information literacy Personal Maintains a positive self-image and possesses positive self-confidenceOf note, the collective stakeholders from the focus groups felt that the following needed to beemphasized or added to the list for engineers to be successful in the global context3: • Cultural sensitivity / tolerance to other people and perspectives • Open-mindedness and ability to adapt • Ability to behave ethically across cultures / social responsibility • Research, analytical thinking, problem-solving, and improvement capabilities • Innovation and entrepreneurshipGiven Cross-Cultural attributes missing from the top eight list, and the observations of the focusgroups, the missing Cross-Cultural attributes, of importance to this
relate to participation in various co-curricular (e.g., clubs andorganizations) and curricular (e.g., internships) programs and activities.Additionally, the NSSE questionnaire includes a set of items that elicitinformation about students’ perceived learning gains, making it suitable forthe present study. For instance, one item asked: “To what extent has yourexperience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, andpersonal development in analyzing quantitative problems?” Responseoptions ranged from 1 (very little) to 4 (very much); other items asked aboutcommunication skills, working on a team, and ethics, to name a few. To date,more than 600 colleges and universities have participated in the nationalsurvey.A web-based approach
member of ASCE, a member of DBIA, Green Globes, and National Institute of Building Science. He is also a board member of USGBC Central California Chapter, and a Senior Fellow of the Environmental Leadership Program (ELP).Dr. Zhanna Bagdasarov, California State University - Fresno ”Dr. Zhanna Bagdasarov is an Assistant Professor of Management at California State University, Fresno. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the University of Oklahoma. Her research interests focus on ethical decision making in organizational contexts, trust repair between leaders and subordinates, and the influence of emotions in the workplace. She has published her work in such outlets as Journal of Business
, 2016 From Problem Solvers to Problem Seekers: The Necessary Role of Tension in Engineering EducationIn this paper it is proposed that the current focus on problems in engineering education andtechnological literacy may be more constructively reframed by focusing on tensions. PriyanDias claims engineering has an identity crisis that arises from tensions inherent in: 1) theinfluence of the profession on society, 2) the role engineers play, and 3) what constitutes validknowledge in engineering. These are ethical, ontological, and epistemological tensionsrespectively, which Dias frames as a tension between identities of homo sapiens and homo faber.Beyond the tensions in engineering there are additional tensions that arise
a humanities course, and the archivist fromNYU Libraries. This activity shows how liberal education can have a natural fit within theengineering curriculum. In particular, we wish to demonstrate how even a small-scale project,using available resources, will help to accomplish ABET Criterion 3: Student Outcomes.ABET’s Student Outcomes encourage engineering education to follow an active learning model,to discuss the social context and ethics of engineering solutions, and to develop skills of analysis,teamwork, and communication. Our archival interventions, though admittedly limited in scope,embody the principles ABET’s Student Outcomes. By working in groups with primary sourcematerials related to science and engineering, we encouraged
experience: Assistant Professor, Universidad Icesi, Graduate lectures includes: Life Cycle Analysis, Process Management, Methods Engineering (manufacturing and service industry) & Process Improvement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing Student Outcomes in Real-World Learning Experiences: The Case of the Solar Decathlon in Latin AmericaAbstractEngineering students face a future in which professional skills (e.g., working inmultidisciplinary teams, ethics, and communicate effectively) will be equallyimportant as hard skills (e.g., design systems and solve technical problems).However, the development and assessment of these skills by the time ofgraduation is still a challenge for
courses in Sustainability, Humanitiesand Social Sciences, Ethics, as well as soft skills such as writing, communication and teamwork.7,8,9 Strategies for pedagogical reforms included cornerstone and capstone courses, projectand problem-based learning, active participatory learning opportunities, instructionallaboratories, learning a second language, and foreign country internships.10,11,12,13Nevertheless, most engineering education programs continue to emphasize the technical aspects,while the social and environmental aspects remain externalized.14 Barbara Olds15 notes that “theeducation of science and engineering students has for too long been merely “technical”, oftenneglecting human complexity in order to achieve quantifiable correctness
-disciplinary teams, an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility, an ability to communicate effectively,the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context, a knowledge of contemporary issues, and an ability to use the techniques, skills,and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.All of these criterions are outcomes of a service learning course for engineers. The outcomeslisted above cannot all effectively be reached through a single traditional course. Introducing theconcepts and true importance of professionalism, communication, team work and problemsolving in a service oriented program
Technology Janille Smith-Colin, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe Global Engineering Leadership Minor aims to develop global engineer-leaders, that is,engineers who can contribute and lead effectively in domestic and international contexts insolving global grand challenges and other societal problems, working effectively across cultures.The Minor is based on the Global Engineering Leadership Development (GELD) conceptualframework, adapted from the Skills Model of Leadership. The Minor curriculum includeslearning and application of leadership theory, enhancement of engineering problem solvingskills, development of interpersonal skills (communication, collaboration, ethics, andmanagement), application of systems-level
