education, any designed learning outcomes must be measured for successfulstudent comprehension. Redman, Wiek, and Barth recommend identifying which reason whichtools should be used and how to connect learning outcomes with the tools used with apsychometric model. Tools vary from student self-assessment, reflective writing, case studies,focus group interviews, performance observation, conventional testing, and regular coursework[15]. These varying methodologies of tools can offer insights into how competent students are inthe realm of sustainability, so those selecting tools should be holistically assessing the topics ofsustainability. For example, one such tool, the Sustainability Matrix, aims to interpretcompetences in resource consumption, design
abroad participation. The international diversity of a major has not been explored previously in relation to study abroad participation, but we Percentage of US Citizens thought it might be related either by encouraging participation by US citizens or lowering participation since non-US citizens are already studying abroad at Purdue University. Study Abroad Participation We included each year individually in the correlation matrix to for each academic year see whether each year’s study abroad participation is in the data set reflective of the total
similar proportion of LCOEenrollment as men constituted in CHHS. This difference in perception between colleges couldindicate that these perceptions disproportionately discourage women from pursuing engineeringrelated careers relative to men pursuing health and human services careers, which could explainthe relative low participation of women in engineering compared to other countries. Consideringthat these responses are only from students who are already pursuing degrees in these colleges, itis possible that these perspectives were developed while in the degree programs and may notaccurately reflect perspectives held by individuals at the time of selecting a major.Because differences exist between the proportion of Black/African American and/or
plan which needs to beaccepted by the unit’s executive committee. (The executive committee consists of the tenuredfaculty in the unit, excluding those tenured faculty holding certain administrative roles.) Thisallows a faculty member and the executive committee to agree upon a plan of work that bestsuits the skills and interests of the faculty member, while allowing the unit to satisfy its staffingneeds. Most of these five-year plans will closely reflect the standard workload policy of the unit,but some may adjust the distribution of the work of a faculty member between teaching,research, and service as deemed appropriate. Ideally, a comprehensive PTR conducted by a unitwill be based upon how well the faculty member met the five-year plan as
revisions and expansions to the lab environment. For instance, in the case of anotherelectronics course that utilizes different versions or manufacturers of instruments, developers caneasily extend the virtual lab to accommodate these new requirements with minimal changes. Thisprimarily involves updating the graphical model to reflect the different appearances of the newinstruments. Additionally, the physical model may be modified if there is a need to adjust thesimulation of the instruments’ physical behaviors, such as their interactions or movements withinthe virtual space. The functional model often remains unchanged, as the core functions of similarinstruments in electronics labs typically stay consistent. Figure 3 illustrates the three types
students to explore and innovate, as reflected in theirheightened level of collaboration. The findings emphasize the significance of integratingexperiential learning methods into environmental engineering education to enhance activeengagement and skill development among students. Importantly, these results hold broaderimplications for educational practices, highlighting the crucial role of hands-on, experientiallearning methodologies in nurturing collaborative skills vital for the future success ofengineering professionals. The limitation identified was the use of a single group for thisexperimental study as well as the small sample size.AcknowledgementThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant
” learning. Bourke [5] provided an insight on the relationship between the class sizes andteaching practices in Australian math classes. The author profiled the faculty teaching small classesto adopt teaching methodologies, like those found in classes with higher ability students, rangingfrom more follow-up questions, homework assignments, oral tests, and direct interaction withstudents with limited nonacademic procedural arrangements.This paper reflects the cumulative years of teaching experience, encompassing both satellite andmajor university campuses. The satellite campus provides equal opportunities to students fromdifferent backgrounds to come together, learn from one another and feel more sheltered andsupported in their academic pursuits. The
