: Page 8.1012.3 o Learn about engineering through a realistic, hands-on problem-solving experience.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education o Learn about the engineering design process--the application of math, science, and technology to create devices and systems that meet human needs. o Learn about truss bridges and how they work. o Learn how engineers use the computer as a problem-solving tool.The contest received nation-wide participation with more than 19,000 registered teams enteringthe competition. The top six finalists traveled to West
the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationIntroductionDuring the last three decades, the scope of electrical and computer engineering (ECE) haswidened dramatically largely due to advances in digital technology and computers. The ECEeducators responded to this continuous expansion by modifying their core courses andintroducing new electives. In recent years however, it became clear that it would no longer bepossible to maintain a modern ECE curriculum by adding a course or two when the need arrived.The changes prompted the ECE departments to consider innovative ideas in curricula design. Thenew curricula often included introductory courses
the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering from 1984 to 1995 and as Associate Dean of the College of Engineering from 1995 to 2008. He was Interim Dean of the Honors College in 2008-2009. He also serves as Associate Dean of Undergraduate Research and the Honors College, and in this role oversees the undergraduate research programs for the entire campus. He is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and a registered Professional Engineer. In 2010-2011, he served as Interim Vice Chancellor/Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer.Dr. Fritz J. Claydon, University of Houston
, frame and resolve ill-defined problems, use technology, exercisetheir intellectual curiosity, work with others, and communicate orally and in writing. Various assessmentmethods aid the instructors in determining course effectiveness, student comprehension, and studentmotivation toward pursuing engineering degrees.What? Another Freshman Intro to Engineering Course?Wait! Before tossing this paper aside, this brand-new freshman “Introduction to EngineeringSystems” (Engineering 100) course really works. Here are some of the distinctive aspects of thecourse:1 Department of Astronautical Engineering, steve.brandt@usafa.af.mil2 Department of Engineering Mechanics, cary.fisher@usafa.af.mil3 Department of Engineering Mechanics, dave.hansen
. Sullivan, W. G., Bontadelli, J. A., Wicks, E. M., Engineering Economy, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993.4. Young, D. Modern Engineering Economy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1993.5. Dahm, K. D. “Interactive Simulation for Teaching Engineering Economics,” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2002, Montreal.6. Dahm, K. D., “Interactive Simulation for Teaching Engineering Economics,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 4, July-December 2003.Biographical InformationKevin Dahm in an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. fromWorcester Polytechnic Institute in 1992 and his Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
Paper ID #9469Events that Promote Engineering Students’ Intrinsic Motivation to LearnKathryn F Trenshaw, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Kathryn Trenshaw is currently a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Brown University’s Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Mis- souri in 2009, her M.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and her PhD in Chemical Engineering, also from Illinois, in 2014. Her research interests include science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education
to implementing engineering lessons for aminimum of two years. They attended a week-long academy where they learned abouttechnology, the work of engineers, and the engineering design process. They were prepared toimplement a series of introductory engineering lessons (i.e. What is technology?, What isengineering?, Introduction to the engineering design process) and one Engineering is Elementary(EiE) unit15, consisting of four lessons. After a year of implementation, teachers attended a three-day follow-up academy designed to answer teachers’ questions and provide further support anddevelopment. Teachers had discretion over when they taught the lessons and to what extent they
Department at Cal Poly StateUniversity, San Luis Obispo, CA. She received her bachelor degrees (in Chemistry and Materials Science &Engineering) from Michigan State University, and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At CalPoly, she teaches undergraduate students Structures of Materials, Kinetics of Materials, and various other courses.LISA CHRISTENSENLisa Christensen graduated from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo in 2004 with an MS inEngineering, specializing in Biomedical Engineering. Her thesis research focused on understanding fracture andfatigue behavior in cortical bone. Prior to her graduate studies, she earned her BS in Materials Engineering in 2002.Currently, Lisa works as a design engineer in
theproficiency exam procedure was instituted since so few students actually passed the exam. Page 10.645.2 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Youngstown State University College of Engineering and Technology ENGR 1555—Engineering Drawings and Visualization Proficiency ExamBase BracketSketch Sketch isometric andfront, top
. B.S., Industrial Engineering, M.S., Civil Engineering, Ph.D. student inIndustrial Technology. Address: 110 Marston, Iowa State University, 50011. Email: goodwinm@iastate.edu Page 10.172.8 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”
ethics learning and practice, professors need to interlace ethicaldecision-making skills into their various engineering classes. The Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology criterion three, part f requires that ethics topics be interlacedthroughout the various courses2. For example, a material science course could have studentswork problems and case scenarios about materials selection not only on stress properties but alsoon effects to the environment and resource sustainability. Another factor could involve the initialand long term cost of the decision involving the same environmental areas. This is especiallytrue where product design priority has been for lower cost, which makes the product easy tothrow away but too expensive to
