that demonstrates the complete problem solvingspectrum. So that's identify given information, write out more or less mathematically what you're trying tofind. Come up with the plan or and like, draw your freebody diagram. And dynamics is the most commonfirst step for a lot of problems. But really, it's figure out the correct suite of tools to apply to the problem,apply those and then justify that answer. That's the intent.While there were baseline characteristics of good assessment practices such as rubrics and scaffolding, hesaw that students’ approach to learning did not use those elements as he (and other faculty) perceivedthem. He described this as “just diving right into the problem solving and kind of missing all thescaffolding work and
necessary to develop impactful, innovative, and successfulengineering solutions [9]–[11].In addition to preparing engineering students to successfully address modern engineeringproblems, the inclusion of comprehensive engineering skills in the curriculum has implicationsfor students’ engagement and persistence in the field. Students’ engagement in their field as wellas their plans to pursue an engineering career or engineering graduate education is determined inpart by an alignment between their personal and professional interests and values in engineeringand curricular messages about what engineering practice includes. For some students, thepotential to leverage engineering for social good is a key motivation for pursuing work in thefield [12
municipal wharf, the re-design of the shipping crates used totransport all-electric Zero Motorcycles (http://www.zeromotorcycles.com/) overseas, the designand installation of a linked rainwater catchment and smart irrigation system that uses a data- driven sensor network to deliver water on demand and most recently, a net energy analysis of arecently commissioned plastic-to-fuel conversion machine. Interdisciplinary teams of undergraduates lead the projects while working closely withlocal experts including university researchers, elected municipal officials and staff, industry andnon-profit professionals, activists, entrepreneurs, and philanthropists to define project topics anddevelop detailed project plans. As undergraduate teams move
active sites create project concepts, which are completed byDecember. Prospective participants are given pre-projects to work on at the beginning of theyear, and graduate mentors and faculty advisers at the location conduct training and researchactivities before the start of the summer program.REU participants select one of the three active host institutions during the hiring process basedon the research activities offered, faculty engagement, and the site's location. Participants in the6-week RET program, drawn from nearby high schools, do not remain on campus. Participantswork on their research for 32 hours per week during the summer, with team-building exercisesand the creation of lesson plans (for RET participants) and weekly reports (for
can also beapplied to other disciplines to identify the demand of the evolving job markets to produce job-ready graduates in the relevant areas.1 Introduction The Australian Government has committed to an ambitious new target of reducinggreenhouse gas emissions to 43% below the 2005 level by 2030 and achieving net zero by 2050[1]. Decarbonizing the electricity sector has become one of the most important and mostefficient pathways to facilitate the Australian economy’s transition to net zero [2]. AustralianEnergy Market Operator (AEMO) has planned a rapid transformation for the NationalElectricity Market (NEM), where the energy generation and consumption profile would changeprofoundly given the expanding renewable energy integration [3
be systematically assessed and evaluated, withdocumented reflection and CI action items for implementation during the 3-years (2021-24). In asix-year period between ABET site visits, the plan is to have two iterations of the CI process tobe completed. Appendix (A-F) includes sample data for the assessment, evaluation, and CIefforts for the BS Electrical ET program.Strategy 2: Documented evidence of implemented action items (I a, I b) demonstrating that theresults of student outcome assessment and evaluation are systematically utilized as input for theprogram’s CI actions. This includes the assessment, evaluation, and CI efforts of the program forthe period, fall 2019 to summer 2022. The four constituents – faculty, students, IAB and
or loosely defined [14] - [16]. Finally, research indicates that uncertaintysurrounding the standards by which one is being evaluated can lead to professionaldissatisfaction and can (perhaps unnecessarily) complicate one’s ability to plan and present acompelling case for promotion [17].There is debate about whether it would help to make written criteria and guidelines morecomprehensive [18]. Alternatively (or in addition), departments can rely on various types ofmentoring mechanisms as a means of clarifying the process. One such mechanism, which hasreceived relatively little discussion in the literature, can be found in pre-tenure peer reviews.Many universities have a process by which faculty are reviewed on their teaching, research
through an onlineteam evaluation tool called CATME, and a diary study where students documented theirreflections on their marginalization by teammates. While data collection and analysis did not, ofcourse, go as the research team had planned, it yielded insights into how frequently minoritizedteammates experience marginalization, instructors’ sense of their responsibility and skill foraddressing such, marginalization, and students’ sense of defeat in hoping for more equitable andsupportive learning environments. The paper describes our data collection processes, analysis,and some choice insights drawn from this multi-year study at a large, research-extensive whiteuniversity.IntroductionTeaching engineering students how to work in teams is
