Team- building: Effects on Team Performance,” AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 205–231, 2018, doi: 10.17705/1thci.00110.[5] K. M. Kniffin, J. Yan, B. Wansink, and W. D. Schulze, “The sound of cooperation,” Source: Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 372–390, 2017, doi: 10.2307/26610625.[6] C. Klein et al., “Does team building work?,” Small Group Res, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 181– 222, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1046496408328821.[7] L. Larson, H. Wojcik, I. Gokhman, L. DeChurch, S. Bell, and N. Contractor, “Team performance in space crews: Houston, we have a teamwork problem,” Acta Astronaut, vol. 161, pp. 108–114, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.052.[8
recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] I. Direito et al., “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Education: an Exploration of European Higher Education Institutions’ Strategic Frameworks, Resources, and Initiatives,” in SEFI 49th Annual Conference Proceedings 2021, SEFI - European Society for Engineering Education; Brussels, Dec. 2021, pp. 189–193. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/3635850[2] K. Fu et al., “Broadening participation: A report on a series of workshops aimed at building community and increasing the number of women and minorities in engineering design,” in
Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, EDUCAUSE, Association for Advancement of Computing in Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Society for Design and Process Science, American Society for Engineering Education, Human Computer Interaction International Conference, and International Academy, Research, and Industry Association) in USA, Canada, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and Romania. Her work was also presented by co-authors at conferences in Brazil, Taiwan and S. Korea. Among Dr. Marghitu’s honors and awards are the following: 2011 AccessComputing Capacity Building Award, the 2012 Auburn University
Khonsari, M.M., 2007, ”Granular Collision Lubrication: Experimental Investigation and Comparison with Theory,” ASME Journal of Tribology – V. 129, pp. 923-932 Synergistic Activities: Engineering Program Manager, Baton Rouge Community College, August 2011 – Present: LA-SiGMA EPSCoR - collaborate with LSU engineering and mathematics faculty to develop modules to train community college students to use sophisticated materials research instrumentation, assist with the Beowulf Boot Camp for high school students and teachers and facilitate the participation of BRCC students in the research experiences for undergraduates (REU) programs focused on computational and experimental materials science NSF S-STEM Scholarships
. & Yuen, S. C., Video streaming in online learning. AACE Journal 14, 31–43, 2006.18. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K., Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education 1–96, 2010. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf19. Falconer, J.L., DeGrazia, J., Medlin, J. W. & Holmberg, M., Using screencasts in ChE courses. Chemical Engineering Education 43, 302–305 (2009).20. Falconer, J.L., Nicodemus, G., DeGrazia, J. & Medlin, J. W., Chemical engineering screencasts. Chemical Engineering Education 46, 58–62 (2012
Transmission from HighAltitude Balloon: An Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project," Proceedings of 2010 AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY June 2010.[17] J. Mitola, Cognitive Radio - An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio.Ph.D. Dissertation. Teleinformatics, Royal Institute of Technology - Sweden, 2000.[18] S. Haykin, “Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications," IEEE J. Sel.Areas Commun., vol. 23, pp. 1-20, 2005.[19] A. Wyglinski, M. Nekovee and Y. Hou, Cognitive Radio Communications and Networks: Page 24.1090.8Principles and Practice, Academic Press, 2010[20] X. Li, V. Chakarvarthy and Z. Wu
in pertinent area(s), and confidence/independence in conducting research Challenges student faced during the program Quality of student’s final paper, presentation, and poster Continuation of research efforts after the completion of the program Contribution to a scientific publication Overall satisfaction with the program Suggestions for improvementProject staff evaluations include: Progress and challenges student faced during the program Overall satisfaction with the program Suggestions for improvementConclusionParticipation in the TTE REU program provides community college students an intellectualexperience, a sense of community with other like-minded community college students
additional data collection and analysis throughout the spring and summer. Assessmentpractices are under way to investigate the long range sustainability of the program.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. EEC 2318489. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.DeclarationsThis project is being conducted in accordance with research reviewed by Institutional ReviewBoards for Human Subjects Research.References 1. Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating
/FIE49875.2021.9637172.[7] A. Benham, R. Fotherby, A. W. Johnson, and C. L. Bowen, “Student Perspectives of Aerospace Engineering Macroethics Issues and Education,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden: IEEE, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962654.[8] E. A. Strehl, M. Ennis, A. W. Johnson, and C. L. Bowen, “Work in Progress: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Macroethical Issues in Aerospace Engineering,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023.[9] E. A. Strehl, S. Olson, C. L. Bowen, and A. W. Johnson, “Work in Progress: Navigating Undergraduates’ Perspectives on Macroethical Dilemmas in Aerospace Engineering,” presented at the 2024 ASEE