currently enrolled as a doctoral candidate in the Department of Electrical Engineeringand Computer Science at Vanderbilt University. She is a student member of ASEE and IEEE. Her interests includeemploying learning models in engineering classrooms and laboratory.ARTHUR J. BRODERSEN is Professor Emeritus and former Chair of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceat Vanderbilt University. His recent technical interests have been the use of computer and network technology toenhance engineering education. Page 10.200.9 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
greatly enhanced.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge and thank the Ford Motor Company for its sponsorshipand continued support of the annual robotics competition at Tuskegee University. In addition,Ford Motor Company engineers have provided input through design reviews and encouragementto the student body.References[1] D. McGraw, "My Job Lies Over the Ocean," in Prism, December 2003, pp. 25-29.[2] "Profile of an Engineer," Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education. [Online]. Available: http://www.tidee.wsu.edu/assets/engineer-profile.html[3] "2005-2006 Criteria for Accreditating Engineering Programs," Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET). [Online]. Available
spring semester. Students reported that the class was enjoyable andhelpful in networking, improving presentation skills, and in giving tips on being a good student.Keywords: Freshmen Retention, Underrepresented Minorities, Scholarship Program, AcademicSuccess WorkshopI. IntroductionSince 1974, NACME (the National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering) has providedleadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful AfricanAmerican, American Indian, and Latino women and men in engineering and technology, math-and science-based careers. NACME believes in the concept of the “learning organization,” acommunity in which each member is encouraged and assisted to grow and develop. With thesupport of
Mentoring Graduate Students In Engineering Education Through Team Teaching Jamie Phillips and Timothy Murphy The University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109AbstractThe preparation of science and engineering graduate students for careers in academia is ofconcern due to the lack of formal professional training in teaching required for new science andengineering faculty members. In this paper, a team teaching project resembling a teachinginternship is described. An undergraduate electrical engineering course was team taught by afaculty member and graduate student in the goal of preparing the graduate student for a futurecareer in academia. The
the Design Teams and leads the HopkinsEmergency Response Unit.GARY H. TONGMr. Tong is a senior in the Biomedical Engineering department, specializing in Chemical Engineering. He serves asa team leader for one of the Design Teams.RICHARD B. BOYERMr. Boyer is a freshman in the Biomedical Engineering department, specializing in computer algorithms. He hashad extensive experience in the field of information technology and provided a highly effective digital processingprogram for the data analysis.ROBERT H. ALLENDr. Allen is a Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University, and has taught andperformed research in engineering design for over 15 years. He directs the Design Teams program.ARTIN A. SHOUKASDr. Shoukas is a
: Curricula Need Product Realization,” ASME-NEWS, vol. 15, no. 10, American Societyof Mechanical Engineers, 1996, pp. 1-6.2. Seat, Elaine and Susan M. Lord, “Enabling Effective Engineering Teams : a program for teaching interactionskills”, Journal of Engineering Education, Oct. 1999, p. 385-390.3. Hissey, T. W. “Education and Careers 2000: Enhanced Skills for Engineers,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(8),1367-1370, (2000).4. Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Engineering Criteria 2000,” 2000-2001 Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs, (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, New York, NY, 1999), pg. 32.5. McDonald, David James Devaprasad, Paul Duesing, Ajay Mahajan, Mohamad Qatu, Maurice Walworth, “Re-Engineering the Senior Design
of specialization in Computer Engineering in the Computer Sciencedepartment is a viable option for schools that can not have engineering programs.References[1] Impagliazzo, John, et. al. Computer Engineering Computing Curricula, SIGCSE 2003, Reno, Nevada, Feb. 2003.[2] http://www.ee.byu.edu, BYU – Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, access on January, 2004.[3] http://www.ece.utah.edu , UU – Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, access on January 2004.[4] http://www.uvsc.edu , UVSC – Department of Computing and Networking Sciences, access on December 2003.[5] Manokhoon, Kitti and Fazil Najafi, Civil Engineering Curriculum at the University of Florida and the Mahanakorn University of Technology, Proceedings of
Session 1413 A Web-Based Case Study for the Chemical Engineering Capstone Course Lisa Bullard, Patricia Niehues, Steven W. Peretti, Shannon H. White North Carolina State University One of the most daunting tasks in teaching the capstone design class is to develop suitableprojects. Some departments may not have faculty with industrial experience; other departmentsmay not be located near industrial partners to provide hands-on experience to the students; andother departments may lack faculty with deep expertise in specific areas such as biotechnology.North Carolina State University is developing, testing
, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993.4. Young, D. Modern Engineering Economy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1993.5. Dahm, K. D. “Interactive Simulation for Teaching Engineering Economics,” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2002, Montreal.Biographical InformationKevin Dahm in an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. fromWorcester Polytechnic Institute in 1992 and his Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1998. Hisprimary technical area is in chemical kinetics and mechanisms. His current primar y teaching interest isintegrating process simulation throughout the chemical engineering curriculum, and he is r eceiving the 2003Joseph J
