will have to be child-friendly in every aspect.To avoid lead paint risk factors, the project used regulated plastics approved by OSHA. Becauseof challenges of having multiple physical issues, this will help the therapist to collect data as theyprogress through their therapy.Students in the senior design course are required to do a literature review for any similar workthrough University’s easy access to ScienceDirect and IEEE Xplore data bases. Their researchthrough both resources regarding any similar work was inconclusive since the research subjectwas very specific. Students found that there are some toys that include the similar ideas andapplications but are not combined into one application. Children’s Therapy Store [1] online andtheir
most international students faced challenges during their firstsemester and that they were unsure how to seek help for these challenges. Students have alsoshared that ISST supported them with their career and academic challenges, but that they do notfeel ISST addressed their desire to connect with American students. Alongside the interviewresults, this paper will also present details of ISST and its offerings for students. This paper couldbe useful to colleges looking for manners in which they can fully support international students,specifically at the discipline-specific level.1. Introduction The transitional experience to college brings lots of firsts for all undergraduate students,as they are navigating a new educational system and
widely discussed in the literature.With this analysis, we seek to contribute knowledge addressing 1) the prevalence of internshipexperiences amongst engineering students drawn from a large, multi-institutional, nationallyrepresentative sample, 2) if the likelihood of having an engineering internship experiences isequitable amongst various student identities, and 3) what additional factors influence thelikelihood of a student having an internship experience, such as engineering field.Data were drawn from a 2015 multi-institutional nationally representative survey of engineeringjuniors and seniors, excluding one institution with a mandatory co-op program (n = 5530 from26 institutions). A z-test was used to analyze differences in internship
thatengineering work helps others.IntroductionEngineering has the potential to help improve the quality of life for people living in underservedand marginalized communities. Increasing the diversity of engineers may increase the extent towhich the engineering profession is committed to fostering positive societal impacts. Forexample, the communal and helping goals of female science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) students has been found to be stronger than male students [1, 2]. There arealso limited data showing that students from racial/ethnic groups under-represented inengineering are motivated by helping others through their work to a greater extent than Whitestudents [2, 3]. However, race/ethnicity and culture are complex ideas that
-12students have less exposure to electrical engineering (EE) than to many other STEM subjects.Within EE, the focus is often on introducing students to robotics or electronics, such as electricalcircuits, microprocessor programming and system integration (e.g., [1] - [3]). However, EE spansa much broader spectrum. The topics of communications and networking are often not presentedto high school students at all, and students are unaware of the fascinating challenges connectedwith careers in this direction.The current pandemic, entailing remote education, offers a unique opportunity to teachcommunications and networking. Remote delivery platforms such as Zoom can be leveraged toillustrate communications and networking concepts in new interactive ways
challenges and required intensive preparation. Aconsultant with expertise on creating distance learning camps for k-12 students with virtual andhands-on components was hired to collaborate with instructors in the translation of their on-campus approaches to maintain desired learning outcomes. The on-campus summer camp wastransformed into a virtual camp with three main delivery components: 1) a supply box sent tocampers, 2) virtual meeting space (Google Meet), and 3) an online learning management system(Moodle).Student Population and DemographicsThe study population consisted of high school students attending Louisiana public high schoolsselected to receive federal GEAR UP services. Demographics for program participants werecollected using an
ahands-on STEM virtual camp presented many challenges and required intensive preparation. Aconsultant with expertise on creating distance learning camps for k-12 students with virtual andhands-on components was hired to collaborate with instructors in the translation of their on-campus approaches to maintain desired learning outcomes. The on-campus summer camp wastransformed into a virtual camp with three main delivery components: 1) a supply box sent tocampers, 2) virtual meeting space (Google Meet), and 3) an online learning management system(Moodle).Student Population and DemographicsThe study population consisted of high school students attending Louisiana public high schoolsselected to receive federal GEAR UP services. Demographics for
