their surroundings, or we will never be able to resolve our pressing societal needs.”16References1. Allenby, B. R.; Allen, D. T.; Davidso, C. I. (2007) Teaching Sustainable Engineering, J. Ind. Ecol., 11 (1).2. Huntzinger, D. N.; Hutchins, M. J.; Gierke, J. S.; Sutherlan, J. W. (2007) Enabling Sustainable Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering Education, Int. J. Engng Ed., 23 (2), 218-230. Page 25.1467.143. Perdan, S.; Azapagic, A.; Clift, R. (2000) Teaching Sustainable Development to Engineering Students, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 1 (3), 267-279.4. Rowan University’s Official Website (2011) College of Engineering
Conference, San Diego, CA. 12. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004, September). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review 16 (3). 13. McKenna, A., Walsh, J., Parsek, M. and Birol, G. (2002). Assessing Challenge Based Instruction in Biomedical Engineering. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (CD-ROM DEStech Publications ) Session 2218. 14. Zubaidah, S. (2005). Problem–Based Learning: Literature Review. Singapore Nursing Journal, 32 (4), October-December: 50-54. 15. Pandy, MG, Petrosino, AJ, Austin, B and Barr, R.. (2004). Assessing Adaptive Expertise in Undergraduate Biomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education 93: 211-222. 16
impact theremodeling materials and teaching with constructivist engagement principles can have on studentattitude, learning, and retention.The authors of this paper acknowledge the support of this research by NSF grants #0836041 and#0737146References1. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.2. National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press, www.national-academies.org.3. Krause, S., Kelly, J., Triplett, J., Eller, A., and Baker, D. (2010). Uncovering and Addressing Some Common Types of
. A closer look at the impact of the humanitarian aspect of student involvement with aproject will shed light on the impact of participation in HFOSS versus participation in FOSS.Acknowledgement Page 25.1192.11This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsDUE-0958204, DUE-0940925, CISE- 0722137, and CISE-0930934. Any opinions, findingsand conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).Bibliography1. Software Engineering 2004 – Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in
the end of their second semester, could be a reason for thisdifference.Table 1. Student survey responses regarding note taking.Questions (15 Respondents) N R S QO VOI take notes in DyKnow by writing with the stylus. 4 9 1 1 0I take notes on my computer by writing with the stylus in a 7 2 2 1 3program other than DyKnow (e.g., One Note).I take notes in DyKnow by typing. 2 4 6 1 2I take notes on my computer by typing in a program other 4 3 6 1 1than DyKnow (e.g., Microsoft Word).I take notes with pen and paper. 6 0 1 4 4N = Never, R = Rarely
leastwe could identify the course title, instructor(s) of the course, and a list of main topics of thecourse. Most of the sites contain much richer contents than the aforementioned minimum amountof information. Among the additional information found on these sites include teachingschedules, topics discussed in the course, lecture notes, detailed homework and projectassignments, and any combinations of the above. In the end, information from a total of 38course websites is collected. Twenty-eight courses of the 38 total have been taught since 2007 (afive-year window through spring 2012). A list of these 28 course websites is in Appendix A.4. Course Titles, Goals, and ObjectivesCollectively the following different course titles are used in the
emphasized by these programs and the value proposition they communicate tostudents. More research is necessary to refine program-level frameworks for teaching innovation,program and course-level course competencies, and the manner in which teaching innovation canbe applied to different disciplines. Page 25.1259.14References1 "A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving Towards Sustainable Growth and Quality Jobs", Washington, DC, 2009.2 Baregheh, A., J. Rowley, and S. Sambrook," Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation", Management Decision Vol. 47, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1323-1339.3 Baily, M., K. Dynan, and D. Elliott, "The
is an ABET accredited, non-traditional, interdisciplinary, Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering with specialties in civil,electrical, environmental, and mechanical engineering, as well as graduate degrees (M. S., M. E.and Ph. D) and research in engineering systems. The Gourman Report ranks the CSMEngineering Division fifth among general engineering programs2. Primary goals of the programare to provide students with a solid foundation in engineering fundamentals, the skills to adapt torapidly changing and advanced technologies, and an aptitude for life-long learning. Uniquenessof the program is particularly evident with respect to its multidisciplinary span, heavyexperimental component, large credit-hour requirement, and use of advanced
