Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James McAllister, University of Arkansas

replacement cost. A fine is handed down to the user whodamaged or returned a kit with missing part(s). A replacement fee will be assessed for any kitthat is not returned. Those notes are listed under the loan policies on the inside cover of the kit.Another challenge is introducing new library staff to Arduino due to common turnover in theuser services (circulation) department. To resolve this, the engineering librarian hosts quarterlyworkshops for training new and interested library staff on Arduino kits. This workshop toucheson the checkout policy for the Arduino kits, when to replenish them, and navigating through theArduino libguide.ConclusionThe process of introducing Arduino Library Kits for checkout appears to be off to a great startwith

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carly Eressy, University of Texas at Austin; Brittain Sobey, University of Texas at Austin; Margo Cousins, University of Texas at Austin

53: Where did you study abroad? How was this experience? Question 54: I participated in undergraduate research with a faculty member for at least one semester. Question 55: Please select all of the BME workshops you attended at least once. If one of the workshops was selected for Question 55: Free-text response: Question 56: Please share how the workshop(s) were or were not helpful to you so we can improve them. Are there other topics we should cover in workshops? Question 57: Did you use the ECAC’s services during your time as an undergraduate? If “Yes” is selected for

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deana Delp; Jake Okun, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

. 573-577, 2013.[4] S. Subhash, and E.A. Cudney, “Gamified Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 87, pp. 192-206, 2018.[5] T. A/L Rajendran, and P.M. Shah, “Students perception of Gamification: The Use of Kahoot,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 773-783, 2020.[6] A. Manzano-Leon, P. Camacho-Lazarraga, M.A. Guerrero-Puerta, L. Guerrero-Puerta, A. Alias, J.M. Aguilar-Parra, and R. Trigueros, “Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Motivation for Cooperative Playful Learning Strategies,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1-10, 2021.

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmad Fayed, Southeastern Louisiana University

Figure 10. It was clear that the tensile strengthis linearly proportional with the percentage infill of the specimen. area (m2) Figure 9 Sample tensile specimen datasheet for specimen XT95-1 Tough Force, strain, and stress data with blue data bars (left). Stress-Strain plot (top right). Elastic portion of the Stress-Strain plot (middle right). Modulus of elasticity (E) & ultimate tensile strength (S u). Figure 10 Ultimate Tensile Strength variation with percentage infill for PLA.2. Impact TestResults from the PLA tough specimens can be seen below in the form of a table and scatter plot.The scatter plot helps visually see the linear correlation between infill percentage and specimentoughness

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deng Cao, Central State University; Marcus Nagle, Central State University; Cadance Lowell, Central State University; joshua jolly; Rajveer Dhillon, Central State University; Augustus Morris, Central State University

isexpected to use transfer learning to customize one or more pre-trained neural networks fornew classes. The new network(s) should be able to distinguish at least two new classes thatare not included in the pre-trained networks. Heavy coding is not required for this project,but each student needs to learn how to collect their own database and write proper code tore-train the existing network using transfer learning.The deliverable of the project is a working image classifier that can work on Linux,Windows, or Mac OS. Each student also needs to prepare a final project report that includesthe motivation, the implementation details, the achieved goals and discovered issues, alongwith a 10-minutes PowerPoint presentation to explain their project in the

Conference Session

CPDD Technical Session 2 - Trends in Student and Faculty Support

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell Springer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kathryne Newton, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

up from 29.9% adecade earlier in 2010. In 2000, one-third of people with at least a bachelor’s degree hadcompleted an advanced degree. By 2018, 37 percent had done so. The number of people withmaster’s degrees, then is roughly 13% of the current U. S. Population. The number of peoplewith professional degrees is roughly 1.2%, while the number of people with Doctorate degrees isclose to 2.2%Given this, what is the interest and likelihood of those with master’s degrees pursuing an onlineDoctor of Technology degree? And, demographically, who are those students?The Doctor of Technology (DTECH) program of this paper was nearly six and a half years in themaking. It began with a committee envisioning a degree concept through a yet to be