engineering cultureduring a time of crisis to examine possibilities for cultural change from a new lens. To that end,this study investigates three U.S. mechanical engineering student’s perspective on theirdepartment’s response to COVID-19 in order to understand the extent to which variousdimensions of engineering culture [1] impacted the response. This study aims to understand howstudents’ reported experiences map onto the dimensions of engineering culture as well as toassess the fit of the theoretical framework and inform codebook development for a largerresearch study.IntroductionIncreasing diversity in engineering has been a major focus in the U.S. for decades. Significantresources have been invested in improving diversity in engineering, but the
howHIEP participation affects student persistence and success in E/CS degree programs. Our researchteam developed and administered an online survey to investigate and identify factors that affectHIEP participation among underrepresented and nontraditional E/CS students. Respondents (N =531) were students enrolled in two land grant universities in the Western U.S. Multiple regressionanalyses were conducted to examine the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable(academic success) explained by the independent variables (i.e., high impact engagement practice(HIEP), coursework motivation, and confidence at completing a degree). We hypothesized that (1)high impact engagement practices will predict academic success; (2) coursework
Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational Scholarship presented by American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021AbstractPrevious studies have shown that there exists a difference in undergraduate students’ academicmotivation based on gender. Specifically, females have been shown to be more extrinsicallymotivated than their male peers in a university setting [1]. However, little research has been doneto examine the effects of gender
students who are minoritized in their programsAbstract:This paper delineates the current status of our study of the experience of shame withinengineering education. The overall study uses interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) toexamine the phenomenon as it presented in individuals (Phases 1.A and 2) and ethnographicmethods to understand the social nature (Phase 1.B) of shame. This paper specifically focuses onPhase 2 of the study examining the experiences of shame in engineering students who areminoritized in their departments. We report on findings of this area of the investigation andbriefly discuss the broader significance related to the context of inclusivity within engineeringeducational space.Introduction:This paper summarizes the
Kokomo 2300 S. Washington St., Kokomo, IN, 46902 Abstract IntroductionThe arrival of the Internet of Things (IoT) into our The growth of the Internet, in the past decade, hasdaily lives in various forms such as home appliances enabled exponential growth of over 26.66 billionand wearable devices has dominated Internet usage. connected devices in 2019, approximately a 57.81%This dominant behavior left network practitioners increase compared to 2015 [1]. This number iswith many questions to be answered related to IoT expected to grow significantly in the coming years
theories, know the usage of the hardware andsoftware, and gain rich experience in robotics.Keywords: IoT, Robotics, Mechanical Engineering Technology, Framework1. IntroductionDistance/online learning 1 is becoming an important form at academic institutions, and the growthin distance/online learning has been outpacing the growth of enrollment 2,3,4. At present, thepandemic has been even further pushing distance/online learning to the peak based on the censusfrom the United States Census Bureau 5. According to the data of EducationData.org, 98% of theinstitutions have moved most of the in-person classes to the online sections 6. From the samesource, the parents have many concerns including poor content, little collaborative learning,inconsistent
; the most uniform component within the licensure process iscurrently the examination requirement.IntroductionProfessional engineering (PE) licensure is necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare ofthe public as advocated by many professional societies including the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) and the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) [1, 2]. However,there is no universal licensure law in the United States, because the 10 th Amendment to theUnited States Constitution authorizes every state and territory to establish laws and rules notspecifically delegated to the federal government. More recently, the United States SupremeCourt clarified that states have regulatory licensing authority for the protection of
: Understanding the Transition from Capstone Design to IndustryOverviewThis paper summarizes the principle findings from a multi-year, multi institution study of newgraduates’ transitions from school to work. Reports of a competency gap between school andwork for engineers abound, dating back at least to the Mann report in 1918.[1] Recent webinarsand reports from ASEE, including the Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering(TUEE) reports [2, 3] and the Industry 4.0 Workforce Summit [4] continue to describe both thegaps and the changes needed in undergraduate education to better prepare today’s students tobecome tomorrow’s engineers.While these and other reports often describe broad curricular changes needed to address the gap