academic achievement and social transformation,” Science Education, 101(6), 1034–1060, 2017.[6] L. S. Vygotsky, The collected works of L.S. Vygostky, Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions (R.W. Rieber, Vol Ed; Hall, Trans) New York: Plenum Press, 1997. (Original work published 1941).[7] M. Fullan, The new meaning of educational change, New York: Teachers College Press, 2016.[8] M. Windschitl, J. Thompson, & M. Braaten, M. Ambitious science teaching. Harvard Education Press, 2018.[9] B. Glaser & A. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.[10] C. Giroux, “How do youth engage in engineering literacies?: A
Guidelines 2023 (CS2023). ACM Inroads, 13(4):22–25, Nov 2022. ISSN 2153-2184. doi: 10.1145/3571092.[16] Amruth N. Kumar and Rajendra K. Raj. Computer Science Curricula 2023 (CS2023): Community Engage- ment by the ACM/IEEE-CS/AAAI Joint Task Force. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2, SIGCSE 2023, page 1212–1213, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450394338.[17] Rajendra K. Raj, John Impagliazzo, Sherif G. Aly, David S. Bowers, Harold Connamacher, Stan Kurkovsky, Bonnie MacKellar, Tom Prickett, and Ma´ıra Marques Samary. Toward Competency-Based Professional Ac- creditation in Computing. In Proceedings of the 2022 Working Group Reports on
on critical thinking, cognitive load c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16514 theory, and high-order learning within e-learning for science education. Dr. Simon received her B.A. in Biology from the University of Delaware, her M.S. in Science Education from Hofstra University, and her Ph.D. in Educational Technology Management from Northcentral University.Prof. Yeong Ryu, State University of New York, Farmingdale YEONG S. RYU graduated from Columbia University with a Ph.D. and Master of Philosophy in Mechan- ical Engineering in 1994. He has served as an associate professor
includes four categories of how anindividual processes and evaluates information29. The first category describes how a personinteracts with his or her environment. People who take initiative and gain energy frominteractions are known as Extroverts (E). Introverts (I), on the other hand prefer more of arelatively passive role and gain energy internally. The second category describes how a personprocesses information. A person who process data with their senses is referred to as a Sensors(S) and a person who sees where data is going in the future is called an iNtuitor (N). The Sensorversus iNtuitor category is an interesting area of study when it comes to engineering education,because professors are historically intuitors while most engineering
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foun-dation.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, NationalAcademies Press, 2004.2. National Science Board, Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education, National Science Foundation Re-port NSB-07-122, 2007.3. Bill Seil, “Design anywhere, build anywhere, work anywhere”, Boeing Frontiers, June 2005. Online at: (Re-trieved March 30th 2014: http://www.boeing.com/news/frontiers/archive/2005/june/ts_sf08.html)4. Bart H. M. Gerritsen, “How to Adapt Information Technology Innovations to Industrial Design and Manufactur
experience in developingteacher readiness to implement the BT curriculum. Page 23.969.11 Figure 1. Item 3— Do you feel that the instructional approach used in the Summer Institute has been effective in providing the preparation you need to implement the Biosystems Technology Curriculum in your course(s)? (Cohort 1 n=8, Cohort 2 n=7, Cohort 3 n=8)These quantitative results are consistent with other sources of data relating to the Institute’seffects in all three years. Most Cohort 1 members expressed in qualitative statements concernabout the difficulty of integrating BT material into their courses and also about the challenge ofthis academic material for their Ag Ed students. No members of the
little(if any) prior knowledge of the subject matter unless they have taken the class before and/or havegeotechnical work experience. Throughout the semester, students will be given short-quizzes atthe end of most lecture periods. Short answer and true-false questions will be included on thesequizzes and the type and difficulty of the question(s) presented during each short-quiz willparallel the type and difficulty of the questions presented on the pre-quiz to ensure parallel formreliability. As a result, the five short-answer questions on the short-quiz can be compared toparallel questions on the pre-quiz to assess comprehension (per lecture). A test is conducted at the end of each content module. Exactly 20% of each test willinclude
be turnedinto opportunities and weaknesses could be transformed into strength with sustained teamspirit and if worked on each specific threat and weaknesses deliberately.AcknowledgmentThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #1915615 titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results,conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] H. Taylor, E. Artman, and J. P. Woelfer, “Information Technology Project RiskManagement: Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice
