) lab. Sepehr’s research focuses on his areas of interest, which include occupational safety and health, workforce training, and engineering ed- ucation. He is also involved in developing training materials and programs aimed at enhancing safety in the construction and general industries.Dr. Siyuan Song, University of Alabama Dr. Siyuan Song is an assistant professor and the director of the Safety Automation and Visualization En- vironment (SAVE) Laboratory in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama (UA). Prior to joining UA, she was an assistant professor in the School of Construction and Design at the University of Southern Mississippi. Dr. Song obtained her
authorityfigure, who traditionally was male. Authority has been studied related to other issues likeclassroom and laboratory work, but reading/following directions is not central to these studies[42]. A third possible explanation is that female students who self-select into engineering arebetter students on average than male students, which would involve a subset from other studiesof first-year college students [43]. This third hypothesis could be examined using standardizedtest scores or high school grades or rank. Since most students in the MEB course are in theirsecond semester of their engineering education, only one semester of grade data is available fromtheir university transcripts.When focusing on higher education, few examples of
. Lord, and H. Kesim, “Technically and Tactically Proficient: How Military Leadership Training and Experiences are Enacted in Engineering Education,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 446–457, 2019.[21] N. Salzman, T. B. Welch, H. Subbaraman, and C. H. G. Wright, “Using Veterans’ Technical Skills in an Engineering Laboratory,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education, 2018. doi: 10.18260/1-2--31217.[22] “Veterans Integration To Academic Leadership (VITAL),” Veterans Affairs, Oct. 20, 2022. https://www.va.gov/new-york-harbor-health-care/work-with-us/jobs-and-careers/veterans- integration-to
graduates [5].However, despite extensive research about how to promote change in undergraduate STEMeducation, systematic change has been limited [6], [7]. Many change initiatives and models thathave been utilized to study and promote change have failed to achieve the adoption of research-based instructional practices at universities [8], [9]. Similar trends in research have beenidentified within engineering education [10]. Thus, it is evident that alternative and more holisticways to understand and support change are needed.The COVID-19 pandemic created a real-world laboratory to explore what instructional practicesand strategies were changed and sustained when instructors were forced to use new instructionalmethods under uncertain situations
teams in the chemical and natural gas engineering section of GEEN 1201, whichinvolved topics in water purification, solar water pumping, salinity treatment by reverse osmosis,and liquid-liquid extraction. For each project, essential mechanical units were provided and thestudents were tasked with developing and testing a prototype unit or in a laboratory setting.Because of the limited time allotted to the project during the semester (approximately 6 weeks),the instructor gave the specific problem definition to the students, rather than having the studentsperform their own problem definition based upon a more generic needs statement.The objective of the water purification project was to develop a prototype device for on-demandpurification of
roles andsecurity clearances. Demographics included 2 women and 4 men. Individuals were from avariety of job sectors, including government agencies, government contractors, governmentresearch laboratories, and private industry (e.g., aerospace and engineering technologysolutions). These individuals all had extensive experience hiring and managing microelectronicsengineers. Participants were asked questions related to the needs for developing amicroelectronics workforce. For example, participants were asked what technical andprofessional skills they look for in an intern or new professional. They were asked to considerbroad technical skills, microelectronics specific skills, specialty microelectronics skills, andprofessional skills needed
developing and implementing pedagogical methods in engineering education.Dr. Samuel Garcia, Texas State University Dr. Samuel Garc´ıa Jr. serves as an Educator Professional Development Specialist at Kennedy Space Center. Prior to his position at Kennedy Space Center, Dr. Garc´ıa worked at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA. As an education specialist, Dr. Garc´ıa is deeply committed to developing STEM educational mindsets, tools, and resources and facilitate educational experiences for educators and students. Prior to working as an education specialist, Dr. Garc´ıa served as secondary school educator in Rio Grande Valley in Texas for seven years. Dr. Garc´ıa, a first-generation college student, earned both
