of methods and systems forobjective measurement and detection requires the identification of the dependent physicalparameters, which are impacted by flow patterns. Any attempt to find such parameters and describetheir relationships contributes to the process of finding such a system to detect flow patterns. Thispaper presents the results of an exploratory experimental research project on two variations ofoptical system response to changes of three arbitrarily chosen flow patterns and changes of mixtureviscosity. The analysis of the results should provide guidance for the next steps in the developmentof flow pattern detections and the applicability of optical systems to this purpose. The evaluation ofthe application of optical systems to
, so students cannot move the check cell away from the answer cell andreplace it with one of their choosing. Making the checked cell both locked and hidden preventsits formula from being seen. If students are permitted to look at the formula to determine the an-swer, then do not make the check cell hidden.Professors can make cheating even more difficult by using random number generators to provideproblems for each student that have the same logical structure, but different parameters. For ex-ample, one student’s problem might have an initial investment of $100,000, whereas another stu-dent’s might have a cost of $103,000 and a slightly different project life. Students still can mimicthe logic of someone who has gotten his or her question
characterizing other electricity markets and larger geographicregions. Thus, the model structure provides the ability to reach a wider audience. IntroductionThe Texas Interactive Power Simulator was designed at the University of Texas at Austin inpartnership with Power Across Texas, a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization. The purpose of thepartnership was to devise a model that effectively communicates key lessons concerning thetradeoffs of electricity generation methods to a predominately Texas audience. Target audiencesinclude students, state legislators and their staff, as well as the general public. The TexasInteractive Power Simulator accomplishes the project goals by allowing the user to manipulatethe
material and return to the initial operation in spite ofthe added insulator. The second characteristic is defined by a new increase in the TEG performancethis would be signified by computing the energy losses and comparing these losses to the powergeneration. This is best approached by utilizing a quasi-steady state conditions and by treating eachtime interval as its own event the trend can be seen as a function of temperature. This showed thatthere was a notable improvement of power generation across the system. While the results showpromise and show a clear divergence in a positive direction over a large number of data sets a lot ofwork can be done moving forward. Further, the potential for this project is heavily based upon theconcept of
psychological safety. All quantitative datawill be analyzed using descriptive statistical methods to reveal underlying patterns andrelationships between variable of interest and to connect those trends to the qualitative data. Thedata will also be used to inform the focus groups and interviews. Qualitative data for the study will be obtained in part through interviews with current andformer project managers for the Hot Wheelz and Formula teams. These individuals will beinterviewed to obtain contextual information about team structures, practices for onboarding ofnew members, training of new and existing members, opportunities for leadership development,team social activities, or other pertinent information about team attributes and practices
that RT-Eval is simpleand intuitive to use and could help students easily communicate with their instructor.7 AcknowledgementWe thank two co-operative work semester (co-op) students from the School of Computing andData Science, Xi Xi Lin and Alex Silkin, who built the prototype system under the supervision ofSalem Othman. We also thank Dr. Tes Zakrzewski, Senior Director, and Joshua Luckens,Instructional Designer, of the Teaching and Learning Collaborative (TLC) at Wentworth Instituteof Technology. Dr. Zakrzewski and Mr. Luckens continue to advise the authors on courseevaluation and assessment throughout this project.8 References[1] J. Watkins and E. Mazur, “Just-in-Time Teaching and peer instruction,” in S. P. Simkins & M. H. Maier
environment. Update the KLAs such that they can be realized in the online labs while realizing the course learning objectives. 4. Be mindful of the challenges introduced by online learning. Design activities that can enhance student engagement and reduce fatigue. Include group projects to incorporate the social component in learning and build an online community. 5. Always follow up to gather student feedback on the program and adapt for subsequent iterations. Encourage self-directed learning to allow the participants to continue to learn and grow.ConclusionsKLAs have been shown to be effective in Computer Science education. Although a shift toonline
decisions and critique the accuracy of the information. Students who evaluate well can provide reflections on approaches taken to solve a problem and demonstrate their ability to assess underlying concepts in the process of choosing the best among multiple alternative solutions. ● Create: putting elements together to produce a new pattern or original work. In engineering, the previous levels of the taxonomy culminate to the design of a component or system that invokes all previous levels of the taxonomy. Such efforts to create are often stimulated in capstone design classes but can also be invoked in smaller projects in lower- level courses.Promoting the integration, design, and evaluation capabilities of students is
the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Student Responses to Remote Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for the Future of Online LearningIntroduction:The COVID-19 pandemic brought a widespread shift in instructional practice as facultyscrambled to shift to remote instruction. One positive
in enabling scientists to do research work using software de- veloped with the help of NCSA as well as teaching good software principles during this process. He is interested in software deployment and scaling software deployments from small research projects to larger installations with many users.Mr. Chirantan Mahipal, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign I’m a Computer Science grad student at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, working under the mentorship of Prof. Lawrence Angrave. Prior to this, I was working as a Research Fellow at Microsoft Research in the Technology for Emerging Markets (TEM) group.Prof. Yun Huang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dr. Yun Huang is faculty in the