is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 First-Year Students’ Conceptions of Sustainability as Revealed Through Concept MapsAbstractThe term sustainability is over-used and often misused in society. Further, sustainability andsustainable engineering are complex topics. This research explored how first year engineeringstudents define these complex ideas, and the impacts of two different instructional methods ontheir ideas. Sustainability knowledge was evaluated using concept
demands of highly technical curriculum, the syllabi, projects andlearning activities often include little if any information about the concept of academic integrity.It is ironic to note that cheating is related directly to concepts found within the National Societyof Professional Engineers Code of Ethics, where it states: Section III. Professional Obligations.Item 9. a. “Engineers shall, whenever possible, name the person or persons who may beindividually responsible for designs, inventions, writings, or other accomplishments”[19](emphasis added).In addition, many industries who hire engineers also place a high value of intellectual property,such as reported in Duke University’s Engineering Management Blog, which states that “Thevalue of a frim
and business. Each team had to research policiesor regulations that relate to their topic, determine the stakeholders for the problem, and develop astudy to investigate the issue. Given the limited time of one semester to develop and completetheir study, all groups conducted survey-based research or observational studies. Each grouplearned about ethics in research and was required to complete human subjects based researchtraining and to submit their study to the university institutional review board.A total of six research projects were completed with each requiring a problem statement and/orresearch questions, literature review, development of data collection procedures, experimentaldesign, data analytics, oral presentations, and a final
-emphasizing social and economicpillars. Furthermore, most instruction on sustainability, as reported in the literature, appears tofocus on teaching the engineering student to be an engineer who practices sustainabledevelopment rather than a consumer who has a role in sustainable practice. In part, thisemphasis on the engineer's role in sustainability is a result of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET)'s mandate that engineering undergraduates complete theirdegrees having achieved student outcome (c): “...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
Paper ID #16261A Civil Infrastructure System Perspective - Not Just the Built EnvironmentDr. Douglas Schmucker P.E., University of Utah Dr. Schmucker has 20 years experience in teaching and consulting. Focused on high quality teaching following the T4E, ExCEEd, and NETI teaching models, he currently is a full-time teaching professional with a focus on practice, project, and problem-based teaching methodologies.Dr. Joshua Lenart, University of Utah Dr. Joshua Lenart is an Associate Instructor with the Communication, Leadership, Ethics, and Research (CLEAR) Program at the University of Utah where he teaches technical
categories with well-defined learninglevels selected for the classification of specific PIs. The Learning Domains Wheel wasimplemented with Venn diagrams to represent details of the relationship of popular learningdomains categories, interpersonal skills, and the types of knowledge. INTERPERSONAL IT skills Teamwork Affective Professional ethics Leadership Drawing Life-long learning
confidence, motivation, expectancy, andanxiety). A confidence interval was derived by bootstrapping the data since normality wasrejected. The PI (Project Impact) items in the survey shown in Table 2, were also averaged andbootstrapped.Table 2. Survey administered to a) senior students upon completion of the capstone project,and b) recent graduates Item Statement/Question Rate how the project affected your ability to (1-No Impact; 3-Moderate Impact 5-High Impact): PIa Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering PIc Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
demonstrations.The survey results from each question are examined based on both self-declared genderand ethic background of students. The Roomba Robot was demonstrated in the C++section of the laboratory class.Programming Demonstration 2: Speed Gait: The speed gait demonstration providesstudents with hands-on-experience developing a real-world programming application.Students brainstorm and develop an inexpensive system to measure the average walkingor running speed of patients for a biomechanics lab. The strength of this demo is in itssimplicity; students develop a useful tool from common engineering materials, achievingthe following learning objectives: • Expose students to real-world programming applications not seen in lecture • Inspire students
themselves in their roles as engineers, theirdefinitions of an engineer started to change. As they discussed their journey throughundergraduate school and their career their description of what it meant to be an engineer nolonger reflected the stereotypes that they described initially. They started to personalize theirdefinitions to now embody personal traits, and they started to describe engineering as part oftheir individual and collective identities. Andy described engineers as individuals with a “strongwork ethic… and high integrity,” “being comfortable around technical information,” and“definitely takes a different kind of thinker to be an engineer.” She also described it as “fun,”likening engineering to being “[…] a private detective.” Others
and process development and 15 years of teaching experience at the secondary and post-secondary levels.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter P.E., Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education papers, and provides faculty development workshops on effective teaching. In 2006, the Kern Family Foundation named Dr. Carpenter a
