Paper ID #16505Reasonable or Ridiculous? Engineering Intuition in SimulationsDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Elif Miskioglu is currently a Visiting Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She graduated from Ohio State University in 2015 with a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and is interested in student learning in engineering.Prof. Kaela Mae Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Kaela Martin is an Assistant Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University, Prescott Campus. She graduated from Purdue University in 2015 with a PhD in
thesesurveys are quite low, about 40 %.The bachelor course got an overall grade of 3.8 in the standard course survey, which isconsidered good having in mind that it was the first time it was held. The bachelor project aswell as the profile as a whole was also carried out by a questionnaire distributed by the author ofthis paper to the students first enrolled, at the end of their bachelor project. The response rate washigh, about 70 %. The overall grade of the course shows that most students were very satisfiedwith the bachelor project. Aspects particularly emphasized as positive were the multifacetedengineering approach and the opportunity to freely work on a large project. The project was alsoconsidered very relevant for the energy engineering
Paper ID #13957Practicing care in global engineering with underserved communitiesDr. Bhavna Hariharan, Stanford University Bhavna Hariharan is a Social Science Research Associate at the Kozmetsky Global Collaboratory in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University. Her field of inquiry is Engineering Education Research (EER) with a focus on engineering design for and with underserved communities around the world. For the last nine years, she has worked on designing, implementing and managing environments for interdisciplinary, geographically distributed, collaborative research projects among scholars, and
Paper ID #12430Promoting Metacognition through Writing Exercises in Chemical Engineer-ingDr. Mariajose Castellanos, University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Page 26.1276.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Promoting Metacognition through Writing Exercises in Chemical EngineeringAbstractA high-level goal of all disciplines is for students to develop the capacity for lifelong learning. Todevelop the capacity of lifelong
://californiacommunitycolleges.cccco.edu/PolicyInAction/KeyFacts.aspx7. California Post Secondary Education Commission, Enrollment (2010). Fall Transfers to Public Institutions by Discipline, for Fall 2009. Retrieved, August 10, 2011, from http://www.cpec.ca.gov/OnLineData/GenerateReport.ASP, accessed 8/10/11.*8. Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available online at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9853.9. Executive Office of the President President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Report to the President – Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Retrieved
cooperation between universities of China and the US invarious disciplinary areas. Among those areas, engineering had the priority. Figure 1 shows thenumber of students graduated from and admitted into engineering programs of universities inChina from 2006 to 2015. The country is producing over a million engineers annually in therecent years which has doubled the number in 2006. This is supposed to be a big support for therapid development of China and the rest of the world. However, the newly produced engineersare not necessarily prepared to meet the requirements of the market and to be able to function inthe globalized industry. 4,12 Developing an effective educational model to produce engineers witha global vision and interdisciplinary mind
cases. Also, it is importantthat students apply concepts in steps, allowing the development of new knowledge and skillsfrom previous knowledge in a summative way. With these ideas in mind, the approach presentedin this paper has the following characteristics that facilitate the achievement of benefits regardingincreasing engagement, active learning, meeting learning outcomes, student success, andprofessional success: • Projects assigned are related to a real apparatus/device used in an engineering application • Projects require experimental validation and calibration • Projects expose students to multiple setbacks related to the development of a product, which will be encounter as a professional. • Students need to research
AC 2007-1253: TEACHING MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TO THE HIGHLYUNINSPIREDBobby Crawford, USMA Bobby Crawford is a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and the Director of the Aero-Thermo Group in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He holds a MS and a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering and is a licensed Professional Engineer.Tony Jones, USMA Tony Jones is a Major in the United States Army and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He holds a MS in Mechanical Engineering
the challenges and lessons we, theSTEM professionals on the team, learned in our struggle to build a mutually respectful, trust-based, and symbiotic relationship with our social science partners. In the spirit of an authenticpartnership, our anthropology colleague also faced challenges and grew intellectually through theexperiences of this collaboration, but that story is for a different audience. Hopefully our storywill inspire other engineering education researchers to not just use social science techniques andtheories when expedient to do so, but to open their minds to new ways of thinking, investigating,and reporting.The Research Institute for STEM Education (RISE) [22] grew from conversations in fall 2001around ideas for a proposal to
AC 2008-134: SURVIVING ENGINEERING: FROM A MINORITY FEMALEPERSPECTIVEJacquelyn Mobley, Ecology & Environment, Inc. Page 13.1125.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Surviving Engineering: From a Minority Female Perspective Jacquelyn R. Mobley, P.E.Abstract – As a practicing female under-represented minority in the field of engineering, I have wonderedwhat I could do to help in the retention and development of minority and women engineering students. Ihave always felt that I represented a unique perspective as one who has lived through the struggle andsurvived. This paper highlights my struggles
