Yelamarthi and Tolga Kaya. "An Engineering Research Program for High School Science Teachers: Year Two Changes and Results" Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research (2016)[9] National Science Foundation, Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering and Computer Science, at: https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=505170, accessed January 29, 2019.[10] L. Bottomley, "Creating effective teacher partnerships: Characteristics of teachers who choose to participate in K-16 partnerships," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE), Portland, OR, 2005[11] L. Albers, E. A. Parry and L. Bottomley, "The creation, evolution and impact of a GK-12 outreach model
]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty#cite_note-5.[10] R. C. Hibbeler, "PowerPoints for Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 14th Edition," Pearson, 2016.[11] J. L. Newcomer, "Inconsistencies in Students’ Approaches to Solving Problems in Engineering," in Proceedings – 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, 2010.AppendixTable A1 – Semesters that assessed the problems Assessed semesters Problems Summer 2018 Fall 2018 Spring 2019 Fall 2019 1 x x 2 x x 3
Technical Educators Board of Directors and currently serves on the Texoma Workforce Board of Directors. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Effect of organizational changes on student retention and engagementAbstractEngineering and computer science disciplines remain substantially under-represented inHispanic, African American and women students. Relative to the population demographicsreflecting approximately 50% women, 60% white non Hispanic/Latinx, 13% African American,19% Hispanic and 1.3% Native American, engineering demographics reflect under-representation. While recent trends reflect significant gains, women remain under-represented inengineering. Based on the ASEE EDMS system, in
eval- uation process and was recently (2016-2019), the accreditation coordinator for the school of Engineering. Her interest in engineering education emphasizes developing new classroom innovations and assessment techniques and supporting student engagement. Her research interests include broadening participation in STEM, equity and diversity, engineering ethics, online engineering pedagogy, program assessment so- lutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, and bicycle access. She is a proud Morgan Alum (2011), having earned a Doctorate in Civil Engineering, with a focus on trans- portation. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of
Development of Five SIMSIn 2017, the year of “BaahuBali-2”, the author developed Five Simplified Integrated Methods ofSolution (SIMS) [4] to solve the basic ten types of vector systems with two or three unknowns inplanar mechanics. Naming the earlier Vector Rotation Theorem as SIM3, he presented them atthe ASEE 2019 Conference, Tampa, FL. One of the paper reviewers commented“Very interesting study to convert sometimes nonlinear and convoluted set of equations intolinear and single variable (unknown) equations. This study is definitely of value to those whochoose to adopt in their teaching of Mechanics and Kinematics courses.”For the use of SIMS, a plane vector is classified with unit vector e with polar angle (θ), asC1. Known vector with known
Outcomes,” presented at the ASEE Annual Meeting 2020, 2020.[18] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012.[19] S. Banchefsky, K. L. Lewis, and T. A. Ito, “The role of social and ability belonging in men’s and women’s pSTEM persistence,” Frontiers in Psychology, p. 2386, 2019.[20] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 371–392, 2021.[21] M. Hoffman, J. Richmond, J. Morrow, and K. Salomone, “Investigating ‘sense of belonging’ in
solutions to their needs, whichin turn may help to improve graduate student mental health and aid in facultyadvisor mentoring and management responsibilities.2 Current State of Graduate Student Mental Well-BeingMental health needs among graduate students are likely 10% higher than therest of the population, potentially causing a mental health crisis within academia(Hyun et al. 2006, p. 256). Graduate students are also not as studied as theirundergraduate counterparts in terms of mental well-being (Cranford, Eisen-berg, and Serras 2009; Levecque et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2019; Nature Editorials2019; Paglis, Green, and Bauer 2006; Schlosser et al. 2011; Sverdlik et al. 2018;Waldeck et al. 1997). University counselors have reported an increase in
. A., Tsai, J., Boll, A., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019). Pain and gain: Barriersand opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. InProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds weneed. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive approaches. SAGE Publications.Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic,and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people