, and MATLAB) and be able to explain your rationale for your choice; 5. Synthesize your knowledge of effective and ethical membership on a technical team (i.e., teaming skills) to refine your conduct as a member of the team. 6. Exhibit a work ethic appropriate for the engineering profession. Figure 2. Schematic of outcomes from the course organization for the first-year engineering experience at Texas A&M UniversityC. Identification of Enculturation Factors in the Context of Engineering EducationPracticeGiven the aforementioned definition of culture, we define engineering culture as the setof knowledge, beliefs and practices, unique to the engineering profession that manifest inits community of practice
Complete a research boot campFocus on foundations of engineering process and the (training on research skills,introduction scientific method, scientific writing and scientific writing, presentation,to cancer presentation, and literature research skills. All ethics, team-building andresearch, lectures are heavily weighted toward laboratory safety)—first offeringresearch discussion and student participation. Students was in conjunction with existinginitiation produce two videos (5 min each) in a team for REU boot camp a broader audience. Students identify a faculty
3Government 3Government 3Communications 3Creative Arts 3Social and Behavioral Science 3Engineering Ethics 3Total University Core 27Engineering Calculus I 4Engineering Calculus II 4Math Elective 3Engineering Chemistry 4Mechanics 4Electricity and Optics 4Total Math and Science
student veterans and traditional studentsand balancing academic and family lives. Most of the student veterans interviewed in the focusgroups reported positive academic experiences with sufficient to ample support from faculty andstudent services. Some noted that the discipline, work ethic, teaming skills, and the mindset thatthey gained from the military facilitated their progress through the engineering curriculum. Someindicated being more vocal than other traditional students in asking questions and in seeking helpfrom faculty in regard to learning course materials, while others relied on study groups. Findingswill provide context and information for various applications, such as: identifying ways in whichthe military can help separating
learningenvironment for female and underrepresented students in Engineering.Burnham highlights that compared to other professions, Engineers seems to have immensepower and responsibility and should therefore be afforded the opportunities to channel this desirefor positive change around the world.29 Engineering Education should therefore prepare studentsto make lasting positive impact in the lives of people globally.Munoz also defines Humanitarian Engineers as Engineers who “try to balance technicalexcellence, economic feasibility, ethical maturity, and cultural sensitivity” through a set ofspecially designed technical, humanities, and social science classes, as well as a DesignExperience.30 This could arguably be said to really be the definition of an
not permit statistical comparisons, however from this dataset public schools average nearly 0.70 more PEO’s compared to private schools. This demonstrates the use of population statistics. Table 5: Example count data, Criterion 2 Average % topic mentioned in program educational objectives AdvDgr Team Int’l Comm Rank Ethics LLL All (n=37) 32.4 51.4 16.2 67.6 24.3 54.1 67.6 Public (n=29) 34.5 51.7 20.7 69.0 27.6 51.7 69.0 Private (n=8) 25.0 50.0 0.0 62.5 12.5 62.5 62.5 Large (n=13
dataStudents designed and built an apparatus that met the specifications given to them, tested theapparatus, collected data, and analyzed the data. They were able to meet the safety, budget, time,and space constraints in each of these designs.(c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health andsafety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityStudents were able to meet the safety, budget, time, and space constraints, in each project. Theyexamined codes and checked EPA regulations. They manufactured several parts and madeseveral modifications to some purchased parts. Students contacted different companies for partsand discussed
therefore might provide the most useful data for addressingthe research question.Table 2. Prompts given on different days of the trip Trip day Prompt 1 What are your expectations for the trip? 6 What differences have you seen with respect to business, culture, and technology between Italy and Switzerland? 8 What role do you think ethics should play in your role as an engineer? 11 What differences have you seen with respect to engineering business, culture, and technology between the companies you’ve seen and the United States? 14 What are your immediate takeaways from this international experience?The qualitative data were analyzed using the software NVivo. Four
of individual assessments (points in time) are stated, includingbreadth and depth limitations, coverage limitations, and circumstantial limitations.Since Nyquist-Shannon’s sampling theorem uses ideal sampling to address the question ofsampling frequency, and because ideal sampling is based on the so-called unit impulse function,the widely accepted one-or-two-hour exam is suggested as a practical approximation of the unitimpulse function. Under this assumption, it is argued that an adequately weighted homeworkassignment could also be considered as a practical approximation of the unit impulse function,provided a high ethical standard is adhered to. This brings up the issues of ethics and plagiarismin modern engineering schools, and the need
, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the
was new and cutting edge (nano-carbons parts made on a 3D printer that may later be used for electronics). It is nice to learn while being on the forefront of this research. In the lab we were given free range to create these dyes using the given knowledge. We were then encouraged to try new procedures that could result in new dyes. This was satisfying because it gave me a sense of autonomy but was scaffold in a way that made us want to keep trying new ideas.No recommendations were made for program modification in regards to this objective.Objective E: Understand the social relevance and ethical implications of engineering activitiesrelated to manufacturing (human rights, environmental impact, etc