Paper ID #38210Labor-based Grading in Computer Science: A Student-Centered PracticeChris MarriottMenaka AbrahamDr. Heather E. Dillon, University of Washington Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, she worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer working on both energy efficiency and renewable energy systems, where she received the US Department of Energy Office of
psychology (New York, N.Y.), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 230-241, 2004.[14] M. Fujino, Y. Ueda, H. Mizuhara, J. Saiki, and M. Nomura, "Open monitoring meditation reduces the involvement of brain regions related to memory function," Scientific reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9968, 2018.[15] D. B. Bellinger, M. S. DeCaro, and P. A. Ralston, "Mindfulness, anxiety, and high-stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom," Conscious Cogn, vol. 37, pp. 123-32, Dec 2015.[16] B. Rieken, M. Schar, and S. Sheppard, "Trait mindfulness in an engineering classroom: An exploration of the relationship between mindfulness, academic skills, and professional skills," in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 12
. Liang and S. Murrell, "Towards anImmersive Guided Virtual Reality Microfabrication Laboratory Training System," IEEEConference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), Atlanta,GA, USA, pp. 796-797, Mar. 2020.[11] M. Kozhevnikov, “Virtual Reality to Improve Nanotechnology Education,” MODSIM World,no. 25, 2022. Available:https://www.modsimworld.org/papers/2022/MODSIM_2022_paper_25.pdf[12] W. S. Khor, B. Baker, K. Amin, A. Chan, K. Patel, and J. Wong, ‘Augmented and VirtualReality in Surgery—The Digital Surgical Environment: Applications, Limitations and LegalPitfalls’, Annals of Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 23, Dec. 2016.[13] R. Goswami. “AR
, Johns Hopkins University Dr. Michel A. Kornegay (Reece) is currently a Senior Professional Staff in the Air Missile Defense Sector (AMDS) at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHUAPL). Prior to joining JHUAPL, for 16 years she was as an Associate Professor within the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Morgan State University.Mrs. LaDawn Partlow, Morgan State University Mrs. LaDawn E. Partlow serves as the Director of Academic Engagement and Outreach for the Cyber Security Assurance and Policy (CAP) Center at Morgan State University. She earned both a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering from Morgan State University. Mrs. Part- low also
STEM education for future researchers. He is currently participating in an NSF-funded grant (#1923452) to spearhead research into middle school students’ digital literacies and assessment. Recently, Dr. Hsu has received a seed grant at UML to investigate how undergradu- ate engineering students’ digital inequalities and self-directed learning characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy) affect their learning outcomes in a virtual laboratory environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Hsu’s research interests include advanced quantitative design and analysis and their applications in STEM education, large-scale assessment data (e.g., PISA), and engineering students’ perception of faculty en- couragement and
Engineering Program, part of the Diversity in Engineering Center.Miss Lily Behnke, University of Dayton Lily Behnke is a first year graduate student at the University of Dayton (UD) pursuing a Master of Sci- ence in Aerospace Engineering. She works as a research assistant in the Heyne Energy & Appropriate Technologies Lab where she focuses on combustion and sustainable aviation fuels research. Lily is also a former intern at Sandia National Laboratories where she worked as a research intern in the biosciences department in Livermore, California. She also acts as the current lead of the Women in Engineering and Sciences (WISE) mentoring program at UD. American c
2017 and has been incorporated in all subsequent offerings. During the 2018 offering,CATME was added to help structure student team formation [13] and peer evaluation [14] withinteams. Papers by Christy et al. and Wilson et al. provide further background information aboutthe course [15], [16].To adapt to online learning, in-person lectures were replaced with weekly asynchronous lectureslides, some of which were accompanied by a video or voiceover explanation. Laboratory /recitation time and office hours were held through synchronous video sessions via the Zoomsoftware application. Additionally, all midterm and final exams became take-home, withstudents receiving approximately 36 hours to complete these assignments and submit them to theCanvas
Paper ID #34305Test Anxiety and Its Impact on Diverse Undergraduate EngineeringStudents During Remote LearningDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an
documents that successful course completion is lower in online courses than intraditional face-to-face courses [21]. Both course completion rates and withdrawals are worse inSTEM courses [22], particularly in lower level STEM courses [23]. A lack of engagement andlower successful completion rates have been shown in online physics courses [24] as reported byMurphy and Stewart. Murphy and Stewart used eight years of data with 3,032 students tocompare face-to-face lecture courses with three semesters of a hybrid course with online lecturesand face-to-face laboratories. They found that there was a 11% lower successful completion rate(A/B/C) for students in the hybrid course compared to the solely face-to-face course. Thesefindings in STEM courses are
