c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Resistance is Futile: A New Collaborative Laboratory Game Based Lab to Teach Basic Circuit Concepts AbstractIn recent years, gamification of education has proven to be an effective paradigm in modernpedagogy. Following the success their previous work "Sector Vector”, the authors now present anew game-based laboratory to highlight the manipulation and calculation of resistors in circuits.In Game of Ohms [1] the lesson of electrical resistance is delivered as an interactive exercisebuilding an intricate circuit. As the game progresses, students are forced to make short and longterm plans to modify an evolving circuit which
the problem on hand.As we can see from how learning takes place in this initiative, there is a great balancebetween learning and service in this activity (Figure 2). The focus of working on theproject definitely is on service learning.Figure 2: What is Service Learning (Furco 2000)The three dimensions of service learning are 1. Curricular Content 2. Service 3. Social IssueThis project experience serves as a capstone project for the students. Students are able to Page 26.1367.4apply their curricular content and develop practical knowledge. For example, one of theprojects involves developing a sound maintenance plan for the wastewater plant
Education student learning outcomes4 Upon graduation from an accredited ACCE 4-year degree program, a graduate shall be able to: 1. Create written communications appropriate to the construction discipline. 2. Create oral presentations appropriate to the construction discipline. 3. Create a construction project safety plan. 4. Create construction project cost estimates. 5. Create construction project schedules. 6. Analyze professional decisions based on ethical principles. 7. Analyze construction documents for planning and management of construction processes. 8. Analyze methods, materials, and equipment used to construct projects. 9. Apply construction management skills as a member of a multi-disciplinary team. 10. Apply electronic-based technology
‘customer’ concept strengthens the ‘model’ theme. It is also important to note that the word ‘model’ is serving two purposes. First it is the name of a theme (a group of words). Second it is a concept (a single word or merged group of words). It is because the word ‘model’ is the most connected word in the theme that makes it the name of that theme. Likewise, the ‘business’ theme in the entrepreneurship texts include the concepts ‘opportunity’, ‘planning’, ‘idea’ and ‘action’. Although each of the three bodies of text are distinct, there are some important commonalities. Each contains as a key theme ‘product’ at approximately the same high level of importance. Both
Syracuse, oneof the city’s most impoverished but also culturally rich neighborhoods.The authors working closely with Marc Norman and a pair of Imagining Americaresearch fellows, began planning courses that could advance a new collaboration in thepublic realm, a first for Syracuse architecture and engineering students working withinthe curricular framework of the design studio and professional elective courses.Figure 2: Diagram, showing student interaction with local stakeholders and neighborhood Page 26.407.4 representatives, including the Syracuse Housing Authority, schools and the Parks Department.The ClientThe client
Engineering (3) G * ‘C’ denotes Integrated lab component; & U – Undergraduate, G – Graduate; ** under development;3. Methods (Courseware) The overall goal of the EECE 6032 – Software Testing and Quality Assurance course was foreach student to understand the basic principles of software testing and quality, and their role incontemporary software engineering. An additional goal for graduate students was to examineresearch areas of interest, and be prepared to conduct research in software engineering in general.The ABET student learning outcomes of the course were:• To understand how to develop a test plan for a set of software requirements
orderto do so, the School of Engineering developed a zero-credit course that was given at the end ofthe sophomore year. This course was originally developed in response to the ABET 2000Criteria, and has been modified over the years to meet changes in protocol, curriculum, andtechnology8. During this course, the students go through an individual interview with theinstructor and take an exam based on the courses from the first two years of the curriculum. Thisinformation is then used during the department’s internal assessment process.This paper gives an overview of this exam, as well as how it is used to help in our internalassessment process and outlines recent plans to use the exam to aid students in their upperdivisional years as well. It also
Same 5 areas of emphasis as Group A. by external forces 3. The types of bonding in polymericPre-lab Followed by completion of a worksheet by each materials (i.e., strong covalent bondslecture student that involved sketching, developing a within chains and weak van der Waals hypothesis, and proposing a plan to test the forces between chains) hypothesis. (Appendix D) 4. How chain alignment can increase