engineering (CE), are projected to rise more than 10 percentbetween 2019 to 2029 [3]. Additionally, as vacancies increase, so too does the need for studentswith graduate degrees (master’s and doctoral level) in the field [4]. However, in the United States(U.S.) participation in graduate schools is more commonly from international students. Accordingto the survey by the Computing Research Association in 2019, almost 70% of the master’s degreesin computer sciences and 80% in engineering were awarded to international students [5].Meanwhile, 62% of the Ph.D.’s in computer sciences were awarded to international students,followed by 67% in engineering [5]. Yet, participation of domestic students pursuing graduatedegrees in computing is less than 30% in the
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Conference Proceedings Journals Book ChaptersFigure 2 provides a concise overview of the acquired publications, adhering to the PRISMA2020 protocol. The data reveals a prevalence of articles published in journals (74%) asopposed to conference proceedings (21%). The majority of journal papers were primarilypublished in 2017 and 2020, while proceedings predominantly featured publications from2019. In addition, a small fraction (5%) of the included studies consisted of book chaptersthat were published in 2012 and 2013.Figure 3: Research Methods used Across Reviewed Studies 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0The articles reviewed employed a wide variety of methods. Figure 3
Education, vol. 34, no. 4, 2012.[40] J. E. Dowd et al., “Student learning dispositions: Multidimensional profiles highlight important differences among undergraduate stem honors thesis writers,” CBE Life Sci Educ, vol. 18, no. 2, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-07-0141.[41] M. Sumpter, D. Follman, and M. Hutchison, “2006-1812: WHAT AFFECTS STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY IN AN HONORS FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSE? What Affects Student Self-Efficacy in an Honors First-Year Engineering Course?,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006.[42] S. Conrad, S. S. Canetto, D. Macphee, and S. Farro, “What attracts high-achieving, socioeconomically-disadvantaged students to the physical sciences and engineering?,” Coll Stud
[17] and Ingenious Science and Technology for All (Ingeniosas)[18], educating and empowering girls and women interested in science and technology.Taking the initiatives mentioned above as a reference point, a group of academicians from theengineering faculty of the Universidad Andres Bello organized the Biobio Women's first meetingin the spring of 2019 [19]. This first event featured a full day of in-person activities. Theactivities included: • Four female guest speakers offered talks and round tables. The invited speakers, outstanding female researchers in the country, shared experiences, challenges, and main achievements of their professional careers. The objective of this activity was to motivate young women who
, no. 4, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.2202/1949-6605.2009.[41] A. Edmondson, The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth, 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2019.[42] S. Adams, C. Zafft, M. Molano, and K. Rao, “Development of a protocol to measure team behavior in engineering education,” J. STEM Educ., vol. 9, no. 1 & 2, pp. 13–20, 2008.[43] B. Beigpourian, F. Luchini, M. Ohland, and D. Ferguson, “Psychological Safety as an Effective Measurement in Engineering Classrooms,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33214, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33214.[44] S. Miller, J. Marhefka, K. Heininger, K
://www.rhdickerson.com/2016/12/local- communities-should-offer-makerspaces/. [Accessed 3 January 2019].[10] S. Carlson, "The Maker Movement Goes to College," 20 April 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Maker-Movement-Goes/229473. [Accessed 29 December 2018].[11] J. Roth, Interviewee, Creating a Successful Fabrication Lab. [Interview]. 5 April 2018.[12] A. K. Andreas and P. Z. Sidwell, "Incorporating Research and Design in a Community College Engineering Program," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Conference Proceedings, Seattle, WA, 2015.[13] R. D. Mabry, S. M. Valery and B. J. Lindsey, "Santa Maria’s Central Coast Makerspace Collaborative: A Network of External and Internal Partners," in ISAM 2018
your BME curriculum track.” It then lists each of the ten professional topicsin Table 1, accompanied by the same Likert rating system as the UIC Survey.Surveys have beenadministered since the beginning of the 2018-2019 academic year and have involved threedifferent student cohorts, capturing a transition from students taking the previous curriculumtrack in which professional topics were covered in a more conventional format throughout thecapstone design courses on an as-needed basis (Cohort 1) to the new curriculum featuring theseparate professional topics course (Cohorts 2 and 3). The nature of the curricular transition andthe timing of courses in the curricula have allowed three comparisons to address the studyobjectives described above