-systems laboratory at UCCS had previously been owned andoperated by the ECE department, but a new MAE program in the college also needed similarfacilities.We concluded that a revived control-systems laboratory was essential, and we formulated twogoals: 1. Hands-on: The new lab should promote control-systems education with experimentation, requiring identification and control of physical device(s). The laboratory course should be designed to complement and synchronize with the lecture course in order to best reinforce concepts learned in class with hands-on experience. 2. Economy: As much as possible, space, money and student time should be economized. A multidisciplinary facility, shared between ECE and MAE classes would allow
Multivariate Analysis of Variance Effect F DF Sig. Sex (S) 3.33 8, 575 .001 Ethnicity (E) 4.88 16, 1152 .0001 Year (Y) 1.97 24, 1731 .003 SxE 1.13 16, 1152 Ns SxY 0.79 24, 1731 Ns ExY 1.05 48, 3480 Ns SxExY 0.97 48, 3480 Ns The statistical significance of differences between the average ratings of the two genderswas tested by use of an independent t test. The results are summarized in
can be conducted. The proposal consisted ofrecording the number of encoder pulses over 3 seconds, a period sufficient to stabilizethe system. Data analysis will be approached in four ways: two analytical analyses,using position and velocity data, and two computational techniques, using MatLabsoftware with the same data sets. At the end of the tests, the following data wererecorded: Figure 14 — Graph of position tests. With the recorded data, the units of the quantities were defined to reduce theprocessing needed in the microcontroller. Thus, the speed unit will be pulses per second(pulses/s) and position in pulses (pulses). Starting with the speed analysis, the data was processed, arriving at
Recitation sessions – Methodology November 5 Methodology Due 100 December 1, 2023 Mid-Term Project Reflection 25 December 1, 2023 TOTAL 500 TABLE 3 SPRING – CAPSTONE II Point Description Due Date s Recitation Session - Data Analysis / Solutions / December, January ROI
," International Journal of Management andHumanities, 3(6), 1-5, 2018.[2] V. B. Onk, and M. Joseph, “International student recruitment techniques: A preliminaryanalysis,” Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 13(1), 25-34, 2017.[3] T. Adams, M. Leventhal, and S. Connelly, “International student recruitment in Australia andthe United States”. The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education, 399-416, 2012.[4] A. Robinson-Pant, and A. Magyar, “The recruitment agent in internationalized highereducation: Commercial broker and cultural mediator,” Journal of Studies in InternationalEducation, 22(3), 225-241, 2018.[5] S. Lomer, “Recruiting International Students in Higher Education Representations andRationales in British Policy London
. Dzombak, S. Mouakkad, and K. Mehta, “Motivations of women participating in a technologybased social entrepreneurship program,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. Winter, pp. 78–96, 2016.[11] A. Jayakumar and S. Nozaki, “Impact of humanitarianism on female student participation in engineering,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, no. 10.18260/1-2–34753, (Virtual On line), ASEE Conferences, June 2020. https://peer.asee.org/34753.[12] E. A. Adams, “Integrating humanitarian engineering design projects to increase retention,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Jun 2017.[13] A. Bielefeldt and N. Canney, “Humanitarian aspirations of engineering,” Journal of Humanitarian Engineering
] J. Lönngren, T. Adawi, and M. Svanström, “Scaffolding strategies in a rubric-based intervention to promote engineering students’ ability to address wicked problems,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 196–221, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1404010.[7] D. Kilgore, A. Jocuns, K. Yasuhara, and C. J. Atman, “From beginning to end: How engineering students think and talk about sustainability across the life cycle,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 305–313, 2010.[8] T. Mirza, J. Dennison, N. Fila, and S. Purzer, “The sustainability decisions of first-year engineering students,” presented at the IL/IN Sectional Conference, American
representative of engineerseverywhere. Nevertheless, their insights are essential in understanding our institutional context,and can guide examination of other settings.Finally, all knowledge produced herein is inevitably affected by the positionalities of theresearchers, beginning with asking a question and continuing throughout the research process.Examination of the merits of this work should be done in understanding and interpretation ofthose positionalities.AcknowledgementsAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Theresearch team would like to thank the College of Engineering at New Mexico State