their practical course-support needs and industry practitioners can post theirofferings (e.g., specialization(s), ongoing innovative projects, type of support, and availability),and the instructors will be intelligently matched with industry practitioners who can meet theirneeds. We hypothesize that by intelligently matching the practice needs of students (andinstructors) with the potential offerings of industry practitioners, students’ noticing andawareness can be disciplined in the practice of construction engineering, and they can begin toidentify with the construction CoP. The key question to be addressed in this research is: Howdoes the accessibility, facilitated by ConPEC, translate into improved disciplined perception andstrengthen
-goals/ [Accessed 1December 2017].[9] Hill, J; Nelson, E; Tilman, D.; Polasky, S.; Tiffany, D. ‘Environmental, economic, andenergetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels’ 2 June 2006. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume 103 no. 30, 11206-11210. Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/103/30/11206.abstract [Accessed 23 January2018].[10] Sing, S.P; Singh, P. ‘Effect of temperature and light on the growth of algae species: Areview,’ October 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.rowan.edu/science/article/pii/S1364032115004839 [Accessed 26 January 2018].[11] Philanthropy New York. ‘Bringing the Liberal Arts to Engineering Education,’ May 192015. [Online
. Amazon [cited 2016 September 25]; Available from: https://www.amazon.com/b?node=8037720011.4. Zuckerberg, M. The technology behind Aquila. Facebook 2016 [cited 2016 September 24]; Available from: https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/the-technology- behind-aquila/10153916136506634/.5. Soergel, A., New Application for Drones: Disaster Relief, in U.S. News. 2016.6. Greene, S., Mesa County, Colo. A National Leader In Domestic Drone Use, in The Huffington Post. 2013: Colorado.7. Workforce Data. Oklahoma Department of Commerce 2016 [cited 2016 September 24]; Available from: http://okcommerce.gov/data/workforce-data/.8. Reese, J., W. Hundl, and T. Coon, Oklahoma Agriculture Statistics 2015
experience.We were excited to see how many of the teams were embracing the conflict and tension thatemerged during their preparatory work and initial outreach to their communities. Team membersrecognized what the literature on culture change has long described: that dissonance motivateschange (as in Festinger 1962). Team members often described culture change as their goal; in thesame sentence, they would indicate that they welcomed uncomfortable conversations becausethese conversations, when approached with openness and listening ears, drew out the best ideasand created a supportive team environment. On a larger scale, we see these discussions as beingconsistent with Bowe et al.’s (2003) recommendations relating to identifying contradictions
, Chemistry, ComputerScience, Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering.RetreatsThe project thrusts described above are most helpful to faculty who are already knowledgeableabout EBT and might even have an idea of which method(s) they wish to apply. There are anumber of faculty though who have little knowledge of EBT and who must be providedbackground information before they can think of applying it. To this end, STEER has institutedtwo different types of faculty retreats:(a) Departmental retreatsSTEER personnel attend departmental retreats at the invitation of department chairs. Typically,they are allowed 1.5 to 2 hours to present an overview of EBT practices and evidence of theirvalidity. After the overview, several practices are generally
learning works best for them. Whenpresented with a problem, they are equipped to quickly identify which style of learning andtechnique(s) best apply to the situation enabling them to address problems in a timelier manner.While metacognition and SDL skills sets can be applied to familiar problems, they also providevalue in approaching unfamiliar problems. IRE alumni consistently reported earning confidencefrom peers and supervisors through a versatile ability of routinely solving unfamiliar problemsmaking the alumni valuable workplace assets.Future Directions and SignificanceWe have identified three areas of research we intend to pursue. First, we will continue totriangulate the think-aloud data with students’ self-report interview data but on an
, Institute of Medicine. ISBN: 0-309-65442-4, (2007).2. G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B.Claar, H. L. Chen, , K. Jackson, S. D. Sheppard, “An EngineeringMajor Does Not (Necessarily) Make an Engineer: Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate EngineeringMajors,” Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 3, 227-234, (2009).3. National Science Board, Figure 2-11, Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington, Virginia:National Science Foundation, (NSB-02-1), 2002.4. National Science Board, Figure 2-17. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington Virginia:National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01), 2014.5. National Science Board, Figure 2-18, Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington, Virginia:National Science
collaborative learning environments. Colmputer and Education, 49, 176-192.Krugman, P., (1991), Geography and Trade, MIT Press: Cambridge.Mitchell, M., (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press.Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6, 36-76.Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 551-585.Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Improvised Dialogues: Emergence and Creativity in Conversation. Page 26.50.13 Westport, Ct: Greenwood.Sawyer