are encouraged; however, smaller teams can be accepted if the students demonstrate theyhave the appropriate discipline, work ethic and accountability to be successful. A faculty/staffselection committee will then evaluate the proposals in terms of quality, research interest, andresources required (e.g., expertise, time, supplies, equipment, funding, faculty advisor). Theselection committee is usually comprised of the MESA Center coordinator, grant directorsfunding the projects and an additional STEM faculty. Once selections are made, teams arenotified and required to attend an orientation where students sign agreements, liability waiversand other requisite paperwork. They also interact with other student researchers through team-building
discriminated, too.” (P8) “I think the first thing is not to make this so awkward because I find myself often not sure of when to disclose to people that I am hard of hearing. If I am at a phone interview, I know that I have to be in a quiet space. Also, I can't use a speakerphone because it sometimes was not clear. I have an experience where I am on a phone call with the call quality is really bad. I have to ask them to repeat. You know it makes the interview not go very well.” (P5) “I did have an interview with the Department of Defense. They made a conditional job offer but withdrew, because of ethical concerns. They encouraged me to apply to different departments within the Department of Defense. I turned it down
participants were informed of the conditions,risks, and safeguards of the project.Additional steps were taken to ensure the study was conducted ethically and avoided any ethicaldilemmas such as protecting the anonymity and confidentiality of the participants. Steps toensure anonymity included assigning codes to mask any personal identifiable information thatcould be traced back to each participant. Steps to safeguard confidentiality in addition toassigning codes to each participant included the storage of any personal identifiable informationin a separate file (e.g., demographic information, student identification number, etc.) andsecurely discarded once the data collection had been completed. NVivo – a qualitative dataanalysis computer software
-residence at Nokia Bell Labs and an assistant professor at the University of Michigan teaching Sci-Fi Prototyping, a course combining sci-fi, prototyping, and ethics. Her ongoing objective is to combine her background in art, design, and engineering to inspire a more positive future. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Considering people: An exploratory investigation of engineering student ideationLaura R. MurphyShanna R. DalyColleen M. SeifertEytan AdarSophia BruecknerUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAAbstractHuman-centered design is a prominent approach to engineering design. However, research hasdocumented multiple engineering student challenges in considering the people who will use
graduate students and two university professional developers),determined the audience and focus for the workshop. We felt the discrepancies between STEM-H discipline research and education research (e.g. natural laws vs. conceptual frameworks,feasibility and ethicality of controlled studies in education), would be the main source of initialconfusion for participants. We hypothesized that the participants would benefit from anintroduction to foundational education research ideas, and we addressed these discrepancies thatlead to tensions due to differing views and values of research among the discipline-basedcommunities. We sought to unpack and diffuse tensions by emphasizing that anywhere on thelandscape, valuable research means appropriately
Paper ID #28515Developing and Sustaining a Research Group: A Novel Approach toOnboarding Doctoral StudentsDr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include workforce development and engineering ethics education.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She holds a
and effectiveness of inclusion and diversity initiatives and employing innovative, ethical and inclusive mixed methods research designs to People Research.Dr. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Michelle Soledad is the Director of Communications and International Engagement in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds degrees degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, and in Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflec- tive practice. Michelle’s professional experience includes roles in industry and academia
, Conference Proceedings, 2017.[6] E. Schmitt, E. Kames, B. Morkos, and T. A. Conway, “The importance of incorporating designer empathy in senior capstone design courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016.[7] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, 2017.[8] E. Segal, K. Gerdes, C. Lietz, M. A. Wagaman, and J. Geiger, Assessing Empathy. 2017.[9] M. Kouprie and F. S. Visser, “A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 437–448, 2009.[10] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka, “A
, manyengineering experiments are costly and complicated, restricting their use to instructionallaboratories. Another common occurrence is that engineering lab classes often encompass a widevariety of learning objectives [9]. For the purposes of ABET evaluation and assessment, it is notuncommon for lab classes to be used to assess student outcomes beyond experimentation, andincluding student outcomes having to do with communication, teamwork, ethics andprofessionalism, and life-long learning. Communication, in particular, is a component in labclasses that often results in the majority of time being spent on the preparation of written reportsrather than on actually doing the experiment or in reflecting on the results [10]. As a result,students in dedicated
since theirgraduations. We also consider evidence of the alumni’s engagement in and support of thecollege as one measure of civic and professional engagement, one of the objectives of theprogram.IntroductionThe general goal of an engineering education is to provide students with the knowledge andskills necessary to operate effectively as an engineer. The main emphasis, of course, is ontechnical knowledge and skills, including problem-solving abilities. ABET engineeringaccreditation goes further and requires that the engineering education include ethics andprofessional skills, such as communication and the ability to work in multidisciplinary teams [1].However, leadership skills historically have been overlooked in undergraduate
Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 268–275, 2016.[22] H. K. Evans and J. H. Clark, “‘You Tweet Like a Girl!’ How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter,” American Politics Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 326–352, 2016.[23] H. Karbasian, H. Purohit, R. Handa, A. Malik, and A. Johri, “Real-Time Inference of User Types to Assist with more Inclusive and Diverse Social Media Activism Campaigns,” in Proceedings of the 1st AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New Orleans, USA, 2018.[24] A. Johri, H. Karbasian, A. Malik, R. Handa, and H. Purohit, “How Diverse Users and Activities Trigger Connective Action via Social Media: Lessons from the Twitter Hashtag Campaign# ILookLikeAnEngineer,” in Proceedings of the
Developed a malware testbed to perform static and dynamic analysis on malware samples inside a sandbox Spring 2016: CSC 2120 Objected Oriented Programming Designed and developed a pizza ordering system(d) An ability to function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal. 2015: Current: LiquidEarth Designed, developed, and validated a flood prediction application In a team environment(e) An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities.(f) An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. Spring 2016: PC 2500 Professional Communications Honors Presented to large groups in various professional settings(g) An ability to analyze the local and global impact
goals after graduation. building structure. gaining an internship. Describe the role of professional licensure Describe what you are in ARCE, and how that includes a strong most excited about focus on engineering ethics and regarding studying professional development. ARCEDesign-Project Mentoring: (CE 562, CE 765)Course Descriptions: CE 562, “Design of Steel Structures,” is a senior-level required course forCE and ARCE majors and 38 students were enrolled during Fall 2017. CE 765, “Advanced SteelDesign,” is a graduate-level course of which CE 562 is a pre
: Freeman, 1997.[11] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, N. W. Sochacka, and M. A. Brewer, “Fostering empathy in an undergraduate mechanical engineering course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016.[12] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, “The Development of Empathic Perspective-Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, 2017.[13] M. H. Davis, “Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 1983.[14] K. E. Gerdes, “Empathy, Sympathy, and Pity: 21st-Century Definitions and Implications for Practice and Research,” J. Soc. Serv. Res., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 230–241, 2011.[15
have identified thatdesirable attributes of an engineer include good communication skills, high ethical standards, theability and self-confidence to adapt to rapid or major change, the ability to work ininterdisciplinary teams and a profound understanding of the importance of teamwork [4]. In theRIOT team surveys, "Political Skill" (described in the next section) measures these competenciesin the individual differences surveys.We hypothesized that explicitly addressing these "soft topics" before the capstone teams wereformed would increase student awareness of their importance and provide specific tools to helpwith self-management and team cohesion. Florida Tech students come from over 50 countrieswith diverse cultures and international
projects. Korea 2016 b) What made the winning project(s) worthy of accolade? Please discuss your impressions from today’s plenary sessions: Korea 2016 The Platinum Society (Japan), Smart Societies (Korea), and The Grand Challenges (National Academy of Engineering). You are a U.S. citizen, on foreign soil, learning about the results Korea 2016 of an election back in your country. ● How are you processing results? ● Explain your feelings about your experience at the DMZ [Korea - Demilitarized Zone]? ● How do these two events shape the way that you see your role as an engineer/technologist? What were your thoughts about the “Ethical Hacking” exercise? Florida 2017 What
analytical portions of the test are converted to apercentile score to allow for comparison of scores across testing dates.Perceptions of the GREThere have been studies conducted on how students perceive the GRE and whether it is viewedas being a fair test by different social classes and ethical groups. Research conducted by Kliegeret al. in 2017 concluded that for United States citizens, “the average standardized test scores ofWhite and Asian examinees have generally exceeded the average scores of Black and Hispanicexaminees by at least one half to a full standard deviation [5].” This seems to support the claimmade by Groeger in 1998 who indicated that a “sample of 4,248 first-year graduate studentsshowed that 96% of the Black applicants indicated
% MACT 0% 1-33% 34-100% Figure 18 – Passing Rates for High Socioeconomic Students with SI Attendance by Math ACT4.4 Minority Cross-Group Examination What about the overlap between students who fit into multiple underrepresented groups?Little difference is found between the gender minority and the ethnic minority, with 4.2% of thepopulation being female and of an ethic minority. Further overlap is found when examiningsocioeconomic status. Figures 19 and 20 show students of low and high socioeconomic statusbroken down by ethnic minority. In addition to the ethnic minority overlap, females make up23.1% of LSES students and 16.1% of
blood borne pathogens. After the training, the participantsbegan working in their assigned laboratories. Over the course of the 6- week, summer program,students also attended didactic sessions and participated in discussions of research ethics,scientific misconduct, and the appropriate use of animals in research. In addition, the studentsparticipated in regular lab meetings with their research teams, and attended a workshop onpreparation and delivery of a 10-minute scientific talk.Throughout the program, the group also participated in enjoyable social and educational eventson weekends and evenings. These events included movie nights, a visit to a local museum, pizzaand burger nights at local restaurants, a visit to a research barn to observe an
level.University of Arizona Student Chapter. Here, at the University of Arizona, the ASEE chapterwas formed on an interdisciplinary model that includes a network of faculty, staff, and studentsfrom several disciplines across the university. The purpose of this cross-college, interdisciplinaryapproach is to promote engineering education at all levels. The mission of the ASEE Chapter atUniversity of Arizona are as follows: 1. To encourage collaboration between engineering undergraduate and graduate students through service, research, and professional development opportunities 2. To encourage and prepare engineering graduate students to pursue careers in academia 3. To increase awareness and understanding of societal, ethical, and public policy
