itemsbut are dependent on each other. If students find that they include a dimension or force in theequations of equilibrium that is not in the FBD then they must go back and add it in.Emphasizing the idea that the equations of equilibrium are driven by the free body diagram hashelped students develop a clearer understanding of how and why FBDs are important to theproblem solving process. In practice, instructors write ABCD ⇒E on the board frequently whendrawing free body diagrams as a constant reminder.Let’s take a look at an example from Hibbeler’s text at how this maps to what’s already done.(Pearson has granted permission to use these images.)To avoid confusion with the discussion of the technique, the point locations are renamed to be P,Q
Higher Quality Science,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e79147, Oct. 2013.[11] R. S. Kushalnagar, G. W. Behm, A. W. Kelstone, B. T. Trager, M. R. Weber, S. S. Ali, and J. Lee, “Inclusive Learning through Real-time Tracking Display of Captions,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2016, vol. 2016–June.[12] G. W. Behm, R. S. Kushalnagar, J. S. Stanislow, and A. W. Kelstone, “Enhancing Accessibility of Engineering Lectures for Deaf & Hard of Hearing (DHH): Real-time Tracking Text Displays (RTTD) in Classrooms,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, 2015, vol. 122nd ASEE, p. 26.657.1-26.657.10.[13] Q. V. Vy and D. I. Fels, “Using Placement and Name for Speaker
support during the research process. Additionally,authors would like to thank University of Michigan - Flint institutional review board, faculty and staff fororganizing necessary field trips and to various locations related to current study and equipment support. References[1] Savoji, A. P. (2013). Motivational strategies and academic achievements in traditional and virtual university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences; 84 (2013), 1015-1020[2] Mazumder, Q. H. and Ahmed, K. (2014). “A Comparative Study of Motivation and Learning Strategies Between Public and Private University Students of Bangladesh” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE North Central Section Conference
., Skokan, C., Kosbar, L., Dean, A., Westland, C., Barker, H., Nguyen, Q. & Tafoya, J. (2007). “K-12 outreach: Identifying the broader impacts of four outreach projects.” Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (2), 173-189.14. Tafoya, J., Nguyen, Q., Skokan, C. & Moskal, B. (2005). “K-12 outreach in an engineering intensive university.” Paper in the Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Portland, Oregon (11 pages). REPRINT: Proceedings of 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, Sydney, Australia, September, 2005.15. Moskal, B., Skokan, C. & Duffield, J. (2004). "GK-12 learning partnership: An outreach program in engineering education.” Paper in the
. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Rehling, L. (2000). Doing good while doing well: Service learning internships. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(77), 77-89.Stanton, M. (1992). Internships: Learning by doing. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 36(2), 30-33.Strauss, A. (1995). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92: 27–39. (2003)4. E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S.L Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for Undergraduates in the Sciences: First Findings from a Three-Year Study,” Science Education, 88: 493-534. (2004)5. Ohland, M. W., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Long, R. A., Lord, S. M. and Wasburn, M. H., Race, Gender, and Measures of Success in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100: 225–252. (2011)6. Villa, E. Q., Kephart, K., Gates, A. Q., Thiry, H. and Hug, S., Affinity Research Groups in Practice: Apprenticing Students in Research. J. Eng. Educ., 102: 444–466. (2013)7. J.R. Reisel, L. Cancado, D. Mitrayani, C.M. Walker
● Virtual and in-person office hours ● Online notes and related content ● Online lecture videos ● Online Q&A between students and instructor ● Peer-learning sessions ● Peer-created content ● E-Books ● Makerspaces ● Training sessions for equipment ● Peer tutors for programming, CAD, etc. ● e-Portfolios for record keeping/CV ● Collaborative online editing toolsCommunityCreating a community within the college where students are comfortable asking questions andsharing opinions is crucial to innovation and peer learning. Students are more driven to succeedwhen they feel they are an integral part of the school [19], [20]. A collaborative community helpsstudents develop team skills, social skills, and
Estadístico sobre la educación de Puerto Rico 2016-2017 (Databook): Tabla 9. Tasas de graduación (IPEDS Graduation Rate) en las instituciones de educación superior en Puerto Rico (año académico 2016-17)” [Online] Available: CEPR webpage, http://www2.pr.gov/agencias/cepr/inicio/estadisticas_e_investigacion/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed Mar. 21, 2018][17] Q. Jin, S. Purzer, and P.K. Imbrie, “Measuring first year engineering students' knowledge and interest in materials science and engineering”, In Proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012[18] P.O. Garriott, L.Y. Flores, and M.P. Martens, “Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first
