largest manufacturer, is on the verge of using 3- D printing to make jet parts. MIT Technology Review,” Available Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513716/additive-manufacturing/.[5] R. Agarwala and R. A. Chin, “Facilitating additive manufacturing engagement and outreach,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24086.
, Tseng, & Akarasriworn, 2013). Furthermore, several studiesfound that collaboration improves students’ performance by developing higher order-thinkingwhen students discuss their ideas in the group (Chung, 1998; S. D. Johnson & Chung, 1999;Mergendoller, Bellisimo, & Maxwell, 2000). Students will more engaged in learning when theyfeel they are an accepted group member (Willms, 2003). For example, girls have positiveperceptions about team processes when they are in a group comprised of other girls. As shown inprior research on SEEK, girls felt less positive about their team processes and were less engagedwhen they were in a co-ed team (Beauchamp, Edwards, Knight, & Lee, 2019). Thus, in additionto focusing on the outcomes (i.e
the other members of Senior Design Team 1078 at University of Texas at Dallas,Maria Valdez, Casey Hatfield, Jieun Kim, Taylor Beach, and Nicholas Swatchick for building thiseducation tool.Special thank you for the support from the Control Systems Department at University of Texas atDallas. References1. B. Balamuralithara and P. Woods, "Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab," in Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Wiley Online Library, 2008, pp. 108-118.2. D. Cook, S. Hamstra, B. Zendejas, J. Szostek, A. Wang, P. Erwin and R. Hatala, "Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education
of education. 5. The resuction in the number of schools and programs will facilitate the government s future stricter control and deeper involvement in 1 higher education.Another, ususally undiscussed objective that the government would like toachieve is by the application of these standards gently direct those schoolsunable to meet them, away from engineering towards technician and crafts-men educ·ation for which the need is much greater than for engineers. This"forced alternative" may appeal to the school owners once they see thewriting on the wall. This will however create other problems as technician 165education systems are even more capital intensive than those for enginee
.), Lessons Learned: Practical Advice For the Teaching ofPsychology (pp. 57-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.Reid, K.J., & Gwinn, S. (1997). Administration and Results of Extra Credit Projects. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Milwaukee, WI: Session1275.Wilder, D.A., Flood, W.A., & Stromsnes, W., (2001). The Use of Random Extra Credit Quizzesto Increase Student Attendance, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(2), 117-120.Wilson, M.L. (2002). Evidence that Extra Credit Assignments Induce Moral Hazard. AtlanticEconomic Journal, 30, 97. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE North Midwest Sectional Conference AppendixExtra
Engineering Education,Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 113-121, 2003.12- Chickering, A. W. and Gamson, Z. F., “ Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice inUndergraduate Education”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 47, pp. 13-25, 1991.13- Bjorklund, S. A., Parente, J. M. and Sathianathan, D., “Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback onGains in Student Skills”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 53-160, 2004.14- Mazur, E. Interactive Teaching Video and Book, Pearson Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-158030-2, 200715-Yearwood, D., from North Dakota University, Lecture at the University of St-Thomas, August 201016- McGraw Hill “Connect” web based system: http://mpss.mhhe.com/connectlinks.php.17- Tegrity, Video Capture system by McGraw Hill in
evaluated through this course. The evaluation results for first twosemesters are also presented. Based on the assessment results it was observed that improvementis needed to increase the ability of students to conduct experiments and critically analyze andinterpret data.References (1) Ohland, M.W., R.A. Layton, M.L. Loughry, A.G. , E B A P E R , J E E , 94(3), J 2005, . 319-326. (2) O , M. ., M.L. L , R.L. C , A.G. , D P E I is Si ,R , V P A S E E A Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2004
achievement, Oxford: Routledge, 2009 [5.] Henri, F., Computer conferencing and content analysis; A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp.115-136); New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992 [6.] Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T., Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, London: Prentice Hall Int., pp.1017−1044, 1996 [7.] Krathwohl D.R. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview; Theory into Practice, vol.41, pp.212−218, 2002 [8.] Kunen S., Cohen R., and Solman R. A levels-of-processing analysis of Bloom's Taxonomy; Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.73, pp.202−211, 1981 [9
://cvt.engin.umich.edu/ 4) Consortium for Nonproliferation Enabling Technologies (CNEC), https://cnec.ncsu.edu/ 5) Nuclear Science and Security Consortium (NSSC), https://nssc.berkeley.edu/AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy / National NuclearSecurity Administration under Award Number(s) DE-NA0003921.This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, byaccepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains anonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published formof this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US
the activities was on K-8 curriculum and waysthe CS concepts can be enacted with students via plugged and unplugged lessons. Thecurriculum focus also included numerous discussions about how to adapt provided curriculum tomake it appropriate for students with varied background experiences. During the last twoSaturdays for Cohort 1 (March/April 2020) and then for all of Cohort 2’s Saturdays (fall2020/spring 2021) an additional focus became discussing how to enact CS lessons in remotelearning environments, including asynchronously. Initially workshops were held in person,before COVID-19 pandemic required shifting to the online Zoom conferencing platform. Theworkshops were designed to be very interactive and discussion-based, with only