Ethics Education Student Party School Learning Student Cadre School Learning Participate in small class good study style classes, advanced class collective response activities Interpersonal communication Cultivate Critical Spirit Volunteering Student Cadres Participate in organizing campus activities Course learning Discipline Competition Professional Education Technological Innovation Activities Entrepreneurial Activities Technology Competition Social Practice Social Work Sports ActivitiesDo you think the following behaviors or events are Very unimportantVery importantimportant for the development of the overall quality of 1 2 3 4 5college students?Cultural ActivityInternational ExchangeObtaining
engineeringintersect with one another.Engineering education should be a place where students are able to make connections betweencurrent political discourse, engineering content, and their practice as future engineers. Yet, thepressure to be the upholders of cultural practices in engineering can interrupt the cultivation oftheir emerging identities that integrate politics with engineering. Students should be afforded aspace where they can co-create meaning between their emerging identities and, introspectively,synthesize a transparent view of the ethical role and relationship that engineering has to society.Our work begins to highlight some of the challenges of pushing against the current culture ofengineering and re-politicizing the engineering
education.Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include critical thinking, ethics, and process design and training.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Tech David Knight is Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in the De- partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering
information. 4.25 4.09 0.16 I understand science. 4.28 4.12 0.16 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 3.84 3.97 -0.13 I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.78 3.76 0.02 I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 4.06 4.12 -0.06 I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 4.31 4.00 0.31 I have skill in science writing. 4.16 3.76 0.40 I have self-confidence. 4.22 4.27 -0.05 I understand how scientists
deficits. We additionally askedthem to explain what interests and experiences drove them to become an engineer.In the following class session, they conducted a team gap analysis, placing a tick mark for eachperson who had each specific professional skill (additional areas focused on lifelong learning,ethics, problem solving, and technical competence). Students self-assessed whether theypossessed each skill, making this a binary choice (present/absent) for each member. For ourpurposes in this paper, we narrow our scope to the areas below, which were well covered by sub-topics:Professional Communications Skills Technical writing (technical summaries, technical descriptions, reports) Professional writing (emails, memos) Oral communication
. Smith presented study after study on this most obvious national issue. One study showed hownames alone influenced whether the committee thought a candidate was qualified or not. In thatstudy, black sounding names were rated routinely lower for comparable qualifications versuscandidates with white sounding names.Dr. Smith produced university-specific numbers, reflecting below national averages across theboard. She made an adamant point to suggest “…tenure was broken… from every perspective– theoretical, practical, moral, and ethical, the tenure process and those participating in itare exercising prejudice and bias in their decision making…”At this tier 1, high research university, the issue is apparent. In a campus newspaper article, theinterim
for4-6 hours per week facilitated a sense of connection and community by creating a social supportnetwork that benefitted each participant academically. This was particularly notable since manystudents had to adjust to a rigorous academic workload in addition to college life itself. Onechemical engineering major commented on the helpful programmatic guidance and inspirationfrom students with strong work ethics and commitment: Being in WISE was very helpful, especially having another academic advisor to help you and participating in events that help you make your schedule for the following semester. Not only did I meet a lot of hard working students who encouraged me to improve my skills, but I made a lot of friends as
program structure andoverhauling the late freshman- and sophomore-level curriculum to better address today’s studentneeds. Over the past 18 months of the grant-based work, the grant PI and department facultyteams have collaborated to develop this vision through a base set of eight courses for all studentsto complete by the end of their second year. Consequently, the base courses must providestudents with a broad enough view of the field that they can make a satisfactory choice for theirpathway to a degree, while also providing them with basic knowledge that will be required ofany of those pathways.The program goals for the base courses are to 1) strengthen the integration of both electrical andcomputer engineering and ethics topics across the
. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida. Prior to joining the faculty, she served as a special educator for students with behavioral and learning disabilities in Title I elementary and middle school settings. Dr. McCray has been recognized on multiple levels for her teaching and research, which focuses on diversity issues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Critical Theories for Unmasking Individual and Structural Racialized
characteristics, meaning that the pedagogicalpractices are unique to students’ cultural, religious, demographic, and gender differences. Thesecharacteristics set students apart from one another and their educators. Therefore, when ateacher’s instructions reflect characteristics of only one group of students, the other students aredenied an equal opportunity to learn [16]. Using CRP takes into consideration a student’straditions, linguistics, value and ethical systems. CRP provides teachers with empirical andtheoretical constructs that support their efforts to lower existing barriers and opportunity gaps [17]- [19] for the increasingly diverse public-school student population in all educational platforms.CRP’s objective is to support students in obtaining