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Online Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bo Yu, University of Wisconsin - Platteville

) is the error signal at the kth time step. r(k) represents the reference temperature, andy(k) is the measured temperature. u(k) is the controller output and DC represents the duty cycle.For this activity, students are asked to write a python function in the program that represents theon-off controller. The inputs of the function are the setpoint and the actual temperature output, pv.The function should return the controller output, op. Once the program is done, they can run theprogram and plot the on-off response of the heater. Fig. 5 shows the response of an on-offcontroller. The top figure shows the temperature response changes with a setpoint for 1200 s. Thedashed line represents the desired temperature output. The 2nd figure from the top

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 5: Strategies for Increasing Classroom Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. David Burghardt, Hofstra University; Deborah Hecht

Conference, Seattle.5. Kerr, Barbara. (2015). The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of theresearch. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive CollaborativeLearning. Florence, Italy.6. Garrick, R. (2018). Flipped Classroom Video Analytics. ASEE Annual Conference, Salt LakeCity.7. M. L. Fowler, Flipping signals and systems—Course structure & results. Acoustics, Speechand Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference. Pp 2219-2223, IEEE 2014.8. S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H.W. Lee.” Flipping the Classroom to ExploreActive Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course” Proceedings ASEE 2009 Annual Conference.9. Burghardt, M. David. (2021). Burghardt Thermodynamics. Retrieved

Conference Session

ETD - STEM Issues in ET I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asif Ahmed, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute

. Reid, K. J., and Cooney, E. M., “Implementing rubrics as part of an assessment plan”. TheInternational Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 893-900, 2008.4. Schaffer, S. P., Chen, X., Zhu, X., and Oakes, W. C., “Self‐efficacy for cross‐disciplinarylearning in project‐based teams”. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 82-94, 2012.5. Ulrich, V., “Rating Capstone Design Students on an Industrial Scale”. In 2008 ASEE AnnualConference, Pittsburg, PA, June 22-25, 2008. (pp. 13-1018).6. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABETengineering criteria”. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25, 2003.7. Osman, A., Yahya, A. A., and Kamal, M. B., “A benchmark collection for mapping programeducational

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel L Romero; Jessica Stershic; Taylor Ryan; Michael Young

of Energy, “A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings,” Sep. 2015.[3] M. Eastment et al., “Solar Decathlon 2002: The Event in Review,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DOE/GO-102004-1845, Jun. 2004.[4] L. Cervantes, T. Letts, L. Vita, and T. Juliani, “Power Forward 4.0: A Progress Report of the Fortune 500’s Transition to a Net-Zero Economy,” World Wildlife Fund, Jun. 2021.[5] “Annual Impact Report: Fiscal Year 2021,” Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. [Online]. Available: https://express.adobe.com/page/n7LSTrJx9RmA5/[6] U.S. Department of Energy, “Solar Decathlon: About Solar Decathlon,” Solar Decathlon. https://www.solardecathlon.gov/about.html (accessed Dec. 17, 2021).[7

Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Boni Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Hannia Koolman, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology; Anna Lummus, Georgia Institute of Technology

category was not considered in analysis. 11Table 7. Paired Samples Testing Bloom’s Category p value Paired Samples Test Skewness (S) Remember <0.05 Sign Test -0.824 Understand <0.05 Sign Test -1.222 Apply <0.05 Sign Test -1.910 Analyze 0.031 Wilcoxon Test 0.228 Evaluate

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Virginia Tech (primary) and Universidad EAFIT (secondary); Matthew James, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Catherine Twyman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Benjamin Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tahsin Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006.[2] M. Mosgaard and C. M. Spliid, “Evaluating the impact of a PBL-course for first-year engineering students learning through PBL-projects,” in 2011 2nd International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace Electronic Systems Technology (Wireless VITAE), Feb. 2011, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2011.5940927.[3] K. M. Yusof, A. N. Sadikin, F. A. Phang, and A. A. Aziz, “Instilling professional skills and sustainable development through Problem-Based Learning (PBL) among first year engineering students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 333–347, 2016.[4] C. S. Simmons, “Using CATME team-maker to form student groups in a