% to 10%. Engineering curriculum roadmaps for degree or certificate completion are designed to see a student complete required courses within two years when beginning the curriculum at Math 5A (Calculus 1). When beginning in an earlier math, students are guided using a three-year plan to complete courses at FCC before transferring.The FCC Institutional Research, Assessment, and Planning Office tracks institutional data for eachobjective. The ESP initiated in fall 2019. As such we do not yet have data on completion rateimpact (Table 1). However, despite the impact of the pandemic, in the remaining years of theproject we expect to see an increase in both 2- and 3-year completion rates. The increase in degreeand certificate
Development: leadership, teamwork, communication, career planning • Transition Support: transfer portal, academic advisors, peer networking, supplemental resources, community engagement • Active Engagement: ambassadors, peer mentors, student organization liaisonTuition and stipend support can be up to $10,000 each, depending on student circumstances.Most of the various types of student support involve direct student engagement so students areboth receiving and providing support.The IEC is a nonprofit organization founded in 2019 to enable its core Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE) programs at Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) to work togethercollectively to address opportunities and problems that they find difficult or
students and an introductory course for a minor in Innovation andEntrepreneurship at Shanghai Tech University [42]. The aim of this course is to allowstudents to utilize scientific methods and critical thinking skills to collaborate with teammatesof different disciplines and solve real-world issues [42]. In higher education, researchers havefocused more on enhancing learners' competencies.Additionally, children from six institutions in Shaanxi Province have taken part in virtualworkshops focused on design thinking and STEM education [43]. Plan International has alsoreached a broad audience in implementing design thinking in STEM. Doing so has aided inreducing gender stereotypes about STEM education and has made students more comfortableexploring
in an online learning environmentinclude requiring synchronous online meetings [2], having weekly online discussion sessions thatpromote a sense of community [2, 12, 9, 33, 18, 31, 34, 25], dividing teaching content intosmaller modules to help students focus [12, 9, 14, 18, 19], having a back-up plan for unexpectedissues, slowing down speech during lectures to allow students to capture key points,utilizing teaching assistants to share the extra requirements, using various methods to modifyhomework and reading to strengthen students’ active learning outside of class, providingtimely feedback to student assignments [9, 19, 31], making compelling lecturevideos, establishing a presence with a welcome message, frequent notices and feedback [12
critical thinking capacities alongside those of students, we propose here somemodular lesson plans. These plans are designed from the perspective of engineering educators atliberal arts institutions where there may be more precedent for dialogues at the intersection ofengineering, social science, and humanities compared to other institution types. These could beintroduced in the context of “traditional” engineering science plans before or simultaneously withthe deeper work of dismantling and reconceiving knowledge production in engineering andengineering education.Lesson Plan I: Understanding Engineering as PoliticalIn this lesson, students will explore the concept of futurism, think about select historical examplesof technologies that were
. The stories shared in the classroom are impactful. Depending on the narrative, aparticular story could convey a message that people of color do not belong in the engineeringfield. In addition, such narratives may create stereotypes that educators continue to perpetuate.WOCSEC provided a safe place for female engineers of color to act as storytellers as they sharedtheir experiences while in college and in their careers. Their stories were impactful and provideda space for counter-narratives that were rich with authentic discussions regarding the realities ofmatriculating as a female of color in engineering.University InitiativeIn 2018, the University of Cincinnati adopted a strategic plan with three major platforms:academic excellence, urban
createimprovement plans to strengthen specific facets of their learning approach. Although pre-intervention scores are often given little attention after submission, the students in this studywere responsible for revisiting their initial scores through a series of reflection assignmentsincorporated into each major unit of the course throughout the semester.The LASSI dimensions can be divided into three categories: skill, will, and self-regulation [4].To better accommodate course content, the designers of GELC’s learning strategies coursecategorized the ten LASSI dimensions to align with the three primary course units: Habits ofProfessionals, Habits of Learning, and Habits of Mind (Figure 1). Within Habits ofProfessionals, the LASSI dimensions included
