Engineering andDesign (ENGR 104) course is a project based class that introduces students to the engineering design processand explores the role of creativity in design, team dynamics, 3D visualization, diversity of perspective, globalimpact of design, and ethics. All engineering and design students are required to take ENGR 104 as pre-majors, prior to applying to major. The majority of students take the course during their first year at WWU.The course is taught by a variety of instructors and has a class capacity of 50 students.The three interventions embedded into the course were 1) a collaborative activity establishing classroomnorms, 2) a mid-quarter activity engaging students with the concept of growth mindset, and 3) instructorconnection
keepindividuals from work they want to pursue.Across the engineering field, diversity has been linked to enhanced innovativeness, intellectualengagement, and innovation [1]. Because of the benefits to the field, some view it as imperativethat we more intentionally include students with disabilities within the civil engineering contextbecause they can provide nuanced and important insights to advance the accessibility ofinfrastructure and the field of civil engineering design. While we agree that diversity itself can beadvantageous, however, we believe it is equally, if not more, imperative to address inclusionfrom the perspective of justice and equity. That is, we believe that as a field, engineeringeducation is morally and ethically responsible for
mechanical engineering through team- oriented projects. Table 3. Programs implemented by AmbassadorsIn addition to providing an overview of their projects and who the intended populations are, theAmbassadors provided further details on their plans, purpose and passion surrounding theirideas. The first ambassador showed excitement around being able to empower other girls andbuild their confidence: “I would like to spread my passion for STEAM and my passion for empowering girls so they can learn to believe that all they need is knowledge, confidence, strong work ethics and determination to achieve anything they want in any field they want. I will
was developed by graduate students, under the supervision of the Education &Outreach Staff Director (Mrs. Risa Hartman) and included statistics, fundamentals ofnanotechnology and ethics classes to offer a wide range of useful preliminary information. Thesafety training (combination of online and onsite) for a total of four hours, under the guidanceand supervision of trained laboratory graduate students, allowed YSs to learn about laboratoryprocedures. During the final day of bootcamp, mentors held a formal meeting with their scholarsto discuss details, plans and expectations about the specific project.During weeks 2-6, students worked on their project daily, performing original research under thesupervision of their graduate mentor
professionals (i.e. mechanical designengineers, product designers, industrial designers, etc.) from a variety of industrial sectors, anddifferent age/experience groups. Prior to creating the survey, the research purpose and logisticswere discussed, reviewed and approved by the research institution’s research ethics board. Thesurvey was specifically aimed at gathering non-specific demographic information, andevaluating whether there is a correlation between heuristics in CAD usage in the conceptualphase of design, and how these insights correspond to the designer’s perception of productquality and collaboration effectiveness. The insights derived from this survey will be discussedwith respect to the literature review to assess the recent state-of-art in
of stipend provided,comparing research topics at the different institutions and by the dates that they receive theiroffers on.All REU sites provide students with hands-on research opportunities with faculty mentorship [1].Most sites offer a variety of research training programs and technical seminars (e.g., [2]) andtraining in technical writing (e.g., [5]). Sites are also required to offer training in research ethics[1]. Many sites also provide training about how to select and apply to graduate school (e.g., [5]),for students who choose to pursue further education. However, even with all of these programs(some of which may be offered outside of normal work hours), the bulk of student time at REUsites is spent on research activities.2.2
students will enroll inthe same section of MATH 124 and PHYS 161 to preserve the cohort structure, and they willadditionally take a 2-credit seminar taught as part of the regular teaching load by a rotating groupof faculty. The theme underlying the seminar course is “socially responsible engineering”, andthe course will include reading and discussion on such topics as ethics, societal “grandchallenges” in engineering [10], and recent technological progress in addressing thosechallenges. Engineering topics with obvious societal benefits have been shown to improverecruitment and retention of traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering, such as women[11]. In addition, the seminar curriculum includes practice with spatial visualization, as
