designed to foster a more inclusive and socially consciousengineering identity, highlighting the importance of ethical considerations in engineeringpractices. This integration is crucial for preparing future engineers to address complex real-worldproblems that span beyond technical solutions.The existing computing course (Introduction to Computing for Engineering, typically taken bymost engineering students in the spring semester of their first-year) historically was focused onteaching the technical concepts of coding and an introduction to data science (data manipulation,visualization, and interpretation). The experimental redesign of the course involves incorporatingjustice-based activities that encourage students to analyze ethically complex
assessment results show a very strong correlation between student satisfaction measured bythe survey and active experience in the classroom. The assessment of the course by students hasled to increased hands-on projects, multimedia technology usage, computer simulations, andassignments linked more closely to real-world applications.I. IntroductionES 107, Introduction to Engineering, is a three semester-hour course introducing students toengineering disciplines, professional practice and ethics, creative problem solving, basic computerskills, team skills, and technical presentations. The course is required for all freshman engineeringstudents and a majority of non-engineering majors at the University of New Haven take it as ascientific
professional, ethical and social responsibilities,j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.The general criteria apply to all ET programs at both associate and baccalaureate degree levels.For programs in different particular disciplines, additional outcomes, specific to the disciplineand degree level are listed. The program criteria for “Civil Engineering Technology andSimilarly Named Programs” are, for example, listed as follows2: OutcomesAssociate degree programs must demonstrate that graduates are capable of: a. utilizing graphic techniques to produce engineering
results highlight national and gender differences in students’ perception of theirdevelopment in ABET-related skills. The American students rated themselves higher increativity, teamwork, ethics, facility with tools of engineering practice, and in recognizing globalimpact. The Korean students assessed their skills higher in design, problem solving, andcommunication skills. There was no statistically significant difference in leadership or analyticalskills. However, in spite of apparent national differences, the students follow similar genderpatterns. The men were more confident in technical and analytical skills, while the women weremore confident in communication and teamwork skills. As such, both cultures could benefit frominterventions that
together onto a printed circuit board. In modern digital systems design, softwarecode describes the functionality of each chip. The code for these chips is available(usually for purchase) so multiple chips can be fabricated in one chip (called a System-on-a-Chip). Our digital systems design course incorporates this concept. Students learnto integrate 3rd-party modules into their own digital designs and are encouraged to useany free modules they find on the internet. However, every module must be documentedand cited correctly for good engineering ethics. Students may use modules developed byother students in previous semesters as long as proper documentation is included.Since previous laboratory work is available to next semester students, the
-learning) program. Thiscourse spanned the winter and summer semesters and included language preparation, culturalimmersion and appropriate technology readings and a six to sixteen week summer service-learning experience doing technical or engineering related work in a developing country. Theoverall goals of this course were to provide undergraduate engineering students with anopportunity to prepare for, choose and then participate in an international technical serviceplacement to enable them to experience another culture, apply the knowledge gained in othercourses to solve unique engineering problems, gain a greater understanding of appropriatetechnology and contemporary issues related to global development, engineering ethics, programmanagement
knowledge about the roles of engineers, the engineering method,ethics, teamwork, and detailed information about each of the engineering majors offered in theCollege of Engineering (CoE) of the host institution. The course is offered as part of a largerinitiative seeking to improve success indicators among low-income students. This paperprovides details about the course structure, implementation context, metrics, and resultsmeasured via descriptive statistics among participant students. The results of a longitudinalimplementation, suggest that early provision of career information and awareness can impactthe engineering retention and persistence of students and their interest in their chosen majors,particularly in educational settings where students
,supplementary learning, over reliance concerns, ethical concerns, detachment from traditionallearning, and lack of critical thinking development. The evolution from GPT from version 3.0, to3.5, to 4.0, which involves a significant improvement in language processing capabilities andscope of knowledge resulting in more nuanced context-awareness, including text and imageprompts, will also be considered in this study. By drawing from student assignment samples,class discussions, and user feedback, a comprehensive overview of the challenges, benefits, andthe pedagogical implications of ChatGPT in this first-year course will also be discussed. As theChatGPT technology evolves, a balanced approach that harnesses the potential of this technologywhile
research experience withthe International Building Code (IBC) wind load provisions, analysis of existing structuresfor wind loads, determining shortcomings (if any) of the analyzed structures, and designingupgrades and retrofits for the structures for complying with the building code provisions.Potential ethical issues arising out of deliberately or negligently using faulty design, inferiormaterial selection and/or sub-standard construction practice, and the effect of such practiceon wind integrity of structures were also covered.A total of 12 comprehensive classroom lectures were given to the participating teachers onthe RET project on Extreme Winds. A description of the various types of extreme winds andtheir effects on structures were shown
