicated that the county has approximately 42,000 acres in field crops and this dropped to just over
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Danielle earned her B.S.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Michigan. She is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow and an Illinois Mavis Future Faculty Fellow; her dissertation research focuses on improving the understanding of branched polymer dynamics via single molecule experiments. Danielle is an active member and current speaker coordinator of the Graduate Committee of the Society of Women Engineers (GradSWE).Elizabeth Horstman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Elizabeth Horstman is a third year graduate student from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign pursuing a Ph.D. in
techniques into engineering fundamental courses taught during themezzanine years. Variations of making are already present in some aspects of the existingengineering curriculum (e.g., project courses offered in the curriculum project spine). Wecurrently explore how aspects of making can extend further into the curriculum. Data have beencollected and analysis is underway on three case studies of making-based pedagogy in ourmezzanine-level mechanics, robotics, and statistics courses [12].Measuring Pedagogical Risk Taking by the Faculty: An instrument has been developed tomeasure faculty attitudes and behaviors toward taking risks in their teaching practices. Thiseffort is in support of the project objectives to 1) establish an understanding of the
manner that allowsfor continuous improvement [1, 2].In addition to being an accreditation requirement for engineering programs, assessment effortshelp educators plan forward their education process with robust sound methods and data, ratherthan arbitrary methods based on trials and errors. The challenge of any program assessmentprocess has always been the development of a structured, systematic, and effective process thatencompasses all stakeholders, and provides opportunity for continuous improvement, as poorlyconstructed assessments can lead to loss of time, money, and educators’ energy [3]. Systematicassessments, though challenging, are necessary for program improvement [2, 4]. With the moveof California State Polytechnic University, Pomona’s
Session 2330Engineering Education and the Internet: A Study of the Effectiveness of Web Formats on Student Learning Anne E. Donnelly1, Jace Hargis2,1 Associate Director of Education and Outreach, Engineering Research Center for Particle Science and Technology, University of Florida/2Assistant Professor of Curriculum and Instruction, University of North FloridaAbstractThere is an explosion of interest in internet classes at all levels of engineering education. Thepotential and advantages of the internet as an educational delivery mode are huge. The webprovides learners with a
skill and content knowledge that exists forinstance when you have an elementary teacher, a middle school teacher and a high school teacherbringing their specific expertise and background to a workshop. It was an introduction in manycases to differential instruction.Faculty members have also benefited from their exposure to K-12 outreach activities byintegrating their experiences and lesons learned into their research grants, especially NSF. Forexample, an asst. professor from Mechanical Engineering who has been involved in our roboticsoutreach activities was recently received an NSF CAREER award that integrates K-12 outreach,and another professor has a new NSF CCLI grant that includes a high school component as afollow on to the Finding NANO
the form of classroom lectures is still the most prevalent methodat institutions of higher learning. While classroom lectures are an important component of teaching, theireffectiveness, as far as student’s comprehension of the subject is concerned, may be less than desirable. Ofparticular concern is the way engineering courses are typically taught — based primarily on lectures. In-depthunderstanding of the physical concepts and methods of analysis discussed in an engineering course, especially atthe senior-level and beyond, requires an enhanced method of instruction that gives full consideration tovariation in students’ learning styles and thinking preferences. 1 However, tailoring of classroom lectures alone,toward this objective, would
concepts applied in the Clinic projects have just been introduced in other courses, so that thematerial is still fresh in the students’ mind5. The sophomore clinic teams with the College ofCommunication to integrate the teaching of a common core of communication skills to allstudents. Faculty engage in reflexive pedagogy, continually assessing and revising the program.In addition to these curricular and pedagogical innovations, the College has a student-to-facultyratio of approximately 17:1 and class sizes not exceeding 35, facilitating personal student-facultyinteraction both within and outside of class The tightly structured curriculum results in strongcohort solidarity among students who take most of their courses together throughout the