IEEE, she is a member of the IEEE Standards Association and is in the Standards Development Working Groups of several standards related to online laboratories, learning environments, and privacy, security and governance of data related to learning systems. In ASEE she serves in the ASEE International Activities Committee and is Secretary/Treasurer of the ASEE International Division. She is an internationally registered Professional Engineering Educator (iPEER), ranked at level 5: Engineering Education Researcher, out of 6 levels. According to Google Scholar, her h-index is 25, i10-index is 59, and she has over 1900 citations.Jusmeidy ZambranoLaura Eugenia Eugenia Romero Robles, Tecnologico de MOnterrey
Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019,.[37] J. Straub, “Evaluation of the Second Year of a REU Program on Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jun. 2020. Appendix 1 – Outcomes by Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Figure A1. Interest in employment in field of participation (prior year data from [34]). Year 1
, pp. 465–469, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1999.tb00475.x.[13] M. Seevers, W. Knowlton, P. Pyke, C. Schrader, and J. Gardner, “Improving engineering undergraduate retention via research and internships,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., pp. 1–9, 2006.[14] G. A. Dietz, E. P. Douglas, and E. D. McCray, “Marginalization and the in/authentic workplace experiences of engineers,” in CoNECD Conference ASEE Proceedings, 2021, pp. 1–38.[15] SWE, “SWE research update: Women in engineering by the numbers (Nov. 2019),” All Together, Nov. 01, 2019. https://alltogether.swe.org/2019/11/swe-research-update-women- in-engineering-by-the-numbers-nov-2019/ (accessed Sep. 17, 2020).[16] N. A. Mozahem, C. M. Ghanem
Vazquez, M. Pearson, L. Singelmann, R. Striker, and E. Swartz, “Federal Funding Opportunity Announcements as a Catalyst of Students’ Projects in MOOC Environments,” presented at the 2019 Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), Milwaukee, WI, USA, Oct. 2019.[4] E. Swartz, M. Pearson, L. Singelmann, R. Striker, and E. Alvarez Vazquez, “Innovation- based Learning: Enhancing Innovative Problem Solving and Higher-order Thinking in Education Through Multidisciplinary Collaboration,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 34832, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34832.[5] E. Alvarez Vazquez, M. Pearson, L. Singelmann, E. Swartz, R. Striker, and Ng, Stanley, “The MOOCIBL Platform,” presented at
-Gobel, J. & Li , Q., (2018). An innovative blended-learning approach aims to develop an entrepreneurial mind-set in all engineering students. Advances in Engineering Education. Vol. 7, Issue 1.4. 24 Hour Imagination Quest. Retrieved on Feb. 3. 2019 from https://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/entrepreneurship/24HIQ.html5. Kim, C., & Tranquillo, J. (2014). K-WIDE: Synthesizing the Entrepreneurial Mindset and Engineering Design. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.6. CTC Challenge. Retrieved on Feb. 3, 2019 from https://www.ct.org/events/college-tech-challenge-hiring-fair/7. Innovation Encounter. Retrieved on Feb. 2, 2019 from https://www.ltu.edu/innovation-encounter/8. Zarch, R., Peterfreund
, pp. 409–435, 2018.[4] M. R. Nazempour, H. Darabi, P. Nelson, , R. Revelo, Y. Siow, J. Abiade, “Execution Details and Assessment Results of a Summer Bridge Program for Engineering Freshmen,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] D. Cole, C. B. Newman, and L. I. Hypolite, “Sense of Belonging and Mattering Among Two Cohorts of First-Year Students Participating in a Comprehensive College Transition Program,” Am. Behav. Sci., p. 0002764219869417, 2019.[6] G. D. Borman, J. Grigg, and P. Hanselman, “An effort to close achievement gaps at scale through self-affirmation,” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 2016.[7] J. M. Harackiewicz, C. S. Rozek, C. S. Hulleman, and J. S
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] L. Singleton, "Tactile Trigonometry: Improving Student Success with 3D-Printed Manipulatives," MathAMATYC Educator, vol. 9, no. 3, Summer 2018.[8] M. K. Watson, S. T. Ghanat, T. A. Wood, W. J. Davis and K. C. Bower, "A Systematic Review of Models for Calculus Course Innovations," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] R. B. Kozma and J. Russel, "Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 949-968, 1997.[10] K. L. Daniel, C. J. Bucklin, E. A. Leone and J. Idema, "Towards a Definition of Representational
