. These software enabled devices allowed students to take notes,draw charts and diagrams. Afterwards the results were measured through student feedback. The Page 26.1592.3results of the experiment were satisfactory as more than 85% of the students thought that usingthe tablets contributed positively towards their active learning experience. Instructors observedthat the level of interaction and enthusiasm increased greatly among students. While it is difficultto provide accurate result values that reflect the amount of increase in student performance in theclassroom, the high level of attendance, which was observed, was certainly a good indicator
reasons: The RF signal power attenuation is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the transmitter and the receiver. The UHF RF signal can be reflected off nearby metal surfaces and concrete walls, which are common in a hospital environment, and cancel the incident signal if it is in anti-phase with incident signal. The reader’s antenna radiation patterns may also vary in different directions depending on the location and geometry of the room, which consequently influence the reader’s performance. Therefore, it is of great importance to adapt the reader’s antenna location to properly scan its environment and provide maximum tag detection capability. Most important is that the UHF RF signals are easily absorbed
to their picture between pre and post surveys (SD = 1.96, N = 50).Discussion and AnalysisAlthough no change occurred between surveys on the Likert-type questions, it is interesting tonote the average feelings of the campers on issues of sustainability and their own ability forchange. In general, campers noted that they believed their own actions are important forenvironmental change. They also generally noted that they thought about where their foodcomes from, showing that the younger generation can be environmentally conscious.Due to the nature of the camp, environmentally and academically minded parents are more likelyto pay for their children to attend this type of camp. Therefore, the campers who attended do notnecessarily reflect
College during the fall of 2014 in the Incubator experience. Although the pilot study did notfind an advantage of teaching integrated courses, it was an important step towards the re-envisioning of the existing curriculum. The Purdue Polytechnic Incubator operated as a facultynetwork that explored best practices on education by deconstructing the models of traditionaldisciplines. This allowed for re-visioning of the traditional educational model by including co-teaching and group reflections as a core component of the experience. The integration ofhumanities and technology provided with a rich ground for student development. Rather thanfocusing only in a mechanistic approach to technology, students were able to draw parallels withtheir cultural
%), Acceptance (84%), Relationship toAccreditation Board of Engineering Technology (ABET) Student Outcomes (94%), andRelationship to Course Objectives (91%). In addition, despite the slower upload speed of theBeagleboard-xM, the total amount of time required to complete DSP hardware-basedlaboratories using the Beagleboard-xM was reduced by 6.6%. Further, and perhaps mostencouraging, is that results suggest even a one-time lab experience with the Beagleboard isenough to overcome any learning curve it might have and thus accelerate lab completion.Finally, comments and feedback solicited from students and teaching assistants reflect positively Page
, theteam will assume a percent removal by LLE based on literature reports. A secondway would be to make sure that teams have some strong leadership andreorganize teams if necessary.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant DUE-0966245. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions and recommendationsexpressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. References1. Perez, T., Cromley, J.G., Kaplan, A. The role of identity development, values and costs I college STEM retention. Journal Educational Psychology 106(1): 315-329, 2014.2. Wilson, Z.S., Holmes, L., deGravelles, K., Sylvain, M.R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M., McGuire, S.Y., Pang
their institution is (andwhat it is not).Alignment of objectives is an important element of effective education practice. In any course,the course content, assessments, and pedagogical practices should be aligned to improve learningand to have valid understanding of the students’ progress. This is more difficult across a wholeprogram with multiple instructors and course offerings, but it becomes almost impossible if theoutcomes are not clearly defined. The multiple definitions of entrepreneurship create many moreopportunities for confusion and misalignment across programs. By articulating the particulartype of entrepreneurship education being offered, administrators can better ensure thatcoursework across the program reflects the desired