student mental health-related help-seeking in undergraduate engineer- ing students. She is completing this project in collaboration with faculty members from educational and counseling psychology. With this work, they aim to better understand the help-seeking beliefs of under- graduate engineering students and develop interventions to improve mental health-related help-seeking. Other research interests include engineering communication and integration of process safety into a unit operations course.Melanie E. Miller, University of Kentucky Melanie Miller, M.S., (She/her/hers) is a Counseling Psychology Ph.D. student at the University of Ken- tucky. American c
Paper ID #33622Impact of COVID-19 Transition to Remote Learning on EngineeringSelf-efficacy and Outcome ExpectationsJohanna Milord, University of Missouri - Columbia Johanna Milord is a Counseling Psychology Doctoral Candidate at the University of Missouri. She earned her Masters of Science degree in Mental Health Counseling. Her general research focus is marginalized populations’ attainment of their desired academic and career outcomes. Her most recent projects have explored career self-efficacy and critical race consciousness interventions.Fan Yu, University of Missouri - ColumbiaDr. Sarah Lynn Orton P.E., University of
developed new methods for imaging and tracking mitochondria from living zebrafish neurons. In her work for the EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring best practices for current and future STEM faculty. As an adjunct instructor in the Department of Neuroscience at the Univer- sity of Pittsburgh since 2009 and an instructor for CIRTL Network and Pitt-CIRTL local programming since 2016, April is experienced in both synchronous and asynchronous online and in-person teaching environments.Morgan V. Fedorchak American c Society for Engineering
Paper ID #32666Kidney and Lung Demonstrations to Introduce Engineering Concepts toMiddle School Students and Their GrandparentsDr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, University at Buffalo Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological En- gineering and an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. This project was conducted while she was an assistant and associate professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in chemical
mathematicsdisciplines (STEM). The number is even smaller for women of color who enter into STEMfields. Based on current projections, it is estimated that by the year 2044, underrepresentedminorities (Black, Hispanic, LatinX and American Indian) will comprise over 50% of the overallpopulation in the U.S. However, underrepresented minority (URM) youth lag significantlybehind their white and Asian American counterparts in their interest in STEM. Lowerrepresentation of URMs in STEM can be attributed to a variety of factors including, a lack ofinstitutional commitment, a lack of representation throughout students’ upbringing, ineffectivecultural recruitment/outreach efforts, educational discrepancies throughout PK-12, and socialexpectations, among others. A large
, which occur in a two-dimensional space. Although trusses can contain non-triangles, the problems explored in Mechanixand many introductory courses all contain only triangles, so we focus on recognizing trussescontaining only triangles.For the purposes of this project, we define a truss to have the following properties: 1. A connected graph 2. Made up of only triangles 3. Each triangle shares at least one side with anotherTrusses are recognized in the following four steps:Graph conversion: The first step in recognizing a truss is to convert the substrokes into a graph.Each substroke end is a possible node, and the substroke itself is an edge in the graph. If the endsare within a threshold Euclidean distance of 30 pixels from an existing
and Innovative Design in Engineering Academy, or iRIDE for short. Before joining Rice STEM, I taught middle and high school mathematics for 9 years.Dr. Christopher Barr, Office of Research, Rice University Rice University Office of Assessment and Evaluation of STEM Programs led by Dr. Barr is the Direc- tor of Assessment and Evaluation of STEM Programs at Rice University. He has been an evaluator and psychometric expert on several federally funded projects in education, natural science, and engineering. His focus is to conduct rigorous quantitative and qualitative measurement and program evaluation utiliz- ing validated assessment tools with published psychometric properties, qualitative rubrics with reliable
thing that flipped the switch. It was really more just having an outlet.” Increased April (CTD): “It helped me identify how much damage my Self-awareness negative self-talk was doing, but then it also helped me separate what I was projecting onto others. My advisors never told me that I was not good enough or that the quality of my work was subpar… Yet, I put those ideas in my head that, ‘Oh, they don't really think that I can do this’.” Skill Building Flora (CTC): [In response to emotional challenges] “[My
Q15h. I received useful feedback on course assignments. -0.01 0.04 -0.15 .883 Q15i. My instructors connect class topics to my future career. 0.24 0.05 4.15 .000 Q15j. I could ask my instructors for help if I did not understand course-related material. 0.00 0.06 0.03 .978 Q3a. I see connections between my hobbies and what I am learning in my engineering coursework (e.g., design projects, homework, exams, presentations). 0.10 0.03 2.75 .006 Q3d. I draw on my previous experiences at home when little instruction is given on how to solve an engineering task
reliability on the attitude dimension was0.95 and the reliability on the persistence dimension was 0.89. Two items (item 19, I like tocome prepared to my mathematics and science classes, and item 29, I am not discouraged bycriticism while working on science or mathematics projects) were found to have some degree ofmisfit as determined by the p-value of signed chi-squared test statistic (S_X2) (p < 0.05). 14Post-secondary sample:The APT-STEM instrument items (language) were updated to suit post-secondary students. Also,6 items (5 five negatively worded items and one positively worded item) deleted after the firstvalidation were added back with all
