also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at ASU. She is deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Listening to Makers: Exploring Engineering Students’ Recommendations for Creating a Better Makerspace ExperienceAbstractThis paper explores the ways that students experience university-affiliated makerspaces ascaptured in interviews and during observations. Our research questions are focused onunderstanding the ways that engineering students have experienced makerspaces in a variety ofinstitutions and institution-types, and their suggested ways of
interfaces, combined sewer overflows, and improved communication and education of engineering concepts.Dr. Anne Pfitzner Gatling, Merrimack College I taught for 10 years as an elementary teacher in Alaska. I won the Presidential Award for Science Teaching, was an Einstein Fellow in Senator Lieberman’s office where I worked on the teacher quality portion of the Higher Education Reauthorization. Now as a professor, I have been the co-director of the STEM Education program for Early Childhood and Elementary Majors for 8 years.Mrs. Katherine Marie Donell c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engagement in Practice: First Year Engineering Students
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preliminary Findings: RIEF - Understanding pedagogically motivating factors for under-represented and non-traditional students in online engineering learning modulesAbstractThe quest to incorporate digital games into US classrooms has been pervasive in educationalcommunities over the last two decades. Educational video games have been studied as amechanism for enhancing the engagement and performance of underrepresented groups (UGs) inspatial learning, physics, computer science, general engineering, software and electricalengineering, mechanical engineering (ME) computer aided design, and aerospace engineering.Less than a handful of these studies have
September 2002 to September 2005, he was an Associate Editor for the IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing and was on the Speech Technical Committee for the IEEE Signal Processing society. Since September 2000, he has been on the Editorial Board of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine. Since May 2002, he has been on the Digital Signal Processing Technical Committee for the IEEE Circuits and Systems society. His research interests are in digital signal processing, speech processing, biometrics, pattern recognition and filter design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Use of Big Data Analytics in a First Year Engineering ProjectThis paper describes a module on
engineering majors. Prior to coming to UT, she independently tutored K12 and undergraduate mathematics and science. Her research interests include engineering education, identity and equity. Address: Engineering and Education Research Center (EER) 2501 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712 Email: apatrick@utexas.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Methods for Developing an Engineering Identity in the ClassroomAbstractEngineering identity is an attractive lens being used by engineering education researchers to helpunderstand the factors contributing to student retention and persistence in engineering. However,few studies have linked pedagogical
of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She is passionate about translational research and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A FRAMEWORK FOR QUANTIFYING STUDENT SELF-CONFIDENCE AND TASK CHOICE IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-RELATED ACTIVITIES Jenni M. Buckley, PhD1,3, Sara Grajeda, PhD2, Amy E. Trauth, PhD1, Dustyn Roberts, PhD4,1 1 University of Delaware, Department of Mechanical Engineering 2 University of Delaware, Center for Research in Education and Science Policy 3 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development
at Powerhouse ScienceCenter. Without them none of these projects could have become a reality.References 1. Stearns, Peter N. Educating global citizens in colleges and universities: Challenges and opportunities. Routledge, 2009. 2. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3 3. Slattery, Darina M., and Michael P. O'Brien. "Using Service Learning and Virtual Team Projects to Broaden the Curriculum and Enhance the Student Experience." Currents in Teaching & Learning 6.2 (2014). 4. Jacoby, Barbara. Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. 5. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette
Practice to Prepare Software Engineers With Effective Team Skills," in Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–12. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch073[3] M. Arvold et al., "Teaching Teamwork: A Training Video Designed for Engineering Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015.[4] P. Sancho, J. Torrente, E. J. Marchiori, and B. Fernández-manjón, "Enhancing Moodle to Support Problem Based Learning the Nucleo Experience," in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, Amman, 2011, pp. 1177–1182. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773296.[5] D. M. Bowen, M. Alvaro, D. Mejia, and M. Saffi, "Industry Practices for Providing Engineers with Team Skills," in ASEE Annual
Paper ID #49600Designing and Developing Summer K-12 STEM Outreach Programs Througha Tenure-Track Faculty’s PerspectiveDr. Nathan Galinsky, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Nathan Galinsky is a tenure-track faculty in the chemical engineering department at WVU Tech since 2019. He has been actively involved in outreach within the university running six summer outreach programs since 2021 and being actively involved within the department and university in K-12 outreach, recruitment, and retention efforts. His educational research interests are on K-12 outreach, developing more engaging out of class
+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Illuminating Contexts that Influence Test Usage Beliefs and Behaviors among Instructors of Fundamental Engineering Courses (FECs)Abstract This research paper illuminates the different contexts elicited by seven instructors whotaught fundamental engineering courses (FECs) when discussing their test usage beliefs andbehaviors, beginning to address a gap in engineering education research on instructors’ beliefsand behaviors and