research.IntroductionDespite decades of efforts to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) fields, most professionals in these generally high-paying, high-statusoccupations continue to be white men. In the United States, the STEM job-growth rateoverall is more than twice the average rate for the total workforce [1, p. 201], with most jobopenings in computer science and engineering (CS&E) [2]. The limited representation ofwomen in these fields is apparent: Women comprise just 28 percent of workers in science andengineering fields overall, and even less in CS&E fields [3].These labor-force dynamics also reflect trends in U.S. higher education: Although women’spostsecondary attainment rates exceed men’s, women remain
as an upward stair-like pattern. The widthof the horizontal steps is determined by the number and distribution of graded activitiesthroughout the course, while the height reflects the weights of these assignments and activities.A student's struggle in a course can be visualized by the difference between their cumulativenormalized and possible score curves. This difference tends to increase over time, particularly forat-risk students, indicating a steeper decline in performance. Additionally, this data allows forcomparisons between the progress of an average at-risk student and an average passing student.Figure 1 (bottom) displays such progressions side by side, with averaging resulting in smoother,almost linear curves, while maintaining
working on CO2 adsorption must examine the system and decide if they need to use a vacuum line, an external CO2 analyzer, or piping rated for their experimental pressures to ensure their experimental work area is safe at all times. 6. Allowing the creation of tangible products and artifacts: The project culminates in a poster session for which teams also prepare a summary of their approach to safety. This safety summary detailing their learning and their safety procedures in the laboratory is the final safety product developed from the courses. Students also reflect on the strategies their pursued to mitigate/minimize risks. Additionally, as required by the PjBL framework, knowledge is created by students
, where critical thinking skills are needed. These findings suggest that theseactive learning strategies effectively promote student learning and problem-solving abilities.However, additional student learning outcomes, such as critical thinking skills andentrepreneurial mindsets, could be correlated with the types of assignments and activitiesadministered in the class. Instructors may choose to design a course with combined activelearning strategies to optimally achieve multiple learning outcomes.Reference[1] R.A. Howell, “Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 325, 129318, 2021.[2] S. Freeman, S
’ criteria.Adopting ABET Student Outcomes of ABET might seems safer to some programs, but thechanging of these outcomes and the existence of program criteria makes the compliance a notalways a straightforward process.Crafting our own program student outcomes that clearly include all ABET student outcomes andassociated criteria, provided the programs with a certain level of stability in the assessment processand continuous improvement practices. We provided proof of this.Since the paper was written to reflect a practical approach to a specific problem facing programsseeking ABET accreditation, the work presented above did not directly referenced a particulararticle, yet we have to admit that we have benefited from the knowledge provided by several
. This metric aligns with the premise that the time invested by studentscorrelates with their level of absorption and understanding. Similarly, tracking the number ofattempts provides insights into the persistence and effort exerted by students. Multiple attemptssuggest a commitment to mastering the material, reflecting a positive engagement pattern. On theother hand, fewer attempts may indicate challenges or disinterest. By utilizing these criteria, weaim to capture both the temporal and effort-related dimensions of engagement, providing anuanced understanding of students' interactions with the virtual labs.The analysis of the viscosity virtual lab was used to get preliminary results on the students’engagement. Table 1 and 2 show the lab
involved.ConclusionStudents need to be trained to consider me, us, and them when they face issues which are out ofthe ordinary or not the normal working situations. A young engineer must reflect, “How do Imake a decision while protecting my integrity so no one can blame me in the future, what Idecide now should not make the coworkers and my institution (us) be blamed for ethicalmisconduct, and my decision will not cause harm to the public (them) or consumers.” Suchfundamental analysis and ethical decision making help address many situations when workersare pressured or tempted to make ethically compromising decisions which sometimes may beclouded by moral obligations. While most professionals follow ethical behavior by habits ofbeing honest and not wanting to break
within ships to effectively deploy networks and comprehend thecharacteristics and transmission capabilities of wireless signals. The research project focused oninvestigating the propagation of RF waveforms for wireless systems in shipboard settings, withpreliminary findings based on the USS Wisconsin as a case study. Providing effective wirelesscommunication on board of naval vessels has always been a challenge. Tight corridors andhighly conductive bulkheads and doors create considerable signal interference, making wirelesspropagation difficult. Any signal transmitted within this complex environment will surely facethe effects of reflection, diffraction, and scattering. In addition, providing comprehensive RFcoverage on board a naval ship makes
