and group projects, and case studies within four major units of inquiry: 1) Learning to Listen, 2) Responsible Conduct of Research, 3) Responsible Conduct of Practice, 4) Witnessing Wrongdoing and the Obligation to Prevent Harm. A major motivation in developing this course was to prioritize listening as a core component of engineering practice and to consider the perspectives of non-experts (i.e., non-engineers, non- scientists, non-architects, etc.) in conventional decision-making processes [1], [2]. The course provides practices in and reflection on empathetic and in-depth listening. Some of the major questions that guide the
Paper ID #32146An Imperative for Diversity and Inclusion Training for Asian-AmericanFaculty to Increase the Number of Women Engineering GraduatesMr. David Soukup P.E., New York University Tandon School of Engineering David Soukup is an adjunct professor in the Department of Technology Management and Innovation at New York University’s Tandon School of Engineering. He teaches courses on discrete event simulation, project management, work design, and operations management. A licensed professional engineer, he earned his M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Tennessee and B.S. in systems engineering from the
Paper ID #32206Diversity, Equity and Inclusivity in Action: What Can EngineeringEducation Research Publications Do?Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student mo- tivation and their learning experiences. Her projects focus on student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, development of problem solving skills, self-regulated learn- ing, and epistemic beliefs. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering
sophomores) fromFremont Academy of Engineering and Design in the Pomona Unified School District. Theseparticipants completed two years in the program during which they engaged in projects featuringCreative Robotics and Wearable Technology. The 2015-2016 academic year marked the third andfinal year of this first cohort’s participation and saw the expansion of the Femineer® Program tonine schools with more than 200 students. The expansion continued in the 2016-2017 school yearwith 14 additional schools, with more than 400 students. In addition, the University of Iowa andSan Diego State University signed on as affiliate universities ready to help start and expand theFemineer® Program in their areas. In the 2017-2018 school year an additional 20 schools
6have grown the program from 36 to 62 participants, and we’ve growncollege matriculants from four participants to 14. We’ve doubled thescholarship for students, so that students now receive a total of $5,000over their first two years in our college.The core of the EngiNearMe curriculum features student groupscollaborating to build Arduino light sculptures. This project is intended toencourage teamwork and creativity, while building on core engineeringprinciples and concepts in a design process. Students also participate inskill-building workshops throughout the week in the ITLL (IntegratedTeaching and Learning Laboratory), including laser cutting, 3D printing,and Arduino programming. In addition to the engineering curriculum,students
assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130.[11] L. Kohlberg, R. H. Hersh, “Stages of moral development,” Theory Pract., vol. 16, pp.53-59,Apr. 1977.[12] M. Sindelar, L. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, R. Miller, C. Mitcham, B. Olds, R. Pinkus,and H. Wolfe. “Assessing Engineering Students' Abilities to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas,” inProceedings, 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, Colorado, USA,November 5-8, 2003.[13] L. Kisselburgh, J. L. Hess, C. B. Zoltowski, J. Beever, A. O. Brightman, “Assessing ascaffolded
transformation of engineering education.Dr. Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University Having completed his Ph.D. through the University of Washington’s interdisciplinary Individual Ph.D. Program (see bit.ly/uwiphd), Ryan is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Texas Tech University. He currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University
published and submitted, in international refereed journals, includ- ing: 1 Nature, 1 Reviews of Modern Physics, 1 Advances in Physics: X, 3 Nature Communications, 2 Physical Review X, and 19 Physical Review Letters, two of them Editor’s Suggestion. His h-index according to Google Scholar is of 36, with more than 4700 citations.Dr. Clarice D. Aiello, University of California, Los AngelesDr. Bruno Marco Quadrelli, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Dr. Marco B. Quadrelli is a Principal Member of the Technical Staff and the group supervisor of the Robotics Modeling and Simulation Group at JPL, where he has worked since 1997 on multiple flight projects and research programs. His research interests