, “Technical Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools: A Survey of Top- Ranked U.S. and Canadian Programs,” J. Bus. Tech. Commun., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 452–490, 2004.[5] J. Y. Yoritomo et al., “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large research university through the lens of writing studies,” Proc. 2018 ASEE Conf. Expo., pp. 1–22, 2018.[6] J. R. Gallagher et al., “A collaborative longitudinal design for supporting writing pedagogies of STEM faculty,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 411–426, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10572252.2020.1713405.[7] J. Monroe, Ed., Local knowledges, local practices: Writing in the disciplines at Cornell. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2006.[8] J. Monroe, “Writing and
faculty across campus. This is where weuncovered the true paradox embroiled in connecting with our community. For example, we set upa meeting with a senior-level C/P faculty-member with first-hand knowledge of the promotionprocess for C/P faculty at the university level. On the whole, our conversation was valuable inaffirming that we were at least asking the right questions. However, when we expressed our lackof clarity around the process for promotion, the first response was to send us back to ourdepartments for examples and written expectations. Our departments did not have examples andthe written expectations were vague so we continued the conversation as follows. Q: “Can you tell us something about what a successful promotion package
. Reviewers were offered a comment box area where theycould elaborate on why they decided on specific scores for each question.Table 1. Working version of Communication Task Rubric distributed to reviewers Q. # General Specific details for question Description 1. Overall design • “Big picture” of robot design project is shown. project and goals • Problems to be solved are provided. identified. 2. Purpose / task of • Robot’s specific goals / tasks to be accomplished are identified. the robot provided.• Precise tasks to perform are clearly described. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright @2024
. Through the lunch, students became acquainted with their discipline-specific facultymentors. These faculty mentors consist of one representative from each engineering disciplinewho eventually would become the SSP students’ academic advisors and have regular check-inswith their students. The lunches offered a casual, non-threatening environment to help buildconnections between students and their mentors. Faculty mentors utilized the lunches to provideshort Q&A sessions with the group describing their discipline along with academic andprofessional opportunities.Throughout the year, social events were planned to provide students with an opportunity to relaxand connect with each other and the grant team. A winter quarter kick-off party was held
Emotional support; peer mentoring and support for Building professional, professional growth social, and cultural capitals Organization Loose and aperiodical Default structure is informal; formal activities are channeled through assigned representatives Shared - Spontaneous Q&A Frequent discussions on Practices and information WhatsApp group, peer sharing in the chat
," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 585-601, 2021.[3] M. Prensky, "Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1," On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1-6, 2001.[4] D.H. Smith IV, Q. Hao, C. D. Hundhausen, F. Jagodzinski, J. Myers-Dean, and K. Jaeger, "Towards modeling student engagement with interactive computing textbooks: An empirical study," in Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2021, pp. 914-920.[5] A. T. Bates, G. Poole, and T. Bates, Effective teaching with technology in higher education: Foundations for success. Jossey-Bass, 2017.[6] J. L. Jensen, T. A. Kummer, and P. D. d. M. Godoy, "Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of
engineering-related fields. The questions also investigated how students were supported as they developedtheir identify with in the engineering community with an increased motivation to advance.Out of the responses to Q-1 (-ways you felt most supported and any areas for improvement in thepeer-led activities) 63% were positive. Similarly, positive comments made up 65% of responsesfor Q-2 (has the interaction with peers helped support your academic and career goals?) InVivowas used to code the reflective responses by themes.Positive Experiences with Peer Led ActivitiesAttitudes and interest towards engaging with peers was well supported through the first question.To answer the question, indicators around broader statements regarding the PLTL (Peer-Led
Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097[9] Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Shen, M. Q. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041[10] Rizvi, S., Waite, J., & Sentance, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence teaching and learning in K-12 from 2019 to 2022: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100145[11] Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Lee, H. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and