similar work ethic. Questions 2 and 7 wereused for certain projects to ensure important skills (e.g. mechatronics, FEA) were represented onthe team. Question 7 was additionally used to balance the other skills on a team (e.g. planning,writing, CAD, manufacturing). Question 8 was used to ensure known personality conflictswouldn’t interfere with team dynamics. Question 9 was used to keep certain students together(often by moving them from a popular project). Question 10 was used for the popular projects,to refine the final team membership. Question 6 relates to certification for using certain machinetools, and was not used for team-forming. The process took about ten hours to form 22 teamsacross three different lab times.Student-Formed TeamsIn
engineering curricula, design projects provide opportunities for students todemonstrate understanding of their technical knowledge through solving a complex problem [1].Additionally, project-based learning allows students to acquire and apply valuable non-technicalskills such as teamwork, systems thinking, communication, ethics, and creativity [2, 3]. Industrydemands that students be able to engage effectively in the practice of engineering, whichincludes not only technical knowledge but also the ability to apply that knowledge to new andcomplex situations in the real world [3, 4]. Therefore, the teaching of engineering should focuson getting students to think independently, rather than simply asking students to replicate theexisting knowledge of
what the dress code is for each event, if it's okay to ask alumni for their contact information, if it's okay to bring resumes, etc.Theme 4: Standing OutA final theme from the interviews and focus groups was that for students who succeeded atovercoming each of the three challenges already described, there was still a hurdle associatedwith standing out in a pile of very similar applications. Students expressed concerns about theirability to clearly explain why they would be a uniquely strong candidate when the other 200+students in their graduating class all had similar experience. They also expressed concerns aboutthe limitations of a resume and cover letter when it came to demonstrating qualities liketeamwork skills, work ethic, and
about their experiences. These interviews were conductedwithin three weeks following the conclusion of the Winter 2023 term. All interviews wererecorded and transcribed via Zoom. Following the interviews, the researcher manually edited theautomatic transcription to ensure accuracy. At the beginning of each interview, the researcherread through the ethics protocol with the students, reminding them that their interview wasentirely voluntary and confidential. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using theinterview protocol described previously. Interviews had a duration of 30 minutes. Specifically,this work examines the symmetry (convergence/complementary) and asymmetry(divergence/dissonance) of conflict experiences.Study ContextThis work
, andinterpreting the findings in the context of existing literature and the study's objectives. The studyadhered to ethical guidelines, ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of participants.Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and they were informed of their right towithdraw from the study at any time without penalty.Results and DiscussionsTo analyze the qualitative data obtained from the interviews, a coding system was established tocategorize responses according to the four constructs outlined in the study: Interest, CareerAspirations, Perceived Value, and Self-Efficacy regarding data science. Beyond exploring thefour primary constructs, students were also queried about their understanding of definition ofdata science, the current
neededimprovement.Students also participated in daily one-hour tutoring sessions. Tutors were current engineeringand computer science students and were assigned to the same participants throughout theprogram. Sessions discussed homework assignments and attendance was required.In addition to math preparation, students were assigned weekly readings on engineering successand participated in professional presentations from current engineers on topics such as mentalhealth, engineering ethics, and internships. Discussions were held surrounding the weekly topics.Based on the student feedback the book, The Secrets of College Success, was integrated into thereadings.Big Sibling MentoringThe Big Sibling program was created to provide a venue where freshmen could have someone
. Theparticipating families were recruited from local middle schools that were hosting family STEMnights, from online Facebook advertisements, and from known family networks. All theparticipants live within the same geographic region. The nature of the study, including the use offacial mapping and video capture for data processing, was explained to the participants.Anonymization of data and the option for participants to opt out of recording at any moment arethe steps taken to guarantee privacy and confidentiality. The research was authorized by theinstitutional review board (IRB) to ensure adherence to ethical standards in research involvinghuman subjects.Family 1: In the video being analyzed to explore the dynamics of family engagement andinteraction
between scientific knowledge and the commercialization of biotechnologyproducts. It will include industry collaborations, mentorship, and exposure to business strategiesand regulatory frameworks. To prepare students for industry placement, we will offer a version ofthe Niswonger Foundation’s CareerConnect and Work Ethics Distinction programs, which seek toequip students with the soft skills needed to function effectively in a work environment such astime management, personal reliability, teamwork, and leadership (Aim 3).Conversely, our industry partners have identified that there will be employees from the businessand non-technical divisions of our industry partners who desire and would benefit from training inthe biology and engineering aspects
