Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 465 Fig. 12 OEE summary.Future WorkWe are planning on adding more modules to the controller such as a relay to control lights andturn on/off equipment. We will continue learning about the Factory Systems software and usingit at full capacity. Additionally, work at MTC is underway to construct and operate a remoteconsole terminal that will soon connect to the F2F network at USC, to monitor and demonstrateIndustry 4.0 concepts to students and visiting stakeholders, as part of the Factory-to-FactorySCRA project.ConclusionsA classroom dedicated to teaching
, or students are overestimating their knowledgebase with these technologies. Either of these results necessitates a change in undergraduateteaching of Industry 4.0 technologies, and future planning for Industry 4.0 technologies.ConclusionsFor a graduate course in Industry 4.0 technologies, students were asked a series of bothperception and knowledge-based questions. Student responses showed that, Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 455 • Students reported some familiarity
, or students are overestimating their knowledgebase with these technologies. Either of these results necessitates a change in undergraduateteaching of Industry 4.0 technologies, and future planning for Industry 4.0 technologies.ConclusionsFor a graduate course in Industry 4.0 technologies, students were asked a series of bothperception and knowledge-based questions. Student responses showed that, Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 455 • Students reported some familiarity
that we were planning on selling, forgetting that all of our activities are commercial…we took the policies laid out too literally: Rather than understanding it as an ethical document.”Further, several students raised key points about teamwork or their team’s social context as theydiscussed what it would take to recognize and act upon the activity’s ethical dilemma, for example: • “I felt something was off throughout most of the lab, but because certain members of my team had interpreted the instructions a certain way and were quite confident about it, I didn’t really raise my concerns until the end of the lab when it was too late.” • “Once we finished the project some of my teammates said ‘I’m confused about
instructions for each laboratory project. The external linksarea contains folders organizing useful websites. The following information about Blackboardmay be useful to instructors planning to Blackboard to deliver course materials online.1. The Resources button bar is almost a worthless feature in Blackboard. Instructors will be moreproductive in locating useful resources (journal papers, books, etc.) using campus libraries onlineand listing those resources under Course Documents.2. Instructors are advised to locate useful reference websites using efficient search engines andorganize these URLs under External links. In one course the author had several hundred usefulwebsites. The best organization of these URLs involved classifying them and placing
minute time into the three compartments. Ascoring formula based on number of balls successfully tossed into the target holes was used toevaluate the device. By building a device that would rotate or move from one position to twoother positions to toss balls into the three separate targets, a higher score would be obtained. Thedetailed design contest rules are provided in [1].DESIGN SCHEDULEThe five teams built uniquely different machines to meet the contest rules. The teams wereassembled during the first week of winter semester, starting on January 22, 2002. The contestwas held at the University of Evansville on March 15-17, 2002. Therefore the teams had onlyeight weeks to plan, design, acquire materials, and build and test a machine to meet
we plan onincorporating into these and other classes. The most intriguing of these are the assessment tools– quizzes and surveys.One of the most potentially useful and time-saving features is the online quizzes. In CE 373,reading assignments with specific reading objectives have been assigned. Periodic pop quizzeswere administered to check that students were doing the reading. However, losing 10 minutes ofseveral lectures to give the quizzes and taking 1-2 hours to grade each quiz are significantdrawbacks to this assessment method. The Blackboard online quizzes offer a solution to theseproblems.Blackboard quizzes can be written with many types of questions. Images can be added to thequestions or the answers. Standard-answer questions such as
Actions that enhance faculty competence in personal, A curriculum designed with mutually supporting interpersonal, and product and system building skills disciplinary subjects, with an explicit plan to integrate 10. Enhancement of Faculty Teaching Skills personal, interpersonal, and product and system Actions that enhance faculty competence in providing building skills integrated learning experiences, in using active 4. Introduction to Engineering experiential learning methods, and in assessing An introductory course that provides the framework for student learning engineering practice in product and system building, 11. CDIO Skills
