practical teaching tools andmethods for educating students as well as radio engineers and researchers about new trends inwireless communications with a focus on spectrum sharing.1 IntroductionWireless communications research is investigating how to make better use of the radio frequency(RF) spectrum. Increasing the throughput per unit bandwidth (spectral efficiency) is a popularchoice that is continuously improved and employed in practice. Reusing frequency bands oppor-tunistically (dynamic spectrum access or DSA) is still in the research phase, but is likely to makeits transition to practice in the near future based on the currently ongoing license auctions for theAWS-3 and other bands in the United States.These techniques are covered in
neurological issuesassociated with TBI and developing technologies. They identify current research to better Page 26.731.2understand these issues and neural engineering efforts to support the needs of patients affectedby TBI. Students explore normal brain function, the impacts of brain injuries, and the potential ofneural engineering devices through the use of a Brain Box model (see Figure 1). In this activity,students build a physical model of the lobes of the brainusing PVC pipe and then use craft materials to constructmodels of the neurons within the lobes. After building theBrain Box model, students connect neurons within andacross lobes and then
Political Science Electrical Engineering Psychology Environmental Engineering Public Policy Environmental Studies Shipbuilding and Ocean EngineeringInitially, there were 15 teams established at the workshop. Of the 15 teams, 5 teams chose not tocontinue with their projects due to lack of commitment and/or lack of time due to their busyschedules in school after the workshop was completed.Below are descriptions of the remaining 10 teams that continue to work on their projects: 11 1. The “FoodSlowers” team is from Koç University. This team is working on multiple projects relating to the “slow food” concept. They are introducing the concept of “slow food” to their
with advisors and mentors, and provided brainstorming and support to help negotiatethese relationships. The assessment data were hand-coded to identify common themes2 and theresults include some striking perspectives of graduate women in STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, Math) and suggestions of ways to better support members of this group throughco-curricular programs.IntroductionIn 2013, the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU) was awarded a mini-grant to support a co-curricular program for graduate students that used the best-selling book,Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead 1 as a framework for promoting professionaldevelopment and community building. “Lean In” encourages both men and women to examinethe
count of the tons of recycled steel used during thecurrent calendar year. Currently, Nucor (in conjunction with two foreign-owned steel companies)operates a facility in Crawfordsville, Indiana that continuously casts sheet steel directly frommolten steel without the need for heavy, expensive, and energy-consuming rollers. The processknown as Castrip30, if successful, would allow an entire mill to be built in 1/6 the space of a'mini-mill' and at 1/10 the cost of a traditional integrated mill. They call this concept a 'micro- Page 26.137.6mill'. Also, Nucor has two pilot projects, one in Western Australia and one in Brazil, which aredeveloping low
transformative experience. Thetransformative experience is a learning experience, after which a student will : 1) apply ideasfrom a course in everyday experience without being required to (also called motivated use); 2)see everyday objects or situations differently, through the lens of the new content (expandedperception); and 3) value the content in a new way because it enriches everyday affectiveexperience (affective value)3. The transformative experience stems from John Dewey’s seminaltheory of experiential learning, and influenced by his work on the value of aestheticexperiences4,5. In other words, we want students to be able to perceive concepts they havelearned in the larger world, put those concepts to work, and enjoy the experience. Framing
(STEM) disciplines. Across all groups, womenparticipate at lower levels than their co-ethnic male counterparts.1-3 Most activities to rectifysuch a deficiency in STEM disciplines have focused on K-16 initiatives to address lack ofpreparation, inability to balance coursework and external commitments, self-efficacy, andfinancial limitations.4-6 However, there has been minimal focus on issues faced by graduatestudents or the need for effective mentoring of post-docs and new faculty in engineering toattract and retain them in academic careers. This is alarming as one approach to increase thenumber of underrepresented minorities who graduate with a STEM degree is to use hierarchicalmentoring, i.e., undergraduate mentor to faculty mentor.7 This is a