, pp. 573–593, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6.[3] S. E. Dempsey, “Critiquing community engagement,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 359–390, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0893318909352247.[4] T. D. Mitchell, “Traditional vs. Critical Service-Learning: Engaging the Literature to Differentiate Two Models,” Mich. J. Community Serv. Learn., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 50–65, 2008.[5] M. Checker, “‘But I Know It’s True’: Environmental Risk Assessment, Justice, and Anthropology,” Hum. Organ., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 112–124, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.17730/humo.66.2.1582262175731728.[6] R. Holifield, “Environmental Justice as Recognition and Participation in Risk Assessment: Negotiating and Translating Health Risk at a Superfund
to abandon the type of instructions that requires a passive role from them [23].This is discussed further in Figure 4 at the end of this section.Table 2Questions associated with type of instruction. Items with Description Factor Item significant difference Type of instruction Active e, f, m, o, p, q e, f, m, q Type of instruction
8. Computing Projects Solutions 9. Posted Recitation 9. Posted Recitation Solutions 10. Exam Self-Assessment 10. Exam Self-Assessment 10. Exam Self-Assessment 11. Q&C 11. Q&C 11. Q&C 12. UGTAs 12. UGTAs 13. RE and MA Solutions 13.12
original model is not normally distributed, as shown in Figure 3, a WilcoxonSigned Rank Test is performed. The hypothesis of the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test is shown inTable 3. The p-value from the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test of 2.2x10-16 indicates that proposedModel performs better than the original model so the null hypothesis is rejected. Figure 3. Phase Two Q-Q Plot Table 3. Null and alternative hypothesis of the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test Null Hypothesis: Difference between the pairs follows a symmetric distribution around zero Alternative Hypothesis: Difference between the pairs does not follow a symmetric distribution around zeroThe following subsection outlines
, James and Jamjoom, Hani and Shae, Zon-Yin and others, "Enabling high-performance computing as a service," Computer, pp. 72-80, 2012.12. Alshuwaier, Faisal, Abdullah A. Alshwaier, and Ali M. Areshey. "Applications of cloud computing in education." Computing and Networking Technology (ICCNT), 2012 8th International Conference on. IEEE, 2012.13. Mircea, Marinela, and Anca Ioana Andreescu. "Using cloud computing in higher education: A strategy to improve agility in the current financial crisis." Communications of the IBIMA 2011 (2011): 1-15.14. Gong, C., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, H. & Gong, Z. (2010) “The Characteristics of Cloud Computing”, Parallel Processing Workshops (ICPPW), 2010 39th International Conference
ch id pr po lr rc gu al h u nd of ar g ta n ea c q hy
Funding agencies 0 1 8 9 17 35 4.20 Q&A 1 1 3 16 14 35 4.17 Teaching methods 0 1 11 13 10 35 3.91 Unconscious bias 1 5 10 13 6 35 3.51 Contacts with Industry 4 6 10 11 4 35 3.14Networking was most commonly cited as the most valuable aspect of the iREDEFINEexperience. About half (13 out of 27 who responded) said that the most beneficial part wasnetworking with the ECE department heads. This supports the idea of the project committee thatbringing students to the
More Q&A, Communication, or more 16 communication time with sponsorTable 2: Summary of Sponsor Engineering Economy Case Study Feedback Questionnaire Data. Question Frequency Answers Where do you spend most of your 3 Field Engineering Manager time in your current position 5 Distribution Center (circle only one)? What are the main reasons (goals) Branding of Company and talent acquisition/ future 6 for partnering with Penn State IE candidates. Industrial
evaluated by the authors. Session 1 Session 2 Presentation Q&A Presentation Q&A 0.4286 0.9333 0.7241 0.5926 no input 4 8 10 12 -1 8 0 2 0 0 4 2 4 11 1 23 29 23 16 Observation: 1. The value of 0.4286 indicates the results could have been better but was still a worthwhile effort. Recall the value could go negative. Note there 23 out of 39 students indicated the
. Page 26.1552.1210. Oyserman, D.; Destin, M.; Novin, S. Self Identity 2014, 1–16.11. Fugate, M.; Kinicki, A. J.; Ashforth, B. E. J. Vocat. Behav. 2004, 65, 14–38.12. Ibarra, H. Adm. Sci. Q. 1999, 44, 764–791.13. Ibarra, H. Identity transitions: possible selves, liminality and the dynamics of career change; 2005.14. Kerpelman, J. L.; Pittman, J. F. J. Adolesc. 2001, 24, 491–512.15. Godwin, A.; Potvin, G. Int. J. Eng. Educ. (In Press. 2015.16. Pizzolato, J. E. Cultur. Divers. Ethnic Minor. Psychol. 2006, 12, 57–69.17. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects; Katehi, L.; Pearson, G.; Feder, M. A., Eds.; The National Academies Press
Worksheet Worksheet Worksheet Worksheet Learning outcomes Bloom Question Bloom Question Illustrate the planes where shear stresses in beams develop. Explain under what loading transverse shear in beams develops. Comprehension ws5a Q5 Comprehension ws5 Q6 Demonstrate how transverse loads on a beam generate shearing stresses Identify the correct area for calculation of Q. Application ws5a Q6 Application ws5 Q9 Identify the location of the maximum transverse shear. Application ws5a Q7 Application ws5 Q7 Determine transverse shear in a beam
hours (gray), 4-8 hours (diagonals), 8-12 hours (dotted), or more than 12 hours per week (white). Table 6. Summary of Tukey HSD results for weekly effort groups with statistically significant differences. Self-Concept Group 1 Group 2 Q statistic p-value Confidence < 4 hours 12+ hours 3.833 0.035 Motivation < 4 hours 4-8 hours 5.479 0.001 Motivation < 4 hours 8-12 hours 6.072 0.001 Motivation < 4 hours 12+ hours 5.892 0.001