the average level of studentratings in the IDEA national database. Also, classroom attendance and passing rates were higherin the experimental classes than the rates in the traditional classes.IntroductionEducational research in the late 20th century has seen the evolution of unconventional teachingmethods like co-operative learning, peer instruction, critical thinking exercises, and classroom Page 10.1075.1assessment.1-8 Patricia Cross,9 a leading educator, indicated in her American Association ofHigher Education’s (AAHE’s) 1998 National Conference keynote address that, “We have moreProceedings of the 2005 American Society for
, and peer evaluations.Logical ReasoningWe teach logical reasoning and thinking methods to solve problems related to engineeringprinciples. The textbook written by Wales and Stager3 gives the examples, step by step, to showhow engineering problems are solved logically. Students are able to complete a series ofequations with correct calculations and engineering units. We also introduce the logical thinkingmethod into students’ report writing and engineering graphics processes.Filed TripsWe arranged several field trips to industrial companies around this area and met with theengineers there. Students found out what daily jobs there are for engineers and what future careerthey could have.Students commented, that "You never stop learning in this
lost in differentlecture styles or written material. The college students being the coaches of each video comparesto peer-teaching which can enrich the learning experience by offering an additional layer ofsupport and engagement alongside the expertise of professors. These videos were intended not as replacements for the lecture materials but ascomplementary resources to reinforce newly acquired knowledge for a deeper understanding.Further, they would serve as valuable review tools not only for students currently enrolled butalso for upperclassmen seeking to refresh their programming skills. This enhances conceptretention and increases student engagement, potentially leading to improved attendance,participation, and grades in computer
the same time, knowing whatactions and individual characteristics lead to acceptance in a graduate program and an eventualacademic career assists students in navigating their engineering careers towards academia. Inother words, a program participant who begins to be viewed by professors and peers as aresearcher, as ―graduate school bound;‖ who talks about what she will do as a professor; whogoes to academic conferences and studies for the GRE could be seen as accepting the pathwaytowards the professoriate.Individuals‘ learning pathways in a community arise from multiple factors related to thecommunity‘s routine practices and the individual‘s historically-developed dispositions andambitions.18 The local community, or the specific group of
andwith their faculty mentor, as this has been shown by prior works to be a good way to improvepersistence and success [7], [12], [16]. Faculty mentors also selected an upper-divisionundergraduate student to serve as a teaching assistant and peer mentor during the activity. Thefaculty mentor, peer mentor, and participants received a stipend for participating in the program.The last half-day of the program was a career skills workshop organized by CSUB’s careereducation center. Students learned skills related to resume writing, job searching, and interviewsfrom career counselors. Students were also introduced to CSUB’s job portal.Assessment ToolsAcademic progress of all participants was monitored through CSUB’s enrollment managementsystem. Grant
. When a member of your team asks about the resolution to the design concerns, the P.E. tells your colleague that if they raise the concern again the P.E. will have them fired. [Question 1. Likert scale, responses choices: very unethical, somewhat unethical, neither ethical or unethical, somewhat ethical, very ethical] Please select the response that best describes how you interpret the ethics of this scenario. • [Q01.1] How ethical do you think it is for the P.E. to act this way? • [Q01.2] How ethical would your peers think it is for the P.E. to act this way? • [Q01.3] How ethical would current engineering professionals think it is for the P.E. to act this way?Scenario 2: Code SharingHaving been edited since the
-ended questions about the Guild usingthematic analysis. The findings demonstrated that the participants perceived the workshop asvaluable and enabled them to see how computing can be a medium to solve problems of humaninterest as well as a tool of self-expression. In particular, participants reported that the empatheticassistance given by the peer mentors made the learning process smoother, thus making itinspiring, engaging, and less intimidating. Going forward, more experiments and fine-tuning areneeded to continue to scale and improve the Guild. However, we hope the description of ourworkshop and findings from our investigation encourage other researchers and educators toconsider similar approaches to engage women and non-binary students in