coaches must love what they do. This is often in the context of small ornonexistence monetary compensations, but even if compensated, good coaches communicate theirpassion for the game. This is also true when an instructor is coordinating PBL. PBL often requires extrawork and coordination when dealing with students in such an intense activity. The instructor of thisengineering design course often communicates the love for the teaching profession and the joy in thesuccess of the students. This kind of passion is contagious to students.Ethical BehaviorCoaches must model ethical behavior on and off the court. Good coaches reward good attitudes byathletes and would never want to win if it includes any unethical behavior. This is true in
types of outlines. During an in-class ethics discussion, students were introduced to an ethics case study, then tasked with writing an outline for writing details about the case study.Results and DiscussionResults from the inclusion of these writing assignments is nascent but optimistic. During the Fall2023 semester writing assignment, the average student score on the rubric component of theassignment specified for writing, grammar and professionalism was 84.7%. In the Fall 2024semester writing assignment, after the presented technical writing assignments had beenintroduced, the average student score on the rubric component of the assignment specified forwriting, grammar and professionalism was 88%. Anecdotally, student writing was
, diversity, equity, and inclusion, Asian American Studies, Critical Mixed Race Studies, engineering ethics, and pop culture.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech Dr. Zhu is Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Science, Technology & Society and the Center for Human-Computer Interaction at Vir- ginia Tech. Dr. Zhu is also serving as Associate Editor for Science and Engineering Ethics, Associate Editor for Studies in Engineering Education, Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include
v) an engineering code of ethics to ethical dilemmas b) Solution of complex engineering problems in at least four specialty areas appropriate to civil engineering c) Conduct of experiments in at least two civil engineering contexts and reporting of results d) Explanation of: i) concepts and principles in project management and engineering economics ii) professional attitudes and responsibilities of a civil engineer, including licensure and safety 2) Faculty The program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in
– Attitudes 4. 2025 ME PedagogyThese boards were focused on the graduate of 2029 as this would be the first class that would beeducated at our university completely in the semester system. Then, two of the working groupmembers used a qualitative content approach to code these responses [10], [11]. Table 1displays the categories that emerged.Table 1. Results of initial Jamboard ideas about curriculum Page Category Example comments ME Graduate of Ethics Environmental ethics, legal system as related to 2029 – engineering decisions, robotics ethics Knowledge Overarching ways of Sustainable development, sociotechnical thinking
workshops onsuch topics as “developing leadership philosophy,” “cultural competency,” “leading,micromanaging, and mentoring,” and “ethics, pragmatism, and risk-taking,” among others.Members also engage in outreach projects and are provided with individualized assessments 2geared to the career and personal goals of each. Participation in the program provides myriadbenefits to members, including mentoring from industry representatives and UConn Engineeringleaders, resume building, exclusive JLLA-related grants and fellowships, faculty social hours(providing interdisciplinary networking), and a professional community through which memberscan make
—Criminal Justice a. CRIJ 1301: Intro to Crim Justice b. CRIJ 3316: Crime Investigation & Proof 4. Legal and Ethical Principles—Business a. INFS 3308: Bus Info Infra b. BLAW 333:7 Bus Law I c. Corporate and Ethical Principles—Business d. INFS 4312: E-Commerce Design (Elective) e. INFS 4330: Business Intelligence (Elective) f. INFS 4391: Information Security (Elective) g. INFS 4397: Health Computer Information Systems (Elective) Figure 2. Cyber Security Degree/Flow ChartFig. 2 shows the details of the degree. It has a total of 120 hours with 50 advanced hours (core,technical electives, and support courses). As we can see, the degree is a balanced
-based modeling of physical phenomena when the datais a combination of actual field measurements and data that is generated through mathematical equationslike Hybrid Models, and Physics-Informed Neural Network, based on AI-Ethics (Mohaghegh 2021), itbecomes clear that the developed AI-model is not based on reality of AI rather it includes assumptions,interpretations, simplifications, preconceived notions, and biases.In this study, authors do not intend to explain the architecture or mathematics of neural networks as theycan be found in depth in several articles. However, it is intended to show a workflow that honors theoriginal definitions of AI&ML and follows AI-Ethics by not including assumptions, interpretations,simplifications
presentation slides completed bystudent groups within the three eligible chemical engineering sections. We measured studentachievement of three learning outcomes, referred to as Criterion 1, 2, and 3, by customizing arubric previously developed for evaluating undergraduate research assignments [16]. Criterion 1,“Evaluate Information Sources Critically,” measures students’ ability to select a variety ofappropriate information sources as part of their projects. Criterion 2, “Use InformationEffectively,” measures students’ ability to synthesize multiple information sources within theirpresentations, as well as their use of in-text citations to bolster their claims with evidence.Criterion 3, “Use Information Ethically,” measures students’ ability to
education through teaching methods, policies, and culture change.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Patrice M. Buzzanell is Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication at the
the course as a technical elective towards my degree, but not seeking a BME minor 4. If your major is NOT Biomedical Engineering, please state your primary major. If your major is Biomedical Engineering, please type “N/A”. (Free response) 5. At the end of this course, how do I rate my ability to: a. Define complex biomedical engineering problems and their critical features. i. Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, N/A b. Develop and evaluate hypotheses framing complex biomedical engineering problems. i. Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, N/A c. Identify appropriate safety and ethical issues relevant to biomedical engineering problems
