Paper ID #35953Bringing Social Justice Rhetoric and Deliberation into the EngineeringWriting Classroom: the case of Amazon ”cubicle activists”Dr. Elizabeth Fife, University of Southern California Associate Prof of Practice, Engineering Writing Program, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California. Expertise areas include: communication in collaborative environments, multidisci- plinary groups, and far-flung virtual teams, communication support for open innovation inside and out- side the enterprise, and finally, techniques to support global multicultural organizations. Dr. Elizabeth Fife has taught
contribute to a sense of STEM identity, andthereby retention, in URMs [39], [52]. In addition to providing opportunities to socialize withother like-minded students, this would provide students with the opportunity to receivementorship from faculty members, which is tied to higher engineering persistence [32]. Asindicated in Figure 2, all participants expressed interest in interdisciplinary research.Similarly, we suggest that universities join forces with industry partners to offer and effectivelymarket interdisciplinary internships, especially towards URMs. Internships have been shown toincrease retention and graduation rates for engineering students [53], particularly URMs [54],making them a promising setting for interdisciplinary collaborations
such as mechanical andcivil engineering [1]. The tools of the engineer in students’ minds are often closer to a hammer ora wrench rather than a test tube or beaker, and thus their conception of engineering is oftenlimited at best [1]. This can get further complicated by the lack of interdisciplinarity exemplifiedin the engineering classroom. When engineering instruction is scaled at the university level, thereis the potential to lose interdisciplinarity as well as too much emphasis on limited topics relevantto the field of engineering [2]. When this happens, the curriculum may revert to limiting thecurriculum to the most popular images of engineering, fields such as mechanical, civil, andcomputer engineering [1].The goal of this work is to
Paper ID #37285A systematic review of pedagogical tools, learning goals, andparticipation strategies for high-achieving engineering and STEM studentsDr. Joseph A. Lyon, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Joseph A. Lyon is a lecturer in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. He received a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, an M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a B.S. in Bioengineering. His research has focused on the use of models and modeling, programming, and computational thinking within undergraduate contexts.Dr. Jacqueline Callihan Linnes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Jacqueline
negative emotional responses such a denial or avoidance. Problem-focused attempts touse purposeful efforts to manage a stressful situation. For example, Olivia’s describes: This is what they think engineering looks like: white men for the most part. And I am not that, at all. I feel like I had to prove myself, even when no one was telling me, "Olivia, you don't belong here.". In my mind it is like I have to show you that this is where I belong.Olivia’s emotional response to this identity related experience was to prove herself. While this isan example of a problem-focused coping mechanism she could have decided to cope in a varietyof ways.Olivia and Joshua both expressed indicators of imposter syndrome through only their
Paper ID #33597Exploring the Team Dynamics of Undergraduate Engineering Virtual TeamsDuring the Rapid Transition Online Due to COVID-19Miss Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee at Knoxville In May 2021, Alexis completed her fourth year at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, earning a B.S. in Honors Industrial Engineering with a minor in Reliability & Maintainability Engineering. Beginning in July, Alexis will be starting her career as a Technical Solutions Engineer for Epic Systems.Ms. Sarah E. Norris, University of Tennessee, Knoxville I am majoring in Aerospace Engineering with course work in computer science
Paper ID #33078Beyond the Social License to Operate: Training Socially ResponsibleEngineers to Contend with Corporate Frameworks for Community Engage-mentDr. Greg Rulifson P.E., USAID Greg is currently a AAAS Fellow at USAID working to improve the environmental performance of hu- manitarian assistance. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University
Paper ID #34308Work in Progress: Measuring Stigma of Mental Health Conditions and ItsImpact in Help-seeking Behaviors Among Engineering StudentsMatilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo Matilde Sanchez-Pena is an Assistant Professor in engineering education at University at Buffalo - SUNY. Her current research areas include (a) advancing institutional diversity, (b) cultures of health in engineer- ing education, and (c) data analysis skills of engineers. She aims to promote a more equitable engineering field in which students of all backgrounds can acquire the knowledge and skills to achieve their goals. She
identities. As such, generalizationsshould not be made as to why Asian students are more likely to endorse the NEP than their otherpeers. Future work should disaggregate racial/ethnic demographics further particularly for Asianstudents and to include Middle Eastern students. A final limitation to using the NEP Scale is thatalthough it is the most widely used measure of environmental worldview, recent studies havesuggested that the scale be further explored to more adequately capture the diversity of modernenvironmentalism [27]. With these limitations in mind, there is still much to glean from the implications of thisstudy for engineering research and practice. The data here indicates that the views of almost halfof White engineering students
, but predominantly believed that engineering matched 13their interests (41%) or that they were either good at or interested in math, science, computerscience, or problem-solving (30%). Eighteen of these 25 students also responded to the question“If your interests have changed, what did you learn about engineering that changed your mind?”Eleven students (61%) indicated that the work was more difficult than expected and seven students(39%) indicated that they discovered engineering is not what they thought it was and is not thecareer for them. Additionally, 14 of the 25 students who indicated having academic difficulty inboth math and chemistry (56
