theirexperiences in engineering.Figure 1: Model of Achievement Goal Theory41.Figure 1 presents AGT as conceptualized by Wentzel and Wigfield41. The two elements of Page 26.1291.6mastery and performance are bridged to create a framework consisting of four overallachievement goals: mastery-approach (MAp), mastery-avoidance (MAv), performance-approach (PAp), and performance-avoidance (PAv)41. When a MAp goal is adopted, individualstry to build upon their competence by striving to master the skill. Approach and avoidance arefundamental distinctions applied to various types of goals. In educational psychology, thecommon goal used is achievement goal, which
Instructor Implements Project-Based Learning 1. Introduction & Objectives In the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Manitoba, Canada, a novice instructor with more than a decade of industry experience in consulting engineering practice re-designed a third-year structural engineering design course around a project- based instructional method. The impetus for changing the course was twofold: his own industry experience that drove his desire to educate students with the engineering knowledge and skills, and foster in them the engineering mind-set to succeed in industry; as well as the fact that the structural course that he was charged with teaching had
coherentlyconceptualize and integrate research quality considerations in qualitative and mixed-methodsprojects and convey the trustworthiness and value of this type of work to others.In this paper we build on a prior parsimonious framework for interpretive research quality thatwas recently developed by Walther et al. 1.This framework, which is described in more detail inthe Theoretical Framework section below, offers a process view on research quality that spansthe entire research project (represented as the two phases of Making Data and Handling Data)and proposes six quality constructs (Theoretical, Procedural, Communicative, and PragmaticValidation and Process Reliability) to facilitate the exploration of quality issues and theapplication of quality strategies
integratedsystem (Figure 1), SiLaRR allows a user without programming skills can install a robotics orelectronic laboratory by pressing several "Ok" buttons and connecting hardware used an ArduinoUNO Figure 1. The architecture of SiLaRR system covers all the steps needed to deploy a laboratory easily and quickly. Page 26.1771.5 - Guided installation mechanism: The system has integrated an Installation Wizard will act as a path, asking you different questions and showing you screens that allow you to configure items such as database or access to laboratory. This mechanism installed on the PC
, program staff, and their peers regarding career pathways and thenecessary preparation for those pathways1,8. “Advisors, particularly in STEM fields, may urge[their graduate students] to avoid spending too much time on teaching preparation in order toensure sufficient attention to research” (pg. 85)1. Doctoral students may also shy away fromcareer opportunities at non-research intensive institutions due to faculty (or their peer’s)perceptions of the career path5 or misunderstandings about the environment at a researchintensive versus a non-research intensive institutions6,14. In addition, many institutions arerequiring students to take teaching appointments to serve as instructors or lecturers15, whichmany view as less prestigious when compared to
been taught with the lecture format of teaching. In this format, the topic is: 1) Introduced by lecture to explain the principals involved. 2) Examples are worked in class to reinforce those principals. 3) Students perform homework to further reinforcing the materials. 4) Finally students are tested to determine their knowledge of the topic material. Research has shown that during the lecture portion of the learning, students are not actively involved in the learning process. The lecture portion of the learning process is the largest amount of time the students and instructor spend together and during this learning step students are not actively involved. In this traditional teaching
relate to the outcomes of their work7. Inparticular, they recommend using perspective-taking as users to discover the complexity of theunderlying socio-technical system of use6. This attention to empathic communication isunderutilized in engineering education as a way of building core professional communication Page 26.871.2competencies. While the construct of empathy is complex, Levenson and Ruef’s9 definition(quoted in Walther et al.6) includes three essential qualities: 1) the cognitive knowing of whatanother person is feeling, 2) the emotional feeling what another individual is feeling, and 3) theact of responding to another’s experience with