a lab-styleenvironment. Students were expected to learn the design process as part of their service/designexperience under the guidance of a faculty member and professionals.Assessment of the course was provided via open-ended written reflections. Students indicatedthat the documentation requirements were overwhelming the service and design aspects of thecourse. In spite of their frustration with the documentation, students indicated that they valuedthe service aspect of the course.The instructors’ assessment mirrored that of the students. The focus of the course was incorrect.In the pursuit of providing resources to help students not waste time, the instructors felt studentsspent an exorbitant amount of time documenting rather than
Press.Marra, R., Edmister, W., Watford, V., Bogue, B., Tsai, C., and Gooden, F. (2010). Peermentoring: Impact on mentees and comparison with non-participants. Proceedings of the AnnualConference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education.Niemi, A., Green, M., and Roudkovski, M. (2013). Evaluation of a first-year retention project:Findings at halftime. Proceedings of the Annual Conference and Exposition of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education.Building Engineering and Science Talent (BEST), 2004. A Bridge for All. www.Bestworkforce.org, accessed 2-19-15.Meyers, K., Silliman, S., Gedde, N. and Ohland, M. (2010). A comparison of engineeringstudents’ reflections on their first-year experience. Journal of Engineering
previous shortcomings are somewhat reflected in observed changes to the class gradedistributions. The data from the summer 2012 course (114 students) was compared toconglomerated course data from 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 (325 students) from the sameinstructor at the same class time. The historical trend for the course is for approximately 27% ofthe students to earn A’s, 33% earn B’s, 23% to earn C’s, 8% to earn D’s and 9% to earn F’s(Figure 1). For the 2012 class, there appeared to be a dramatic shift within the gradedistributions from the historical trends. As shown in the Figure, 42% earned A’s, 16% earnedB’s, 7% earned C’s, 26% earned D’s and 9% earned F’s. Data were also compiled for the sameStatics class in the summer of 2013 (148 students
to note that the diversity among BPHS studentswas reflected in the EE students. Page 26.1232.10While BPHS students engaged well with the tables staffed by Suffolk EE faculty and students,these exhibits would have benefitted from the types of signs that the industry had to orient the 9students about what they were learning. They also would have benefitted by having seatsarranged around their exhibits and the industrial presenters had. The Suffolk EE studentsinteracted with and engaged the BPHS students at this exhibit quite well, and the Tesla coil had apalpable ‘wow’ factor.There were other
thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Author Robert Parker also acknowledges financial support from the B.P.America Faculty Fellowship of the Swanson School of Engineering at the University ofPittsburgh. We also thank the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering for staffsupport of this REU program.References1. Congressional Budget Office. Technological Change and the Rate of Health Care Spending. Pub. No. 2764. The Congress of the United States, 2008.2. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M., Shuman, L.J., Wolfe, H. (2004). Scoring Concept Maps: An Inegrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education. 93(2), 105-115.3
. Despite thebenefits of an approach teaching problem-solving skills first, the transition from pre-programming problem-solving courses to courses in which students should master a full-fledgeprogramming language remains a challenge 18, 22. This is reflected in the number of students(44%) who did not have an acceptable performance in either concepts or skills (Figures 4 and 5).Even though those students had passed a previous problem solving course, they find thetransition to a learning environment that uses a full-fledge programming language like Javadifficult.According to Mayer 17, in addition to the cognitive and metacognitive aspects of problemsolving, other aspects like motivation and engagement are also important determinants of studentsuccess
seven. To reflect these changes, the course has grown from one credit totwo credits. Material for each lab was delivered in a two-week cycle with a one-hour lecture andtwo-hour lab period every week. Each lab had one dedicated lecture and additional lectures wereadded to further emphasize broader topics including data acquisition, measurement uncertainty,and statistical analysis.In addition to the updated course content, the Toyota A3 report format has been adopted for alllabs to expose students to a wider variety of tools for technical communication and to foster aspirit of creative and innovative problem solving. In keeping with the iterative nature of thesereports, the general process for each lab involves multiple events with feedback from
and meetingand conversing with local people. Third, the program provides students with an opportunity toexperience different countries where the political, technological, social, cultural, educational andenvironmental systems are different than that of the U.S. by completing in-class assignments thatlink to experiences when traveling abroad. Reflective assignments are completed after studentsfinish the international module.Program ComponentsEach spring, a new cohort of RSAP participants enroll in a semester-long course on GlobalEngineering Practice: Leadership and Culture. The course, which meets weekly for three hours,is designed to: 1) prepare students for travel abroad and 2) get students to consider engineeringchallenges and solutions