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Key Elements for Integrating a Semester Long Abroad Program into the Engineering Curriculum AbstractResearch studies have consistently shown that study abroad changes people’s lives for the betterin terms of personal growth, interpersonal relationships, [1, 2, 3] and subsequent long-termcareer benefits. The longer the program, the more effective these positive impacts of a globalexperience are on individuals [4].Semester-long reciprocal exchange programs provide a lasting and impactful experience, but it isnot always easy to find classes that are both transferrable and can satisfy a student’s degree plan.This may be a reason
pandemic.IntroductionKindness perhaps seems like an overly simplistic response to the weighty issues of highereducation that became exacerbated and exposed concurrent with a global pandemic. Highereducation overlays life, which has always included the sickness and death of family and friends.There was already a growing awareness and perhaps incidence of mental health issues amongstudents [1-8], likely exacerbated during the COVID pandemic [9-10]. And 2020 also revealed toa greater extent long-standing issues and trauma associated with racism and poverty [11]. Until2020, many faculty, staff, and administrators in higher education had the privilege and goodfortune to personally avoid many of these challenges. But the pandemic touched us all. Highereducation institutions
challenge for many engineeringprograms [1]. Most inclusive and equitable learning initiatives are spearheaded by departmentssuch as Diversity and Inclusion and Gender Studies with a focus on broader institutional culture[2-3]. Such efforts, however, grapple with inspiring STEM faculty [4] as STEM classroomsremain relatively neglected. Consequently, STEM students from historically underrepresentedgroups, particularly those with perceived lower social capital, may still experience inequities inthe classroom; inequities that include exclusion from high-profile team roles [5-9].Research shows that first-year, team-based design courses present a unique opportunity toaddress such inequities by providing early cooperative and collaborative learning
better support their professionaldevelopment. Given the largely positive experiences of our students and their plans to pursuecareers involving applied computing, we believe that our approach of adding computingeducation alongside a social science degree demonstrates a promising model for meeting theincreasing demand for diverse interdisciplinary computing workers in this digital age.IntroductionThe nation and its expanding digital workplace need more computing professionals [1] as well ascomputing-capable workers to fill interdisciplinary computing jobs [2] - [4]. These jobs requireworkers to have computing skills, such as managing and analyzing data, as well as knowledge inrelated domains [5], [6]. To ensure the nation’s competitiveness, the
hopes to provide insights to engineering educators aboutclasses taught in a remote teaching mode as well as strategies to make in-person classes moreeffective. In this paper, we focused on the following research questions. 1. What is the impact of COVID-19 on student learning for engineering students at SJSU? 2. What are student perceptions towards emergency remote learning? 3. What aspects of remote learning worked best and least for students in engineering? 4. What can faculty do to improve both remote and face-to-face learning environments?Review of the LiteratureSince the move online because of COVID-19 in the United States, there have been many surveysof students to determine their attitudes towards this change. MindWires [1] is
instruction, can be a barrier to some of the faculty members.Generally, online learning comprises of a combination of synchronous (real-time) andasynchronous learning (on-demand). Most common pedagogies in online teaching includediscussion boards, audio and video submissions, text-based assessment, collaboration, emailsexchanges, text-based chat, audio and video conferencing, real-time polls, real-timecollaboration, and real-time assessment [1], [2]. These teaching modes can be classified as“surface structures” (pedagogies that transmit the information between the teacher and students),“deep structures” (pedagogies that encourage, higher order thinking and problem-solving) and“implicit structures” (pedagogies that develop a moral dimension in terms
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Chemical Engineering Students’ Learning Preferences at a Midwestern UniversityKeywords: chemical engineering students; learning strategy preferences; verbal-visual preferencesIntroductionThere continues to be calls for improving engineering education. For example, the NationalAcademy of Engineering publication entitled Educating the Engineer of 2020 [1] calls for thereinvention of engineering education. An important finding of that study was the importance ofaddressing how students learn in addition to what they learn and recommended more researchinto engineering education. This included how to better serve
, with many of them as first-year freshman students. In this paper, we present preliminary findings of two first-yearenrichment programs in ASSURE-US: the student teacher interaction council (STIC) and thestudent summer research, as well as lessons learned from two years’ implementation of theproject in order to improve the project implementations for future years. 1. Introduction Billions of dollars are allocated every year to fund research, program development, and directservices aimed at increasing the number of women, minorities, and underrepresented populationsentering the STEM major/career pipeline. Nevertheless, disparities in STEM representation ofthe Hispanic community prevail. Hispanics account for 17.4% of the US population, and