was driven by the need to provide quasi-real timefeedback for students in project-based courses. In the Software Enterprise8,9 at Arizona StateUniversity, a project-based curriculum is offered to undergraduate and graduate softwareengineering students. In a typical project experience, students are grouped into teams, eachworking on building a software project by incorporating the principles of Agile. A course projectis typically divided into 4-5 sprints spanning 3 weeks each. The requirements for this projectedare accumulated into a product backlog created through a planning process. During each sprint,the team identifies a set of user stories from the product backlog and adds them to the currentsprint backlog. Teams then identify tasks to do
small proportion of students majoring inhigh-demand fields such as engineering. The National Science Foundation(NSF) reports that 39% of URMs "plan to major" in science and engineeringfields as freshman, but less than half of these earn an undergraduateengineering degree; rates are startlingly lower for Blacks and Hispanics.One way to increase retention and graduation rates in engineering for allstudents is to enhance their overall skills and readiness for engineering-related work by way of cooperative education (i.e., co-op) and internships1that offer students "real-life, hands on" experience in their major subject. TheCenter for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University identifies suchexperiences as a "high-impact practice" that likely
, Vietnam,Sri Lanka, Honduras, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Brazil, Jamaica, DominicanRepublic, St. Kitts, Ethiopia, Togo, Ghana, South Africa and Morocco 6.In this paper we will summarize our approach to integrating an international research (IR)experience for minority students in STEM in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Austria from 2008 topresent.NYC Alliance European Host Site Programs OverviewGraz, Austria - The Marshall Plan scholarship, funded by the Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation.It is an academic exchange program established to finance scholarships and fellowships foracademic exchange between Austria and the U.S., with a special focus on universities of appliedsciences, such as University of Graz (Uni Graz) and technical
include student development of identity and motivation in graduate engineering environments and understanding creativity in engineering design processes.Mr. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Nevada, Reno. He graduated from the University of Nevada, Reno in May 2017, and plans to pursue a career in academia in the future. His research interests are in graduate student attrition rates within academia, engineering identity development and the factors that influence decision making on persistence.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering
Department of Pathology. In 2006, she served the College as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. After eight years, she returned to faculty and developed a passion for the best practices of facilitating learning and the mentoring process.Dr. Janet E. Rechtman, University of Georgia Dr Janet Rechtman is a Senior Fellow at J.W. Fanning Institute for Leadership Development at University of Georgia. With more than 30 years of experience as a volunteer leader and consultant to nonprofit or- ganizations, Janet provides technical assistance to nonprofit organizations in areas of strategic planning, evaluation, marketing and communications, as well as individual coaching and leadership development. Her doctoral
students as seniors, comparing the maleversus female students.Another area where gender showed differences was the change in skills reported by thestudents between freshman and senior year. As shown in table 1 there was some change ineach skill for both genders, however the women had much greater variance betweenfreshman and senior year. The male students did not have any area that changed more than10%, while the women had several. They had a greater than 10% decrease in DecisionMaking, Flexibility, Futuristic Thinking, Goal Orientation, Interpersonal Skills, Leadership,Persuasion and Presenting. The two areas they had a greater than 10% increase wereDiplomacy Tact and Planning Organizing.Table 1: The percentage change in soft skills between
the female STEM student data. Using the emerging themes, suggestions ofpossible action for colleges and universities to take within their STEM program to increase thesuccess of the STEM students and STEM female students were made in this paper.Questions from the SurveyAs described earlier, the approximately twenty minute survey was composed of a wide variety ofquestions. The authors developed all the questions to the survey with the feedback andsuggestions of others who often work with the STEM student population on our campus. Beloware example questions from the survey (Table 1).Table 1: Example Survey Questions Are you majoring (or planning to) major in a STEM field? Yes No Are you or have you been a
