an ever lighter human footprint onthe earth."Writing in The New York Times, Jay Parini endowed Orr, chair of theEnvironmental Studies Program, with the apt appellation "environmental guru."Orr led more than 250 students, faculty, and town residents in discussions withnational ecological designers during the building's initial design phase three yearsago. He also raised most of the funds for the project.For Oberlin, that knowledge has resulted in a 14,000-square-foot, $6.6 million,self-sustaining structure of classrooms, laboratories, and surrounding gardens.More than a building where teaching takes place, the Lewis Center is a place thatteaches. By virtue of the building's design concepts, students learn ecologicalcompetence and mindfulness
23 x x x 24 x 25 Page 7.338.8Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Table 4. Approaches to success skills training used in programs HowRef. Computer Team Test- Diversity to Time Conflict # Seminar skills skills Writing Speaking Studying taking training learn management resolution 1
, ajoint engineering and architecture course was organized with half undergraduateengineers and half architects to complete the detailed design drawings of the Page 7.1102.4house. Currently, in Spring 2002, the construction phase of the project hasbegun with the cooperation of architects, engineers, and c onstructionprofessionalsThe Undergraduate ThesisIn engineering, the senior thesis provides a mechanism for the requiredinterdisciplinary collaboration. Engineering students at the University of Virginiaare required to write an undergraduate thesi s; this thesis is directed by theDivision of Technology, Culture and Communication through two core courses:TCC
problem. · Provide an opportunity to apply basic knowledge in addition to what is learned in the course to solve an engineering problem. · Learn to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data. · Provide an opportunity to function on multi-disciplinary teams, which requires communication with team members and to learn professional and ethical responsibility.In order to select a design project for a course, the course objectives must be clearly defined.Advanced mechanics of materials students will be able to: · develop models of mechanical components by making reasonable assumptions and writing appropriate equations, · apply appropriate failure criteria, · formulate a design methodology.For
, American Society for Engineering Education”members. No formal peer evaluation process was implemented. Instead, team problems wereidentified by informal conversations with the teams throughout the semester. It is our opinionthat resolving conflicts is an inherent part of realistic teaming. It may in fact be the mostimportant aspect in maintaining an effective work environment. Therefore, teams wereencouraged to manage themselves courteously and professionally. Irresolvable conflicts werehandled expeditiously in the instructor’s office face-to-face. No attempt was made to determinewhat percentage of the work each team member might have performed as we consider equitableload sharing to be an essential part of team self-management. Therefore, every
motivation, Maslow 1 clarified the relationship between motivation and unmetneeds. His Hierarchy of Needs defines the human needs from bottom up as follows:physiological needs such as food, water and shelter; safety needs such as security, freedom fromfear and order; belongingness and love needs; esteem needs such as self-respect, achievementand reputation; and self-actualization needs. These needs must be satisfied from bottom up. It isassumed in this study that all of the lower level needs of our engineering students are sufficientlysatisfied. They have food, shelter, are safe and feel they belong with their peers. Brandon 2divides self-esteem into two interrelated components: self-efficacy (the sense of self-competence) and self-respect (the
focusing onteamwork issues, teaching style, students’ belief in their own abilities and desire to continue theireducation, peer interactions, and laboratory projects. While student perceptions are only one partof a comprehensive assessment program, they are certainly important. By addressing studentperceptions of core outcomes and fundamental pedagogical issues, TUBA should be relevant to arange of BMEN programs which offer a wide variety of specialized “tracks,” different areas ofprogrammatic emphasis, etc. Given that there exists a need for a measure such as the TUBA, thefollowing sections will describe the development and subsequent validation and reliabilitytesting that has been thus far performed.Development of the TUBAIn keeping with the
Educationthis way, since its inception, the GLC has drawn its faculty from the university’s colleges of arts and sci-ences, business, communication and engineering. A permanent director, who is also a faculty-teammember, leads the GLC.While international themes comprise the foundation for the intellectual content of the GLC’s entire pro-gram of study, academic and vocational processes are also important. These include developing stu-dent proficiencies such as: the ability to work in multidisciplinary teams (interpersonal skills), the abilityto identify and conduct appropriate research as well as the ability to communicate effectively throughboth writing and public speaking. Through real-world projects of contemporary interest having interna-tional