. The involvement of high-profile governmental entities highlights the national importance placed on quantum education.[9]. These efforts by both private and public sectors reflect a growing recognition of theimportance of quantum education and its pivotal role in preparing a skilled workforce for thefuture. As with cybersecurity initiatives led by NICE and NSF, Quantum educational initiativesneed to learn from the failures of preparing cybersecurity workforce [10], adapt well designframeworks and accelerate educational initiatives to bridge the current skills gap and ensuringthat the workforce is ready for the challenges and opportunities of the post-quantum era. Wepropose that there is no need to ‘redesign the wheel’.Incorporating Quantum
program. Students participating in the summerresearch abroad program expressed a positive and enriching experience. They took pride inlearning about diverse cultures and languages. The program enhanced their confidence andresearch skills, providing valuable insights into applying classroom knowledge in a lab setting.This encompassed the practical application of skills (presentation skills, knowledge of software),the transformation of academic concepts into concrete research projects, and an enhancedunderstanding and confidence in navigating the research process. Some students aspired to workand live abroad, viewing their developed technical, linguistic, and social skills as valuable assetsin their STEM career paths. Students reflected that their
, and engagement variables. Mediators explain the observed relationships betweenpredictors and outcome variables. Two studies assessed students’ motivation as a compositemultidimensional construct comprising of student scores on task relevancy, self-determination,self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation together and named it motivation [31],[35]. The results from their study show that need for cognition was an important construct andthat its effect was mediated by students’ motivation. Similarly, researchers have also examineddeeper processing strategies, such as reflective thinking, are associated with the level ofcognition necessary for conceptual change learning [38]. Our analysis revealed that mostmediational processes of
5 19 6.20 8.83 Very 37 80 46.25 37.20 Total 77 215 ~97 ~100Not all students answered all of the questions, so the totals for each question are unique. Thepercentages reflect the answers to the specific survey question. As well, not all students whoresponded to this question were online learners. The table above is included to show opinions ofthe importance of online course offerings. Of these respondents, 42.5% of returners elected toenroll in coursework, while only 25.6% of direct pathway did.Respondents were asked how confident they were to complete
subsequent sections along with a brief overview of the participants in thestudy.ParticipantsAll students enrolled in both sections of the Engineering Fundamentals course as collegestudents (n = 29) were invited to participate in this study, and of those 29 students, 27 returnedthe necessary consent form for participation. Of the students who gave consent to participate, allthose who remained in the class long enough to complete at least the first exam were offered theopportunity to complete the survey for the study, which resulted in 25 total participants. Thiscutoff was set to ensure student feedback reflected commentary from those who had enough timein the course to be able to speak to how the course’s structure impacted them. Of the
to constrain, modify, and emphasizespecific aspects of the project. Ultimately, this project presents a unique way to introduceengineering concepts in an engaging way with the potential to get students excited about theemerging field of soft robotics.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work partially supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 2235647. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors would like to thank Jason Merrill for designing andmanufacturing the 3D parts for the negative mold and the test rigs. The authors would also like tothank Matthew Mastej for
rate of69.4%. Through meticulous data analysis using SPSS, it was observed notable increases in meanscores for Ideation, Interest, Help Seeking, and Unnamed factors, reflecting positive shifts instudents' entrepreneurial mindset. Significant improvements in factors such as Ideation, Interest,and Help Seeking highlight the efficacy of our course in nurturing the multifaceted skills essentialfor success in engineering and entrepreneurial endeavors. Our findings indicate modest statisticallysignificant improvements in Ideation and overall total scores from pre- to post-tests, validating theeffectiveness of this pedagogical approach. Lessons learned from this study will inform futureiterations of the course, ensuring continued refinement to better
such a way that this alignmenttermed their academic identities has a certain impact on their efforts and achievements. Thestudy [8] reveals that the college experience for individual students is influenced by theirperceptions of interpersonal interactions and norms, which a reflective of the college culture andthus play a pivotal role in shaping student performance, engagement, and persistence, surpassingpredictions solely based on socioeconomic status or academic preparedness indicators.The fundamental concept of Engineering Stress Culture (ESC) originates from the uniquedemands and challenges inherent in the culture of engineering education which equates learningwith suffering and shared hardship identity, as emphasized in one of the six