College Writing Program which provides a student Writing Associate toprovide additional guidance to students, and by the College Library which assigns a researchlibrarian to work with each section to develop research skills.The FYS was a promising context for our foundational interdisciplinary project-basedlearning experience for the same reasons such seminars are effective pedagogically and“high-impact” [14]. They engage students with faculty and with their peers in formal andinformal conversations “about substantive matters, typically over an extended period of time”[15].To our College’s standard FYS learning outcomes related to writing and information literacy,we added three additional learning outcomes: that after completing this class
Américas Puebla (UDLAP).Problems vary in different ways, so different kinds of problems call on different conceptions andskills 2-4. Based on those differences among problems, different kinds of food engineeringproblems were developed such as decision-making, troubleshooting/diagnosis, and designproblems. For seven PSLEs' assignments an Argumentation Rubric (adapted from Jonassen2),was utilized to assess students' (n=81) argumentation skills, particularly adequacy of premises,credibility of premises, organization of arguments, quality of conclusions (claims), and writing(content/ideas). Four evaluators assessed student papers and videos. Furthermore, the mostcommon method for assessing argumentation, protocol analysis of student essays or
earlier in their college career – ideally their first year.In response to this feedback, with the support of the Pieper Foundation(srpieperfamilyfoundation.com), and under the leadership of an endowed professorship forServant Leadership, we created and launched a pilot course in Fall 2011 for 25 incomingfirst year students. One course enrollment slot was open during each summer orientationsession until the course filled. Quickly we had a waiting list of additional students wantingto enroll, so in Spring and Fall 2012, the enrollment cap expanded to 35. Each time thecourse filled to capacity. As we write this paper, we are considering feasible models to
first workshop by Lindsay Marshall was focused onhelping PhD students overcome barriers to writing their dissertation, which is a source of anxietyfor PhD students and was a topic requested by members of the program. Students learned aboutmethods to organize their writing and overcome writing blocks. Resources for PhD graduatestudents to support their thesis writing were also shared with the group. The second workshopwas on time management for the busy student offered by the UIC Wellness Center. Finally, therewas a seminar on leadership by Dr. Jarrad Hampton-Marcell on science and being competitive inSTEM. We had a seminar on how to prepare for the postdoctoral search and maximizing theexperience as part of supporting their professional
consider, which was the ArchivalPublication Authors, a National Science Foundation sponsored workshop hosted by theAmerican Association for Engineering Education. 2“The aim of the APA1 is to facilitate growth in manuscript writing skills and anunderstanding of the review process, leading to the development and refinement of newmanuscripts that are intended to be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.The APA will include instructor-led sessions and panels and interactive breakout sessionswith writing teams and mentors. Specifically, the workshop was designed to:1.Use ASEE journal solicitations to contextualize content;2.Challenge teams to draft
% Lack of infrastructure 15% Concerns about the review process 13% Difficulty finding collaborators 5% Percentage of total responses Other factors 8% Figure 1. Factors preventing MSI faculty securing NSF CISE funding (n=104).When respondents spoke about time issues, their concerns centered around time needed to (a)cover their heavy teaching loads, (b) pursue research funding opportunities, (c) write proposals,and (d) conduct the research. A couple of responses alluded to poor timing of submissiondeadlines. Lack of time due to heavy teaching loads was the most frequently mentioned
, andis working to eliminate barriers to participation, create a space that respects diverse traditions,heritages, and experiences, as well as promote diversity in all staff, volunteers, and audiences (C4DISC,n.d.). How do we increase diversity on editorial boards and pools of peer reviewers for EER journals?Other important considerations include how we refer to gender, disability, race and ethnicity, amongother characteristics, in our publications. The American Psychological Association (APA) has provided anonline guide based on their updated 7th Edition Handbook about bias-free language and urges authors to“to use language that is free of bias and avoid perpetuating prejudicial beliefs or demeaning attitudes intheir writing” (APA, n.d.). But
learning, expressed in the student reflections (LS), can instructors assess from individual assignments? Question 3: Do students whose reflections on doing are assessed to be more insightful focus on different “doings” than their peers? What can we infer by text mining the data about the ways that ‘insightful’ students write their LS? We anticipate certain patterns to emerge, given our intentional effort to tie eachassignment to successive POED over the course of the design process; see Figure 1. We are alsointerested in the degree to which the evolving focus in the course design is reflected in thestudent learning. Based on our prior work, we expect both team formation, concept