by over 300 first-year engineering students who go on to major in variousengineering disciplines. Because the learning tool is web-based, it will also available to anyinstitution that wishes to use it. The project is being developed with support of the NSF throughthe Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program. In this paper we discuss our motivation for creating this tool, its design, and the current status ofthe implementation.Goals and ObjectivesThe goal of this project is to provide an example of and a template for education modules inengineering that integrate experimental work, web-based text and resources and numericalsimulation of the laboratory experiments with a web-based assessment tool, based on primarytrait
the program faculty, department chair, and theprogram industrial advisory board (IAB). As a result of this report and feedback from the IAB,the program and department chair develop an action plan that recommends changes to coursesand the curriculum. The program chair submits this action plan to the IAB and updates them onprogress in its implementation.A standard format is used for each program in preparing yearly reports allowing the sharing ofassessment information. Summaries are developed for each PO that show the learningopportunities, assessment criteria, assessment methods and results, analysis of data and actionplans. The summary for the materials PO which is common to all three programs is shown inFigure 3 as an example
anaccidental explosion were to occur, the goal is to be able to correctly predict the effects of theblast on the RC structural members used in construction. Though many of the concepts in thisarea lay in the realm of graduate level knowledge and applications, undergraduate CivilEngineering students at the end of their curriculum are poised to enter and make contributions tothe field. This paper will demonstrate the synergistic undergraduate learning outcomes and DODpartner agency benefits resulting from an undergrad Civil Engineering (CE) research team atUSMA, mentored by faculty and practicing DOD engineers from NAVFAC EXWC, pursuing aculminating research project that offered practical performance-based alternatives to prescribedcode limitations for
Page 23.1278.2experience is essential. Especially when the topic of interest involves heat transfer, fluiddynamics or both, it becomes very difficult for students to obtain a hands-on experience due tothe nature of the experimental apparatus. Incorporating the design component in undergraduateengineering education has been an immediate and pressing concern for educators, professionalsocieties, industrial employers and agencies concerned with national productivity andcompetitiveness. Student-led projects as required components of course curriculum addtremendous value to science and engineering education. The design experience develops thestudents’ lifelong learning skills, self-evaluations, self-discovery, and peer instruction in thedesign’s
catch up. Accelerated technology development is one macro-level factor that contributes tocivil engineers requiring agile technical skills (e.g., related to infrastructure, automation, virtualcollaboration, information access, and big data). Although technical knowledge is traditionallythe foundation of civil engineering education, the workforce also needs professional skills suchas leadership, teamwork, ethical reasoning, disciplinary boundary crossing, and communicationto be competitive and successful in the civil engineering profession [28]. With an agingworkforce and high turnover [12], it is imperative to integrate these non-technical competenciesin academic and professional curricula for current and future generations of engineers. In
Communication via Self-Reflection” CHE Curriculum session) #11972 • “Technical and Professional Communication for Chemical Engineers” #13875 • “Student Led Example Problems in a Graduate-Level Advanced Transport Phenomena Course” #13944 • “Using an Article in a Sophomore Engineering
Fall 2015 Fall 2016 in their Calculus I course, expressed how interesting it was Avg. S.D. Avg. S.D. to be able to utilize the math that they had learned in solvingDo you feel the Mechanical 3.85 0.67 4.12 0.78 an engineering problem.Engineeringprogram/curriculum is The above is an example of why Calculus I is the mathengaging? course that all engineering programs start with for theirDo you feel the Mechanical 4.22 0.79 4.51 0.62 freshman students. The implication is that the students thatEngineering
School of MinesAllyce Horan, Colorado School of Mines Allyce Horan’s interdisciplinary background includes a B.A. in History and French, an M.A. in History, and a certification in TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language). She has been the Mines Writ- ing Center Director since 2018 where she has provided support to faculty, graduate, and undergraduate students on projects ranging from composition curriculum development to grant proposals. Allyce has taught a wide range of academic, technical, and ELL composition classes and workshops since 2012. She is passionate about supporting her campus community, empowering individuals to find their voice and effectively communicate their ideas not only to STEM fields but