-calculus. The Campbell School of Engineering allows anystudent admitted to the university to enroll in engineering; students are divided into tiers basedon their math preparation. Tiers I and II have math ACT scores of 24 or below or math RSATscores of 580 or below and start in Fundamentals of Mathematics (Tier I) or College Algebra(Tier II). Those with higher ACT or RSAT math scores are designated as Tier III and start in pre-calculus (or above if they have AP or transfer credits). To recruit for the S-STEM, students wereasked to fill out an application that included the four essay questions listed in Table 1, aiming toget a large number of students applying from Tiers I and II. We also had a kickoff meeting opento the entire engineering school
Learned: College Student Surveys as a Professional Development ToolIntroductionThe development and adoption of student evaluation of teaching (SET) were first recorded in the1920s [1] [2]. Since then, many proponents have researched the practice and suggested ways ofimplementing SETs to improve instruction. Student evaluations of teaching have mostly beenstandardized and accepted as a regular practice of assessing teaching effectiveness in mostcolleges, including my university. SETs have standard features that are described by Sproule [3]. 1. The SET is a survey about course content and teaching effectiveness with open-ended and close-ended questions. 2. The closed-ended questions present a scale of possible values
presented as translations of three course design considerationspertaining to 1) content and learning objectives [1], 2) constructive alignment [2] and 3)inclusive teaching [3]. Table 1 identifies the general course design considerations, the core ideabehind these considerations specific to this course development context, the way the designconsiderations were reframed given the open-ended nature of the course, and the strategy forimplementation for course design and instruction. By considering these translations, the specificlessons learned show how components are applied from course development through instructionleading to three implementable strategies: 1) journey mapping for holistic student experience 2)integrating course content, active
Curricula to Engender Inclusive Professional Identities in StudentsIntroductionTo identify and solve the wicked problems [1] our society faces, science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enterprises need a heterogeneous constellation ofperspectives, mindsets, and expertise. Diverse teams are appealing because of their documentedcapacity to outperform groups selected based only on ability when facing difficult challenges [2].However, organizational theorists note that equipping people with the skills necessary to worktogether productively on teams composed of diverse members remains a challenge [3].Additionally, the culture of engineering and computer science, in particular, is oftenunwelcoming toward those with
ofEngineers provide design and analysis of structures to resist blast effects from accidentalexplosions and terrorist or foreign threats. Current code provisions for designing structures underaccidental blast conditions and dynamic loading are given in Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-340-02 (Change 2, 1 September 2014). The field of structural blast safety is uniquely and acutelymore relevant to DOD agencies due to the nature of both malicious and accidental risks.Obviously, terrorist incidents address one component, but the requirement to safely storemunitions on DOD installations sparked the formation of the DOD Explosives Safety Board in1928 after the major accidental explosion at the Naval Ammunition Depot, Lake Denmark, NewJersey. The
for the JROCT STEM Leadership Academy. He also serves as an assistant coordinatorfor the summer academy. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Leveraging the US Army JROTC Program to Increase the STEM Workforce PipelineIntroductionNumerous reports have documented our country’s critical and growing need for STEM savvyworkers –from technicians and middle-level managers to engineers and scientists. According tothe Innovation and STEM Fields issue of the New American Economy, the number of advertisedSTEM jobs outnumbered unemployed STEM workers by more than 13 to 1 in all but 10 states[1]. Compounding the growing demand for STEM workers
ofchange. In doing so, potentials for scholarship, concientização, and praxis via labor organizing inengineering are elucidated in order to provide direction toward liberation.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering is a field that both shapes and is itself shaped by oppression and inequitable powerdynamics. Engineering education researchers have sought to study facets and intersections ofracism [1-8], heteropatriarchy [4-10], capitalism [5, 6, 10], and militarism and colonization [8,11] within engineering. In many ways, engineering education researchers have shown how thesefacets are fundamental to what is currently considered engineering epistemology. Owing to thathistory, peoples marginalized along many and varied axes of interlocking systems of