-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100017, 2021.[16] P. Johanes and L. Lagerstrom, “Adaptive learning: The premise, promise, and pitfalls,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[17] C. Richardson, “Council post: The next revolution in global e-learning,” Jul 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/07/25/the-next-revolution-in-global-elearning/?sh=66f38d357c25[18] Y. Niu, L. Ying, J. Yang, M. Bao, and C. Sivaparthipan, “Organizational business intelligence and decision making using big data analytics,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 58, no. 6, p. 102725, 2021
vision impairment, speech impairment; learning or psychiatricconditions). The majority of students do not report their disabilities to their university [1]. Astudy by Love et al. found that 75% of students who self-disclosed a disability in a survey, chosenot to inform their instructor [2]. Similarly, UIUC’s 2019 survey found that 8% of students hadindicated having a disability while 28% of them stated their disability needs were not being met[3]. Additionally, Dewantoro et. al. found that SWD were less prepared for online courses, whencompared to SWOD [4]. These studies highlight the need to further investigate whichinstructional features can foster success for SWD, especially when a large proportion mayhesitate to disclose their disability
women in STEM doctoral programs,” Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 23, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/socsci7020023.[4] D. R. Johnson, “Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM),” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2011, no. 152, pp. 75–85, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1002/ir.410.[5] K. G. Wilkins-Yel, J. Hyman, and N. O. O. Zounlome, “Linking intersectional invisibility and hypervisibility to experiences of microaggressions among graduate women of color in STEM,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 113, pp. 51–61, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.018.[6] A. C. Arnold et al., “Examining the effects of STEM climate on the mental health of graduate women from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds
Bachelors of Arts degree in International Development Studies at UCLA, she began a successful career in banking and finance at Bank of America, Merrill Lynch. She has completed various post baccalaureate certifications through UCLA Anderson and the Harvard Business School; most recently, she completed her MPA at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and MBA at Cornell Tech. She has published in multiple academic journals including ASEE, ROPPA, and AP- PAM. Additionally, her scholarly work has been featured in Forbes magazine. She believes that research can inform diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and programs to one day have a workforce that is representative of the society it aims to
, women make up 14% of the engineering workforce (15% internationally),according to SWE Research Fast Facts, 2022. In 2020, 24% of bachelor’s degrees in engineeringwere earned by women, and women of color earned 10% of the total engineering degrees.However, there is no existing data particularly dedicated to international women of color inengineering. Women of Color are often presented as a monolith in all the statistical reports.While the overall number of STEM workers in the United States increased by 44.5 percentbetween 2000 and 2019, the number of immigrant STEM workers more than doubled over thesame period. By 2019, there were almost 2.5 million immigrant STEM workers, compared to just1.2 million in 2000. Women workers still remain
researchers anticipate that additional factor analysis and future studieswill be beneficial to transfer students, their advisors, and stakeholders of higher education.6 AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) CISE-MSI award CNS-2219623 and an ASEE CyBR-MSI mini-grant under NSF award CNS-2139136.References [1] K. Reid, “Reaching the uncertain student,” Eduventures Principal Analyst at Encoura, 2021. [2] J. D. Edwards, R. S. Barthelemy, and R. F. Frey, “Relationship between course-level social belonging (sense of belonging and belonging uncertainty) and academic performance in gen- eral chemistry 1,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 99, pp. 71–82, 2022. [3] E. Höhne and L. Zander
. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage, 1985.[17] M. F. Fox and V. C. Ferri, “Women, Men, and Their Attributions for Success in Academe. Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 55 ED-3, pp. 257–271, 1992.[18] A. Joshi, “By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 59 ED-2, pp. 202–239, 2014.[19] C. S. Bolton, E. Miskioğlu, K. M. Martin, C. Aaron, and A. Carberry, “Practicing engineers’ definition of their expertise: Emergent themes and frequency by gender identity and role change into mamagement,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference &
. 1, pp. 1–19, 2011, doi: 10.1037/h0100597. 12. (G. Illescas, A. Alvarado, y J. Portillo, “Active, topic-centered learning”, en 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2020. 13. K. Durkin y B. Rittle-Johnson, “Diagnosing misconceptions: Revealing changing decimal fraction knowledge”, Learn. Instr., vol. 37, pp. 21–29, 2015. 14. R. M. Welder, “Improving algebra preparation: Implications from research on student misconceptions and difficulties: Improving algebra preparation”, Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 112, núm. 4, pp. 255–264, 2012. 15. K. Falkner, L. Levi, y T. Carpenter, “Early childhood corner: Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra”, Teach. Child. Math., vol. 6, núm
engineering. Janice is an ASEE Engineering Postdoctoral Fellow (eFellow) researching engineering career concept development alongside FIU’s Partnership for Research Education Consortium in Ceramics and Polymers (PRE-CCAP) program. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Janice received her B.S. in Biological Engineering and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Mississippi State University.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her
suitable for teaching courses in computer architecture and organization", IEEE Trans.Educ., vol. 52, no. 4, pp.449 -458, 2009[25] Erdil, D. C., & Bowlyn, K. N., & Randall, J. (2021, July), A Hands-on Learning Approach toIntroducing Computer Organization and Architecture to Early-college Students. Paper presentedat 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference.10.18260/1-2--36584[26] Junxiang, Gao & Yu, Huang. (2019). Design of Mobile Learning System for Courses ofComputer Science and Technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1237. 052002.10.1088/1742-6596/1237/5/052002.[27] Shabaz, Getting Started with the Active Learning Module ADALM1000, Feb 14. 2015.