valuable introductions to problem formulation and the use of tools forresearch and discovery. Students find these "designed-for-success" experiences highlysatisfying, and these successes whet their appetites for more independent problem-solvingsituations.Assessment of Problem-Based LearningAssessment of PBL experiences is multimodal and ongoing. Methods include laboratoryjournals, technical briefings, design reviews, technical reports, collaborative teamworkassessment, design portfolios, peer assessment, and self-assessment.10 Faculty serveprimarily as advisors and coaches, providing extensive feedback to students throughoutthe learning experiences.In Introduction to Aerospace and Design, where students design, build, and fly radio-controlled LTA
process. Overmany years, seniors and alumni reported that what they learned in this courseproved valuable for their capstone design.2)They report more depth of knowledge in the area chosen for design.3)Their experience with doing work in teams was enhanced.4)Technical writing skills and oral presentation skills were promoted, supported,and developed.5)Skills and comfort in the use software for preparing technical reports and oralpresentations were strengthened.6)Peer teaching was encouraged and it did take place within teams demonstrably.7)Students with special interests and abilities in design discovered this aspect of Page 7.709.8"Proceedings of the 2002
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2002-1817attempt to integrate content knowledge “silos” of mechanics, design, materials, etc.,along with cross disciplinary skills in conceptualization, knowledge capture, writing andpresentation. The industry is increasingly demanding students with learned know-how –students that possess the ability to understand multiple content areas as well asdemonstrate experience with applied problem solving.The demand for engineers with business knowledge, driven in part by the growth ofmanagement consulting firms, has led to numerous
of the problem, but the group combining reports and each student having to write an abstract, introduction and conclusions.4) Important for faculty to ensure that all students contribute and learn all skills. § Rotate the chair and minute-taker roles that students adopt in weekly team meetings. § Ensure a balance of students in each team; i.e. natural leaders, team workers, etc.NATIONAL SUPPORT FOR MATERIALS FACULTYSupport for teaching and learning among Materials faculty in the UK is been providedthrough the following ongoing activities of the UK Centre for Materials Education: § Materials Education Network: a forum for materials faculty to discuss relevant issues in teaching and learning and to exchange
to manage engineering and business systems and organizations, how to dealwith people, organizations, and management related policies as well as problems, and how toadapt to the changing environment. The other purpose is to provide students networkingopportunities by exchanging their thoughts with seminar speakers. One important aspect of thiscourse is to let students see engineering management issues from different perspectives throughthese seminars.This class requires students to write two-page reports for four of the seminars they attended.Each report contains a discussion of the key concept presented in the seminar, their thoughts andresearch of this key concept, and the potential use of this concept in their work. The followingtwo
for the fellows, thus allowing theirfirst lessons to be mostly individual efforts focusing in areas of their own expertise. With thecomfort now gained from this first term, the fellows feel more confident in both theirrelationships with the teachers and students and access to the school's resources. They now findit easier to create, plan, and execute lessons given general competency goals and/or specificdirectives from the teachers. Weekly meetings of the fellows provide peer support and a forum todevelop and maintain school-wide activities such as the Science Box. The Science Box resides inthe school’s media center and provides all students and teachers an opportunity to write down ascience/math-related question and have it answered by the
willparticipate in a three weeks intensive session that will focus on Math, Science, English andforeign language skills. At the end of the session, students will have received approximatelyseventy hours of academic instruction. During their second summer, the rising juniors willparticipate in a seven weeks residential summer program at Purdue University’s West Lafayettecampus. The students will take courses in foreign language, mathematics concepts andapplications, advanced topic in mathematics, writing, introduction to biological sciences, andintroduction to technology and magazine production. The students have a full-day schedule withfour 75-minutes classes, and scheduled mandatory study sessions between 6:30 and 8:30 PM.During this summer period, the