Foundation (NSF) provided the BroadeningParticipation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering (BRIGE) program which intends toincrease the diversity of researchers in the engineering disciplines. The goal of the BRIGEprogram is to support innovative research and diversity plans that contribute to recruiting andretaining a broad representation of engineering researchers especially those from groups that areunderrepresented in the engineering population2. In 2012, the project titled “ReliabilityAssessment of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Results for Performance Evaluation of Structuresunder Earthquakes” led by first author was funded by NSF to develop a probabilistic approach toassess the reliability of experimental results using the real-time hybrid
Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Conference Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Education 192partnerships with UWT and the Institute of Technology, including UFPB, UFPE, PresbyterianMackenzie University.One important point of cooperation planning consisted in choosing students who share commoninterests with UWT faculty areas of expertise. In this specific case the area of interest is“Wireless Communications” due to the depth of experience and achievement of the ComputerEngineering staff from the Institute of Technology in this important topic.After selecting the
success, campus involvement and community engagement.Freshman Programs facilitated the following for the ECS scholars program: (1) enrollment ina Freshmen Year Seminar (FYS) Course that is vital to academic planning, orientation, andtransition to CSUF; this seminar offers further integration into areas of Engineering andComputer Science via a Service Learning component, (2) coordination of block-scheduling ofparticipants (3) professional development for FYS Course instructors; and (4) assessment ofall professional development programs as well as peer evaluations for instructors.e. Women in EngineeringIn 2012, ECS received funding from the Engineering Information Foundation to support a“Women in Engineering" learning community project. Nineteen
data, and prepare scientific presentations; which would not have been possibleotherwise. The students obtained excellent information to write in their plan of study whilesubmitting their applications for admission in the universities. In addition, they could contact theauthor anytime in their career, whenever they need a reference for future use. More importantly,the community college and high school students received an exposure to university leveleducation and research, which not only motivated them to pursue higher education but alsohelped them to streamline their academic goal. The cohort group 2 students are presented inFigure 5.Figure 5: Second cohort group: 2 high school students and 3 community college students. Proceedings of
setup forstudents to achieve fundamental knowledge on the logic gates, pin configuration of the chips andin building simple circuits on breadboard. However, too many connecting wires on thebreadboard make the circuit cluttered and almost impossible to trace bugs in case the circuitfails to work. The problems could be anywhere from a faulty circuit design to the connectionsbeing loose and the board itself getting bad due to aging. Two major undesirable outcomes wereobserved in using this traditional way of learning, i) dissatisfactions of the learners and therebyreluctance to learn the subject and ii) difficult to complete a planned syllabus on time. It hasbeen found that, as the circuits become more involved, it is a good idea to switch over
professional courses pertaining to each discipline,emphasis is also given on acquiring knowledge in the basic and social sciences. A student needsto complete a total of 160 credit hours to obtain an undergraduate degree in Civil Engineeringdegree. The total credit requirement is higher than the standard requirement for a University inNorth America. The grading system and marks distribution are as follows. Distribution of marksis fixed irrespective of course, instructor and needs of students. 10 % marks is assigned to classattendance, 20% is assigned to home works and quizzes, and the remaining 70% is for the termfinal exam. Course offerings and planning are decided by Board of Undergraduate Studies(BUGS). There is also provision for employing teaching
instructors (formativeassessment). TAs developed lesson plans with integrated activities, such as Process OrientedGuided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) real world problems to foster collaborative learning, whileemphasizing challenging concepts. PAL students tutored individual students or groups, based ontheir discretion, and regularly updated TAs to ensure ESP lessons transitioned at the same paceas that of the course. It was hypothesized learning would increase over time, which would in turnresult in a continuous increase of class mastery from test to test.On average, students had a mastery of 59.1% (SD = 14.0) when the outcome was originallytested in AURAS (pre-test). Mastery of chemistry content increased to 78.6% (SD = 7.8) on theformal examination