that end, the RDIplaced emphasis on providing participants with strategies and tools for forming enabling andsupportive mentoring and coaching alliances with faculty, other graduate student peers, staff, andadministrators. Such alliances offered an excellent opportunity for minoritized students to getearly exposure to the knowledge content, language, vocabulary, and philosophy of the discipline,as well as become engaged in research laboratory meetings to acquire skills, protocols, andpractices designed to move a beginning graduate student to an engaged researcher and scholar(Barker, 2011; Felder et al., 2014; Twale et al., 2016).Table 1Theoretical Support of the RDI WorkshopsWorkshop Content
. 2017.[3] S. Jaikaran-Doe, A. Henderson, E. Franklin, and P. Doe, Strategies for promoting cultural diversity within student laboratory groups in an engineering degree course at an Australian uni ersit , Australasian Association for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2018, Hamilton, New Zealand.[4] M. V. Jamieson and J. M. Sha , Appl ing Metacogniti e Strategies to Teaching Engineering Innovation, Design, and Leadership, Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, 2017.[5] S. Beecham, T. Clear, J. Barr, M. Daniels, M. Oudshoorn, and J. Noll, Preparing Tomorro s Soft are Engineers for Work in a Global En ironment, IEEE Software, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 9 12, Jan. 2017.[6
literature that international students face different challengeswhen compared with domestic students [11]. One of the challenges includes engaging in a newacademic environment [2] and the academic challenges that come alongside that. Thesechallenges can be discipline-specific and are often unaddressed by the larger school-wide supportsystems. For example, understanding where to get tutoring support for specific technical classesor the differences between laboratory and lecture-based courses. Discipline-specific academicadvisors do offer this support to students, but many international students aren’t sure whatsupport they should be seeking in terms of academic items. Additionally, items such asmismatched writing strategies from a home country to the
laboratory studies, people expressmore empathy for one victim of a tragedy than they do for eight, ten, or hundreds.” (p. 9). Thus,the sheer scale of traditional engineering work with sometimes rare interactions with theindividuals most impacted may make empathy (and perhaps by extension kindness) moredifficult among engineering in comparison to professions like medicine (e.g., doctors meetingwith single patients). Thus, the notion of ‘care’ may be more applicable to the engineeringprofession in the context of this broader impact of our work, while kindness is more relevant inengineering education as we interact with individual students.The hidden curriculum through engineering courses that do not seem to embody kindness orcaring might convey to
Paper ID #34800Learning Social Innovations and Social Entrepreneurship During COVID-19Pandemic: Lessons LearnedDr. Ajay P. Malshe, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Malshe is a R. Eugene and Susie E. Goodson Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Materials and Manufacturing Research Laboratory (MMRL), Purdue University. His fields of academic and industrial interest are advanced manufacturing, food-shelter-clothing and re- lated life insecurities, bio-inspired materials and designing and system integration. He has overlapping 24 years of academic plus overlapping 15 years of
. She is a graduate of NSF’s I-Corps program for educators.Dr. Fred W. DePiero, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Fred DePiero received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State Uni- versity in 1985 and 1987. He then worked as a Development Associate at Oak Ridge National Laboratory until 1993. While there he was involved in a variety of real-time image processing projects and several laser-based ranging systems. Fred began working on his Ph.D. at the University of Tennessee while still at ORNL, and completed it in May 1996. Fred joined the faculty at CalPoly in September of 1996. He previously served as the Associate Dean for Student Success in the College of
reflection and/or discussion; constructing a timeline of the history of neuroethics;and perspective taking by brainstorming the needs of potential end-users of a device or therapy.In addition, some lesson plans included opportunities for more structured discussion andargumentation, including Socratic Seminars [19] and Philosophical Chairs [20].Embedding teachers into a neuroethics research group. Another strategy for deeplyintegrating the study of neuroethics into the RET program was to embed science teachers into theneuroethics research group as apprentice researchers. The CNT’s neuroethics research group ledby co-author Dr. Sara Goering already had an established history of embedding philosophers intoCNT engineering laboratories in order to