writing material they had at their disposal. At the time, itmade sense to lecture, as a basic requirement for learning is having access to the knowledge andit was the only way to do so. Since those days, not only has printing technology evolved, but newmedia have emerged; understanding of cognitive processes has progressed, learning theorieshave been developed and tested, new methods and tools have been created. Yet, practices used inmost of our engineering faculties and schools do not reflect this wealth of knowledge.One of these practices concerns the way we go about creating a new course or even a newcurriculum. This paper presents the concept of instructional engineering (IE), in emergence forthe last 40 years in the field of education. The
the likelihood that learning objectives aremet. Toward that end, applicable classroom approaches and course characteristics wereidentified. (The authors currently use some of the following approaches and characteristics):§ Problem based learning: the classroom process that uses “real world” problems to motivate students to identify and apply concepts, principles and information 4,6§ Experiential learning: learners act and think, not just think, to integrate concrete experience, reflection, generalization (abstract conceptualizations), and experimentations 7.§ Cooperative team-based learning activities with team and individual deliverables 4,8§ Self-directed constructive learning with peer teaching and faculty coaching in the delivery of
work was provided by NSF CAREER Award 0093994 (P.I. Turner), UCSBScience Partnership for School Innovation (Phase 3) Beyond the Classroom, Supplemental Grantfor 3 years to Materials Research Lab, from NSF Education to Human Resources Directorate(EHR), and UCSB Research Experience for Teachers, NSF Math and Physical SciencesDivision, Supplemental grant to MRL.Bibliography[1] K. Turner, MESA demonstration for 9th grade girls, 2000, observations.[2] L. D. Edwards, Coddington, A., Caterina, D., “Girls teach themselves, and boys, too: Peer learning in a computer-based design and construction activity,” Computers in Education, 29 (1), (1997) pp. 33-48.[3] P. J. Cornwell, Stienstra, D., Smith, S., “Fast Forward—An adventure in Engineering for
, industry communications and instructor experiences, we developeda revised breakdown of class time per topic. The breakdown is presented in Table 2. In theIntroduction to Computers section, students learn the terminology of computer hardware,software, how to evaluate different systems and be capable of deciding which system is the mostappropriate for the specific needs.Students are very familiar with word processors. One class is dedicated to the use of styles,inserting images, tables and indexes. Another class is for writing the students' own resume usingMS word.Spreadsheets will be covered in nine classes instead of five classes for the students' interest andindustry needs. The important topics for this section are data input, cells and ranges
applies materialfrom prior course work, along with concepts of project management, design optimization, andother material related to a group-engineering project. In the first term, teams of two to sixstudents conduct a literature search concerning their chosen project and write a proposal thatdetails their approach and outlines how funding will be secured. This proposal acts as a contractbetween the facilitating faculty and student team members. Page 7.1117.1 "Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf erence & Exposition Copyright ã 2001, American Society for Engineering
principles of business management andentrepreneurship. The abilities they would like to see their graduates master are: Rigorous background in engineering science; Broad base in liberal arts, writing and communication; Superior computational skills; Experience in small team project design and project based problem solving; Exposure to cutting edge research activity in corporate and university settings; Firsthand knowledge of business and entrepreneurial practices; Philanthropic spirit; Confidence.In Canada, McMaster University has implemented the Problem-based learning (PBL) approachconceived by Woods (1993, 1996) [10]. PBL is a generic term. According to Woods, «PBL
using their experiences to improve the course.The HTOL students were divided into two small groups and asked to write answers to thefollowing questions: § What helped you learn in this course? Please explain or provide specific examples. § What changes would make the course more helpful? Please suggest specific ways to alter the course.The two groups worked together for about 5 minutes on each question. Then the classparticipated in a whole class discussion; the out-of-town student answered the questionsindividually, then contributed to the whole-class discussion. As the students reported theiranswers, Linse created a master list of strengths and suggestions for change. After the interview,the comments were divided into themes based on both