Paper ID #30929A Tale of Two Universities: An Intersectional Approach to ExaminingMicroaggressions Amongst Undergraduate Engineering Students at an HBCUand a PWIMeghan Berger M.A., North Carolina A & T State University Meghan is a PhD student in the Rehabilitation Counseling and Rehabilitation Counselor Education pro- gram at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Her broad research interests include exploring the experiences of marginalized groups and multicultural competency in counseling. In the clinical setting, she focuses on culturally relevant therapeutic interventions with African-American and
Paper ID #22879Harnessing State-of-the-art Internet of Things Labs to Motivate First-yearElectrical and Computer Engineering StudentsDr. David John Orser, University of Minnesota David Orser received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Minnesota State University, Mankato, MN, USA in 2000, his M.S. degree and his Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA in 2007 and 2014 respectively. He is an assistant teaching professor at the University of Minnesota, where his focus is teaching circuits, IoT, and power electronics. He has worked in the high-speed analog IC
Paper ID #23241Research on Comprehensive Quality Evaluation System of Engineering Un-dergraduates Based on Developmental Evaluation: Taking X University asan ExampleMs. Zhi Fang, Beihang University Zhi Fang is a Ph.D. candidate in School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University, Bei- jing, China. She received M.Ed. in Beihang University, and B.E. in School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Southwest Jiaotong University, China. Her academic and research interests in Research and Methods of Higher Education. She works in Beihang University.Prof. Shuiting Ding, Beihang University Shuiting Ding is a
Education, 2018IntroductionIn 2013, the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan launched the CommonReading Experience (Edington, Holmes Jr., & Reinke, 2015). This program was developed forincoming first-year engineering students with three goals in mind: 1. Students build and develop a sense of community (including a sense of belonging and engineering student identity) 2. Students broaden their thinking about the skills (both technical and non-technical) that they need to be a successful engineer in the 21st century 3. Model intellectual engagementThroughout the history of the Common Reading Experience (CRE), program evaluations havebeen compiled annually. However, to determine if the program was meeting its
Paper ID #29546A comparison of the renewable energy and energy storage sectors inGermany and the United States, with recommendations for engineeringteaching practices.Dr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her research interests include STEM Education and the Impacts of Technology on Society. Within the realm of STEM Education, she has done a variety of work in areas including teaching the entrepreneurial mindset, competency-based learning, self-regulated learning, transdisciplinary education, integrating the humanities into
objective of nurturing globally minded engineering talent, Mr.Johnson's narratives exposed students to diverse perspectives on global challenges andinternational business practices. Importantly, his focus on cultural elements provided students witha nuanced understanding of the societal context in which they would be immersed during the fieldtrip. The interactive lectures served as a catalyst for fostering cultural awareness among thestudents, preparing them for a meaningful and respectful engagement with the host culture.Furthermore, Mr. Johnson's insights inspired students to broaden their horizons, particularlyresonating with those from minority groups or those with limited exposure to overseas experiences.The lectures not only contributed to
, further cementing the importance of such experi-ences towards stronger teamwork and problem solving skills [5][10].With these educational shortcomings in mind, we decided to join the effort in providing experien-tial learning to first and second year students and become student-teachers by designing and lead-ing the Introduction to Electrical Circuit Design and Introduction to 3D Design & Fabrication FirstYear Design courses. Our motivation was to address the aforementioned issues by giving lower-division students a glimpse into professional engineering practice that we had accrued through ourdiverse experiences both inside and outside of academia and our preliminary results show we aresuccessful [9]. By working to scaffold the development of
engineering student population at some institutions [1].With these issues in mind, the research team is starting to develop an engineering orientation-style seminar for SVSM and nontraditional students. The purpose of this semester-long seminaris to support SVSM and nontraditional students in developing a community and provide bothfaculty and peer mentoring throughout the semester, as well as learning supports for studentsstarting or transitioning into an engineering degree. Supports will likely include math and writinghelp sessions, connections to faculty/industry mentors, career preparation activities, info sessionsfrom the veteran resource office, in addition to other resources identified by students. Thisseminar is being developed using a design
Paper ID #44078Engineering Learning among Black and Latinx/e/a/o Students: ConsideringLanguage and Culture to Reengineer Learning EnvironmentsDr. Greses Perez, Tufts University Greses P´ rez is the McDonnell Family Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in the Civil and e Environmental Engineering Department at Tufts University with secondary appointments in Mechanical Engineering and Education. She received her Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design with a focus on Engineering Education from Stanford University. As an Afro-Latina engineer and learning scientist, she has dedicated her career
gender.Underrepresented students, in particular, were oversampled given that they are more likely to beaffected by inequities in assessment and reporting practices.Interviews were conducted with two goals in mind: to understand how underrepresented studentsfeel about their institutions current assessment and reporting practices, as well as to betterunderstand their experience learning mathematics, a core subject/precursor to engineering. Theresearchers wanted to more broadly understand what factors dissuade students from pursuingengineering, and so were interested in both students’ identity and confidence development aswell as their experience learning math. This paper, however, focuses only on highlighting thelearnings from what students said about assessment