semester having covered only half of theintended material. Class can even progress in the absence of the professor if he/she has to begone for a conference or last minute interruption. While the initial investment of time in the creation of the video file may seem somewhattedious, the end result of saved time will more than make up for it. Once the file is done, it canbe updated as needed, but the pictures, videos, notes, demonstrations, and other components willlikely be relevant to a course for years to come. Future preparation and planning is minimized.Additionally, students are able to download and print their own notes thereby saving professorsthe time and universities the money in making photocopies. Finally, when using video
, prepared students ultimately select engineering as a collegemajor and may help reduce attrition.Academically, most of the students who are accepted into the Academy have already beguntaking Pre-AP (Honors) classes and their average GPA is 3.0 or greater. The distinct advantageof completing their math and science at the Academy is that those classes will be comprised of ahomogeneous population of students with similar interests and skills. In addition, as noted above,the concepts taught in the core classes are enhanced and enriched in the engineering classes.As was pointed out by the university representatives in the early planning stages, many of thestudents are also actively involved in extra-curricular activities at their high school
, science andtechnology were unchanged, it is not clear from the surveys how students felt about thetopics beforehand. The same can be said of those 74% students who already had decidedon a course of study and the 69% for whom Botball did not influence their career choice.Botball participants are a self-selected group and may already have been planning to gointo science, math, or technology-related fields. Future surveys will seek more detailedinformation regarding pre-Botball opinions and career choices.Botball as engineering outreach From a university standpoint Botball is a wonderful thing. We have students from many different high schools in the area who, due to interest in Botball, wind up coming and doing robotics
groupsthat had purchased the information. Since none of these experiments were performed inadvance, the results were occasionally surprising but that, too, was part of the lesson.Once all experiments were completed the groups met again to summarize their data andinterpret the results. They were asked to brainstorm ways of correcting any problemsthey found (in either the testing procedure or the environmental site). The finaldeliverable was a written memorandum with a summary of their data and an oralpresentation on their results.Conclusion The response of the students was quite positive throughout the semester. It wasgratifying to walk into the classroom planning to facilitate a discussion and find that thestudents were already discussing it
playbackmessages are of random length and subject to change, the timed control loop that ispeculiar to the IFI software must be adapted to handle an external untimed event, i.e. aninterrupt. This is a sophisticated topic for an introductory programming class. The fidelityof the recorder chips is such that the gender of the person recording the feedbackmessage is easily recognized. We have boy and girl rovers!Calibration:Although the fleet of rovers have identical capabilities and sensors, each of these motorsand sensors require independent calibration. At one time, it was planned to build a sensorboard that would have calibration hardware to reduce the sensor output of the black/whitesensors to a single bit instead of an analog voltage. The response of
assessment to facilitate continuousimprovement on biomaterials and related topics: 1) What are the three strengths of this course? 2) What are the top three things that you have learned? 3) What are the three improvements for this course that would help you learn better? 4) How can these improvements be made? 5) What action plans can be put in place to help you learn more? 6) What have you learned about your own learning process? 7) Is there anything else you would like the instructor to know about the class? Several different answers were received from the students depending on the background,field of interest, level of students (BS and MS) and employment. The common answers for thequestion number 1
specificproblem solving approaches to successfully accomplish robotics tasks. Informal observations ofthe students had shown that they used a variety of problem-solving approaches - including trialand error as well as, less frequently, pre-planning and problem analysis.Similar to the learning instrument, participants scored significantly higher on the posttest(M=155.91, SD = 20.20) than on the pretest (M=147.52, SD = 22.03, t (133) = -5.09, p < .001)indicating the 4-H robotics and GPS/GIS summer camps have a positive short-term effect onattitudes towards STEM topics. While most sites had pre-post increases in attitudinal means, thet-results were not as significant as those from the content test (Table 3). Table 3