of abilities required to succeed professionally in theinformation age. The top four of these skills include critical thinking, creative thinking,collaboration, and communication [1]. In a typical engineering education curriculum, criticalthinking is addressed effectively. Also, students develop their collaboration skills via project-basedcourses that have become increasingly widespread in engineering education in the last twodecades. Furthermore, communication skills are often addressed through the inclusion of atechnical communication course or by otherwise satisfying the communication component ofestablished general education requirements. Laboratory experiences and project-based coursesemphasize the development of technical communication
Engineer of 2020 attributes. This study will also be ofinterest to educators considering how the attributes described in 2004 remain relevant in 2020and may spark conversation about how these attributes may need to be adjusted in the future.The study will be of particular interest to those responsible for recommending and implementingcurricular changes in engineering programs.BackgroundThe report titled The Engineer of 2020, published in 2004, is a product of the National Academyof Engineering[1]. The committee responsible for writing the document included 18 people: 12affiliated with academic institutions, 4 affiliated with technology-based companies (IBM, HP,Telcordia, and Reliant Energy), 1 affiliated with a national laboratory (Sandia), and 1
, and selfies represented the lowest three categories. The topcategories show that engineering study abroad programs are more focused on engineers’definitive work via images of structures, bridges, campus infrastructures and designs,laboratories, factories, communal interventions through community projects, and thesustainability of nature, etc.). While the bottom categories do not present a significant attachmentto engineering, they account for the pride of students’ experience from visiting places, getting toexperience the heritage of host countries, and the institution’s prestige. When separated, someinstitutions produced a higher number of images in some categories than others. For example,MRU1 produced the highest number of images in the
students applied had an August 17 start date. A fifth project started in late Augustwith a national laboratory. This student was funded from a current grant active at the university.The selected student was an international graduate student who was overseas at the time, and thedelayed start was due to the processing time for CPT, security, and grant paperwork. This studentcould begin the internship overseas and complete it after returning to Oregon State University forthe Fall term. The last two projects involved direct hiring by the employer partner and did notutilize the technology platform due to company security concerns. These began in late Augustand ended in early October. One of these two students was also an international student.Phase 3
Detroit Mercy Alexa Rihana Abdallah is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of De- troit Mercy. She received her PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Michigan. ri- hanaa@udmercy.eduLauren Ross, University of Detroit Mercy Lauren Ross is an undergraduate research assistant working in the Assistive Technologies Laboratory at University of Detroit Mercy majoring in Mechanical Engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WHY IS RETAINING WOMEN IN STEM CAREERS SO CHALLENGING? A CLOSER LOOK AT WOMEN’S INSIGHTS AND EXPERIENCES IN
faculty member… to help young people or people like myself…” – CarlosA second theme emerged in this work in progress, the influence of social networks, such asfamily, professors, mentors and peers. For example, Jared decided to pursue an advanced degreebecause he met several professors through a program designed to assist Black men in preparingfor graduate school and received coaching to make his decision in pursuing another engineeringdegree beyond the doctorate: “When I joined the scholar’s house... it was a pretty pivotal point, I would say. That's where I got to meet some great individual professors. And, they kind of opened my options up to research and I spent a summer interning at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Careers in the Chemical Sciences. She received an associate degree from Yavapai College, a bachelor of science degree in chemistry from New Mexico State University, and a doctoral degree in chemistry from the University of Arizona. She was a staff scientist at the Idaho National Laboratory for twelve years before joining the faculty at Northern Arizona University.Dr. Angelina E. Castagno, Northern Arizona University Angelina E. Castagno, PhD, is the Director of the Din´e Institute for Navajo Nation Educators, and a Pro- fessor of Educational Leadership and Foundations at Northern Arizona University. Her teaching, research, and consulting focus on equity and diversity in U.S. schools, with a focus on Indigenous education