-reflections in later presentations, and this effect will be quantified as part ofthe study.Presentations are critiqued for communication aspects in two forms, both of which are student-based. The two types of feedback include student self-reflection and group member critiqueseach during a subsequent viewing of provided videos. Constructive student responses areincentivized by including participation as a small portion of each presentation grade (~5%).Student feedback is screened and comments that are rude or vapid receive a reduced participationgrade. Presentations are recorded for student review using a standard video camera. WindowsMovie Maker (Figure 1) is used to edit presentation videos, though other affordable programs areavailable for similar
increased efficiency and allowed for the expansion and growth ofcourse content. The viewing statistics show that video modules are initially viewed prior to thelab period and, again, during the preparation of the final report.This paper will explore the concerns and motivations that preceded preparation of multimediacontent, outline thoughts to aid future production of effective course material videos based onexperience gained, and offer a qualitative assessment of the changes in terms of the student Page 26.941.2experience and outcomes. Page 1 of 10BackgroundThe undergraduate educational laboratory is an
, bibliographic coupling,and co-citation networks. Using the exploratory data analysis and visualization tool for graphs and networksGUESS that is integrated within the Sci2 Tool, it was also possible to visualize these networks.To increase general understanding, the networks were weighted, meaning that the nodes size and the edgesthickness, as well as their color, changed based on specific criteria.ResultsThe WOS features “Citation Analysis” and “Create Report” used for the group of sixty-two articles producedthe first set of results. The number of published items each year (Fig. 1) increased from five in 2007 to fifteenin 2012, demonstrating an increase in research activity for the period of this analysis. The sixty-two identifiedpublications by CE
students. There are several labclasses in the junior and senior years which require specialized equipment. The initial focus ofdelivering lab education to satellite campuses is the junior thermal fluids lab on measurementtechniques. There are three styles of laboratory experiments throughout engineering education: hands-on,simulation, and remote (or virtual) labs.1-7 Hands-on experiments allow student to physicallymanipulate components and gather data. Simulations use computer software to emulate the resultsgathered in a real laboratory setting. Simulations can be successfully used to explain and reinforcephysical concepts, but limit the capability for true experimentation. Remote labs use the positivefeatures of both hands-on and simulation
potential for transformative change often do not scale or extend far beyond their local settings; furthermore, they are difficult to sustain without continued external funding. This panel brings together several groups who are focused on fostering an entrepreneurial mindset to advance the scaling and sustaining of educational innovations. The panelists will offer approaches and strategies for achieving scale by examining the educational ecosystem, and offering entrepreneurship-‐focused models to embed this goal at the outset. The panel will consist of four representatives. 1. Epicenter offers entrepreneurship and innovation programs for engineering
transferinformation without loss of data.2,9. This range of packages is illustrated in Figure 1 below. Thisincludes design software 3D BIM modeling software, scheduling software to produce 4Dmodels, and digital document control software to track changes in information during theconstruction phase.The CAD industry, including construction is expected to continue to grow at a rate ofapproximately 2 percent per annum, and is expected to result in revenues of over $8.2 billion by2016.10 The existing market itself is experiencing a rapid evolution due to cloud, social andmobile technology, and this is likely to continue. In order for construction companies to remaincompetitive in this area it is necessary for higher education institutions to provide a balance
welding time. Oncecompleted the frame weighed 120 lbs with a material cost of $322 (Figure 1).An additional consideration with the structural design was transportation of the finished Shack.One option considered was to make the base of the Shack a trailer. This option was consideredto be overly expensive and involved additional safety design issues regarding highway safetyapproval. The more traditional method of placing the Shack on skis (or skids) was settled on. Monitoring team interaction and communications can be an important aspect of advising a design project. It is important for students to realize that even though they have been placed in charge of one particular portion of the design their decision will affect the
hand, falls from equipment orloads, struck by or caught between accidents, musculoskeletal injuries due to lifting, bending orworking overhead, electrical equipment operation and maintenance requiring safe practices andlock-out/tag-out, and welding and chemical processes. These potential hazard exposures becamethe basis of the curricula outline and the expected learning outcomes for each module. As shownin Table 1, the curricula is divided in 10 modules. The first module (Module 0) provides anoverview of the training program, the second module (Module 1) provides an overview of thehazards routinely encountered in the industry. Modules two through seven address specifichazards. Module eight addresses worker’s rights as defined by OSHA. Module 9
