. Research Questions Our goal with the IPE study is to answer the following research question: How do informal engineering programs (such as Design Squad, a WGBH multimedia informal engineering program for middle schoolaged children) support engineeringrelated learning over time (i.e., engineering pathways)? To get at this larger question, we will also explore five related, secondary questions: 1. What is the profile of children who benefit the most (i.e., develop positive outcome expectations about engineering, greater engineeringrelated selfefficacy, and an increased interest in engineering) after exposure to informal STEM programs? 2. How much exposure to informal STEM programs is sufficient to support
analysis tutorials. Initial results from a laboratory-based study showed astatistically significant 1.21 standard deviation improvement in student performance compared tonormal textbook-based homework. The software has been used by over 1290 students at fourdifferent universities and some community colleges, with high levels of user satisfaction andgenerally favorable comments.1. IntroductionOne of the most widely taught courses in undergraduate engineering curricula is linear circuitanalysis, as many majors other than just electrical engineering require their students to have atleast general familiarity with electrical circuits. For example, around 19 mostly large (70-80student) sections of this course (including 2 sections completely online) are
research. Several students received research positions based on this activity. Aftereach meeting the participants were surveyed to determine how effective the meeting was and toidentify topics of interest for future meetings.Six of the 22 CIRC students were transfer students, leading to the realization that transferstudents were very much in need of a “little hand holding”.1 Based on this we applied for andreceived a second NSF CSEMS (award #0324212), this one focused on transfer students, Page 26.358.2beginning in Fall 2003. CIRC transfer students were then put into this second program calledCIRC/Maricopa Engineering Transition Scholars (CIRC/METS
(CCs). The authors suspected that these transfer students might just be the tip of a large icebergof students who sought and could benefit strongly from a “supportive hand.” 1 There were noprograms at that time specifically for new transfer students in ENGR; the only option availableto learn about life at a large school for these students was to join freshmen students in an ASU101 introductory class. Transfer students averaging age 25 are not particularly enthralled to be inclass with 18 year olds who are very interested in what happened in the dorm last night. The firstauthor and director of the NSF STEM for upper division students then wrote a second successfulproposal (#0324212) to NSF to support upper division transfer students in an S
we have been working.Much has already been published on this program, including the evolution of CIRC.1-6 Majorhighlights will be discussed.Program HighlightsThe goals of this scholarship program have remained the same through its history. The first goalis to graduate the student. The second goal is that they will graduate in good stead with anexcellent set of experiences in addition to the classroom, including internships and researchpositions. A third goal is that the student will go right on to graduate school full-time aftergraduation and earn an engineering or computer science Master’s or Ph.D. degree. Everythingdone in this program is designed to help the student reach these three goals.An Academic Success and Professional Development
data collection.Motivation - Why Research on Adult Nontraditional Engineering StudentsEngineers seek to find solutions to society’s problems. The keystone to successfully attainingsolutions may be said to be diversity - diversity of our lived experiences. We can claim thatengineering, by its very nature, is dependent on teamwork and creativity of thought. Diversity Page 26.879.2increases the range and creativeness of possible solutions the team or individual can attain(1).Whereas gender and ethnic diversity are commonly studied aspects, studies involving studentage comprise a much smaller set of the available literature within the engineering
education and outreach programs, STEM teacher development, and climate change education programs. Page 26.785.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Flipping the Infrastructure ClassroomThis paper and its companion poster are the result of a recent (September 1, 2013) funding award fromthe National Science Foundation. The outcomes of the proposed work are: Establish and sustain the Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) as the source for infrastructure education materials that are continuously improved by a vibrant
wild” will be noted. Based on this feedback, we have produced four new variations on the inquiry-‐based Page 26.463.2activities. These involve: a) replacing the students’ experiments with simulations; b) replacing the students’ experiments with the students observing the experiment 1 as an in-‐class demonstration; c) the students’ watching the simulation as an in-‐class demonstration and d) replacing both
and display their screen on a large monitor; laptops available forcheck out; dual monitors on the computer stations; and rotating art pieces from the campus’spermanent gallery collection.To assess the effectiveness of the space, user demographics are collected and analyzed. Table 1shows usage of the space in CenterPOINTS’s first two complete academic years. These uniqueuser numbers represent approximately 30% of College of EMS students in 2013-14, andapproximately 35% in 2014-15.Table 1: CenterPOINT VisitorsYear Visits Unique Visitors Average Visits per VisitorAcademic Year 2013-14 12,932 816 16Academic Year 2014-15 13,956 933 15In 2013-14 overall, 29.4% of visitors were
, and this new categorization system allows OEC users toquickly see all case studies on the site. This is true even when case studies are embeddedwithin other resources such as teaching modules or published papers. Users can alsoquickly find other resources collected by the OEC such as educationalactivities/programs; assessment tools; instructor materials such as syllabi, lesson plans, orpedagogical notes; bibliographies, and more (figure 1). Figure 1: Resource typesIn addition to categorization by resource types, topical categories provide a method forfinding resources based on ethical themes and also by controversial issues in science andengineering