operations approach. Whiledrawing heavily from problems of the petrochemical industry, commodity chemicals, andpolymers, the core courses were adequate to prepare chemical engineers for careers in emergingareas of energy and environmental engineering, semiconductor manufacturing, and the diverserequirements of the pharmaceutical industries. Elective courses in these technologies were straightforward applications of the paradigm, as they were based on the same chemical engineering core;namely, thermodynamics, reaction kinetics, and transport phenomena. More importantly, over theyears, when chemical engineering departments brought into the curriculum advanced materials,combustion and fuel engineering, biotechnology, or environmental engineering, that
typicalengineering (or other professional) student, particularly if they were designed toward the “typical”liberal arts major. General education is needed to accomplish the “total education” of a “typical”engineering graduate. However, the choice of categories, the courses in these categories, and thetypical student they should serve should be markedly different for engineers compared to generalarts and science graduates. Professional organizations such as ASEE (American Society ofEngineering Education) and ABET (Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology), aswell as specialized areas such as AIChE (American Institute of Chemical Engineers), must assumea leadership role in academics to ensure engineering graduates are being served in their
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1 Tribus, M., “Education for Innovation,” Engineering Education, p. 421 ff., February, 1971.2 Travers, R.M., Essentials of Learning: The New Cognitive Learning for Students of Education,5th Edition. New York: MacMillan, 1982.3 Jacobs, G., “Hypermedia and Discovery-Based Learning: A Historical Perspective,” BritishJournal of Educational Technology 23(2), 113-121, 1992.4 Goforth, D., “Learner Control = Decision Making + Information: a Model and Meta-analysis,”Journal of Educational Computing Research 11(1), 1-26, 1994.5 http://www.abet.org/images/eac_criteria_b.pdf6 Felder, R.M., “Reaching the
many female elementary students diverge frominterest in Math and Science at the fourth to fifth grade level 1,2. Reasons for the divergenceinclude implicit or explicit bias within the classroom, lack of role models, and subsequentdecreased peer support.In addition (and on a broader scale), the number of undergraduate degrees awarded in engineeringhas been steadily and consistently decreasing over the past decade 3. Specifically, the percentageof degrees awarded in engineering and engineering technology decreased by 4 percent between1990 and 1995, and an additional 7 percent between 1995 and 2000.Finally, on a personal level, the author is both a practicing engineer (Mechanical and ComputerScience) and the father of three daughters. Because of
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationStudents will be individually tracked, with results correlated with course recordsindicating what materials from this project were used. This individual tracking will allowfor variations in the implementation of the enhanced courses and for examining the roleof learning styles on retention.SummaryThis project is intended as a proof-of-concept study with the intent of developing a costeffective means of improving retention of calculus concepts for science and engineeringstudents. The project team intends to continue improvements on this project as part oftheir routine instructional activities, and to expand the scope of the project as resourcespermit. Adaptation of new technologies is
Technological University in 1980, M.S. in MechanicalEngineering from MIT in 1982, and Ph.D. from Purdue University in 1987. Dr. Capece joined the facultyat the University of Kentucky in July 1999.WILLIAM MURPHYWilliam E. Murphy is Director of the University of Kentucky Engineering Extended Campus in Paducahand a Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He received his BSME degree from the University ofKentucky and his M.S. and PhD degrees from Purdue University. He is currently a member of the ABETEngineering Accreditation Commission and served for six years as alternate or voting director on theABET board. Page 8.1249.10 “Proceedings of
Session ____ Program Renewal for Sustainable Engineering at RMIT University Associate Professor Roger Hadgraft Teaching & Learning Director in the School of Civil & Chemical Engineering RMIT University, Melbourne, AustraliaIntroductionProgram Renewal is the process of moving existing engineering degree programs at RMIT inline with the University’s Teaching and Learning Strategy 1,2,enabling students to:• develop a framework for understanding validated knowledge and cultural achievements
presentation of problem solutions and be able to defend the procedures and solutions.(3) Utilize technology for problem solving and understand basic principles behind problem solving with current technology.Not all outcomes were common to each course. For example, the following were specificoutcomes of the Principles of Design course:(1) Learn to utilize engineering methodology to solve problems throughout their engineering career.(2) Work effectively as a member of a team.(3) Obtain a basic understanding of the ethics required of an engineer in society.(4) Write a technical report and make an oral presentation.Joint projects were selected as the activity to integrate the three courses. There were a number ofcriteria that had to be met for a
., New York. pp. 109-121.4. Brohn, D. M. 1996. “Engineering on the right,” Structural Engineer 74(22). Institute of Structural Engineers, London. pp. 380-382.5. Krawinkler, H., P. Francisco, L. Ibarra, A. Ayoub, and R. Medina. 2001. “Development of a testing protocol for woodframe structures,” CUREE publication W-02. Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, Richmond, CA.6. Ferguson, E. S. 1993. “How Engineers Lose Touch,” Invention and Technology winter 1993. pp. 16-21.7. Parmelee, R. A. 1998. “Have we let computers replace structural engineering judgment?” Structure winter 1998. National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, Council of American Structural Engineers, and Structural Engineering
Session 1772 A New Role of Assembly Language in Computer Engineering/Science Curriculum Afsaneh Minaie Reza Sanati-Mehrizy Assistant Professor Associate Professor minaieaf@uvsc.edu sanatire@uvsc.edu Computing and Networking Sciences Department Utah Valley State CollegeAbstract:A separate assembly language course in computer engineering/science curriculum is not requiredby curriculum guidelines anymore4. This is because assembly