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Liesl Folks, The University of Arizona; LAURENE TUMIEL BERHALTER, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Nancy Schiller, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

: https://www.facebook.com/UBNavigate/ • Twitter Page: https://twitter.com/UBNAVIGATE • Ten downloadable case studies that teach a variety of concepts, issues and strategies concerning women in STEM: https://www.buffalo.edu/navigate-project/case-studies.htmlReferences[1] Catalyst. (2015). Revealing the Real Millennials: Workplace Gender Bias. New York.Retrievedfrom http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/revealing-real-millennials-workplace-gender-bias. 7[2] Bird, Sharon R., and Karla A. Erickson. 2010. A constructive controversy approach to casestudies. Teaching Sociology 38(2): 119-131.)[3] Shields, S. A., Zawadzki, M. J., & Johnson, R. N

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Guntulu Hatipkarasulu

Paper ID #37617An Organizational Review of CIP Code Designations forConstruction Science, Technology, Engineering, andManagement Programs and CurriculumYilmaz Hatipkarasulu (AssociateProfessor)Guntulu S Hatipkarasulu © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com An Organizational Review of CIP Code Designations for Construction Science, Technology, Engineering, and Management Programs and CurriculumABSTRACTThe higher education programs in the United States are organized using the Classification ofInstructional Program (CIP) codes. This taxonomic scheme

Conference Session

WIED: Activities and Programs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Weiss-Lopez; Michael Frye; Orion Jones

) and AEOP REAP through the Rochester Institute of Technology.Reference[1] N. N. Heilbronner, (2012). “The stem pathway for women.” Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460085[2] A. Connors-Kellgren, C. E. Parker, D. L. Blustein, & M. Barnett, (2016). “Innovations and challenges in project-based STEM Education: Lessons from ITEST”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9658-9[3] N. Dasgupta, & J. G. Stout, (2014). “Girls and women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471[4] S. Cano, (2022

Conference Session

ERM: ERM Medley Session!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tina Wang; Laura Jun Chee Yong, Pennsylvania State University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Linda Hanagan, Pennsylvania State University

, R.W. & Brown, S.D. & Hackett, Gail. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development (4th Ed.. 255-311).[5] Oyserman, Daphna & Destin, Mesmin. (2010). Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention. The Counseling psychologist. 38. 1001-1043. 10.1177/0011000010374775.[6] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).[7] Oyserman, D. (2015). Pathways to success through identity-based motivation, 188. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195341461.001.0001[8] Knight, M., & Cunningham, C

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 3: Best of ELOS

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget Smyser, Northeastern University

Conference Session

Assessment in Mechanics Courses

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Brown, Abilene Christian University; Timothy Kennedy, Abilene Christian University

mechanics curriculum, as well as the efficacy of differentiatedlearning both within this class and as students continue through their curriculum in both subjectareas.BibliographyB. S. Bloom, “Mastery Learning,” in Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice, New York:Rinehart & Winston, 1971, pp. 47–63.Durm, Mark W. "An A is not an A is not an A: A history of grading." In The educational forum,vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 294-297. Taylor & Francis Group, 1993.Agrawal, Ashok K., and Stephanie Harrington-Hurd. "Preparing next generation graduates for aglobal engineering workforce: Insights from tomorrow's engineers." Journal of EngineeringEducation Transformations 29, no. 4 (2016): 5-12.Nilson, Linda B. Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 5: Remote, Hands-On Laboratories