important to fully appreciateits effects within China’s stratified educational system.References[1] J. L. Hess, A. Lin, A. Whitehead, and A. Katz, "How do ethics and diversity, equity, and inclusion relate in engineering? A systematic review," J. Eng. Educ., pp. 1-21, 2023.[2] J. Salmi. (2020). Higher Education and Inclusion, Background paper prepared for the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report Inclusion and Education: All Means All. UNESCO [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373689.[3] J. Salmi and A. D’Addio, "Policies for achieving inclusion in higher education," Policy Reviews in Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47-72, 2021.[4] S. Marginson, "Equity, status and freedom: a
, collaboratingwith industry partners and government agencies to stay at the forefront of technological advancementsand threats. The center also provides mentorship, internships and scholarships to undergraduate andgraduate students, in addition to opportunities and assistance with achieving post-graduate degrees inembedded systems or cybersecurity (CAP Center, n.d). CEAMLS engages in research, education, andoutreach efforts to address ethical considerations and mitigate biases in these technologies, contributing toa more equitable and just use of AI and machine learning systems (CEAMLS, n.d). Both centers aredeeply involved in cultivating the next generation of engineers through K - 12 school partnerships,seminars, workshops and summer camps. The CAP
ethics. Her research interests include drinking water quality and treatment, odorous and toxic algal blooms, impacts of toxins on crops and humans, impacts of wildfires and hydraulic fracking on surface water quality, and affected indoor air quality due to use of contaminated tap water. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42547Dr. Monica Palomo, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Professor B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Guanajuato, Gto, Mexico, December 1999, summa cum laude. M.S. Civil Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, May 2003
and experience. While this can create challenges for all participants, the typicallearner has strong expertise in their chosen field, strong work ethic, and considerable maturity asadult learners which serves them well in graduate programming [29], [30]. This leads toproductive discussions of practical applications of data analytics, learners helping other learners,and unexpected insights.The expectation that a learner who has never written code in any programming language canlearn Python in one semester is a high bar. For example, a learner might feel that code that is“almost” right (e.g., using a semi-colon instead of a colon in a Python “if” statement) should“almost” work. This can lead to frustration.Given this frustration, it is
opportunity to activelyengage with and take away valuable insights that they could apply in their own classrooms. Eachworkshop had an approximate duration of two hours, covering various topics throughout the series.Manufacturing Research Experience by K-14 EducatorsSeveral approaches were incorporated into the planned research training. The participants attendedpreliminary training sessions that included presentations and discussions on the history andfundamentals of systems and machine languages, with an emphasis on tools for data analytics.Research workshops and seminars introduced them to important engineering ethics, safetyprotocols, subject privacy, and confidentiality. Participants researched popular engineering casestudies and were then
, professionalorganizations, and engineering ethics. Planned Strategies for the CAM program: CAM scholarmeetings will include career and graduate school preparedness topics every year (with theassistance of the Career and Internship Center) so that the students are prepared at all academiclevels. E-portfolios will be created with applications for internships, jobs, and graduate schoolsin mind.5. Current Academic Tutoring. In addition to general academic tutoring available through theUniversity, the CET offers tutoring specific to engineering in lower-level classes at theEngineering Tutoring Lab. Tutors are advanced upper-level students. CAM scholarship recipientswill receive tutoring as needed. Planned Strategies for the CAM program: Additional tutors willbe hired
Experiences for Interdisciplinarity in Biomedical Engineering Education’, in ASEE, 2023.[13] H. Golecki and J. Bradley, ‘Experiential Learning: Exploring Nuances When Making Ethical Decisions in a Capstone Design Course’, Biomed Eng Educ, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43683-023-00126-2.[14] C. Cvetkovic, S. Lindley, H. Golecki, and R. Krencik, ‘Biofabrication of Neural Organoids: An Experiential Learning Approach for Instructional Laboratories’, Biomed Eng Educ (In Press), 2024.[15] ‘BIOPAC: Data Acquisition, Loggers, Amplifiers, Transducers, Electrodes’, https://www.biopac.com/.[16] S. H. Kim and M. Y. Chang, ‘Application of Human Brain Organoids—Opportunities and Challenges in Modeling Human