practices within technological literacy.Game-Based Learning in Engineering EducationIn the realm of education, games have been gaining prominence as a medium for supportingstudents’ development and growth [9], [10]. Games can act as powerful learning tools that offerseveral benefits for learning including: developing professional identities [9], [32], providing asimulated project environment and context for learning professional skills and practices [9], [33]–[35], providing immediate and continuous feedback [7], [17], and inspiring new interests andenhancing motivations [10], [36], [37]. Much of the research in this area focuses on gamesdeveloped specifically for learning or educational contexts, often called serious games [38],although some work
.(2011, para. 3) concisely argue: technical writing is usually not the same as scholarly writing, and scholarly writing is required in most research-based writing projects, such as theses and directed projects. As opposed to being concise, to the point, or having the data speak for themselves, scholarly writing relies on analysis, synthesis, and logical construction of a proposition with appropriate support. Technical writing is generally designed primarily to transmit specific information, while scholarly writing is designed to underpin the creation of new knowledge.Thus, the way in which technical communication programs approach teaching writing—along with debates on whether or not technical writing
andmentors to share their experiences, achievements, and advice. Because this is anovernight event, participants are hosted by current freshmen who living on the CWITLiving Learning Community, which allows the participants to get the true collegeexperience while also meeting our current students.The Cyber 101 ProgramTarget Audience: high school senior and junior girls interested in learning the basics ofcybersecurityApplication and Selection Process: We promote the program through direct emails tojunior and senior high school girls via lists obtained from the UMBC UndergraduateAdmissions office and emails to teachers via contacts of ours who forward themessages to Project Lead the Way (engineering) and computer science teachers intheir networks. In
College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and learning ex- periences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem-solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomed- ical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson University. American
Engineering with emphasis in Construction Engineering and Management. His area of concentra- tion is construction safety, and in particular Prevention through Design. Upon graduation, he worked for four years as an Assistant Professor at UNC-Charlotte. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Bucknell University (Lewisburg, PA, USA).Dr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University, with a background in struc- tural engineering and project management. Dr. Mosier has received regional and international teaching awards through the Associated Schools of Construction. Research interests include the
in-person laboratory experiences. The course used the video conferencing clientZoom as the primary method of communication. If virtual and in-person learning was happeningsynchronously, the Zoom call was projected in the classroom so that all students could see andhear each other. A video and audio feed was also available from the classroom so that studentscould hear each other across platforms.ResultsThe results of both Cohort A and Cohort B’s activities were extremely promising. Students inCohort A had statistically significant improvements in the number of other students they feltcomfortable working with over the course of the semester. At the start of the semester, studentsidentified in the survey that they were willing to work with an
MBA from Butler University. Dr. O’Leary has taught numerous graduate and undergraduate courses at UTC, including Groups and Teams in Organizations, Training and Development, Current Topics in I-O Psychology, Introduction to I-O Psychology and Introduction to Psychology. Before starting his PhD, Dr. O’Leary worked for 14 years in various management positions at Western Electric, AT&T and Lucent Technologies, primarily in government contracting, accounting and project management. Dr. O’Leary has also provided consulting services to local, regional and international organizations.Dr. Bart L. Weathington, WECO Solutions Dr. Weathington is founder and managing consultant at WECO Solutions where he focuses on the applica
Management. The course istypically offered in fall and spring semesters with enrollment of approximately 90 students eachsemester. The course exists to introduce the management functions of planning, organizing,motivating, and controlling. Further, the course analyzes the application of these functions inresearch, design, production, technical marketing, and project management and studies theevolution of the engineering career and the transition to engineering management.The course was regularly delivered in a traditional format with two 75-minute classroomsessions each week, including lecture by the instructor with student response to questions usingclickers. Assessment typically involved individual assignments and several multiple-choiceexams each
general.Consistent with our guiding conceptual model, features characteristic of this summer camp,including connecting lessons to the real-world with applications, team building, and professionaldevelopment, seem to matter. Indeed, given that students had no prior experience in coding, theweek-long activities appeared particularly effective in instilling a sense of competence in theparticipants, which may encourage students’ future participation in STEM related educationalpathways and careers. In addition, the camp likely facilitated students’ feelings of autonomy byallowing them to engage in self-directed activities, such as coming up with their own ideas forshowcase projects. A sense of relatedness is also likely a consequence of the camp, as
program, a hands-on experience is expected mostly through laboratory classes [4-6]. Theyusually enjoy laboratory classes and look forward to implementing what they had learnt in bookcourses. But most importantly, since project/lab-based learning is one of the most effective andbetter resonating methods of learning, and one that distinguishes between engineering programs[5, 6]; engineering students immediately feel that they are getting their money’s worth whenengaging in a laboratory environment. Different engineering schools struggled to convince their students with “emergency”remote laboratory classes as an alternative to in-person laboratory classes [7, 8]. As ABET has notrelaxed any accreditation requirements, it was mandated that