/ www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/papers/22458541 datasheets.scbt.com/sc-52666.pdfDr. Celeste Chavis P.E., Morgan State University Celeste Chavis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Transportation & Urban Infrastructure Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore, MD. Dr. Chavis is a reg- istered professional engineer in the State of Maryland. Her research focuses on transportation operations, safety, and performance metrics for multimodal transportation systems through an equity lens. Dr. Chavis specialized in instructional technology, STEM education, and ABET accreditation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
decided that our main considerations would be thatpresentations should come from College of Engineering faculty, to help ensure that the topicsand discussion pertain to engineering, engineering technology, math and physics, and that allpresentations should include plenty of time for questions and discussion.The committee was renamed ASEE Best Practices in Engineering Education, and the mission ofthe group was defined as:• Organize engineering education-related presentations to assist College of Engineering (COE) faculty in learning about best practices in teaching and learning• Provide a forum or platform for our own faculty who are engaged in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, SoTL, to present their findings locally• Provide
.[26] M. B. Sarder, “Improving Student Engagement in Online Courses,” in Proceedings of 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 10.18260/1-2--20611.[27] J. M. Little-Wiles, P. Fox, C. Feldhaus, S. Hundley, and B. Sorge, “Student EngagementStrategies in One Online Engineering and Technology Course,” in Proceedings of 2013 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 10.18260/1-2--22481.[28] P. W. Odom, H. E. Merzdorf, F. J. Montalvo, and J. M. Davis, “Analysis of StudentEngagement Data from U.S. News & World Report Regarding Online Graduate EngineeringPrograms,” in Proceedings of 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL,10.18260/1-2--32087.
State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20755The NAU/CQUPT 3+1 Program in Electrical EngineeringDr. Phillip A Mlsna, Northern Arizona University Dr. Mlsna is an Associate Professor in the School of Informatics, Computation, and Cyber Systems at Northern Arizona University. He currently serves as the Faculty Director of the NAU/CQUPT 3+1 program in electrical engineering described in this paper. His research interests are mainly in the areas of image processing, computer vision, engineering education, and academic ethics. He has extensive
Engineering Design, Technology & Professional Programs. Her research interests center on the transition of students from high school to 4-year engineering programs, especially those from under-represented populations.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the Associate Department Head and Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She re- ceived her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in mathematics and physics, incor- porating non-traditional teaching methods into the
explore engineeringconcepts, to investigate solutions to problems too complex for hand solutions, to analyze andpresent data effectively, and to develop an appreciation of the power and limitations of computertools. Students are introduced to such ideas as interpolation, curve-fitting, and numericdifferentiation and integration, through applications areas such as data analysis, imageprocessing, communications, position tracking, basic mechanics, and system modeling.The Engineering Models sequence was required for all incoming first-year engineering andengineering technology students starting with the 2012-2013 academic year. Lectures, recitationactivities, homework assignments, exams, and projects were common across all sections, thoughsome
Designing Effective Simulation Games for Active Learning in Systems Engineering Hung-da Wan and Nihar GuptaCenter for Advanced Manufacturing and Lean Systems and Mechanical Engineering Department University of Texas at San Antonio 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA E-mail: hungda.wan@utsa.edu, nihar_gupta11@yahoo.com Abstract question is raised here: How to design a simulation game Simulation games have been an effective method of that is effective and easy to implement?teaching, especially for Systems Engineering concepts. The
really learned a lot about new engineering and technology innovations.It must also be noted that there were some areas of negative comments. Many studentscommented on the lack of depth in topics, while others noted that in their section, the topics werenot distributed evenly. Other students did not see connections between global issues and theirlives. Common examples were: Only about 2 or 3 students gave presentations having to with engineering issues in history so I didn't really learn much. Again, people chose issues in foreign countries, not many any relation to me. Not to[sic] many local presentations. Very little depth, however a few new concepts.The next two questions asked whether the students found the
. Students are addressing their peers in their remarks in the discussion aswell as their summaries so they are communicating to a well-defined audience. Engineers in theworkplace often present summaries, investigate new technologies, and/or lead meetings, so thisexperience provides useful practice for an engineering career. Finally, the experience is notoverly burdensome to the engineering faculty instructor as there is not too much grading to bedone and some class time is led by students so there is less need for the professor to prepare. Itdoes, however, require organization at the beginning of the semester to insure that every studenthas the opportunity to present.Student response to the class was quite enthusiastic as may be expected for a small