STEM students as well as the major barriers to STEM students’success. This study provided insight into the qualities of successful STEM students andidentified possible barriers that lead to attrition problems within the STEM field. One of themain findings for student success was that successful STEM students possessed several skillsthat were not necessarily discipline specific but were more general and applicable acrossdisciplines [6]. In general, these beneficial skills were personality trait related such as curiosity,inquisitiveness and strong work ethic [6]. Other domain-specific skills were also identified asinfluential to STEM student success, such as strong written and oral communication skills andstrong information synthesis skills [6
learning. The overview of cave setting isillustrated in Error! Reference source not found.. Figure 3. The CAVE learning setting.Data Collection After obtaining approval from the institutional review board (IRB), ethical protocols werefollowed, securing written consent from each participant through their endorsement of aninformed consent form. By implementing this process, participants were able to make informeddecisions about their participation, emphasizing their right to withdraw at any time. CT scaleswere then administered to students prior to exposure to the CAVE at the beginning of thesemester. Following the CAVE exposure, focus group interviews and non-participant directclassroom observation provided
Research in Rural Education, vol. 26, 2011.[8] D. Urquidi, “Exploring the Pathway of Rural Students into the Engineering Field.,” Teachers College Record, vol. 115, no. 10, p. 100305, 2019.[9] D. Boykin, “Pennsylvania Engineering Professors Mix Creativity with Ethics Education,” PE Magazine: The Magazine for Professional Engineers, p. 10, Dec. 2015.[10] M. Milligan, “Engineering a Better World Through Diversity, Equity and Inclusion,” ABET. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/engineering-a- better-world-through-diversity-equity-and-inclusion/[11] Engineering for sustainable development: delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals. UNESCO, International Centre for Engineering Education, 2021
training. Other presentations included an eclectic mix of ethics training,interpretation of artistic images (one of the student’s favorite discussions), and giving betterpresentation. The students especially enjoyed discussion topics that were much different thannormal engineering classes. There was typically above average student participation in theseclasses.c. industrial internshipIndustrial internships can be a vital part of a student’s education. One of the main goals of theprogram was to strongly prepare students to compete for engineering internship opportunities.Students noted that the resume critiques, mock interviews, and discussions with hiring managersgave them extensive preparation. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 epidemic significantly
, and P. A. Ralston, “Why Engineering?: Students’ reasons forchoosing an engineering major,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.[22] M. K. Watson, S. T. Ghanat, D. Michalaka, K. Bower, and R. W. Welch, “Why DoStudents Choose Engineering? Implications for First-Year Engineering Education,” 7th FirstYear Engineering Experience Conference, August 3-4, 2015, Roanoke, VA.[23] G. A. Rulifson, A. R. Bielefeldt, and W. Thomas, “Understanding of Social Responsibilityby First Year Engineering Students: Ethical Foundations and Courses,” 2014 ASEE AnnualConference, Indianapolis, IN.[24] A. R. Bielefeldt, “Disengaged or Disappearing? Losing the most Socially MotivatedStudents from Engineering?” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.[25] E. H
Paper ID #44504Toward an Integrated Framework of Empathy for Users among EngineeringStudent DesignersDr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Nicholas D. Fila is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His research interests include empathy, ethics, design thinking, and course design.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Purdue University
Developing Hands-on Competency in Generative AI with Ethical Considerations,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2024.[38] Ryan Chan. “Closed Loop System in Technical Training – How to Initiate and Maintain a Student-Led Makerspace,” Proceedings of the international symposium on academic makerspaces (ISAM). Pittsburgh, PA. 2023.[39] Natalie Chan. “Scaling Up Student Tutor Programs in Academic Makerspaces: Best Practices and Challenges,” Proceedings of the international symposium on academic makerspaces (ISAM). Pittsburgh, PA. 2023.[40] Natalie Chan, Chun Kit Chui. “Embrace Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Makerspaces with a Network of Tutors (Work in progress),” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2024.[41] Match WL
math have been empirically provenbeneficial [7]. Additionally, intervention or implementation of social determinants of health, suchas education, socioeconomics, community, and health care have substantive value in fosteringenvironments facilitating a student’s work ethic and retention.Females enrolled in STEM programs, particularly electrical engineering, often do not completethe program. The sense of unbelonging in electrical engineering is more prevalent amongunderrepresented groups. These students change programs during the second or third semestersafter enrollment [8-9]. Academic and workplace environments in engineering are not alwayswelcoming to female counterparts, leaving females with a sense of unbelonging [10-11]. Withpaucity of