Paper ID #22175Work in Progress: Baseline Survey about Community and IdentityAbigail M. Clark, Ohio State University Abigail Clark is a graduate student at The Ohio State University. Prior to coming to OSU, she earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Ohio Northern University and spent several years working at Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio. Her research interests include women in engineering. She is currently a Master’s student in STEM Education and is planning to pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in
do your research methods employed tostudy engineering education align with your social justice values? In what ways could you examine orimprove upon your research methods to reflect a critical intersectional frame? How might that framebe relevant to your work and change-making in the field of engineering education? Participants willleave the workshop with an increased awareness of how to do engineering education research thatreflects social justice values, paired with concrete methodological ideas to run with. 1 Aligning your Research Methods with your Social Justice Values Plan for the workshop
diversity, inclusion, and equity. After establishingthe current literature taking on issues of equity in engineering as well as a summary of thenetwork analysis already conducted through our ROAR grant, we will describe our owntheoretical framework, initial analysis of outcomes from other educational organizing campaigns,and initially planned actions for the CoNECD event and how it fits into our research.Background and FrameworkMany scholars have explored the problem of equity, diversity, and social responsibility inengineering as a discipline more broadly [1], [2], [3], [4], but there is little work done on the fieldand positionality of academics in engineering education specifically and their change-makingstrategies or interests for seeding
reflectiveactivity [8], described the ways in which they could elicit the funds of knowledge of theirstudents, and analyzed representative examples of culturally responsive STEM activities thatdraw from funds of knowledge [11-14].Finally, for the science and engineering practices the teachers were divided into groups and eachgroup was in charge of describing two of the eight science and engineering practices assigned tothem for the activity. They identified the practices that were primarily described as science orengineering and the ways in which these practices overlapped. The eight science andengineering practices included: (1) asking questions and defining problems; (2) developing andusing models; (3) planning and carrying out investigations; (4
with the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Memphis. She directs the U of M’s Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute, the Southeast Transportation Workforce Center and the West TN STEM Hub. Her technical research includes focus on journey to school in urban areas, transportation planning (particularly related to freight impacts), livability assessment in urban communities, and strate- gies to engage citizens in the transportation planning process. She has a strong record of STEM workforce and education research, with special emphasis on transportation workforce development, partnerships be- tween industry and academia, and increasing representation of women and underrepresented minorities in
blocks resulted in an improved consistency of the blocks. With improvedcommunication flow and collaboration with the new contractor, the technical planning ofestimated materials and project management increased.. In addition, the participation of thecommunity increased with community members suppling all the water for construction.MARWA PRIMARY SCHOOL RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM For the third iteration of the rainwater harvesting initiative focus was placed onimproving ease of construction, reducing overall costs, and improving work agreements withthe Marwa Contractor. Adjustments from the previous design were implemented andadditional focus was given to the logistics and planning aspects of the project.The redesign focused on the
cusp of that orientation category. Figure 2: Intercultural Development Continuum [17]Pre and Post training assessments were conducted for each class. The author is a qualifiedadministrator of the IDI and administered the surveys as a part of the course. Using a Likertscale, the overall values range as described previously. For the purpose of this study, I generatedgroup reports identifying both the Perceived Orientation (PO) and Developmental Orientation(DO) for each class. PO is a measure based on their own perceived position on the continuum,which for most people score higher than their DO values. Individual reports and customizedIntercultural Development Plans designed by IDI, LLC to aid in increasing cultural
students. Students must maintain the average• Having difficulties paying for materials GPA of 3.0 (books, notebooks), parking passes• Having difficulties paying student loans and other debts• Having difficulties paying accommodation and travelling (e.g., need for a car, gas)• Not qualifying for parents’ and ODU graduate student health insurance plans Difficulties with Campus InvolvementDescription: Proposed Intervention:• Having difficulties socializing with other • Build research project groups, which are students because of age difference interest-driven and introduce SCS students into• Having difficulties interacting with other the