. Foreman, J., July/August 2003, Next Generation Educational Technology Versus the Lecture. EDUCAUSEReview [On-line], http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0340.pdf , 29 June 2011.2. Starr, Paul, July-August 1996, Computing Our Way to Educational Reform, The American Prospect no. 27: 50-60[On-line], http://www.princeton.edu/~starr/articles/27star.html. 30 June 2011.3. Turner, Wayne C., et al, Introduction to Industrial and Systems Engineering, Prentice-Hall, 1993.4. Geuting, Manfred: Planning Game and Social Simulation With-in the Education Range, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M., 1989.5. Plataforma SINC. "Educational Video Games Effective In Classroom If Certain Criteria Are Met." ScienceDaily,20 Feb. 2009. Web. 30 Jun. 20116. Roberts, D., Foehr, U
joys of engagement or the so called fruits of labor. So, this author introducedsome new pedagogical approaches that involved the students quite actively in theteaching - learning process. These approaches provided them with rewards for theirinitiatives and involvement. Students need to feel the pressure of a challenge in any givencourse but they also need to find a venue where a genuine conversation takes place andwhere they could see the connecting dots of their endeavor to their desired goals. Acarefully planned strategy can deliver such a climate.The issue raised in this article addresses an important S&T teaching and learning issuethat could go beyond the boundaries of this campus, many universities struggle in likemanner in its
anywhere, anytime,” Journal ofOnline Education, January 2005.[2] Richardson, J.C., and Swan, K., “Examining Social presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students’Perceived Learning and Satisfaction,” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks , Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003, pp.68–88.[3] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, “Evaluation ofEvidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies,”Washington, D.C., 2010.[4] Moore, J.C., “Elements of Quality: The Sloan-C Framework”, Needham, MA. Sloan-C, 2002[5] Jamieson, S., “Likert scales: how to (ab)use them,” Medical Education, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 1217-1218.[6] A Mayadas et al., “Online education today,” Science 323
2017c)The plan puts in milestones to solicit stakeholder input to influence BOK3 development.Summary and ConclusionsThe first two editions of the civil engineering Body of Knowledge have been very useful fordefining and developing the profession. The documents have had a significant impact on civilengineering education, including the two most recent revisions to program accreditation criteria.The profession is changing, and the challenges of 2017 are not the same as those of 2004. Thedevelopment of the BOK3 recognizes this fact, and sets in motion an eight year cycle forupdating the Body of Knowledge as well for civil engineering program criteria.ReferencesABET Inc., (2004) Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting
few years, and we have done joint design projects. The projects havehad varying success, and the students often complained about the difficulties in working with aremote team (which was part of the point of the joint project). Because my 2017 seniorscomplained that they had made very few, if any, oral presentations in coursework before makingpresentations during their summer internships, I wanted to add an oral presentation to my designproject for the junior year. The plan to continue the joint remote project with an oralpresentation was that each of my teams would be given a design from a remote competitor teamand would make a presentation comparing its design to the competitor’s design. Although thejoint remote project did not come about
Management System for Effective Traffic Control and Collision Avoidance." International Journal of Science 4.5 (2015): 3241- 246. W.[8] Velez, J., Trafford, R., DeMartino, A., Tomkins, K., & Topchiy, I. (2017). IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS) Proceedings, 307-311. Retrieved April 15, 2017.[9] Zhong, Xunyu, Xungao Zhong, and Xiafu Peng. "Velocity-Change-Space-based dynamic motion planning for mobile robots navigation." Neurocomputing 143 (2014): 153-63. W.
collected through the use ofwritten reports and surveys. The author discusses what was learned about the impact onstudents’ attitudes, learning and quality of work. Challenges are also described, as well asrecommendations for enhancements.IntroductionComputer programming has traditionally been a solo activity. Even in teams of softwaredevelopers, the planning of the project may be done together, but the actually coding is typicallydone individually. In recent years the growing popularity of the extreme programming softwaredevelopment approach has brought attention to pair programming.1,2 Pair programming iswhere two programmers work together at one computer. They continuously collaborate ondesigning, coding, and testing the program. The person in
% Supervisor’s final evaluation: 30% Final Report 25% 100%The Daily Journal Activities (DJA) consists of: 1. List of the activities participated on aparticular day; 2. Identification and description of special learning experiences; 3. Identificationof specific links to student’s academic instruction; and 4. the questions or concerns that emergedduring the service learning experience and how they were solved or planned to be solved. TheDJA will be graded by the course instructor.The Weekly presentation (WP) consists of the list of specific