2006-2285: INTEGRATING ETHICS INTO A CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSEChristy Jeon, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAdjo Amekudzi, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 11.784.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Integrating Ethics into a Civil Engineering CourseAbstractEthics is a critical component of Civil Engineering education and practice. This paper discussesa case study to integrate ethics into a required undergraduate Civil Engineering course -- CivilEngineering Systems -- at Georgia Institute of Technology. The course introduces systems andsustainability concepts in Civil Engineering planning, design, operations, and renewal, and thuspresents an
wanting to be engineers in the lower grades. Thisvision of the engineering faculty member persists in the minds of most business persons andmany times eliminates the thought of working with faculty members to develop more productsfor business. One note here is that the administration of some engineering universities havedeveloped a negative reputation with the business community, specifically one in which the firstquestion asked by the University is “How can what you propose harm the university?” Thisattitude discourages business people who are interested in economic advantage and companyvalue related to the ownership or control of technology in the market place. As with theengineering faculty member, the business person is focused on the
policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning. Page 23.522.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Engineering Students' Perceptions of Workplace Problem SolvingAbstractResearch shows that workplace problems are different from traditional textbook orclassroom
applications throughout the engineering curriculum. The project wascompleted during academic year 2011-12.Several hands-on modules were developed for three courses in the engineering curriculum,spanning the entire freshman to senior experience. The modules were developed with “activelearning” principles in mind, to ensure students’ full participation in the learning process in theclassroom. The author chose the affordable and now widely adopted LEGO Mindstormsplatform to illustrate basic mechatronics concepts and applications.The targeted courses were the freshman “Introduction to Engineering and Design” course, junior“Kinematics” course, and senior “Dynamic Systems and Control” course. The modules weredeployed in the three courses throughout the
,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, no. 4, 1989, pp. 356–366.7. National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.8. Cardella, M. E., “Which mathematics should we teach engineering students? an empirically grounded case for a broad notion of mathematical thinking,” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 27, no. 3, 2008, pp. 150–159.9. Christensen, O. R., “Closing the gap between formalism and application–pbl and mathematical skills in engineering,” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 27, no. 3, 2008, pp. 131–139.10. Mustoe, L., “Mathematics in engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering
industry. This view ofassessment helps faculty members with an engineering background and industrial experience tobetter understand costs, goals, and operative requirements of assessment. Faculty of engineeringtechnology departments working on assessment should keep in mind the relationship with qualitycontrol in order to evaluate resources, costs, goals and other hidden details of assessment.Assessment of outcomes became a critical activity for engineering departments in 2000 whenABET changed their traditional requirements for accreditation to outcomes-based which requiresassessment of learning outcomes (or quality control). The Technology AccreditationCommission (TAC) of ABET also started requiring outcomes assessment of programs soon
students’ responses pre and post travel. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”At issue is whether the students responded to the survey with political correctness in mind oractually as a result of in-depth introspection. The survey was used as an avenue to involvestudents in thinking about the international experience and international culture. It should benoted that, although different, British culture is a western culture not significantly differentfrom that of the Midwest in terms of socio-economic conditions. The students comfort levelwith overseas travel was increased while in Manchester
AC 2010-119: CAPSTONE COURSE SEQUENCE FOR ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY STUDENTSVladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis—Associate Professor and Applied Engineering Technology Program Director in the School of Technology and Professional Studies, Drexel University, has developed and taught graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, nanotechnology, biomedical engineering, nondestructive testing, and acoustics. His research interests include ultrasound wave propagation and scattering, ultrasound imaging, nondestructive testing, electronic instrumentation, piezoelectric transducers, and engineering education. Results of his research work were published in scientific
AC 2010-1723: USING WIKIS IN A SOPHOMORE ENGINEERING DESIGNCOURSEPatricia Mellodge, University of HartfordFouad El Khoury, University of Hartford Page 15.1347.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Using Wikis in a Sophomore Engineering Design CourseIntroductionWith the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the nature of creating content and gathering informationon the internet began to change dramatically. Initially introduced as a free online encyclopedia1,it has become a single source of information on nearly any subject and one of most visited siteson the internet, consistently ranking in the top ten. It can be used as a starting point for researchon almost
Session Number 1793 A Value-Added Per spective on the College Ratings Br uce R. Thompson Rader School of Business, Milwaukee School of Engineer ingAbstract In recent years, various models have been developed to measure the quality of educational institutions. One group of models, particularly popularized by the U.S. News and World Report’s ratings of colleges and universities, along with specialized programs such as engineering schools, makes use of data such as that on incoming students and resources to rank the institutions. A quite different approach has become