toothbrush. Students will beexpected to write a report with detailed description of all steps taken during the development ofthe prosthetic limb.Once we perfect the prosthetic arm, the same process can be applied to development of otherlimbs such as arms or legs. This project will benefit patients with disabilities and improve theirday-to-day lives at a fraction of the cost of current solutions.MotivationThe purpose of this project is to help low-income families’ children who have a disabled handand to expand students’ awareness of societal needs. With this project, students demonstrate thelearning and knowledge gained from the different sources, such as using Arduino board to designa myoelectric prosthetic arm. It is therefore important to show the
traditionalhomework in engineering education occurred [1-4], but the overwhelming majority ofengineering faculty members believe that homework is an indispensable component in thecourses they teach. As an analogy, students majoring in English need to write many essays forpractice, and they cannot master the skill of writing just by learning various writing skills andreading novels. In the same way, engineering students cannot grasp the necessary knowledge andskills without the struggling process in solving homework problems [5].Almost all the publishers of the textbooks provide the solution manuals to the instructors, andunfortunately, these materials are leaked to students through the internet. Some websites eveninvite students to provide quiz and exam
substituted by a professional portfolio including reports and drawings that weresubmitted to the company - 25% of the final grade), final Power Point Presentation (PPT to bemade to the peers from the same section of ENGR 490x - 10% of the final grade), journal andlog (25% of the final grade). Supervisor feedback (35% of the final grade) is critical. Eachstudent is required to have a supervisor, direct or indirect supervisor, who is aware of student’sperformance. Supervisors are determined by the companies at which students are employed. Forthe internal research projects, supervisors are determined by the students as they choose theirproject and the owner of it. The supervisor is approached (most likely through phone contact ande-mail) for both
Community,thinking not only about your own contribution but also how you would like to interact withothers within this Community, including your peers and your instructors.”At the end of that first seminar students were asked to write reflections responding to that initialletter, “Go back and read that letter to yourself and then write a reflection about your experiencethrough the lens of your expectations.[…] Share how this experience has affected the way youlook at yourself, others, your education, your goals, and your success. Is there anything that younow look at or approach differently due to your experience in this course?” In addition, studentswere asked to write a letter to an incoming student about the first seminar experience.At the end
involving large datasets Writing First year • Receive writing feedback from peers and Community consultants • Develop writing skillsParticipants We conducted interviews with participants who were in the 2017 or 2018 cohorts duringsummer 2019, i.e., participants who recently completed two-year D3EM program trainingrequirements. All students in the 2017 and 2018 cohorts were invited to participate in aninterview. Three cohorts of students have completed at least one year in the program. Studentsmay still participate in D3EM activities after the two-year training. All participants werecurrently in their 3rd or 4th year in
mechanics.Student involvement in the design process encourages active learning. The literature suggeststhat an active learning laboratory style is required for students to achieve the highest knowledgelevel of the course material. Upchurch and Thai10 describes a interactive laboratory that allowsall electrical systems students to participate in the exercises. Specifically, on independentcomputers, students can mimic the teacher, work independently, or work with other students.The professor can intervene at anytime. Miller et al.7 presents the results of laboratoryimprovements that include increased emphasis on report writing, peer review, and studentplanning of experiments. Adams et al.2 presents the use of hands on experiments to generatestudent interest
: Page 5.702.4Team #3: The grade for Partner A was 20 points less than the project grade. Partner B gave hispartner an effort grade of 2.5 and 3.5 for himself. His comments were: No help in writing programs. Of the remaining work, it was about 65- 35 split to her benefit. I ended up performing the majority of the work, > 70%, in order to meet the deadline.Partner B also came to the instructor midway through the project and expressed his difficultywith his partner. Once again Partner A did not submit an evaluation form.Team #4: The grade for Partner A was 20 points less than the project grade. Partner B gave hispartner an effort grade of 30% and 70% for himself. His comments were: He made
undergraduate students. There are currently four companies thatare hosting a total of nine students. The host companies are Qual-Tron Inc., Railroad SignalInternational, Centrilift and John Zink Company. The interns work part-time during the schoolyear and full-time during the summer break. The interns are required to write progress reportsand technical reports on their work assignments. The interns also make a poster presentation atOklahoma regional Universities Research Day hosted every year at the University of CentralOklahoma in Edmond, Oklahoma. The internship program has not only provided workexperience to the students but also helped the companies in developing new products.I. Introduction:In a standard four-year engineering curriculum, leading