participants, as reflected by the summerprogram course evaluations. Even in the online setting, which was used to accommodate studentswho were unable to make it in person during the first offering of the summer program due tovarious reasons, students were able to work through the detailed instructions and execute theexperiment with real-time guidance and troubleshooting help from the instructor. An informal in-class poll was conducted to gauge the familiarity of fluid flow-based topics like flow rate,friction, pressure drop, and viscosity. Of these four topics, the most familiar topic was friction,while flow rate was the least familiar. However, the familiarity did not come from fluid flowcontext but from having heard the word “friction” from day-to
discrimination faced byAsian engineering students in postsecondary education. The identified relevantstudies need to be consistent with this research scope. In order to do that, we focus onboth Asian American and Asian international college students within the engineeringdiscipline, reflecting our centered research interest. Considering the scope of ourstudy and the research questions, we established relevant studies in our review asstudies that satisfy the following three conditions: a) the presence of Asian students,b) a focus on college engineering majors, and c) relevance to experiences ofdiscrimination.Selecting Studies We conducted the literature search using a variety of scholarly databases,including Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, ERIC
selected topic can be challenging for the students. Thefollowing quote is directly from one of the student competition team members. “Reflecting on the event, the biggest benefit I realize by participating in the program isthat my work impacts those beyond homework, assignments, and projects. Working in the SDCcompetition for our capstone project adds an elevated challenge for me beyond data analysis andpaper writing. This environment is one where I may engage with individuals in a new sense:alongside classmates, academics at ISU, and professionals in the industry nationwide. Short ofvisiting the project site location, I recalled knowledge from previous extracurricular projects andprospecting and oratorical skills from over the years and
the habitat. Finally, the smaller groups integrated theircomponents and collaborated to maximize the energy efficiency and performance of the Solar-powered Habitat.The assessments of this project were designed for each level of teamwork: 1) Studentshighlighted their contributions through an Engineering Portfolio. 2) Smaller groups reflected ontheir design and building process by submitting weekly engineering logs and a semester-endposter. Finally, 3) Each group habitat (comprising 5~6 groups) presented its energy-efficienthabitat design in the first-year design expo at the end of the semester. The ongoing datacollection of this effort on project-based, multidisciplinary, multilevel teamwork proved how thisproject design effectively cultivated
boundaryless new spaces of knowledge. To truly impact the world, webelieve this is the next step in STEAM and encourage faculty to push themselves to explore thesespaces and collaborations.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1811119. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.We would also like to acknowledge and thank the faculty participants for this work who werewilling to engage with the public in this unique format. We are grateful for your participationand insights.Finally, we would like to acknowledge the rest of the larger study
., serves as an Advanced Instructor in the First-Year EngineeringProgram at the University of Arkansas. She holds a MS in Environmental Engineering and a BSin Biological & Agricultural Engineering, both from the University of Arkansas. Leslie is alsocertified in Effective College Instruction. With over a decade of experience in teaching, research,and academic advising, she has made significant contributions to various engineering programsand courses, with a particular focus on innovation and student success. Her commitment toeducation is reflected in her numerous awards, extensive teaching activities, and dedication tomentoring and advising students. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
university if I need it.”In the current reflection, students highlighted the financial challenges associated with internetaccess and having devices connected to the internet. One student suggested that providing freeinternet access or offering the ability to borrow or rent a university computer could ensure equalaccess for all. Another student mentioned that paying for internet services can be prohibitivelyexpensive, especially for those who do not live close to campus due to financial constraints.Therefore, remote lab developers should prioritize creating tools that are less dependent onresources that may be inaccessible to some students. This would help alleviate the digitalinequality barrier and promote more equitable access to remote lab