ofUndergraduate Education. The current deployment and effort is being supported through theImproving Undergraduate STEM education (IUSE) program (Award # 1432373), also under theDivision of Undergraduate Education.References[1] Munoz-Merino, P.J.; Kloos, C.D.; Munoz-Organero, M.; , "Enhancement of Student Learning Through theUse of a Hinting Computer e-Learning System and Comparison With Human Teachers," Education, IEEETransactions on , vol.54, no.1, pp.164-167, Feb. 2011.[2] Guzman, E.; Conejo, R., "Self-assessment in a feasible, adaptive web-based testing system," Education, IEEETransactions on , vol.48, no.4, pp. 688- 695, Nov. 2005.[3] Renninger, K. A., Sansone, C., & Smith, J. (2004). Love of learning. In C. Peterson & M. E. P
National Science Foundation underGrant #DUE-1140852.Bibliography 1 The National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineeringin the New Century, The National Academics Press, 2004.2 J. Frolik, T. Weller, P. Flikkema, and C. Haden, “Implementing an Inverted ClassroomUsing Tablet PCs For Content Development”, in The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-Based Technology on Education: Going Mainstream, Robert H. Reed and Dave A.Berque, eds., Purdue University Press, 2010.3 P.G. Flikkema, J. Frolik, C. Haden, and T. Weller, “Experiential Learning of ComplexEngineered Systems in the Context of Wireless Sensor Networks
gender and ethnicity have c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12876caused institutions to change policies so that they may improve. Awards and publications may be foundat https://engineering.purdue.edu/people/russell.a.long.1. Page 26.346.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Characterizing and Modeling the Experience of Transfer Students in Engineering— Progress on NSF Award 0969474Major Goals 1. Understand the transfer
Steffi Renninger Department of Psychology The George Washington University Ekundayo Shittu Department of Engineering Systems and Management Engineering The George Washington UniversityIntroduction From microscopy to materials synthesis, the demand for expertise in nanotechnology isnot only growing, but it also spans multiple disciplines and encompasses a variety of careers.1The requisite education and training typically occur at the graduate level which limitsundergraduates’ access to cutting-edge jobs and many companies’ workforce options.2Meaningful nanotechnology undergraduate education is difficult to achieve because: (1
have been at maximumcapacity and assessment results show that the activities have been well received.Based on the first two years of activities, we have made the following observations:1. Students will make time to attend BSC events if there are hands-on opportunities to learn about STEM topics.2. Tech Fridays provide students an opportunity to build relationships with other students interested in STEM careers.3. The Robotics Programming Challenge and the STEM Challenge motivates our students to take on more challenging projects in computer hardware, robotics, and programming.4. Students have a chance to meet faculty and students from all campuses, and engage with industry partners during BSC events.5. Industry
teacher performance to student outcomes assessment logic model. Figure 1 (below) illustrates the links between teacher performance and student outcomes in the model. F gur Ass ss MThis logic model indicates how each of the program components relates to the intendedoutcome goals of the RET. Aligned with this logic model, five assessment metrics were used to measure the impact of the SRET/ACCESS 4 Teachers RET programs. Two impact measures were used for teachers and three impact measures were used for students. A description of each measure and associated results follow. Teacher assessments • Teacher Instructional Performance Metric: This assessment is a rubric scored observational measure of
enjoyed the activities, with both groups reporting positive experiences insurveys administered at the end of the camps.Fig. 1. Experimenting with light in the “Robotics and Photonics” middle school summer camp Page 26.714.42014.In addition to the summer camps, several STEM day events took place during the year whichincluded photonics presentations and activities in the lab. The International Year of Light 2015 isan auspicious time to introduce the field of photonics to K-12 students, teachers, counselors, andparents. Participants in STEM day events ranged from elementary to middle school to highschool students, accompanied by teachers and counselors
ashort-term goal of graduating 10,000 more American engineers each year to bring the total toabout 130,000 annual graduates.1 The United States needs more engineers for its economics andhealth both locally and internationally. As the need for more engineers in the US has grown,more attention has been focused on the community college (CC). Although many students attendCC due to lower tuition, smaller classes, and the proximity to their home, saving on both roomand board. However, many students attend a CC because they are not sure of their major. Amongthe transfer students they we receive in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, a study showedthat 30% of them only decided on their major after they were at the CC. This study of 61
-generation students (LIFGs) can contribute to US engineering problem definition and solving”.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. Strutz, M. L., Orr, M. K., & Ohland, M. W. 2012. “Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals: An Invisible Minority in Engineering.” In C. Baillie (Ed.), Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond (pp. 143-156). Purdue University Press. 2. Ohland, M. et al. 2012. Viewing Access and Persistence in Engineering Through a Socioeconomic Lens. In C. Baillie (Ed.), Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and
limited pre‐requisites understanding. However, most respond favorably to efforts to get to know them and assist them. We have learned many things about how to assist our ECASE students, and others like them, insucceeding through to graduation and into a technical career. The following is a short list ofsome challenges that we have discovered and the corresponding approach that we use to mitigatethe challenges. Many of these are corroborated in the literature as discussed in the Introductionsection of this paper. Here we consider them collectively and concretely. 1) Challenge: Students have varying needs for encouragement and prodding. Some have low confidence. Others do not yet recognize the significance of poor study