information, funding sources, government entity, etc.) of information they seek. This preference will drive the use of the corresponding web site seed along with the presentation of the associated keywords to the user as defined by the attribute property also in the ontology. And third, the refined list of keywords, instead of all the keywords under a given topic, is used by the application for the searches. Figure 9 contains a sample mockup of the modified search application including the Page 26.1358.14 Figure 9 - Sample Search Application Mock-up user’s ability to set the search aspect. Note the categories reflect
directly observe what happens in engineering design, model the practiceof their teacher, and reflect on the ideas they learn, including addressing any relatedmisconceptions. Teachers encourage the development of their learners by making tacit knowledgeexplicit, modeling effective strategies for completing tasks, providing scaffolded support whenlearners are practicing new tasks, and offering specific feedback for improvement15. Thisapprenticeship is vitally important for the transferability of what is assumed to be learned in anorientation or training session to become actual practice. As part of this research, additive manufacturing is being explored as a means of implementingthe theoretical cognitive learning concepts. Research on the use of
equipment, antennas, etc.).Depending on the location, these objects could be considered to either obstruct the IFOV of thesolar panel and lux, or could potentially reduce the availability of reflected light off of nearbyspecular surfaces to increase available light to the systems. Although this situation wasconsidered, the students could not come up with a way to mitigate this confounding. Therefore,no further attempt to normalize the variable, besides compensate for lux to output, wasincorporated into the study. Finally, while the decreasing temperature throughout the course ofthe study likely had bearing on numerical outcomes, preliminary analysis suggested thatfactoring in the theoretical effect would not have altered the overall consensus of
serve as “discovery labs” can be used as a means to lead students from a physicaldescription of mechanics to a mathematical description. These kinesthetic/tactile activities can bedirectly connected to deeper thinking about the how and why of the results.11,12 This type ofactivity reflects a fundamental aspect of the engineering modeling process where an engineerobserves a physical phenomenon, e.g. mechanical behavior of a material, and develops ways toquantify the behavior to use in a predictive manner in the future.The scope of this paper focuses on the development, implementation and planned assessment ofSAIL techniques in a Biomechanics course to address our goals and is a work in progress. Wededicated 50% of class time to group problem
students were exposed to and Page 26.1413.11learned additional concepts.A follow-up survey was sent to the four participating students approximately nine months after theacademic year ended. The students were asked to reflect on their involvement in the project, andthen rate how their participation affected their learning in six areas, as indicated in the following: 1. Ability to work as part of a large interdisciplinary team of technical and non-technical professionals. 2. Ability to write a real request for proposals and evaluate the responses. 3 Ability to consider life cycle issues when specifying components and identifying vendors. 4
Evaluation of Effectiveness. Engineering practitioners rate a sample of student papers using a simple 1 to 5 scale from “not effective” to “effective” - or, as translated by one practitioner, from “horrible” to “hire this person!” They are given basic information about the task and asked to evaluate based on what they know to be effective writing in workplace practice. Scores for pre- and post-intervention papers are compared statistically with Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon Matched Pairs tests. 4. Perceptions of Usefulness. Students are asked to complete a short survey about their perceptions of their learning and the materials’ usefulness, or – if instructors prefer – to write open-ended reflections on their learning. The survey
KnowledgeFigure 1. The frequency of teachers coded responses to our free-response items associated withteaching the CCSS-Math and NGSS practices.When asked to rate their level of knowledge of the practices of the CCSS-Math and the NGSS(on a 10 point Likert-like Scale), the participants indicated moderate knowledge of the CCSS-Math practices (M = 5.67, DS = 2.22) and relatively low levels of knowledge of the NGSSpractices (M = 2.62, SD = 2.00). When we compared the participants’ answers rating their levelof knowledge of the practices to the their responses to our item asking the participants to explainthe practices, we revealed alignment between their rated knowledge of the NGSS practices, asboth the coded answers and self-report answers were reflective