to attend school. These womenwere able to leave because they planned to return to their communities and share their newknowledge and skills. This research also emphasized the importance of sustaining the perspectiveof seeing the “self as whole” and incorporating traditional teachings and lessons with what it meansto be an engineer or technologist. For example, Jaemie merged her identities as a Native Americanwoman engineer by being involved in outreach to fulfill her cultural values, as well as a way torestore balance in her life by returning home. Maintaining balance was necessary for the womento see themselves as whole by honoring all of their identities. Foster [26] highlighted how spacesin which the whole self can be recognized are to
. Results of thispart of research led to the delineation and refining of three categories of pedagogical support: (1)College attending support, (2) Program planning and execution support, and (3) Classroom andprogram performance support. These categories led to development and refinement of a collegelevel pedagogical practice taxonomy and inventory which was used in stage two of the researchin which data was collected on 2476 community college students in STEM majors. The intent ofstage two of the research is to determine the role of students’ creativity and propensity ofinnovation had on their persistence and the impact that use of particular pedagogical practiceshad on their persistence, creativity and propensity for innovation in STEM
reportingpreliminary data on Cohort 1 after their first semester (Fall 2016). Academic performance dataafter the first semester include grade point average, math course grades, academic social support,and whether they are retained at the University.Overview of the Project Goals and Objectives The current research seeks to accomplish three goals: (1) Increase retention inEngineering among racially underrepresented engineering students by extending a successfulsummer bridge model and transition program to regional campuses in the Penn State system, (2)Develop long-term sustainability plans for these programs, and (3) Compare the efficacy of threedifferent bridge models. The primary outcome measure is retention in baccalaureateEngineering majors following
A&M University conducted processsafety related surveys of ABET accredited Chemical Engineering Programs in 2006 and 2012.7,8The survey focus was to determine the number of programs offering either a core or electiveprocess safety courses or those planning to develop such courses. Surprisingly, in 2012 onlyabout 50% of the respondents (32% of all programs) offered a core or elective course in processsafety. An additional 16 % of responding institutions indicated that they planned to developeither a core or elective course in process safety. Results from a more recent survey werepresented at the AIChE 2014 Annual Meeting.9 About one third of responding ChemicalEngineering programs indicated that they have a process safety course while
because they tend to distract instructors from their main functions, i.e., theirteaching, research and service to the department and the college. On-campus facilitiesand institutional arrangements such as consulting and enterprise incubators should beinvestigated by appealing to other professional models, i.e., medicine, law, veterinarymedicine, etc. Some of these activities are at the very least self-supporting, but could,if properly planned, shed funds that could be used to support other academicendeavors.I believe there are feasible action plans that should be adopted to pave the way forpotential collaboration between industry and academe. These would include:i) First, seeding and propagating the idea, that: gaining practical experience
. As withmost 2020 summer programs, the SCR2 program was challenged by the novel corona virus(COVID-19) pandemic, which hit the United states during the recruitment period of theproject. Consequently, the project leadership team decided to offer the summer program remotely(on-line) rather than bring students to the participating three campuses across which the programis distributed. The planning and execution of the program during a global pandemic has broughtkey insights into techniques, methods, and technologies for effective cross-site communication,faculty advisor/mentor involvement, participant engagement, and leveraging the strong networkthat connects the participating schools. Essentially, a multi-site remote only combined REU
(DTU). Each summer, these* Refer to the webpage for more information on the Summer School: https://pire.soe.ucsc.edu/universities host an intensive, four week course housed in Electrical Engineering (UCSC, DTU),Biological and Agricultural Engineering (UC Davis), and Energy and Environmental Planning(AAU). The program is open to selected senior undergraduates, graduate students and morerecently professionals in any discipline from US and European Institutions; participants areadmitted based on their academic qualifications, creativity and commitment to renewable energyand sustainability assessed through the submission of an essay and interview. The bulk of theactivity takes place in the summer during a three week, in-person workshop preceded