Paper ID #8857Developing Engineering Ethics through Expert Witness Role PlaysDr. Bradley J. Brummel, The University of Tulsa Bradley Brummel is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at The University of Tulsa. His research inter- ests include using role plays and other simulations to teach responsible conduct of research. He conducts interdisciplinary research with Mechanical Engineering, Neuroscience, and Computer Science. His work has appeared in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Personnel Psychology, Human Rela- tions, and Journal of ManagementDr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa
Paper ID #8663Engineering Vocabulary Development using an Automated Software ToolMr. Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto Chirag Variawa is an accelerated-stream Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. He earned his B.A.Sc. in Materials Science Engineering in 2009 from the same institution. He is the first Graduate Student member of the University of Toronto Governing Council elected from Engineering. His multi-disciplinary research uses principles from arti- ficial intelligence, computational linguistics, higher education and aspects of neuroscience to
. Page 24.279.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Collaboration within Engineering Education Research’s Community of PracticeAbstractEngineering education research (EER) is a relatively young field of inquiry, established with theintent to improve the academic experiences of young and emerging engineers. While manyresearchers’ perceptions of how to improve engineering education stem from traditionalclassroom experiences, a select group of researchers belong to EER-oriented departments, labs,and research centers. These on-campus resources create a formal bridge between EER-expertnetworks and offer researchers an opportunity to collaborate with other like-minded
Paper ID #9209Integrating Sustainability Engineering into Second-Year CompositionDr. Connie Gomez, Galveston College Dr. Gomez received her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA. She has worked in the areas of computer aided tissue engineering and sustainability at the University of Texas at El Paso. She is currently a member of Galveston College in Galveston, TX, where she is developing a new engineering program.Ms. Leslie Braniger, Galveston College Page 24.778.1
policy;those who wish to teach at non-research colleges and universities; engineering students with astrong interest in educational research; corporate training management; and universityassessment staff or research faculty. Another sector of our target Ph.D. audience may includepeople with interest in a teaching career who hold BS and/or MS degrees in engineering withgood industrial experience, but who do not wish to pursue a Ph.D. degree in their traditionalengineering discipline. This degree is primarily designed with the following issues in mind: i) alarge increase in requirements for assessment of academic programs and difficulty in findingfaculty with that expertise and ii) shortage of quantitative academic assessment professionals
INTEGRATING ETHICS INTO THE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION CURRICULUM Sunil K. Sinha, Assistant Professor, Civil & Environmental Engineering, 231 Sackett Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802. H. Randolph Thomas, Professor, Civil & Environmental Engineering, 206 Sackett Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802. John R. Kulka, President, HRI, Inc., 1750 West College Avenue, State College, Pennsylvania, 16804
small group compared to international students from other cultures. Thus, professors need to deal with each student on an individual basis, keeping his/her personality in mind. • Religion: Some Muslim students who do not affiliate successfully with a local mosque return home. • Food: Most members of the Muslim faith do not eat pork. Many may need to ask if foods contain pork or pork products as this is not obvious to ascertain. Page 10.638.5 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for
Teaching K-12 Engineering using Inquiry-Based Instruction Glenda T. Kelly, Mary Hebrank, Gary A. Ybarra and Paul A. Klenk Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NCIntroductionSince 1999, the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University has placed 95 undergraduate and33 graduate Engineering Teaching Fellows in 14 elementary schools and five middle schools infour counties in North Carolina serving 6,500 students. These Fellows assist partnership teacherswith the creation and delivery of lessons and activities that integrate meaningful math, scienceand engineering exercises into all areas of the Standard Course of Study. Based on outcomeassessments of training needs for these Teaching
University freshman engineering admission requirements. [on line] Retrieved September 19, 2003,from https://engineering.purdue.edu/FrE/resources_for/prospective/reqs[12] Virginia State University admissions requirements [on line] Retrieved September 28, 2003, fromhttp://www.vsu.edu/admissions/freshmen.htm[13] Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.[14] Ree, M.J., & Carretta, T.R. (1997). What makes an aptitude test valid? In Dillon, R.F. (Ed.), Handbook ontesting (pp. 204-219). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.[15] Mills, C.J. & Ablard, K.E. (1993) The Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Its usefulness for identifyinggifted/talented students. Roeper Review, Feb/Mar 1993, 15(3) 183-187[16] Harnisch
conclusion thatpeople learn better when they have trust relationships with others in the learning community. Page 10.617.7The concept that learning is embedded in a matrix of social and physical factors is supported by Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationsignificant evidence. Professors seek out communities of like-minded researchers andpractioners. People who rock climb find others who climb, they share climbing-related interests,and they meet in places such as Yosemite National Park. The