biases, to have accurate understandings of other cultural world views, and to display attitudes of curiosity, openness, and empathy; 6. To recognize ethical issues when presented in a complex, multilayered (grey) context, to analyze cross-relationships among the issues, and to evaluate ethical perspectives and concepts, including his or her own.These six essential learning outcomes and student objectives are a subset from the LEAPInitiative (Liberal Education and America’s Promise) on General Education developed by theAssociation of American Colleges and Universities [2]. The specifics of the entire Strand ModelGeneral Education are beyond the scope of this paper. However, all strands begin with aFreshman Seminar and
public policy and appreciative of the sustainabilityof projects. A summary of the attributes of the ideal engineering that resulted from the brain-storming session follows: Ability to communicate orally and in written form in a manner appropriate for the in- tended audience. Understanding of local government operations and decision making– planning, engi- neering, financing, politics, procurement, education of public, etc. Ability to evaluate projects from a holistic perspective – environmental, ethical, aes- thetic, political, historical, social impact, technical needs, costs. Awareness of sustainability issues of projects. Ability to use engineering judgment - evaluation of reasonableness of answers
wewant to increase the diversity of the cybersecurity workforce because one good indicator ofcareer interests for adolescents is their choice of leisure and extra-curricular activity3.Tangentially, we also recognize that while computer-skills are critically important to acybersecurity professional, professionals in cybersecurity also are required to have a widebreadth of skills. This broader set of skills include critical thinking, teamwork, communication aswell as being well versed in privacy, ethics, and legal aspects of cybersecurity.To expand demographic participation in cybersecurity and the diversity of the cybersecurityworkforce, we believe that cybersecurity competitions at the formative ages should focus on abroader set of cybersecurity
communicate effectively in writing, orally, and graphically (ETAC 3g)College Goal(s) Supported:Goal number 1. To foster teaching and learning in a supportive environment6. Intended Outcome:Students will be able to understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities.(ETAC/ABET criteria 3i)College Goal(s) Supported:Goal number 1. To foster teaching and learning in a supportive environment.Goal number 2. To provide students with a broad academic foundation which includes anappreciation of the interrelationships among the applied sciences, technologies and society.Goal number 3. To enhance students’ appreciation of culture, ethics, esthetics and culturaldiversity fully empowering them to participate in the lives of their communities.7. Intended
students studying the basics of engineering design. The authors inthis paper would discuss the results of the survey and recommended actions based on the survey.IntroductionHigher educational institutions have recognized and acknowledged their responsibility towardsachieving the goals of sustainability as they prepare the future engineers for the global world.Sustainability challenges all schools and universities to rethink their mission and vision torepresent themselves as the new generation school. With this in place most of the accreditingbodies have also included the ethical part of sustainability in the curriculum, which makes mostof the program to restructure and realign the curriculum, develop research programs, andredefine the student life
social responsibility education in first year, including ethicsand societal impact. Ethics education has been correlated with increased measures of socialresponsibility, and greater student ranking of the importance of ethics relative to fundamentaltechnical skills [7]. The case studies allow reflection on and discussion of ethics, economics,stakeholders, and impact of engineering projects; while providing a richer context for learningengineering math and science fundamentals. The term “case study” as used in this paper refersto an exercise that contains elements of “inquiry-based learning”, “guided discovery learning”,“problem-based learning”, and “case-based learning” [5]. Our case studies at this point do nothave the historical, decision
Technology. His research focuses on integrating Makerspaces and Design Thinking with higher education to enhance learning through hands on interdisciplinary practices.Dr. Megan K Halpern, Michigan State UniversityDr. Isaac Record, Michigan State University Isaac Record is an Assistant Professor of Practice at Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, where he directs the Collaborative Experiential Learning Laboratory and teaches courses in philosophy of science, science and technology studies, and critical making. His research seeks to situate our epistemic and ethical circumstances within a network of values, capabilities, and material and social technologies. Isaac holds a PhD and MA from the Institute for the
problems g an ability to communicate effectively h a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning i an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities j a respect for diversity and an knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues k a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement Figure 1. ABET Program Outcomes for Engineering Technology Program [1]The outcomes, as per the definition in Figure 1, are frequently referred to as a-k outcomes. Theopening statement in the Figure demands that the outcomes should be assessed on the graduates,not on
required program outcomes that the students must obtain both a“recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning” and “anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility11.” In order to be life-long learners,students must be information literate. The Association for College and Research Libraries Page 14.384.4eloquently states the following which appeared in Information Literacy Competency Standardsfor Higher Education. Information literacy forms the basis for lifelong learning…. It enables learners to master content and extend their investigations, become more self-directed, and assume greater
information management (DB) information systems development intelligent systems (AI) legal/professional/ethics/society networks operating systems programming security software life cycle systems administration