Challenge. Particularly, participants prominently improved theirencouragement skills. Only the Challenge attribute displayed divergent improvements.Introduction Leadership traits are not always emphasized in the engineering curriculum of highereducation institutions. Once in college, if a student starts an engineering program, leadershipopportunities are typically only available through extracurricular activities or internships1. This islargely because traditional engineering programs are not able to accommodate specific coursesthat foster leadership traits in their degree plan. This lack of curriculum integration can often beattributed to the topic’s perceived complexity and the growth in the number of required corecourses that subsequently
development andevaluation.ASU has developed a curriculum leading to a Master of Science degree focused on securitysystems and engineering and, in the process, faced many challenges. The experiencedemonstrates that a rigorous methodology, such as the Sandia methodology, can successfullyform the foundation of a system engineering curriculum focused on security engineeringeducation. In addition, such programs offer students an option for a scientifically rigorouseducation in the field, in contrast to the more typical criminal justice or policy-orientedapproaches used in most educational programs focused on homeland security. This paperexplains the Sandia methodology, briefly describes the courses developed, the types of master’sprojects done by students
excursionsproviding hands-on understanding, and (purple) interdisciplinary collaborative group work.The ABBY-Net summer school advantage and its innovation in the context of graduate trainingin engineering therefore lies in the highly integrative research experience. Learning of scientificcompetences from disciplines relevant to energy systems and transitions outside of the traditionalengineering curriculum in an intense yet relaxed learning environment with immediate access tofield experts, online and offline resources. This environment has been proven to challengeparticipants to give their best, while forming interdisciplinary network linkages and expandinghorizons in research and teaching. Akin to similar collaborative learning experiences [6] a highlevel
thefollowing: 1. Apply engineering design principles to formulate a problem statement, analyze requirements and produce a system-level block diagram. 2. Develop a prototype of an electrical/electronic and/or software system to meet given specifications. 3. Integrate knowledge from across the core Electrical Engineering Technology curriculum. 4. Work effectively and productively in a team environment. 5. Effectively communicate technical ideas and concepts.The required course deliverables are as follows: 1. Problem Statement (Definition) 2. Benchmark Studies 3. Requirements Specification 4. System Block Diagram 5. System Specification and Design/Analysis 6. Prototype Fabrication 7. Testing/Debugging Plan
system, the student laboratory experience as well asthe authors’ methodology for integrating outcomes-based assessment strategies in the lecture and thelaboratory segment of this courseI. IntroductionThere has been considerable interest recently on incorporating “experiential learning”, especiallythe laboratory experience, with emphasis on modern instrumentation and computer-assisted dataacquisition in the undergraduate engineering curriculum. As the society becomes increasinglytechnologically advanced, real time-data acquisition and on-line processing of data will becommon place both in workplace and home. This has required the engineering faculty to modifytheir curriculum to ensure that the students have savvy and skills to set up experiments
mechanicalparts, can lead to a substantially higher resolution. This simple construction explains the actualprinciple of an AFM, which can then be shown to children in an arranged visit to an AFM facility. Wehave tested this concept on a number of children in grades 4-8 and they seem to get some idea of howan AFM works on the nanoscale. However, one needs to do a systematic study on a larger number ofchildren with the help of teachers and educational experts, which will be the subject of a subsequentstudy.Science, Engineering and Mathematics Now we are ready to explain some science and engineering principles. A Pentium 4 microprocessorhas millions of transistors integrated on an area of approximately 1-2 cm2. The use of a transistor as aswitch is a key
Training Civil Engineers to Communicate Effectively: Teaching Technical Communication in a Student’s First Engineering CourseAbstractABET requires that graduates of accredited institutions have “an ability to communicateeffectively.” The importance of effective communication of technical information is alsoaddressed in the ASCE Body of Knowledge. How schools meet this outcome varies byinstitution but about half of the schools surveyed for this paper require a specific course on thesubject. Constraints at the United States Military Academy (programs can not extend beyondfour years and a very large core curriculum) make it impractical to require a technicalcommunications course