with the easeof access to such Gen AI tools have raised a lot of questions about ethics, authorship and academicintegrity [25], [27]. While academics are still exploring the possible applications of Gen AI in education [27], severalresearchers agreed that Gen AI literacy is essential in education [28], [29], [30]. Some educators andresearchers argue that several AI tools like the writing assistance tools may enhance the learningexperience by providing automated assistance [31]. AI has also been explored as a creative collaboratorin various fields, such as game level design and computational tools for creative writing, where it is seenas a potential source of new ideas and support for designers' goals [32], [33], [34]. Providing
Garcia (Education Specialist) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com IN-PERSON INSTRUCTION OR REMOTE LEARNING?: UNDERSTANDING STUDENTS’ LEARNING EXPERIENCES DURING COVID-19Research attests that student success in engineering education is cultivated largely due toclassroom environments, academic inclusion, and engagement in undergraduate research. It isfurther revealed that the social and academic fabric of the institution such as academic advising,peer tutoring, disability services, and outdoor recreational programs is essential towards fosteringwell-being, recruitment, retention, and student success. However, these studies
retainingwomen engineering students? Do the virtual measures foster the same levels of self-efficacy inwomen engineering students as the previously offered face-to-face interactions? Do womenengineering students feel additional isolation from their peer group and perhaps question theircareer path when faced with an increased amount of online presence and the removal of criticalprograms aimed at increasing retention?While it is impossible to know the long-term impact on women engineering students due to thepandemic, it is possible to measure the immediate change in self-efficacy, sense of belonging andconfidence in program of study. This study measured changes in self-efficacy, belonging andconfidence of undergraduate women engineering students at a
“green screen”; developing a threestep iterative process for videos based on story boards; and changing how concepts wereidentified. In the first year students selected from a list of relevant concepts, in the second yearconcepts were represented mathematically. During both years the videos were scored usingrubrics on both accuracy of conceptual understanding and production values, and were also peer-evaluated. Comparisons of video scores to performance on standard exams and the results ofconcept inventories are presented. We also reflect on the value of videos for self-explanationand for engaging with conceptually difficult material. Example student videos will be used toillustrate both correct and incorrect conceptual explanations.Introduction
of this NRT, the main goalof which is to generate an innovative model for STEM graduate student training by identifyingand implementing the most effective tools for the training of STEM professionals. In futurecontributions, we intend to showcase data from the NRT, focusing on the evaluation of itsconstituent parts.Briefly, this multi-year academy includes two required courses (one focused on research-relatedcontent and another on transferrable skills) and two elective courses, which together constitutethe basis of a graduate certification. Other features include two summer internships (one inter-departmental and one at an external institution), peer mentoring of subsequent trainee cohorts,and initiatives including collaborative research
participating in their learning process—not simply observing what their Page 24.574.3neighbors are doing and copying answers. This means that the exercises cannot be identical foreach student, but should be similar enough to encourage collaboration and peer teaching.Both of the above issues were addressed by the integration of technology. The Moodle coursemanagement system was used to deliver active learning exercises, provide automated assessmentof student responses and immediate feedback, and allow easy faculty access to class performancedata. Rather than simply being a delivery mechanism, Moodle became the focal point of courseactivities. The course
particular section, fitting their own teaching style and allowing greater buy-in and usage byboth instructor and students.The course evaluation included an opinion survey of the students’ reaction to the onlinecomponents and an investigation of server statistics. These data show that Manhattan: aidedstudent learning; increased professor to student communication, facilitated grading and returningof computer-based student work, aided freshmen academic advising, and improved coordinationof the course between professors. Somewhat surprisingly, the students did not utilize the peer-to-peer communication tools (available to individuals and teams) to the level expected. Overall, wehave successfully balanced the integration of on-line communication into a