Methodology This study was designed as a first phase to study the effectiveness of teaching engineeringethics at the University. Later areas of study will build on this study and may include alongitudinal study and expansion to other institutions.Design This study was a non-experimental between-subjects non-equivalent groups design. Thisstudy was designed to compare the moral judgment of engineering students who are justbeginning their studies at the University with those who are completing their studies. The studydesign was approved by the University’s Ethics in Research Committee (EIRC).Hypothesis The University’s teaching of engineering ethics increases students’ engineering moraljudgment as reflected in scores on the Engineering
0.783 for Section 002.This is likely due to the makeup of students in each section and the time difference betweenwhen the two sections met for class. The lower performing section was the earlier 8 AM classwhen more students were apt to miss class, show up late, and be less engaged during the classlectures. The importance of the difference between the two sections is reflected in the unevendistribution of homework assignments. The section that performed better was assessed twicewith paper homework while the section that performed worse was assessed twice withWeBWorK homework. This would indicate the difference between paper-based homework andWeBWorK-based homework may be larger than directly indicated by the score averages weobtained. If only
be sought out to serve asthe basis of comparison for future studies.AcknowledgementsFunding for this study was provided by the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) EngineeringClub. The authors also thank the support from the VMI ASME student chapter. Page 26.249.8Bibliography 1. Bairaktarova, D., Pilotte, M., Evangelou, D., Cox, M.F. (2013) Examining Reflections of Current Engineering Students on Educational Outreach. Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013. 2. Salzman, N., Ricco, G.D., Ohland, M.W. (2014). Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First
Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 100(1): p. 89-122.4. Kolb, D.A. and L.H. Lewis, Facilitating experiential learning: Observations and reflections. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1986. 1986(30): p. 99- 107.5. Abdul, B., et al., Addressing Student Learning Barriers in Developing Nations with a Novel Hands-on Active Pedagogy and Miniaturized Industrial Process Equipment: The Case of Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 27(2): p. 458-476.6. Golter, P.B., et al., Combining modern learning pedagogies in fluid mechanics and heat transfer. chemical engineering, 2005. 39: p. 280-287.7
; and3) a small group cohort experience that emphasizes reflective and experiential learning through smallgroup team building, but also includes social activities. The BUILD program began in the summer of2006 and has continued uninterrupted to the present.The success of the BUILD program has fueled the initiative. BUILD cohorts consistently have higheraverage first term GPAs, high school GPA averages, and average SAT scores compared to the Universityaverages (The first-year retention rates for BUILD cohorts increased from 89% for the (2006 cohort) to ahigh of 95% (2012 cohort). This compared to the University rates which increased from 79% for the(2006 cohort) to a high of 81% for the (2012 cohort), with a high of 81% also occurring for the Fall
ensure teams are inclusive and diverse. With a clearmessage delivered from the leadership, student, experiential-learning, engineering competitionteams can become early incubators of the diversity and inclusion ideals that are promoted byindustry.AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge the funding that makes this work possible from the NationalScience Foundation's Directorate of Undergraduate Education's STEM Talent ExpansionProgram Grant No. DUE-1068453. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography1. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics
to succeed.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a National Science Foundation grant (#1203206) to the NationalCenter for Women and Information Technology, and a National Science Foundation grant(#062444) for Project PRiSE. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Page 26.328.16Science Foundation.References1. The White House. (2011). Women and girls in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp-women-girls-stem-november2011.pdf2
development. This paper is based upon worksupported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1037655. Any opinions,findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 26.335.14Bibliography1. Paretti, M., Howe, S., Blair, S., Rogers, P., Kanai, J., Stanfill, R. K., and Livesay, G. (2012) “Capstone Design Hub: Building the Capstone Design Community,” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.2. WordPress. (2015) https://wordpress.com/ Accessed March 2015.3. Kline, W