AC 2007-1294: INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY-BASED PROJECTS ANDENGINEERING EDUCATION: THE ADVISOR'S VIEWPOINTChris Swan, Tufts University Dr. Swan is an Associate Professor in and current chair of the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. His current interests are the reuse of recovered or recyclable materials and sustainable construction.David Gute, Tufts University Dr. Gute is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Tufts university. He has traveled numerous times with the teams who have gone to Ghana. His research interests are in occupational and environmental health.Douglas Matson, Tufts University Dr. Matson is an
Classification of Educational Goals. Susan Fauer Company, Inc., pp.201-207. 3. Carr, J.J., 1996. Elements of Electronic Instrumentation and Measurement, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 4. Dally, J.W., W.F. Riley, and K.G. McConnell, 1993. Instrumentation for Engineering Measurements, Second Edition. John Wiley and sons, inc., New York. 5. DuBois, D. and E.F. DuBois, 1961. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if weight and height Page 13.753.11 are known. Archives of Internal Medicine, 17:863-871. 6. Johnson, C.D., 2006. Process Control Instrumentation Technology (8th Edition
AC 2009-1000: INTRODUCING SOPHOMORE ENGINEERING STUDENTS TOCONTROL THEORY USING MOBILE ROBOTSBruce Dunne, Grand Valley State University Bruce E. Dunne received the B.S.E.E. (with honors) and M.S. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1985 and 1988, respectively, both in Electrical and Computer Engineering. He received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, in 2003. In the Fall of 2003, he joined the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI, where he is currently an Assistant Professor of Engineering. Prior to this appointment, he held several research and
Education: Washington, DC, 1954.(14) Facione, P. A. "Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations", 1990, Millbrae, CA, The California Academic Press, ERIC Document No. ED315423.(15) Ennis, R. H. "A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities", In Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice; Baron, J. B.; Sternberg, R. J., Eds.; W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, 1987.(16) Iowa. "A guide to developing higher order thinking across the curriculum", 1989, Iowa, Iowa State Department of Education, ERIC Document No. ED306550.(17) Lunt, B. M.; Helps, R. G. "Problem solving in engineering technology
2006-1021: PREPARING ENGINEERS FOR THE GLOBAL WORKPLACE: THEUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIGayle Elliott, University of CincinnatiCheryl Cates, University of CincinnatiBrian Dansberry, University of CincinnatiLouis Trent, University of Cincinnati Page 11.1015.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Preparing Engineers for the Global Workplace: The University of Cincinnati International Co-op ModelAbstractIn 1906, the University of Cincinnati developed the concept of Cooperative Education in theCollege of Engineering. Today UC has the largest cooperative education program at any publicuniversity in the Country, with 4,000 students (from five
roots of entrepreneurial spirit. Today he works at CELONIS. As a business development manager he brings innovative technology to businesses around the globe.Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University Eric is a PhD student in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford interested in engineering design, manufactur- ing, entrepreneurship, and engineering education. From 2011 to 2016, Eric worked at MIT D-Lab where he co-developed and taught two courses and was a lab instructor in Mechanical Engineering. Addition- ally, he managed the MIT D-Lab Scale-Ups hardware venture accelerator supporting full-time social en- trepreneurs primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa and India. Eric has worked extensively in less-industrialized
platforms), emerging economies development and the role of IT/communications technology, and methodologies for measurement and assessment frameworks c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Making the Case for Technical Communication Training in Ph.D. Engineering Curricula:focus on international studentsElizabeth Fife, University of Southern CaliforniaA substantial and identifiable need exists for Ph.D. engineering students to receive instruction inacademic communication genres. The importance of effective communication for individualresearchers, for the field, and for promoting the broader impact to society are all recognizedbenefits, yet opportunities for engineering students, particularly at the
STEM program to prepare pre-service teachers to become K-12 technology and engineering educators. His research involves engaging college students in human centered design and improving creativity. He also develops nanotechnology based lessons that integrate the STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design through empathy: how low vision simulators can be used to engage students in better design solutions (Academic Practice/Design Interventions) INTRODUCTION: One of the objectives of a first-‐year engineering design course is to engage students in a real engineering design project. The team project typically
demographics and engineering identity.References[1] ASEE. (n.d.) “Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students”. Washington DC: ASEE.[2] LSU BIOS, www.lsu.edu/science/bios/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2018.[3] Gillock, K. L., and Reyes, O. (1999). “Stress, support, and academic performance of urban, low income, Mexican–American adolescents”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 28(2): 259–282[4] Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D., and Schuster, J. (1999). “Predicting the retention of university students.” Research in Higher Education 40(3): 355–371.[5] Perrine, R. M. (1999). “Stress and college persistence as a function of attachment style.” Journal of the First Year Experience
Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the
chair of the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. His teaching interests include structural engineering and mechanics, the design of timber and steel structures, structural dynamics, and earthquake engineering. Professor Estrada received his B.S. (with honors), M.S., and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1993, 1994, and 1997, respectively.Dr. Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student and Instructor Perceptions of Online Engineering Education VideosAbstractWith increasing technological development and wide accessibility of online video