planning on taking one or two moresemesters to finish their undergraduate degree (n=5) or were continuing on to graduate school(n=4); these students often did not have concrete ideas of what an ideal career would be. Whilethere was a significant diversity in responses, the researchers identified trends that fit into fourgroups that are distinguished by the degree to which the student described helping people orimproving society as integral to a careers desirability, and whether they expressed this desirebefore or after being asked what would make a career rewarding (Table 2). The types of eachstudent and other demographics are shown in Table 3. For students with internships, theinterview in which they discussed this experience are noted in the
University Dr. Pyrialakou is an Assistant Professor at the Wadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental En- gineering at West Virginia University. She received her Diploma in Civil Engineering from the National Technical University of Athens, Greece, in 2011 and in 2016 she earned a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Pyrialakou’s expertise and interests involve the use of statistical, econometric, spa- tial, and economic analysis tools in the broader research area of transportation planning and evaluation of transportation systems. She started working in the area of engineering education at Purdue University when she taught Introduction to Transportation Engineering in spring 2016. She currently
positive learning outcomes for students,but clearly guide faculty to plan carefully, as it is not just doing S-L, but how and what studentslearn depends on the quality achieved. The goal in this work was to consider that the type ofneighborhood could have a positive, negative or neutral effect on learning and students’perception and continued interest in community service.Even in 2006, the idea that the hallmark of S-L was its focus on relationship and reciprocity wasbecoming recognized. [9] Though not the main focus of this work, being able to really give andtake requires knowledge, comfort, closeness and acceptance, which may come if students feellike they are a part of the neighborhood, rather than merely visitors. By this method, the
more likely they are able topersist to transfer status. Figure 2 illustrates our theoretically grounded logic model, the nature ofits interrelatedness, its multidimensionality, and ultimately, its connection to persistence. Thismodel informs and guides our research design and provides grounding for our analytical choicesand associated results. The research plan that follows articulates this.Over the course of three years, our research employs a mixed-method design using arandomization procedure in which in which students are randomly selected from each CC schoolsite within the majors of engineering and science to participate with randomization of selectionoccurring at the school site level within each targeted academic program. During the
break thetraditional lecture dominant pattern when cooperative learning protocols are deployed. Thepaper will illustrate how cooperative learning can advance academic success, quality ofrelationships, psychological adjustments, and attitudes toward the college experience. Whatneeds to be done to move the process forward? What are the key components of successfuldeployment of active learning in general and cooperative learning in particular? How tofoster and expand the community of engineering faculty who use cooperative learning in theGulf States? What plans, efforts, and resources need to be mobilized to institutionalizepedagogies of engagement including cooperative learning at the department or college level?Next, it identifies barriers to
partnership, the company plans to engage 80-100 engineers andscientists over the next 18 months, who will create 25 design challenges based on their work andexpertise. These challenges will be integrated into community-based programs that the GlobalCorporate Citizenship arm of the company supports with philanthropic dollars across severalmajor geographic sites. This study reports on the first two iterations of this program where twocohorts of volunteer teams (N=26) delivered STEM design challenges in different geographicregions in Family science events described here. To support the kick-off of the creation of thesedesign challenges, the engineering and technical function of the company co-invested in theprogram, providing labor budget to defray the
general population of the school, more than half of which was made up of underrepresentedminorities. By 2013, the once-dire school’s previously-declining enrollment had turned around,due in large part to the STEM initiative. About one in four students at the school was enrolled inthe academy, which boasted a total of 340 members. The academy was quite diverse, minorityand female students each comprising 35% of the population, while 23% were of low socio-economic status.Lacking the necessary funds to purchase ready-made engineering curricula at its inception, twoscience teachers had been tasked with creating the course plans themselves. These two, who alsoserved as the original instructors, possessed valuable backgrounds – one having earned a
object-orientedprogramming practices. The students enrolled in these courses are primarily computerengineering and computer science majors.The second set of participants are the project clients. Over the four years covered by this study,four different sets of clients were used. In 2014, the clients were engineering education studentsdeveloping materials in support of educational outreach activities. The software applicationswere designed to augment lesson plans developed as part of a series of teacher workshops thatthe students helped to deliver in the Dominican Republic. Due to the departure of the instructorleading the then-annual trips, in 2015 the focus shifted to having ASEE student chapter membersserve as clients in support of their