representative sampling was achieved. Theparticipants matched the characteristics of entering freshmen engineering students:predominately males (77.9%) who identified as Caucasian, non-Hispanic (83.5%). Theuniversity’s freshmen class is 99% full-time students with an average age of 18 years old.Eighty-one percent of freshmen are classified as in-state students(http://ira.mst.edu/decisionsupportreports/reports/factbook/14-15/students/). The mean ACT testscore for Missouri S&T freshmen is 28, which corresponds to the 90th percentile nationally(http://www.actstudent.org/scores/norms1.html).Survey QuestionsThe survey included three questions modified from Belter & du Pre1. To answer items 1-3, refer to the following passage, which is quoted
. They acquired flight data and analyzed it. The week ended with teampresentations to all the stakeholders from either side. The project schedule is showed in Table 1below;Table 1: Project Schedule 1st (Teams were in their home countries) 2nd (Japanese Team visited India) Nov Dec Jan Feb FebJapanese +Defining + Developing specifications measurement software + Checking and revising a sensor +Designing and module fabricating a sensor + Designing and making rockets module + LaunchingIndian
private university in Mexico with a top ranked engineering school. It is well (1)known by the quality of their graduates and by the excellent connection with theMexican industry. In particular, Monterrey is a large industrial city, located near theUnited States border, with two large and prestigious universities. The availability of largenumber of well-trained bilingual engineers and qualified labor force in the market areattracting a large number of high tech companies that are moving their manufacturingfacilities and engineering design centers to this area. The fast growing engineering demandof well-trained people, capable of generating new products, improve process efficiency andcreate
their circuits. At that time, the students initially place their components onto the breadboardand would work to cut their wires to length and place them in rows/channels. If you were willing tospend time laying out the wires you can get a clean layout as seen in figure 1. Figure 1. Solderless breadboard with wiresAs the weeks progress, some of the wires get removed and others inserted, and little by little theboards grows to a complicated arranged of components and inter-connections as seen in figure 2. Figure 2. Solderless breadboard with ratsnestThe end result is that the students spend more time debugging loose wires and each time they placescope probe on the board, another wire wiggles loose. The end goal of the
-generation, low-cost, air quality monitoring systems – termed Pods.These are used to educate students on air quality and energy development issues, as well as byK-12 students to collect data to answer a research question. In terms of structure, a graduatestudent works with teachers and students in the classroom on a monthly basis and assistsremotely as necessary. The entire administration of the project (including curriculum andstudents projects) typically spans a school year. The curriculum is comprised of modules whichprovide students with: (1) an introduction to air quality and air quality measurements, (2) anopportunity to practice air quality data collection, (3) an opportunity to practice air quality dataanalysis, (4) an introduction to study
the cyber security realm within the Coast Guard and in the private sector after my military career. Page 26.1071.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Learning IPv6: Becoming a Subject Matter Expert of a Technical Topic through a Year-Long Capstone Design ProjectIntroductionThe purpose of education remains the subject of much vigorous debate and discussion. Educationhas been a part of the development of humans from the earliest times to the present with manydifferent perspectives [1-4]. While university education contains many pedagogical aspects, theconcept of a
Bridge: Linking Engineeringand Society, two papers highlighted the need to bring experiential learning opportunities toengineering education. Ambrose stated “experiential learning opportunities prompt learningwhen students are put in unfamiliar situations for which they are not prepared and yet must act inorder to get a job done.” [1]. Further, Stephens highlighted the need for diverse skills by stating“Today’s engineers need to be not only technically strong but also creative and able to work wellin teams, communicate effectively, and create products that are useful in the “real world””. [2].In addition, research conducted in two Intensive Innovation Experiences, called Aggies Invent,indicates that over 90% of the student participants agree or