more than punishing a wrongdoer, justice isachieved when equity is restored, when relationships are repaired, and when collective decision-makinghas been invoked. We follow Braithewaite[21] in imagining that restoration focuses on the victim, takingthe harmed individual as the central driver of decision-making.The case described above offers an example of epistemic violence, and demonstrates the need forrestoration and repair that is driven by the victim (i.e., Chloe). As Walton et al[22], [23] (2019) articulate,this is one strategy for moving from recognizing injustices to replacing those unjust practices with newones that have been co-constructed with coalition members or victims. Their applied theory of inclusionsuggests that an important
International Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 10–20, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1108/13527601111104269.[5] M.-Y. Wu, “Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions 30 Years Later: A Study of Taiwan and the United States,” p. 10, 2006.[6] H. Murzi, T. Martin, L. McNair, and M. Paretti, “A Longitudinal Study of the Dimensions of Disciplinary Culture to Enhance Innovation and Retention among Engineering Students,” American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference. New Orleans, LA, United States, 2016. 12[7] M. Guerra, H. Murzi, J. Woods, and A. Diaz, “Understanding Students’ perceptions of Dimensions of Engineering Culture in Ecuador,” American Society
., American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)),identity (i.e., Black Greek Letter Organizations (BGLOs), or both (i.e., National Society of BlackEngineers (NSBE)) [3]. Martin, Revelo, Stefl, Garrett, and Adams investigated the impact ofparticipating in ethnic professional organizations (NSBE and the Society of HispanicProfessional Engineers (SHPE)) at the undergraduate level [4]. However, the focus was solely onengineering related professional organizations and students who attended a predominantly Whiteinstitution (PWI).The purpose of this study is to identify counterspaces utilized by Black engineering students andthe associated values of engaging in these spaces. This study stems from a larger NationalScience Foundation (NSF) funded study
through a focus on women in their undergraduate years who havedeclared computer science and/or electrical and computer engineering majors. The programprioritizes peer-to-peer relationships, career mentorship, strategic coaching, and hands-onexperience to recruit and retain such individuals in technology fields. In this paper, we furtherdiscuss the particulars of the program, distinguish it from other programs discussed in theliterature, as well as present evaluation processes and findings from a mixed-methods studyfocused on activities from the 2018-2019 cohort. Our evaluation includes program administrativedata, baseline and post-program survey data from three program sites and focus group data. Weconcentrate on the effect of program activities
Civil Engineering. Currently she is pursuing a Master of Engineering in Civil & Environmental Engineering and is due to graduate May 2019. She has been actively involved within the Department of Engineering Education & Leadership as a recruitment leader and administrative assistant. Currently she serves as the graduate advisor for the American Society for Engineering Education student chapter and is a research team director in the Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Education where she focuses on the success of students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics of two post-secondary educational institutions based in El Paso.Mr. Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso Mike
Connections, ASEE, Ed., 2018.[2] California State University, "Student Success Dashboard," ed, 2019.[3] C. Corbett and C. Hill, Solving the equation : the variables for women's success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: AAUW, 2015, pp. xi, 141 pages.[4] E. P. Bettinger and B. T. Long, "Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students," The American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 152-157, 2005.[5] NAP, Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2007.[6] P. Gallagher, S. Alestalo, S. Bhatia, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and S. Soundarajan, "Geotechnical Women Faculty