Education. 90(3): 363- 374. 3. Jensen, D., D. Rhymer, et al. (2002). "A rocky journey toward effective assessment of visualization modules for learning enhancement in Engineering Mechanics." Educational Technology & Society. 5(3): 150-162. 4. Linsey, J., Talley, A., et al., (2009) “From Tootsie Rolls to Broken Bones: An Innovative Approach for Active Learning in Mechanics of Materials”, Advances in Engineering Education Journal, Vol. 1, Number3, Winter. 5. Raucent, B. (2001). "Introducing problem-based learning in a machine design curriculum: result of an experiment." Journal of Engineering Design 12(4): 293-308. 6. Mills, J. and D. Treagust (2003). "Engineering Education: Is Problem-Based or Project- Based Learning the Answer?" Australasian
evaluation of the Texas A&M freshman integrated engineering program. in 1995 Frontiers in Education Conference (1995).2. Olds, B. M. & Miller, R. L. The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Engineering Education 93, 23–35 (2004).3. Ambrose, S. A. & Amon, C. H. Systematic design of a first-year mechancial engineering course at Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of Engineering Education 173–181 (1997).4. Froyd, J. E. & Rogers, G. J. Evolution and evaluation of an integrated, first-year curriculum. Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change 2, 1107
as they did in-person. Zoom technology with screen sharing, breakout rooms, remote access to students’computers to instruct and troubleshoot were implemented in the virtual classroom for bothArcGIS and AutoCAD. In addition, both faculty teaching the Fundamentals course when itmoved to an online format had taught online classes previously and were comfortable withvarious modalities of online instruction. This study will be repeated with first-year studentswhen in-person classes resume to determine if the online vs. in-person delivery affects theresults.Part of the curriculum change that resulted in making Fundamentals a first-year course alsoinvolved adding separate AutoCAD and ArcGIS courses to the curriculum for upper-classstudents
. Stories Eng. Fac. Pedagog. Journeys. Synth. Lect. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 53–58, 2019.[8] S. Odeh, S. McKenna, and H. Abu-Mulaweh, “A unified first-year engineering design-based learning course,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 47–58, Oct. 2016.[9] D. B. Dittenber, “Project based learning in an introduction to civil engineering course: A cascade effect on student engagement and retention in subsequent years,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, no. Paper 19087, 2017.[10] C. Pierce, “Creating a community of collaborators to achieve curriculum change,” Transform. Teach. A Collect. Stories Eng. Fac. Pedagog. Journeys. Synth. Lect. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 53–58, 2019.[11] C. S. Kalman
and curriculum committees to structure theirrespective curricula to maximize the benefits and to minimize the conflicts when offering both programs. Thiswill result in increased student satisfaction and enrollment, improved economics and better relationships withindustry. In addition these programs may also benefit if they are or are seeking to become accredited by ABET.Examples will be provided how both disciplines can benefit from mutual collaboration and how these collaborateprograms can be promoted to attract strong support from industry.The author anticipates that this paper will initiate an open discussion on both sides for the benefits of studentsand the profession.IntroductionThroughout the Engineering and Education Community we
ofalternative learning pedagogies such as in-class training that integrate students’ developmentskills in addition to technical contents.Background and MotivationFrom providing access to clean water to managing large-scale infrastructure projects, thegrand challenges that engineers face in the modern world are equally technical and social. Toovercome these challenges, engineers must not only become experts on the technical aspectsof their specific field but also develop their soft skills, such as communication andpresentation skills, to enable leveraging their technical knowledge in an evolving,increasingly complex and globalized work environment. In today’s world, wheremulticultural teams are encouraged and considered the norm rather than an exception
related IT tasks, (ii) operational aspects, (iii) overall user reception of this approachand also about (iv) the cost vs value considerations of this approach.With minor operational modifications, this approach can be applied as a generic model for manyengineering courses that have compute-intensive lab components. It’s a modular cloud-basedsolution that can be rapidly deployed to address specific course needs. We begin with a briefdescription of the Digital VLSI course, as a running example.Running Example – Digital VLSI CourseThe Digital VLSI course constitutes an important component in upper division electrical andcomputer engineering curriculum in VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) and System-On-Chip(SoC) design. In addition to in-class