of aeronautics to their major. They madeconnections between aeronautics and their major where previously they thought none existed.This had the effect of changing their attitude towards the course and the material, a positiveoutcome.IntroductionWith the implementation of EC2000 requirements for the assessment of engineering programs,the Criterion 3 Student Outcomes a-k have become an important part of any engineering majorand are essential for accreditation.1 Several of these criteria, listed below, present challenges to Page 26.598.2any program: The program must have documented student outcomes that prepare graduates to attain
Page 26.1100.3industry mentors who advise each team on technical and professional issues.These multi-disciplinary, multi-university AerosPACE teams have demonstrated many of theadvantages of learning in such an environment. They have also identified some specificchallenges and opportunities that academic institutions and industry partners must be aware of.The end of the paper contains a “Looking Back” section where former undergraduate studentswho have spent 1-3 years in industry provide their feedback on how effective this DBF projectwas at preparing them to succeed professionally.Projects SummaryIn order to better understand the student experiences and impact, it is important to review thevarious student activities in the context of their
collected from thirty-five student interviews, we developed aconceptual framework for CCD progression. The Culturally Contextualized Design frameworkrepresents three levels of sophistication – novice, aware, and informed – for each of the fiveCCD aspects: (1) human-centered, (2) collaborative, (3) intentional, (4) open to flexibility andambiguity, and (5) invested and committed. The goal of this paper is to present the examples ofthree engineering students with different backgrounds and experiences and to map theirdevelopment within the framework. We also discuss the potential utility of this new frameworkto understand how engineering students learn to integrate culture and design and to assess theimpact of educational practices.Introduction and
spaceconsisting of five categories of description of students’ ways of experiencing their transitionfrom pre-college engineering programs and activities to a first-year engineering classroom.These results, described in the following section, provide a theoretical framework that is Page 26.1141.2currently guiding the development of a quantitative instrument to understand students’transitions to first-year engineering on a larger scale across multiple institutions.Qualitative ResultsFigure 1 shows the outcome space illustrating the relationships between the five ways ofexperiencing the transition from pre-college to first-year engineering. In order of
current electricity (DC) andusing an alternator converts it into alternative current (AC) that can be used to power equipmentinside a house. Photovoltaic cells have to combine cost effectiveness with relatively highthroughput energy yield production, in order to achieve this combination a couple of factors haveto be counted in: Material of construction, location that the PV cell will be placed and energyconversion efficiency. Even though there is a high initial cost to purchase and install Solar panels the financial Page 26.1484.2return of investment is worth it besides it provides added home value. Figure 1. Solar PanelsWind
become,engaged in a motorcycle fuel economy challenge design project?Theory & Methods Page 26.1606.3Student engagement is one of the biggest issues in engineering education. If you can engagestudents they will persist4 .It was decided that using a student motivation model such as the MUSIC model5 would be agood theoretical foundation upon which to build this project and to answer the research questionsposed above.The 5 key principles of the MUSIC model are that students are more motivated when theyperceive that: (1) they are eMpowered, (2) the content is Useful, (3) they can be Successful, (4)they are Interested, and (5) they feel Cared about
revealed.Question 1 - With respect to the webinar format versus a traditional classroom format – are youfinding that your learning is more effective than a traditional classroom, less effective than atraditional classroom, or about the same as a traditional classroom? Why? Table I. Results for Question 1 More Same Less 2012 7 9 7 2014 5 6 6Four of the “less” responses in 2012 and one in 2014 indicated that their learning was only a“little less” effective. Four of the “less” responses in 2012 and
received a University grant to “revitalize”the senior design experience through the following goals 1. develop an alternative project selection method, 2. involve students in project selection in an entrepreneurial fashion, 3. utilize active learning teaching methods and enhance content and delivery, and 4. increase use of online course content. Page 26.1346.3The pedagogical purpose of this approach was driven by a desire to put the students in situationswhere not only the solutions to design problems are open-ended, but the generation of thespecific design problems is somewhat open-ended as well. Furthermore, the purpose