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Robinson

engineering programs, 2022–2023. url: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineeringprograms-2022-2023/.”[2] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005.[3] T. Kotulski and S. Murray, “The national engineering laboratory survey,” Labshare Project. December, 2010.[4] M. Robinson, “The machina: an ecosystem of control system experiments,” ASEE NCS Regional Conference, Pittsburgh: ASEE 2022.[5] J. Sarik and I. Kymissis, “Lab kits using the arduino prototyping platform,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. T3C–1, IEEE, 2010.[6] P. Jamieson and J

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophia Santillan, Duke University; Lupita TeMiquel-McMillian, Duke University; Jennifer Ganley; Stacy Tantum, Duke University

. M. Allen, “Essential Functions of Academic Advising: What Students Want and What Students Get,” NACADA Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 56-66, 2006.[5] B. J. Zimmerman, A. Bandura and M. Martinez-Pons, “Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 663-676, 1992.[6] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366-395, 2016.[7] B. W. Smith, J. Dalen, K. Wiggens, E. Tooley, P. Christopher, and J. Bernard, “The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the

Conference Session

Computers in Education 9 - Technology I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Sullivan, Virginia Military Institute; James Squire, Virginia Military Institute; David Feinauer, Virginia Military Institute

, Natesan, P. Vidhya, and Xiao-Zhi Gao. "Virtual laboratory: A boon to the mechanical engineering education during covid-19 pandemic." Higher Education for the Future 8.1 (2021): 31-46.5. Makransky, Guido, Thomas S. Terkildsen, and Richard E. Mayer. "Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning." Learning and Instruction 60 (2019): 225-236.6. Deshpande, Amit A. and Samuel H. Huang. "Simulation games in engineering education: A state‐of‐the‐art review." Computer Applications in Engineering Education 19.3 (2011): 399-410.7. Brown, Corina E., et al. "Visualizing molecular structures and shapes: A comparison of virtual reality, computer simulation, and traditional

Conference Session

Manufacturing Workforce Development

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenifer Blacklock, University of Colorado Boulder; Greg Vanderbeek, University of Colorado Boulder

validation strategy." Global Journal of Engineering Education 13.3 (2011): 96-101.9. Lui V.M., Gallardo- Córdova, K.E., Castillo- Díaz S., "Performance and authentic assessment in a mechanical engineering course." Global Journal of Engineering Education 20.1 (2018): 30-38.10. Cruz M.L., Saunders-Smits G.N., Groen P., "Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review." European Journal of Engineering Education (2019): 1-29.

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maartje E.D. Van den Bogaard, Delft University of Technology; David Reeping, University of Cincinnati; Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan; Joanna Millunchick, University of Michigan

. Johnson, and C. J. Finelli, “The role of college knowledge and proactive behavior on participation in cocurricular activities,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 114–142, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20380.[4] C. A. Capper, Interpretivist Epistomology. New York City NY: Routledge, 2018.[5] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.[6] K. Charmaz, Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, 2006.[7] E. Nordmann, C. E. Küepper-Tetzel, L. Robson, S. Phillipson, G. I. Lipan, and P. McGeorge, “Lecture capture: Practical recommendations for students and instructors.,” Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol., 2020, doi: 10.1037/stl0000190.[8

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Kun Yao, University of Georgia; Adel Al Weshah, University of Georgia; Olanrewaju Olaogun, University of Georgia; Shiyu Wang, University of Georgia

-option multiple-choice test, for example,there is a 25% chance of choosing a correct option by pure luck. Similarly, a test taker has 75% chance ofchoosing the wrong option inadvertently. The fact that what students really know may be so confoundedundermines the objective of administering CIs to probe their prior knowledge. Similarly, it may also bedifficult to determine whether a respondent chose a wrong option on the CI test due to a lack of priorknowledge or as the result of having a misconception(s) about the concept the test item assesses. Accordingto extant conceptual change literature, being able to differentiate between misconceptions and a lack ofknowledge has considerable implications for effective pedagogy [9, 11, 12]. Thus, an

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 2 - Community Engagement without Frontiers