al.’s designing effective instruction (2018).4.1.1 Updates to the Seminar: Systematic Design of InstructionAs an example of the updates made for the Summer 2022 ETW, the Seminar on “SystematicDesign of Instruction” was redesigned in an effort to shift the ETW to a more learner-centeredapproach. This shift precipitated the transition away from the more linear approach taken by 5Dick and Carey [3] to the circular design utilized by Morrison et al. [4], resulting in a Seminarthat places a greater emphasis on the continually iterative nature of instructional designcombined with the importance of continual assessment of instructional effectiveness
whether theywanted to work individually on their project or team up. Four students chose to workindividually, six students chose to work in pairs, and four students teamed up to work together asa group.By the beginning of week two, we had found a qualified faculty mentor for most projects, eitherat Portland State University or elsewhere, who was comfortable to advise and mentor thestudent(s) over the summer. The tight timeline made the faculty mentor search process ratherchallenging, but we ended up with an enthusiastic set of mentors willing to volunteer their timeover the summer.CommunicationWe mainly relied on Slack for our all-cohort communications. Different channels helped to focusthe content and discussion. Students reported that they also
Scientific Inquiry,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st ed., A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 3–26. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.003.[2] M. C. Loui and M. Borrego, “Engineering Education Research,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, 1st ed., S. A. Fincher and A. V. Robins, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 292–322. doi: 10.1017/9781108654555.012.[3] G. Tembrevilla, A. Phillion, and M. Zeadin, “Experiential learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 195–218, 2024, doi: 10.1002/jee.20575.[4] V. C. McGowan and P. Bell, “Engineering Education as the Development of Critical
class start. The goal of this gradedsurvey was to ensure the students read or at least skim through the case study draft and to acquirethe students’ knowledge and experience about the concepts related to TVD. The questions in thisgraded survey included: • What is your major? • What is your current knowledge of project delivery methods, such as Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, Integrated Project Delivery, etc.? Please briefly describe your understanding of these methods. • Do you have experience with any of the project delivery methods mentioned previously (Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, Integrated Project Delivery, etc.)? If yes, please specify which method(s) and describe your experience. If no, just type “I
, 2022, and 2023. A total of 78 students and 3 teachers participated in the program during thistime period.Each team of students submits a project report at the end of the spring semester as part of the programrequirements.3.3 Data Collection Instrument(s)For this study, a total of 10 reports were randomly selected from the participants' submissions. Thesereports were analyzed using Open ChatGPT to explore the students' experiences in the Dual-CreditEngineering program.Open ChatGPT was utilized to conduct a thematic analysis of the reports. Each report was inputted intoOpen ChatGPT, which generated codes based on its content. These codes were then combined to formoverall themes across all 10 reports.The procedure for thematic analysis with Open
-9830.2009.tb01030.x9. Liberatore, M.W., Improved student achievement using personalized online homework for a course in material and energy balances. Chemical Engineering Education, 2011. 45(3): p. 184-190. DOI: https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/12214910. Chapman, K.E., M.E. Davidson, N. Azuka, and M.W. Liberatore, Quantifying deliberate practice using auto‐graded questions: Analyzing multiple metrics in a chemical engineering course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2023. 31(4): p. 916- 929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.2261411. Couch, J.D., J. Towne, and S. Wozniak, Rewiring Education: How Technology Can Unlock Every Student's Potential. 2018: BenBella Books12. Miller, M.D., Minds
English), International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 414-424, 2015. [Online]. Available: ://WOS:000352378800025.[6] C. E. Harris Jr., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, "Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93-96, 1996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[7] H. C. Luegenbiehl and B. Puka, "Codes of Ethics and the Moral Education of Engineers," Business & Professional Ethics Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 41-61, 1983.[8] A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, "Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 327-338, 2008, doi: https