. Page 26.1405.3A quick grading process - focused on getting “correct answers” on the problems - was used toplace participants is below average, average, and above average groupings based only onproblem-solving performance during the study. This enabled us to categorize via an extremegroups split7. Since a focus of the study is on strategies and misconceptions - which are assumedto vary between the above average and below average groups - the records of participants whoperformed above average and below average on the problems were given more attention duringcoding than those in the average grouping during the pursuit of saturation. Table 1 provides thebreakdown of score ranges observed and the grouping into below average, average, and
. Students were evaluated on performance of the design (based onquantitative results), cost, creativity of design, and craftsmanship and aesthetics. Deliverables forthis project included a project schedule, project definition and requirements, a design proposalpresentation and report, design prototype presentation with demonstration, and a final designreport.ResultsThe first three questions in the survey instrument requested information about the academic statusof the student population, and their level of college experience. Figure 1 shows that the surveyedpopulation is primarily composed of students with freshman level academic standing and fewupper level students. 200 180
engineeringdesign processes to solve the problem. The community-based problems selected by theparticipants in the first year of the study are shown in Table 1. All the names are pseudonyms toprotect the identity of the participants.The community-based problems were characterized as ill-structured problems because they were“not constrained by the content domains being studied in classrooms.” 21 For example, thecommunity-based problems selected by the students were dynamic, required collaboration,involved multiple solutions, and the constraints, both engineering and non-engineering, wereidentified by the students themselves.21, 22 The main objective was to observe how students usedengineering design processes, how they perceived engineering, how those
"biological clock" that imposes genuine constraints when women bear children. As anexample, Assimaki et al.’s 1 study of issues that affect the retention and professionaldevelopment of female faculty in Electrical and Computer Engineering in universities in Greecenoted that there are difficulties related to “the demands of an academic career due to the paralleldemands of the role of the woman as wife and mother.” Similarly, women’s perceptions andprofessional issues in Civil Engineering include concerns with the level of commitment that anacademic career requires in comparison to their family obligations.10 Females also take careerbreaks due to their partner’s relocation or to take care of an elder family member.11 Researchsuggests that some females
is a significant negative impact.Increased awareness and involvement in the legislative process ensures that the constructionindustry is not only an informed constituent but a well-represented one. This paper looks atworkers’ compensation history and key privatization issues in an effort to raise awarenessamong construction industry professionals.The relevance of understanding workers compensation from a construction management,construction engineering, and contractor’s point of view is multifaceted. One of the firstthings owners wants to know about a general contractor or a subcontractor is their safetyrecord. The standard measure of the safety record of a contractor is the experiencemodification rate (EMR). The standard industry EMR is 1
familiarwith in the United States. In EEE, students are exposed to foundation courses in the discipline:circuits, C programming, digital logic, and microprocessors in Years 1 and 2 and discipline-specificcourses in communications, power systems, microelectronics, embedded systems, fields, andcontrols in Year 3. In Year 4, students may specialise within a particular EEE disciplines throughtheir selection of elective courses and their choice of topic for the Individual Project, a requiredcapstone design course. There is a heavy emphasis on hands-on learning with laboratories andprojects integrated into almost all of the engineering courses as well as two stand-alone coursesthat involve team design projects. There are required mathematics, or maths
over time.IntroductionThe Engineering Leadership Development Program at The Pennsylvania State University wasone of the pioneering university-level leadership development programs in the world. Foundedin 1995 as an initiative of the Leonard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, theProgram has graduated over 600 students with an 18 credit-hour minor in EngineeringLeadership Development.A study conducted by Purdue University suggested that today’s engineering leader must be well-versed in three dimensions, namely technical, professional, and global skills.1 While the initialfocus of the Penn State Program was to address professional skill development, over the past 10years, global competency skill development has been robustly