Engineering programs received initialABET accreditation in 2012, followed by Computer Engineering in 2013. Mechanical Engineeringbegan in 2014 and produced its first graduates in 2018, with ABET accreditation currently (as ofJanuary 2019) pending. The Electrical, Computer, and Industrial & Systems Engineering programs wereall reaccredited by ABET in 2018. The Computer Science programs were transferred to the School ofBusiness in the spring of 2018, resulting in the renaming of the Liberty University School ofEngineering (LUSE). Civil Engineering will start in the 2019-20 school year, and ComputationalEngineering is planned for 2020-21. The number of declared engineering majors has grown steadilyreaching a peak enrollment of 518 in the 2018-2019
and potential for automated grading.They were then asked for their perception and feedback on their learning environment. It was shown thatthe interactive and visual nature of the modules engages a high level of spatial cognition and criticalthinking among students while preparing the students with a cutting-edge software skill.Zhang et al. [4] studied approaches that improve the students’ problem-solving skills in civil engineeringand construction management education. They used a teaching-learning experiment in a civil engineeringeducation program by role-playing with a real-world project using the procedures of the BIM ProjectExecution Planning Guide and process mapping. Their results based on the surveyed students showed thatthis
cognitive theory (Bandura 1989): • People have the capacity to create internal beliefs and models, plans for action, and testing complex ideas; • Behavior is goal-oriented and seeks to accomplish a task; • People are self-reflective and able to analyze their experiences and thoughts; • People can control their own behavior and actions; • People learn by observing others; and • The environmental events, personal factors, and behaviors interact together.People’s beliefs about their abilities are primarily informed by the following: • Performance experience – a task can be accomplished because it was successfully achieved previously, • Vicarious experience –the task can be accomplished because someone else
Undergraduates (REU) program hostingstudents from universities outside of Arkansas. The LSRM program mirrored the 10-week REUsummer schedule with the addition of monthly mentoring sessions after the full-time summerexperience ended (Figure 1). This structure took advantage of the ability to maintain contact withthe students after the program ended that traditional REU programs lack. These sessions weredesigned to extend the mentor-mentee relationships formed during the program and provide careerawareness and professional development sessions. These sessions included presentations fromspeakers and tours of local industry planned with input from the students. The program expectsthat continuing to support the community and relationships formed will result
2’s message to bird 3 6. Panda then shares bird 1’s message to bird 4 7. Bird 4 flies to snail 2 8. Bird 4 passes on the message to snail 2Discussion prompts: 1. Break down the delay caused by Panda – how much of it is because of waiting? 2. Can we categorize the different sources of delay? 3. (optional to use if time permits) How does Panda deal with messages from different sources going to different destinations?The implementation of the activity was done in-class as an activity for a planned duration of 25minutes, with the following breakdown. 1. 5-minute setup: Students first form groups of 3-4 students. They are first given the time to read the scenario, followed by a check-in to ask for clarifications. 2. 5
. Then, the week’s designated topic was covered for the remaining 45-50 minutes.As this first cohort consisted of younger high school students, the content was primarily gearedtoward the engineering disciplines and painted a general image of the college applicationprocess. An example lesson plan showing the structure of a seminar (from the first meeting) isshown below, with subsequent meetings following a similar format. Topic UT Austin Engineering Program Overview Learning After this session, students will: Objectives: ● Get to know their Cockrell School student mentors. ● Recall important facts about UT Austin’s Engineering Program. ● Become familiar with engineering
20.3 Academic Involvement 14.5 16.3*Note. N- 12; * p < 0.05Given the COVID changes to the planned intervention, qualitative results also point tobelongingness as a key factor in supporting students’ academic success and professionaldevelopment. As a result of their participation in this program, the group developed professionalrelationships with peers and faculty, and belongingness within the university community. SeeTable 3. This psychological connection made possible by this program, in turn has supporteddegree completion and job placement success.Engineering students in the cohort completed valuable internships while in the program (7placements) gaining valuable skills training and improving their