opportunity for the engineeringtechnology community, at both the two- and four-year level, to work collectively to develop, incooperation with EBI, a national survey that can be used for benchmarking associate andbaccalaureate degree programs that are viewed as peers nationwide. The EBI has been in thebusiness of doing educational surveys for many years, primarily for the leading business schoolsin the country. Because they use a common survey tool for a large number of schools, a servicethey are able to offer client schools, in addition to the results of the type discussed here, is acomparison with up to five other schools offering similar programs. All results are displayed inconfidential mode so that no single schools identity is revealed. A
everything in human society has a pedagogical intention and theneed to share what we know with those who do not know it is part of our nature. So, teachingand learning are what we do the most, perhaps not always efficiently. However, there is nowa different student and a different economic scenario; it is not important who or what comesfirst. As a consequence, a new teacher capable of adjusting the learning process accordinglyis becoming more and more necessary. It has been stressed in literature that nowadaysstudents need to know more about collaborative work, self learning, must have good readingand writing skills, computer literacy and so on. Therefore, teachers have to grasp a deeperunderstanding on such pedagogic topics and also on how people
Data. of Information Explore new applications in other fields, find new ways of doing Intuitive things, search in different contexts. Theories and abstractions. Visual Graphs, drawings, models, pictures and demonstrations. Effective perception of information Verbal They learn by listening, speaking, discussing, reading and writing. Inductive Show consequences and applications so the students can have Preferred intuitions about the general principle. They need motivation. organization of the
leadership and team unity, build their reputation on the skills they have, and not compete unfairly with others. Page 7.690.5 6. An engineering technology student shall get to know their peers, assist them in their “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” professional development, and to support them in following this code of ethics. 7. An engineering technology student shall respect others’ ideas and fairly treat all people regardless of race, religion, gender
exchange and at distance. In another effort1 4 a renovation of the entire senioryear was performed to incorporate project management, merging three design courses into oneteam-taught yearlong course. The new course makes use of computer-aided scheduling and otherproject management techniques. Students expressed concerns about the difficulty of workingrelatively independently on an open-ended design, and on the more performance-based evaluationwhich the course involved. To help with evaluation, a computer tool was developed by anothergroup of researchers1 5 to track project management and team performance information, includingindividual and team time spent, action items and milestones completed, peer evaluation of teammembers and private comments
might be: 1) alter the data as your bossrequests, 2) alter the data, but write a memo to keep in your file that expresses your disagreementwith this request, 3) refuse your boss’s request, 4) refuse your boss’s request and go to yourboss’s superior to report his unethical behavior. The simple form of a decision matrix (withoutweights) that might aid in analysis of this case is shown in Table 2. In ranking each alternativewith respect to cultural appropriateness one might consider the corporate culture of theemploying company. The scores in the table might reflect that in this company data are notalways taken that seriously and loyalty to an immediate superior is highly valued. Transparencymight include the idea of honesty and the issue of
to a given procedure should carry a Reference number which links that document to the procedure.8. Action PlansTo establish whether ISO 9000 or the 4Rs model requirements can be applied in a given HEI,it is crucial to write down their presence or absence in relation to the requirements set eitherby the ISO system or 4Rs model, in an actual institution. The following are examples ofenquiries prior to developing an action plan for a given HEI.8.1 Enquiry 1– Applying the 4Rs Model Requirements to an Existing University• Ascertaining client, customer and community needs (strategy exists).• Ascertaining external bodies requirements (YÖK only)• Curriculum negotiations
them of an additional benefit namely implicit in the exercise the development of an effectiveclassroom environment conducive to the students learning the course material.At this point the professor simply writes on the board "Who Is This Professor?" In clarifyingthis statement the professor tells the students that in order to obtain the answer to this questionthey must ask him some questions. The professor notes the questions can be either personal orprofessional in nature. The questions should also help satisfy the curiosity many of the studentshave regarding them. The student groups are given about five minutes to think of severalquestions they would like to pose to the professor. Once the time is up the professor asks onegroup to state