Paper ID #37065Managers, Reporting Structures, and Re-Orgs: Volatility and Inequalityin Early-Career Engineering and Implications for EducatorsDr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University Shannon K. Gilmartin, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Scholar at the Stanford VMware Women’s Leadership Innovation Lab and Adjunct Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University.Sara Jordan-Bloch, Stanford University Sara Jordan-Bloch, PhD, is a sociologist and senior research scholar at the Stanford VMware Women’s Leadership Innovation Lab, where she also directs the Seeds of Change initiative. ©American
developed for the program support ESP’s goals to: 1) create a diverse andwelcoming STEM climate on the FCC campus through events and media that encourage broaderparticipation, 2) increase participation in engineering among economically disadvantaged studentsthrough targeted outreach and recruitment, 3) increase persistence of engineering students alongdiscipline specific pathways to transfer and graduation from four-year universities through a seriesof structured support interventions, and, 4) establish on-going collaborative transfer supportprocesses between the FCC engineering program and CSU-F.With these goals in mind, ESP’s success is evaluated based on achieving the following objectives: 1. Increase engineering degree and/or certificate
–findings. In addition, weunderstand that the path to becoming an anti-racist and socially just researcher is not completelylinear; it is complex and nuanced as students challenge their ways of knowing. Regardless ofwhat the path looks like, or how circuitous it is, our goal remains to provide graduate studentswith the skills to become socially just engineering researchers. This paper outlines the process ofcreating a course for graduate students that helps prepare them for engineering research withequity and justice in mind. By outlining the course development, structural components, and theinitial findings from the first offering of the course within our 3-year longitudinal study, we hopeto provide other engineering departments with encouragement
Paper ID #37187Rapid Change to Refined Teaching: Lessons Learned and Lasting Impactsthe COVID-19 Pandemic Had on How We Teach EngineeringMs. Boni Frances Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology Boni Yraguen is a PhD student at Georgia Tech. Her dissertation work is in the field of combus- tion/thermo./fluids. She studies a novel diesel injection strategy: Ducted Fuel Injection (DFI), which is used to drastically decrease soot emissions during diesel combustion. In addition to her thesis work, Boni is passionate about engineering education. She has led and participated in various educational stud- ies on the impact of
there was less live attendance in online SI sessions, and somestudents expressed negative feelings about attending SI online [14]. Keeping these pastexperiences with online SI in mind, we explored the effectiveness of our online SI offerings.Study contextFirst-year engineering students entering Northeastern University in September 2020 encountereda profound change in instructional strategy compared to previous years in which all classes wereoffered in-person: during the Fall 2020 semester classes were offered under a hybrid learningmodel in which a limited number of students could attend each class meeting in-person and theremainder would attend only remotely, based in part on student preferences. This study focusedon assessing consequences of
linguistic, cultural, literacy, and educational backgrounds.The perspective of faculty members in engineering is often to conflate language and literacy withsimply needing to improve English grammar to become ‘good writers’ at the doctoral level.A question also remains whether graduate communication support designed with peercollaboration in mind—such as in the case of graduate writing centers and learningcommunities—can fully serve the diverse needs of those who enter programs with diverselinguistic, cultural, literacy, and educational backgrounds. Many multilingual doctoral studentsbring with them culturally specific academic, professional, and broader rhetorical strategies thatmay conflict with locally defined and field-specific conventions in
attitude toward diversity and inclusion, we expect them toacknowledge its current state as a problem and to believe that improving it will bring somepositive outcome. Generally, the ECE faculty interviewed did show evidence of such a positiveattitude, and their reasoning fell very consistently into two themes: (a) the importance ofdiversity for equality, and (b) the benefits for students of working with diverse groups of people.Importance of diversity for equality “Well, the first things that come to my mind [about diversity and inclusion] are minority students and women. Especially in an engineering program and in ECE where we don't have enough women.” – ElliottFaculty frequently began their discussion on diversity by
engineering will be as well. There is both a sense inwhich Nicole’s experience of shame is lived by her and a sense in which her engineeringenvironment establishes the context for her to live in the experience of shame. Our previousresearch [1,6,7] has provided a more extensive review of how shame has been examined in prioreducation research.With this individual-in-environment connection in mind, we chose to examine Nicole’s case ofexperiencing shame within the context of engineering education. Nicole, who identifies as aWhite woman, was a junior-level mechanical engineering student at the time of our interview.She also holds an identity as a student-athlete at the university. These multiple identities arepresent in different social situations in
mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark has a BSS from
engaging students but increasing their learning experiences. Though it isrecommended learning environments should be designed to actively engage students, professorsshould also be mindful of how these activities are perceived by the students. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the types of activities used to teach electriccircuits and students’ reported perceptions of these activities. This systematic literature review isaimed at answering the following questions: “How are engineering learning environmentsdesigned to promote students’ understanding of electric circuits? What are students’ perceptionsof the types of activities used in enhancing their understanding of circuit concepts?” Systematicliterature reviews as opposed to the