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Hunt, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Matthew Williamson, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

project expectations and encourage students toembrace the unique opportunity provided by the community focused design project. Earlyfeedback from instructors should ease some of the confusion or overwhelmed feelings thatstudents seem deal with when presented an open-ended problem. In the Spring 2022 semester,one capstone design section will be given more frequent project deadlines and outcomes will becompared against a section with less frequent project deadlines. The addition of these definedmilestones may be a benefit to those students who struggle with the open-ended nature of thecourse and project.References[1] A. J. Dutson, R.H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C.D. Sorensen. ‘‘A review of literature onteaching engineering design through project

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cyrus Habibi, University of Wisconsin - Platteville

of specification, and they wererequired to first design and simulate the circuit using Spice software, and then test their design inthe lab. The findings reveal that using both simulation and hands-on together has been an effectivemethod in students’ learning. Although students were frustrated by design features of the labs, webelieve that design portion had increased the students’ motivation. Distance students weredisappointed with working with Analog Discovery on their own, and not to be in lab with otherstudents, or in the presence of the instructor; we have not found any good resolution for them. Thedistance students usually work during the school time and complete the schoolwork on weekendor weeknight.References[1]. Edward, Norrie S

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers; Erin Carll; Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington

that they would stay on the pathway to a bachelor’s degree in engineering or computerscience. COVID-19’s impact on our plans to host in-person networking events in convenientlocations and times in specific regions of the U.S. resulted in a need to pivot to virtual events.While this move allowed us to offer these events to anyone interested in attending, regardless oflocation, it presented some recruitment challenges that negatively impacted event attendance bythe specific population we were most interested in studying,This study was also undertaken to help inform SWE’s program development to better supportCC students in STEM programs. SWE has limited relationships with students attending CCs, andthese events were offered as a way to introduce

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

harderquestions. Adaptive testing is frequently used for placement tests (e.g., in language or mathematicscourses); it is useful whenever it is necessary to gauge a student’s skill with precision. The only one ofthe five platforms that implements adaptive testing is Moodle. In Moodle, an “adaptive quiz” selectsquestions from a question bank that accord with the apparent ability level of the student. Blackboard andCanvas have a related feature called “adaptive release.” With adaptive release, a new assignment isreleased to a student after (s)he makes a specified score on some other assignment. For example, astudent might be allowed to take Quiz 2 after scoring 90% or greater on Quiz 1. This isn’t quite asflexible as adaptive testing, because it requires

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi Sherick, University of Michigan; Pauline Khan, University of Michigan; Tershia Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan; Deborah Covington, University of Michigan

begin by asking each individual to introduce themselves and then by establishing someguidelines. ● We value your honest feedback and would like to hear from all participants. ● Empathy and humility are essential characteristics needed both for the eventual program itself as well as this initial visioning process. Therefore, we ask you to respond to the greatest degree possible with these traits in mind.During the session, ● Help the participants focus on the goals. ● Identify a specific subtopic or a theme and ask participant(s) to expand on their thinking. ● Highlight the diversity of perspectives and encourage thoughtful engagement of different viewpoints, but encourage participants to expand on their thinking and/or to

Conference Session

Computers in Education 7 - Modulus 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahmoud Quweider, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Fitratullah Khan; Liyu Zhang; Hansheng Lei

/stem-solutions/articles/2016-11-23/study-girls- less-interested-in-stem-fields-perceived-as-masculine10. Bonwell, C., and Eison, J. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report 1, 1991.11. ODEP. (2016). Essential skills to getting a job. Retrieved from http://promotions.usa.gov/odep/essential_job_skills.pdf12. Julia Evetts” Women and careers in engineering: management changes in the work organization,” Women in Management Review Volume 12, Number 6, pp. 228–233, 1997.13. McRae, S., Devine, F. and Lakey, J., Women into Science and Engineering, Policy Studies Institute, London, 1991.Appendix A. Sample Cyber Security Program Brochure