Professional Internship: Don't Graduate Without One. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 25.93.1 - 25.93.15). San Antonio: American Society for Engineering Education.Mosher, G. A. (2015). Creating and Sustaining High-Quality Senior Capstone Experiences. ATMAE 2015 Conference (pp. 334-340). Pittsburgh: Association of Technology Management and Applied Engineering.National Academies of Sciences, E. a. (2019). The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press, https://doi.org/10.17226/25568. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/25568Pace, L., Spolsdoff, J., & Becker, M. (2022). Utah’s Engineering and Computer
innovation [5]. The adaptive tutoring systems, such asMcGraw Hill Alerks, Pearson Mastering Physics, and Carnegie Learning MATHia were cited.Pardos stated that “Students can be interacting with a technology that has the capacity topersonalize instruction — a limited capacity, but more so than a video or textbook.” For acommunity college setting, another interactive solution would be the use of the Open Stax freephysics book with each student paying 32 dollars subscription fee to the Expert TA system.A “Death of lecture” was debated by faculty members at the University of Nottingham duringthe lockdown and shared on Youtube [6]. A caution on the flipped class pedagogy was putforward with a citation on the 2019 MIT publication, which reported that the
student’s answers were recorded in a dichotomous format,meaning that answers were recorded as either correct or incorrect. Correct answers from eachstudent were summed to form a raw score and converted to a percentage form. Of the 111students who took the TMCT, 108 completed all 12 items, including 63 who completed subtestA and 45 who completed subtest B. Missing data were assumed incorrect. Independent samples ttests were performed between groups to assess equivalence of means. All calculations wereperformed using Microsoft Excel 2019 or Jamovi 2.3.21 [37].Internal consistency of the TMCT with a sighted population was assessed using both Cronbach’salpha and McDonald’s Omega. Cronbach’s alpha is a widely used measure of internalconsistency for
higher education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53–76, 2003. [6] E. W. Burkholder, G. Murillo-Gonzalez, and C. Wieman, “Importance of math prerequisites for performance in introductory physics,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 010 108, 2021. [7] M. J. Khan and C. A. Aji, “Tolerance of Ambiguity (Work in Progress),” en, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 33 443. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33443. [Online]. Available: http://peer.asee.org/33443 (visited on 02/09/2022). [8] S. Salehi, E. Burkholder, G. P. Lepage, S. Pollock, and C. Wieman, “Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of
://methods.sagepub.com/reference/sage-encyc-qualitative-research-methods/n420.xml. [Accessed: 25- Feb-2021][13] N. Robson, I. Dalmis, and V. Trenev, “Discovery Learning in Mechanical Engineering Design: Case-based Learning or Learning by Exploring?,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, p. 25.5.1-25.5.10, doi: 10.18260/1-2--20761 [Online]. Available: http://peer.asee.org/20761. [Accessed: 18-Apr-2021][14] E. Swartz, M. Pearson, E. A. Vazquez, R. Striker, and L. Singelmann, “Innovation Based Learning on a Massive Scale,” in 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2019, pp. 90–95, doi: 10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939635 [Online]. Available: https
Education 107(4): 656-689. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results.American journal of physics, 69(9), 970-977. Davishahl, E., & Haskell, T. R., & Davishahl, J., & Singleton, L., & Goodridge, W. H.(2019, June), Do They Understand Your Language? Assess Their Fluency with VectorRepresentations Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa,Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32675 ESTEME@OSU Action Research Fellows, 2016-2017. [accessed 2020 Mar 15]; Availablefrom: http://stem.oregonstate.edu/esteme/action-research-fellows Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning
Paper ID #28706BITES and TEST Web tools to Enhance Undergraduate ThermodynamicsCourseDr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He is a member American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers(ASABE) and is actively involved in teaching and research in the fields of (i) robotics and mechatronics, (ii)remote sensing and precision agriculture, and
”. Information Analyses - ERIC Clearinghouse Products (071). pp. 3. ISBN 978-1-878380-08-1. ISSN 0884-0040.[2] J. Schultz, J. Wilson, and K. Hess, (2010), "Team-based classroom pedagogy reframed: the student perspective," American Journal of Business Education, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 17-24[3] Compeau, C.R.., Talley, A., Tran, P.Q., (2019). “Active Learning in Electrical Engineering: Measuring the Difference”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. Tampa, FL[4] Dutson, A., Green, M., Jensen, D., and Wood, K. L., (2003) "Active-Learning with Engineering Mechanics: A BuildingBlock for Design," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference.[5] Jensen, D., Wood, K.L., And Wood, J., (2003) "Hands-on Activities, Interactive Multimedia and