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering Graduate Students’ Salient Identities as Predictors of Perceived Task Difficulty D. Satterfielda, M. Tsugawaa, H. Perkinsb, M. Bahnsonb, C. Cassc, and A. Kirna a College of Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, bApplied Social and Community Psychology, North Carolina State University, cDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State UniversityAbstractThis
for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring," Educational Researcher, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4-16, 1984.[4] E. A. Roe and T. Bartelt, "Converting a Traditional Engineering Technology Program to a Competency-based, Self-paced, Open-entry/Open-exit Format," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[5] T. Brumm, S. Mickelson, B. L. Steward and A. Kaleita, "Competency-based outcomes assessment for agricultural engineering programs," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 1163–1172, 2006.[6] R. M. Felder, R. Brent and M. J. Prince, "Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations," Journal of
were a large number of remedial English students amongthe incoming freshmen in both Fall 2012 and 2013, with an increase in both the number ofstudents and the number of remedial English students in 2013. The percent and numbers ofremedial English students vary by discipline from none in Biomedical and Materials Engineeringto 60% of the incoming Industrial Technology freshmen. There were differences in ethnicity aswell (see Table 2). The largest ethnicities among the remedial English engineering freshmenwere African-American, Asian, and Latino/a. At SJSU, African-American and Latino/a studentshave lower retention and graduation rates.Table 1. Incoming Fall 2012 Freshmen remedial in English by Major Fall
-solving skills.39 Faculty may alsoinfluence student gains in general education when emphasizing higher-order activities.40 Theprinciple of faculty affecting problem solving and cognitive development may mean facultyinfluence critical thinking specifically. However, counter to this principle, one study foundlecturers in humanities conceptualized critical reading very differently from their students.41Therefore, this leads to an area for further study within both disciplines.A specific concept of identity that is important in engineering is that of engineering identity. Onestudy found that students defined engineering as improving or helping the world, using math,science, and/or technology, solving problems, and applying knowledge.32 The last three
Paper ID #11547Design of an extended engineering curriculum to increase retention and eq-uityProf. Diane Grayson, University of Pretoria Diane Grayson is Extraordinary Professor of Physics at the University of Pretoria and Director: Institu- tional Audits at the Council on Higher Education, which is responsible for quality assurance in higher education in South Africa. She designed the ENGAGE program when she was academic development manager in the Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology at the University of Pretoria. ¨Dr. Erika Muller, University of Pretoria, RSA Dr Erika M¨uller
Paper ID #12113Teaching Teamwork: A Training Video Designed for Engineering StudentsMadeleine Arvold, Seattle Pacific University Madeleine Arvold is a second year industrial-organizational psychology master’s student at Seattle Pacific University. Madeleine is interested in organizational and team cultures, and particularly on the effects of those cultures on the attraction and retention of women in the technology industry.Mr. Steven David Mow, Seattle Pacific University Steven D. Mow is and Industrial-Organizational Psychology M.A. student at Seattle Pacific University. He has four years of formal leadership and
forthe course.Bibliography 1. Johnson, C.D., 2006. Process Control Instrumentation Technology (8th Edition). Pearson, Prentice Hall. Columbus, OH. 2. Northrop, R.B., 1997. Introduction to Instrumentation and Measurements. CRC Press, NY. 3. Webster, J.G., 1999. The Measurement, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook. CRC and IEEE Press., Baca Raton, FL. 4. Nachtigal, C.W., 1990. Instrumentation and Controls, Fundamentals and Applications. John Wiley and sons, NY. 5. Mitchell, B.W., 1983. Instrumentation and Measurement for Environmental Sciences. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. 6. Dally, J.W., W.F. Riley, and K.G. McConnell, 1993. Instrumentation for
Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) for the 12 institutions in the University System of Maryland, and Co-PI Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Bridge to the Doctorate at UMBC. Dr. Tull has worked with thousands of students from Alaska to Puerto Rico, and in Latin America through graduate school preparation workshops that have been sponsored by AGEP, The National GEM Consortium, National Society of Black Engineers, Society for Hispanic Pro- fessional Engineers, Society for the Advancement of Chicano, and Native American Scientists, American Indian Science and Engineering Society, and the Alliance/Merck Ciencia Hispanic Scholars Program. She has presented workshops on graduate school
,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, New Orleans, LA (2016).6. G. W. Bucks and W. C. Oakes, “Enhancing the Experience in a First-Year Engineering Course Through the Incorporation of Graphical Programming and Data Acquisition Technology,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).7. McLeod, S. A. Jean Piaget. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html (2015).8. Rogalski, J. and R. Samurcay. Acquisition of programming knowledge and skills. Psychology of Programming. J. M. Hoc, T. R. G. Green, R. Samurcay and D. J. Gilmore. San Diego, CA, Academic Press: 157-174 (1990).9. Ma, L., J. D. Ferguson, et al. "Investigating the viability of mental models held by novice programmers." SIGCSE Bull. 39(1): 499-503 (2007).10