may be especially true for new educators, who may be simultaneouslyworking to establish practical classroom experience. This paper provides an overview of onenovel pedagogical practice, mastery grading, and provides experience from a new educatorimplementing the technique for the first time. This guidance may help alleviate challenges facingother educators hoping to implement this technique and may shorten the “start-up period”associated with trying out new classroom practices. It is hoped that this will reduce fear aboutimpacts on teaching evaluations and increase the accessibility of the method, especially amongnew tenure track faculty [1].1.1 What is Mastery GradingIn this paper, the term mastery grading refers to assessment techniques
, collaboration, and the other disciplines changedbecause of the competition. Seventy-eight fourth-year students took part in the competition: 26architecture students, 19 construction students, 14 graphic design students, and 19 interior designstudents. Seventy students completed the initial survey, for a response rate of 95%, and 63students completed the final survey, for a response rate of 81%. The discipline-specific genderdistribution for the 34 males and 44 females taking part in the competition is shown in Figure 1,below. 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 Female 4 2
outcomes. Additionally,transition issues from pilot to regular course and solutions to implementation difficulties aredescribed. Future work toward continuous improvement is also considered. This work extendsand expands upon previously published conference proceedings by following students after pilotcourses, and by describing the process, challenges, and efficacy of solutions in transitioning frompilot to regular course.Introduction and BackgroundWest Virginia University (WVU) uses a common first year engineering curriculum, includingtwo consecutive introductory courses in engineering problem solving, This has become commonfirst year engineering curricula in many institutions.1-4 Of interest in this work is the secondcourse, which is taught as a
-depth understanding of users, stakeholders, and their goals. This understanding is oftensummarized in a user profile or persona and leads to deriving specific designrequirements for the new product. Another core characteristic is the iterative integrationof user feedback throughout various stages of development, beginning with the earlyconceptual stages. In this paper, we explain how we adapted techniques from user-centered design to create a learner-centered curriculum.Step 1: Understanding Clients, Stakeholders, and the ProblemThe first step in the user-centered design process requires that we understand theproblem, the client, the stakeholders, and the users13. In this particular situation, we canthink of the higher administrative bodies
pprotective rellays and systtem design. This d as a basis forpaper willl describe th he efforts pu ut forth by faaculty and stuudents to deevelop the labb. It willdescribe some of the lab procedu ures. Finallyy, it will provvide the readder with som me informatioon todevelop their t own rellay lab. Fig gure 1 – Typ pical Relay L Lab StationIntrodu uctionThe electtric power geeneration an nd delivery in
mentoring, and summer bridge programs,6, 7 to be described in thenext sections. Page 26.1300.3 (a) (b)Figure 1: (a) A side-by-side comparison showing the extent of the mismatch in the demographics of the United States adultpopulation versus those of the STEM workforce.4 (b) A pronounced increase in the fraction of minority school age-children overa twenty year period highlights the urgency of raising minority participation and performance in STEM.5 Page 26.1300.4The Role of Community Colleges in
National Council of Examinersfor Engineering and Surveying (NCEES)—a national nonprofit federation that includes theengineering and surveying licensure boards from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam,Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.1 NCEES’s Model Law and Model Rules facilitateprofessional mobility, promote uniformity of licensure processes across the U.S., and advancethe qualifications for licensure to protect the public interest.State licensure boards are composed primarily of practicing licensed professional engineers, whotypically have two to five decades of practical experience. However, most board members donot have the expertise to evaluate the details of an individual candidate’s educational credentials,as reflected in
significant part of static analysis and design was done using the tools ofGraphical Statics. Graphical Statics is based on the graphical method of adding vectors; briefly,when vectors are drawn to scale, the sum of the vectors, a resultant, can be measured on thedrawing. The roots of using graphical methods to solve engineering problems can be traced backto Leonardo da Vinci and Galileo Galilei. German engineer Karl Culmann, however, is generallyconsidered the father of graphical statics.1 Early works formalized these methods forengineering,2 and the topic is of on-going interest in teaching structural design to architecturestudents,3,4 and in emphasizing the significance of form in design to civil engineeringstudents.5,6,7The methods existed as a