/. 1019. Somerville, M.H., Goldberg, D. E., Kerns, S. E. & Korte, R. (2010, October). A war of words: Using sticky language to effect change in engineering education. 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE: T3B-1-T38-2.20. Turley, J. (1981, August). Mobilization manpower: A credible force or an empty promise? Military Review, 2012.21. U.S. Continental Army Command. (1973, April 5). CONARC soft skills training conference. Proceedings of a conference conducted at the Air Defense School, 12-13 December 1972.22. Wang, X., Bendle, N.T., Mai, F. & Cotte, J. (2015). The Journal of Consumer Research at 40: A Historical Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 5-18.23. Whitmore, P.C. (1972, December). What are soft
Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[3] UNESCO, "Education: From disruption to recovery," UNESCO, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse. [Accessed 2021].[4] D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1998.[5] S. Farmingdale State College, Proposed mode of instruction, Farmingdale: Farmingdale State College, State University of New York, 2020.[6] R. F. a. R. Brent, "Learning by Doing," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 282-283, 2003.[7] J. V. TRANQUILLO, "KINESTHETIC LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM," in ASEE, Pittsburgh, 2008.[8] R. F. a. R.Brent, "Cooperative
theregion, culture or other factors, and direct engagement with members of the community in theircontext.Slide 17 Concluding Remarks (Zoom picture)So that is an overview of some of the steps we are taking. We would deeply appreciate thoughtsand feedback.ReferencesCorbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036.National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Assessments created and analyzed by the Center for the Study of Higher Education• Distributed through Qualtrics• 4 surveys throughout the 6 weeks 13 Social and Personal Growth • Consistent percentages of personal growth and finding mentors Center for the Study of Higher Education, Dr. Leticia Oseguera and Tong Li, PhD candidate, The Pennsylvania State UniversityWhen we first were creating our remote experience, we knew that it’d be a transformativeexperience regardless but we didn’t know how much of a difference it would be incompared to previous years. As we can see in the table, Cohort 8’s self assessment of theirdiscussing campus life, personal growth, and
(Online), 2015. Available: https://proxying.lib.ncsu.edu/index.php/login?url=https://search-proquest- com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/docview/1648203396?accountid=12725.[21] S. M. Lord et al, "Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, (1), pp. 32-56, 2019.
as a Teaching Professor in BME and the Director of the Office of Multicultural Affairs at WPI. Dr. Butler fosters a student community at WPI that respects and celebrates diversity in all its dimensions, including but not limited the many intersectional identities of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, and physical ability.Mrs. Ryan Meadows, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Ryan Meadows holds a B.S. in Mathematics and Business from Fitchburg State University and an M.A. in Teaching from Sacred Heart University. She is currently the Associate Director of Pre-collegiate Outreach Programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Meadows works with K-12 S STEM outreach programs
collecting more qualitative intervention data and quantitative outcomedata to examine the Undergraduate Systemic Change Model.References[1] Wigfield, A. and Eccles, J. S. “Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no 1, pp. 68-81, Jan. 2000.[2] Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.[3] Goffman, E. “On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction,” Reflections, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 7-13, Spring 2003.[4] Aronson, J. “The threat of stereotype,” Educational Leadership. vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 14-19, Nov. 2004.[5] Rudman, L.A., Ashmore, R.D. and Gary, M.L. “’Unlearning
civil engineers who went to college in Virginia.If you see someone whose career you’d like to learn more about, you can click on their photo to r. So if you areinterested in learning more about Emily’s career, click on “Go to Profile” … 33… and up comes her profile. This is similar to what we saw on the earlier example of a person’s profile.At the top you can see how many years of experience they have and what university they attended.On the left side you see general information about them. In this case Emily provided a video about her experiences. Onthe right side you can learn about the project(s) she worked on
material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Kendall, M. R., Choe, N.H., Denton, M., Borrego, M., (2018). “Engineering IdentityDevelopment of Hispanic Students.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ConferenceProceedings, 2018.2. E-mail from TAMUK Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, February 24,2021.3. Prince, S.P., Tarazkar, Y., (2013) “Mechanical Engineering Design Experience forHispanic and Low Income Students.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ConferenceProceedings, 2013.4. Meyers, K., Cripe, K. (2015) “Prior educational experience and gender influences onperceptions of a first-year engineering design project.” International
understanding of each method's physics byconnecting the physical principles to the applications; compare various plausible NDEtechniques for common industrial applications; given an application, identify one or moreappropriate NDE technique(s) by providing convincing scientific reasoning and justification. Teaching ‘Nondestructive Evaluation of Flaws’, an all-around course in NDE, using thetraditional lecture-based methods is challenging because: (1) each NDE method is based on adifferent physical principle; it is difficult for the students to grasp all the different principles andmethods one after the other within the short 15-week timeframe of one semester, and (2) theclass is highly heterogenous; the students have very different backgrounds
homeworkwrappers.SummaryThis formative assessment of the use of homework wrappers focused upon completion andagreement rate (accuracy). The observed rates are both lower than hoped for, but the studysuggest ways that both the wrappers and their implementation might be improved.References[1] C. R. F. Lund, "Can Students Self-Generate Appropriately Targeted Feedback on Their OwnSolutions in a Problem-Solving Context," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020: ASEE, p.17, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34256.[2] Ambrose, S. A. et al. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for SmartTeaching. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. 2010, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 199pp.