and Development,Colonel, USAF, and even “Chief Skunk” (at the iconic Skunk Works at Lockheed Martin).Leaders from all but one but one of the ten companies participating in this study of innovation incorporations recommended that innovative engineering graduates have high levels of confidenceand/or attributes and behaviors that depend directly on such confidence. It is not enough that aninnovative engineer be competent. He/she must also have the confidence needed to behave andact in the following ways: Confidence-dependent Behavior/Attribute Mentioned by innovation leaders at: 1. Question the status quo enough to consider DuPont, IBM, Lockheed Martin, Pankow disruptive solutions
an introductory course for mechanical engineering majors.IntroductionEvery college of Engineering faces the challenge of recruiting and retaining students in theirmajors. 1 Midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy (USNA) face additional constraints,opportunities, and challenges in the form of a strict requirement to complete their course work infour years as well as myriad other demands on their time and attention.The Naval Academy uses an application process to select 2,500 highly qualified rising highschool seniors to participate in Naval Academy Summer Seminar (NASS) for a week-longimmersion in the unique requirements and academic opportunities available to our students. Theirtime on the Yard includes athletic, academic, leadership
for the globalworkforce is a national priority in the U.S.1 In order to address this need, educational institutionshave made great efforts to increase the recruitment and retention of students in engineering andimprove students’ professional skills through engagement in educational purposeful activities.Involvement in out of class activity has been believed as an effective way of promoting students’cognitive, affective, and career development in higher education.2, 3 The Final Report for theCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education posits that research on student experienceis fundamental to informing the evolution of engineering education.4 College impact researchsuggests that focusing on what students do during college, both inside
phrases in the curricula referring to data or evidence withTAP’s data, and warrants included any reasoning beyond data (e.g., explanation, justification,rationale). The results section of this paper reflects both of these types of argumentationlanguage, the terms of TAP and those used by the teachers.Additionally, this work was guided by the Framework for Implementing Quality K-12Engineering Education31. This framework identifies nine key indicators that define thecharacteristics of K-12 engineering. Figure 1 provides a list of the key indicators and a shortdescription of each. When an element of argumentation was identified to be in an engineering
Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the cate- gory Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-SoE’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 7 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 109 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 16 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research students and 11 under- graduate senior design project teams
interest in pursuing in college and as a career. But there is adichotomy - mathematics is a precise science, and any problem solving engineering paradigmprovides an optimal (or near optimal) solution. Anyone with an engineering perspective learns toappreciate this and continue to combine the two skills advantageously. However, not all studentssignificantly develop this skill when learning math in their curriculum as they may not see theconnection between the theoretical concepts in the subject and the practical problems associatedwith STEM fields. This lack of a connection could negatively affect the students’ performanceand interest in STEM. Our initial focus was to develop the robot as a tool for problem solving 1-3.We also made sure that it is
problem solving.1. IntroductionProblem solving is seen as a desirable skill for recent graduates1, and also for students ingeneral2–5. This paper analyses problem solving strategies of first year students in a newlydeveloped program. The program has been created to focus on developing students for a neweconomic and social reality, in which higher order thinking skills are the driving force. Higherorder skills, such as analysis, evaluation, and creation, are extremely important for criticalthinking and unstructured problem solving. Or-Bach6 indicates “…the retrieval and handling ofinformation; communication and presentation; planning and problem solving; and socialdevelopment and interaction…” (p. 17) are abilities much in demand by the general
. Page 26.1256.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Problematizing Best Practices for Pairing in K-12 Student Design TeamsIntroductionResearch on group work in STEM education has documented that in some cases, students’relative expertise with respect to other group members can impact student participation in thediscipline: expert-like students can help novice-like students gain conceptual understanding,1 thesuccess of pairings depends on the complexity of the task at hand,2 and group dynamics and rolesimpact local equitable access to disciplinary knowledge and identities.3 Within engineeringeducation, Tonso highlights how roles and gender dynamics within