. presentation of the material before the experiment. Mathematical description ofsignals or functions.Figure 07. Measurement of the resistance of a resistor using a multimeter.The Face-to-Face Laboratory:The face-to-face experiments part of the laboratory course, consists of fully contactedexperiments by the students at the College’s laboratory under the direction and supervision of theinstructor.The students work individually and in teams. This approach fully reflects the industrial approachwhere engineers work either on a specialized part of a project, alone or on a part of a big projectalong with other engineers. The approach prepares them for industrial employment. Thelaboratory consists of one experiment in a three-hour time once a week. The
teams and visit these rooms when questions arise. Also, studentteams were able to rehearse the term project presentations together by sharing their computerscreens and camera with their colleagues and also record the final presentation and upload it tothe respective course assignment.At the time in-person teaching was suspended, the Biomolecular Engineering course, out of ninelabs, had three left to be conducted. Since the experiments were well-established from previousyears of instruction (as well as an abundance of video resources found online), we decided toproduce videos to demonstrate the experimental protocols being implemented. We augmentedthat with detailed video explanations of the experimental steps recorded by the Lab
been set aside.In spring07 student teams simulated, assembled and tested AM/FM receivers. Training kits fromOmnitron Electronics, AM/FM108TK, were used for the projects. Students assembled andtested stages starting with the audio output stage. They worked backwards towards the receiverfront-end. They simulated some stages in the receiver, but needed more information on thetransformers. When using the spectrum analyzer the students observed the same AM and FMfrequency spectra in the receiver and as was shown by the simulator. Figure 21. AM/FM108TK Receiver Stages Figure 20. Students Testing Receiver Proceedings of the 2007ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference
Engineering. As part of the first yearengineering courses (ENG1101 and ENG1102), students are exposed to all engineeringdisciplines through a wide variety of department explorations, engineering problems/projects andethics case studies. The curriculum for these courses (engineering analysis, design, computerprogramming, technical communication, the engineering profession) is applicable to allengineering disciplines, however, the six credit hours that they occupy are in high demand inevery degree program.According to Christopher Rowe (Rowe, et al., 2005), “Approximately 40% of the first-yearengineering students at Vanderbilt University are unsure of their major upon entering theuniversity.” To help students make an informed decision before getting
available in most of the class room computersand/or computer clusters in universities. Moreover, the target student group of this tool (junior,senior, and graduate students) is fairly conversant using EXCEL. Once the students understandthe fundamental concept of the curve matching in Theis method, it can be easily performed usingthis tool. Since the entire method can be performed exclusively in EXCEL, the instructor maydemonstrate the use of this tool following the step-by-step procedure described in the previoussection by projecting the laptop screenshots on to the large screen in the class room. In addition,the instructor may assign a set of problems on Theis curve-matching and encourage the studentsto use this tool for solving the problems. This
as project based learning4. The literaturesuggests that through these methods students engage higher-order thinking tasks which in turnpromote stronger development of necessary problem solving skills5. Students who learn by thesemethods have been found to have better overall achievement as well as improved criticalthinking skills4. These skills thus better prepare the student for life-long learning when comparedagainst a traditional lecture-only approach. By asking students to complete an assignment wherethey had to identify a system or object in static equilibrium, it was intended for the student tobegin to look beyond their textbook and relate the course material with their surroundings.Similar work by others has demonstrated success in
sections for any course that involved with materials of construction improves efficient and effectivelearning. There are three different parts to the Portland Cement Concrete Materials course:1. The stones and sand (aggregates)2. Cement3. Concrete mixture.The aggregate tests are used to evaluate the properties that can be used in the concrete mixtureproportioning scheme called “Mix Design”. The cement tests can be used to evaluate the properties sothat the right type of cement can be used in the mix design. Eventually, the mix design can be finishedwith the right proportion of each ingredient such as cement, sand, and water. After the mix design is donewith figuring out the right concrete mixture for a particular project, the ingredients need to