learning environment and instructional design were evaluated byconducting a survey at the end of the Fall 2020 semester. Survey was posted on the class websiteand its purpose was clarified at the beginning of the survey question as well as in email beforeinviting students to participate in the survey. Students were given extra credit for theirparticipation in the survey. There were 5 questions in the survey to determine students generalview on learning online. These questions were: 1. Have you ever taken online class(s) before classes becoming virtual in COVID-19 pandemic? If “YES”, did you like online classes? 2. What do you like about online classes? 3. What do you DON’T like about online classes? 4. What do
and impending motion as areasoning applied to this problem. The altered question but still with free response, referred to asQuestion B, is shown below in Figure 2. Figure 2. Question B is an isomorph of the question altered based on student reasoning patterns.We then mapped the codes for the question onto the coupled response for the question pair weplanned to place on the Concept Warehouse. In Table 2, the first column shows the proposedresponse that would be provided to students in the follow-up question. The follow up questionreads, “Given your answer to the previous question, select the following reason(s) that help youjustify or support your answer. Select all that apply.” Given this phrasing, students should
are up to 3 GHz. wave bands. expensive Dynamic Range Only 30 dB of dynamic Excellent Dynamic High frequency Local range at 1500 MHz 5th Range over a wide Oscillator harmonic Band upper bandwidth that can be components are very edge with 50 dB of greater than 100 dB expensive dynamic range in the below 300 MHz band. S – parameters S11 and S21 with no S11, S21, S22, and Transfer Switch adds coverage transfer switch. S12 with built in cost transfer switch Ability to
, 2001.[4] B. Sukumaran, J. Chen, Y. Mehta, D. Mirchandani, K. Hollar, “A sustained effort for education students about sustainable development,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004.[5] S. Badjou, “Implementation of an integrated project-based approach within an established and EAC-of- ABET accredited interdisciplinary electromechanical/biomedical engineering program,” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2011.[6] J. Pan, A. Liddicoat, J. Harris, D. Dalbello, “A project-based electronics manufacturing laboratory course for lower division engineering students,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2008
, Washington, DC, 1976.[7] J. W. Prados, G. D. Peterson and L. R. Lattuca, "Quality Assurance of Engineering Education through Accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and Its Global Influence," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 165-184, January 2005.[8] T. Ruutmann and H. Kipper, "Rethinking effective teaching and learning for the design of efficient curriculum for technical teachers," International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44-51, January 2013.[9] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, "Understanding student differences," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57-72, 2005.[10] S. O. Ikenberry and G. D. Kuh, "From compliance to ownership," in Using evidence of student learning to
the use of multi-colorhighlighting to keep track ofsimilar terms as well as theshaded box to indicate the finalanswer(s). The use of thestraight-line tool was also used Figure 1: Analysis involving detailed mathematics andeffectively to divide the schematics from 2nd year electronics course. Workworkspace in multiple regions. from iPad is shown on the left, while hand-written work is shown on the right.The work shown in Figure 2 is anexample of the use of GoodNotesfor a laboratory notebook in anECE-specific introduction toengineering course. In thisexample, the students utilized theiPad’s built-in camera to capturephotos of the circuit assemblies aswell as a screen capture of theoutput of
Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.10.18260/p.24743[3] Wuerffel, E., & Will, J. D. (2015, June), Engineering in the Humanities: InterdisciplinaryProjects in the Arts and Engineering Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23968[4] Padir, T., & Looft, F., & Michalson, W., & Ciaraldi, M., & Cobb, E., & Stafford, K. (2010,June), Teaching Multidisciplinary Design To Engineering Students: Robotics Capstone Paperpresented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky.https://peer.asee.org/16452[5] Kaplan, A., & Flynn, J., & Katz, S. (2014, June), CubeSat: A Multidisciplinary Senior DesignProject Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual
disaster prevention measures. Why are engineering educators observing Give a formal definition of Design thinking. Define the life cycle of and engineering significant shifts in societal expectations of product. engineering? What are the five (5) steps of design thinking? Name the three fundamental dimensions of What is the 6th factor in the sustainable Define sustainable return on investment (S- sustainable development. analysis of design thinking? ROI) for an engineering project. Why systems thinking is a powerful tool to Explain how sustainable development can be
include market research, finite element, and other analyses in an attempt to run the project as an independent company. This was a much wider scope than would have been afforded under the external client and resulted in a richer senior design and practicum experience. References Ancona, Deborah G., and David F. Caldwell, “Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance,” Organization Science, 3:3 (August 1992) pp.321 – 341. Bass, Bernard M., and Bruce J. Avolio, Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, Sage Publications Inc (1994) Donnelly, Richard G., and Deborah S. Kezsbom, “Overcoming the responsibility- authority gap: an investigation of effective