place of actual computer games geared towards engineering design and learning. Inthe future, there should possibly be more research on specific games or a push for more games thattarget game-based learning.References[1] C. V. de Carvalho, “Is game-based learning suitable for engineering education?,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Apr. 2012, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201140.[2] S. M. E. Sepasgozar, “Digital Twin and Web-Based Virtual Gaming Technologies for Online Education: A Case of Construction Management and Engineering,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 13, Art. no. 13, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10134678.[3] Bajak, “Lectures aren’t just boring, they’re
, students often expressed low self-esteem, frustration, and feeling misunderstood or misplaced within their HE program. Status Data analysis has not begun Status Currently in process of data analysisBandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy : the exercise of control / Albert Bandura. W. H. Freeman.Miller, M. J., K. Sendrowitz, C. Connacher, S. Blanco, C. M. de la Peña, S. Bernardi, and L. Morere. 2009. “College students’ social justice interest and commitment: A social-cognitive perspective.” J. Couns. Psychol., 56 (4): 495–507
: Education for immigrant families in America. The Falmer Press, 1991.[2] S. Hurtado and D. F. Carter, “Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate and Latino college students’ sense of belonging,” Sociology of Education, vol. 70 issue 4, pp. 324-345, Oct. 1997.[3] D. Santiago, S. J. Andrade, and S. Brown, Re-Release – Latino Student Success at HSIs: Findings from a Demonstration Project. Washington, D.C.: Excelencia in Education, Jan. 2024.[4] M. Guajardo and F. J. Guajardo, Critical ethnography and community change. In Y. Zou and H. T. Trueba (Eds.), Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of education, pp. 281-304. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
thatneed further exploration such as the impact that feelings of competition have on students in theSTEM field, how academic counseling may be a useful tool for student success and retention,and how the psychological, academic, and social adjustment to the college learning experiencemay impact STEM student success.References[1] S. Kaleva, J. Pursiainen, M. Hakola, J. Rusanen, and H. Muukkonen, “Students’ reasons for STEM choices and the relationship of mathematics choice to university admission,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2019. doi:10.1186/s40594- 019-0196-x[2] M. Saxena, T. A. Geiselman, and S. Zhang, “Workplace incivility against women in STEM: Insights and best practices,” Business Horizons
., "Integrating Innovation and Entrepreneurship Principles into the Civil Engineering Curriculum," J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract,, vol. 141, no. 3, 2025.[6] KFF, "The Kern Family Foundation," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.kffdn.org.[7] G. Michelsen, "Sustainable Development as a Challenge for Undergraduate Students: The Module 'Science Bears Responsibility' in the Leuphana Bachelor's Programme Commentary on "A Case Study of Teaching Social Responsibility to Doctoral Students in the Climate Sciences""," Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1505-1511, 2013.[8] G. S. a. S. Srinivasan, "Integration of Ethics, Sustainability, and Social Responsibility Components in an Undergraduate Engineering
aclear description of information sources and the search strategy, ideally presented in full for eachdatabase [1, Items 7 & 8]. Further emphasizing the importance of transparency of the search forES reviews, in 2021 PRISMA introduced the PRISMA-S searching extension [2], providingadditional guidance regarding the details that should be reported for systematic review and othercomprehensive ES search strategies.ES is no longer a methodology exclusive to health sciences. The value that ES methods can bringto the knowledge-translation process is highly applicable across disciplines. In recent years, thesemethods have been adopted by non-health fields like engineering. Even more recently, therehave been calls for increased rigor and adherence to
Strategies and Achievement in Introductory Biology,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), p. ar30, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-09-0269.[5] J. E. Jacobs and S. G. Paris, “Children’s Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 22, no. 3–4. Informa UK Limited, pp. 255–278, Jun. 01, 1987. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052.[6] J. D. Stanton, A. J. Sebesta, and J. Dunlosky, “Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, no. 2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), p. fe3, Jun. 2021. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289.[7] B. S. Bloom