instruction until a safe and effective vaccine became widelyavailable8. Online teaching, a growing but supplemental segment of higher education market,and conducting research remotely became the only safe option available, testing the flexibilityand resilience of students, faculty, and administrators alike. Engineering educators faced aparticular challenge in providing a virtual substitute for the lab-based, hands-on experiences andteamwork that their discipline demands8.The immediate challenges in the transition to remote research were to learn how to focus on thetopic of investigation, to work in an online team environment and to manage time efficiently. Inthe Fall 2020 semester, the beginning of this project, redesigning the research objectives
ensures that one set of priorities does not dominate the review process.Considered individually, more students would meet the application review criteria outlined so farthan we can support at our REU Site. Thus, our approach also emphasizes the characteristics of thecohort rather than just the those of the individual students. Our cohort criteria are (1) The studentsshould come from different schools. We have learned that group dynamics can suffer if a subset ofstudents is from a single school. (2) The students must plausibly fit within a range of possibleresearch projects because we cannot place all the students in just one or two research labs. (3) Thestudents should bring diversity of life experiences because the students will not learn as
𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 2 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 3 The third framework is one of one-to-one correspondence with lag. The underlyingtheory behind this framework is that a “heavy” week for cadets, particularly in the sense ofacademics, will often result in their proffering of significant assessable work to professors andinstructors. Examples of such work are problem sets, tests, essays, papers, oral recitations, briefs,debates, projects, and lab reports. Faculty, in turn, must devote time to grading that work in someincreased proportion relative to a “typical” faculty week, just as cadets devoted more than typical
completed two co-op experiences. Academically, he is neargraduation, and we expect him to eventually graduate as he works through his personalresponsibilities. He is a very creative and talented student and has written a technical paper withthe PI of this project. We, thus, have lost two percent of our students due to personal reasons.Our total loss for all reasons is 7 percent. Thus or retention rate for students in the NSF programis 93 percent. Of the 44 students who have received funding, 98 percent are still in school or Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright 2003, American
Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore, MD 21202, December 26, 2000.3. “Curricular Analysis in the Assessment of Program Outcomes for ABET Criteria EC-2000,” by William E. Simon and T. L. Chambers, 2002 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Paper IIC3, Lafayette, LA, March 20-22, 2002.WILLIAM E. SIMONDr. Simon currently serves as Professor and Head of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University ofLouisiana at Lafayette. His research interests are in the aerospace and thermal science areas, including fuel cells,conventional and state-of-the art heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics, multidiscipline advanced developmenttechnology management, and large project management. Dr. Simon is a
Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., Baltimore, MD 21202, December 26, 2000.3. “Curricular Analysis in the Assessment of Program Outcomes for ABET Criteria EC-2000,” by William E. Simon and T. L. Chambers, 2002 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Paper IIC3, Lafayette, LA, March 20-22, 2002.WILLIAM E. SIMONDr. Simon currently serves as Professor and Head of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University ofLouisiana at Lafayette. His research interests are in the aerospace and thermal science areas, including fuel cells,conventional and state-of-the art heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics, multidiscipline advanced developmenttechnology management, and large project management. Dr. Simon is a
University (CYCU) in Taiwan, and a Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the Universityof Alabama (UA) at Tuscaloosa. Currently, he is an associate professor of mechanical engineering inSUBR. He is a member of ASME and ASEE.SAMUEL IBEKWEDr. Samuel Ibekwe is an Associate Professor & Interim Chairman of mechanical engineering department.His interests are in Design, Manufacturing, and Engineering mechanics area. A past recipient of thedepartment’s faculty of the year award, Dr. Ibekwe is a Louisiana State registered professional engineerwho holds one design U.S. patent. His funded research projects from Louisiana Board of Regents, NSF,DOD, and LaSPACE. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
. 1. IntroductionFor an engineering degree to be generally accepted, it must come from an institution whose degreeprograms have been certified by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET).One of the essential major components to achieve program accreditation by ABET is the approval ofits capstone design activities, which are commonly referred to as its senior design courses. We havefound that a student’s successful completion of his (her) engineering design project is muchdependent of his (her) engineering mathematics background. The Electrical Engineering Departmentat Southern University and A& M College, Baton Rouge, in the past twenty year experiences hasshown that students with engineering major can’t make a
ConclusionsThe Finite Element Method is a real powerful tool to solve engineering problem, but in ourexperience and opinion the course for undergraduate student will be includes a very strongmathematical concept in order to develop skills and allows the student understand all theconcepts in which is based the develop of a commercial software for FEM, obviously thestudent needs to develop computational mechanical skills in order to be ready for thechallenges of the professional life. The best combination of mathematical consideration forFEM formulation and the understanding of all the concepts give the students the right to useany kind of commercial software. In addition of them this kind of course could be the gate forresearch and industrial project for
drift region with inlet and outlet of the gas, the amplification region where theGEM is attached and fixed, and the collection region where the total charge is collected. Thevisuals can be seen in figures 1 and figure 2. In this detector we used a double GEM detector toenhance the amplification and to decrease the probability of sparks. The visuals of the differentregions have very discrete values of all of the dimensions to our detectors. From these picturesand dimensions for our project, we were able to build our actual parts in the NSLS User Shop.The parts that were used were assembled out of various different materials as shown in figure 3.After building the parts, the X-Ray detectors were assembled together and were ready for thetesting
. Undergraduate research studentshave been an integral part of this curriculum development project. During this class students gainedhands-on experience operating a Nano Test Systems, atomic force microscopes (AFM), andfabricating nanocomposites based on ceramic nanoparticles.During these module students from Mechanical and Chemical Engineering were involved inapplying three dental fillers (silver, ionomer and epoxy) to cavity in human teeth using theassistance of a local dentist. Students prepared the sample (cutting, polishing) and ran severalnanoindentation tests to examine the hardness and modulus for these materials. Students also carriedout nano-fatigue tests to test the integrity of the filler/dentine interface. Upon submission the abstractof this
award. In total, her projects have received over $20 million dollars in external funding. This funding has produced 12 software packages that have been requested from (and shared with) more than 3000 researchers in 86 countries (as of October 2012). Dr. Camp has published over 80 refereed articles and 12 invited articles, and these articles have been cited almost 4,000 times (per Microsoft Academic Search) and over 7,000 times (per Google Scholar) as of December 2012. Dr. Camp is an ACM Fellow, an ACM Distinguished Lecturer, and an IEEE Fellow. She has enjoyed being a Fulbright Scholar in New Zealand (in 2006), a Distinguished Visitor at the University of Bonn in Germany (in 2010), and a keynote presenter at
business sectors. The quality assurance inengineering education is a systematic project, facing a special internal and external policyenvironment. At present, engineering education accreditation has become the main qualityassurance mechanism for higher engineering education, and has promoted the formation oftwo major engineering education accreditation systems: Washington Accord (WA) andEuropean Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE). The globalengineering education accreditation presents the result-oriented, international connection,continuous improvement and industry-university cooperation trend [1]. Under this framework,colleges and universities in various countries and regions have tried to explore the path ofquality
. External Battery: An external battery works as the independent energy storage device in the system. It usually takes an entire day for the solar panel to charge the battery. C. Projector: The pico-projector runs on an Android OS and uses the Digital Light Processing (DLP) technology invented by Texas Instruments for projection. The pico- projector has an internal battery which can be charged through the external battery. This battery can run the projector for approximately 2.5 hours at 130 lumens of brightness. D. Memory Devices and Ports: SD cards or USB drives can be used as memory devices for the educational content in stand-alone mode. The systems deployed were shipped with a standard 32 GB SD