havethe opportunity to earn academic credit for their engineering design work. A key difference in thisframework as compared to other typical capstone designs, independent studies, or research creditcourses is that undergraduate TAs and project managers within the project teams are responsiblefor developing many of the assignments distributed to those students enrolled the course as theproject progresses. The methods of student assessment within this framework include: individualor small-group weekly assignments, design notebook checks, peer and self-evaluations,participation, summative technical reports, and the Humanitarian Library. Additionally, unlikemany traditional problem set or laboratory courses, student skills are developed through
Paper ID #18684Creating Meaningful Experiences Through Extracurricular Project-BasedExperiential LearningDr. Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Dr. Dukart graduated with his B.A. in English and Honors from the University of North Dakota in 1997, followed by an M.A. in English in 1999 and a B.A. in Computer Science in 2002. He recently received (2016) his Ed.D. emphasizing Higher Education from the Department of Organizational Leadership, Pol- icy, and Development from the University of Minnesota. He has worked as an instructor and academic advisor at the University of North Dakota, the University of
requirement for capstone courses. Continuous improvements havebeen in progress to provide a systematic approach while remaining flexible for innovation. Thishas proved valuable in sustaining the continuity of the experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.Activities are organized each semester using project management techniques (plan, logbook,reports, and meetings). The instructor monitors and coaches these activities using a virtual platformMS TEAMS. Activities include an early presentation of the project proposal (week 2), a scheduledprogress report presentation (week 4), a meeting with the instructor before delivering the activityto the selected community (weeks 4-8), a poster and a final presentation (weeks 12-14). Studentsalso deliver a package
Paper ID #37585Developing Collaborative Online International Learning(COIL) projects in Engineering EducationMeredith Blumthal Meredith Blumthal became the Director of International Programs in the Grainger College of Engineering in 2017, and has 15 years of experience in international education. She collaborates with faculty members across the college to create international education opportunities for engineering students, including semester, short-term faculty-led and summer research experiences. Meredith has doubled faculty led programs since her start, and was instrumental starting COIL courses in
Paper ID #33521Team-Teaching a Project-Based First-Year Seminar in PandemicDr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. Her research interests include engineering education, swarm robotics, statistical signal processing, and swarm intelligence.Dr. Hugh Jack P. Eng. P.E., Western Carolina University Dr. Jack holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering and a Master’s and Ph.D. in Mechanical En- gineering from the University of Western Ontario. He is currently a Distinguished Professor and Director of the School of
Investigating Team Roles Within Long-Term Project-Based Learning ExperiencesIntroductionExperiential learning continues to increase in undergraduate engineering education in order toprepare students for their professional careers. Project-based learning is becoming more commonthroughout engineering programs, with the additions of first-year cornerstone design experiencesand capstone senior design experiences. These experiences provide students with context fortechnical skills to be learned and applied as well as professional skills to be developed. While thefirst and final years of undergraduate engineering curricula have evolved significantly, themiddle years are often lighter in project-based learning with more emphasis on
those core courses serve as thesteppingstone to advanced professional courses in the discipline. Other curricula rely on themechanics courses in a similar way but have a different disciplinary core at the junior level anddifferent professional courses at the senior level.The three courses are generally associated with three semester credit hours each. At the rise ofThe Mechanics Project, these courses were taught in a lecture-based format that met twice aweek using common mechanics textbooks. We will refer to this context as the “traditional”learning environment, which is comprised of lecture during class time, homework outside ofclass, and a few exams to assess learning. Capstone
B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She then transitioned into the engineering education field by completing a post-doctoral appointment at Oregon State University investigating technology-aided conceptual learning. She is currently doing research on team dynamics and students’ changes in engineering self-efficacy in project-based learning.Dr. Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Faculty Director for Engineering Education Research at the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineer- ing (CRLT-Engin) at University of Michigan (U-M). She earned B.S.E.E
Paper ID #22639ROS as an Undergraduate Project-based Learning EnablerDr. Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Stephen Wilkerson (swilkerson@ycp.edu) received his PhD from Johns Hopkins University in 1990 in Mechanical Engineering. His Thesis and initial work was on underwater explosion bubble dynamics and ship and submarine whipping. After graduation he took a position with the US Army where he has been ever since. For the first decade with the Army he worked on notable programs to include the M829A1 and A2 that were first of a kind composite saboted munition. His travels have taken him to Los
project and can be found atthe following URL address:http://www.eng.utoledo.edu/mime/design_clinic/design_expo/fall00pages/2000-01-06/home.htmlFigure 3 Vertical Wheelchair Platform Lift Figure 4 Isometric Schematic of the Vertical Wheelchair Platform Lift Page 13.521.12Outcomes of the Senior Design Course in the Mechanical Engineering Department:The ME Senior Design course is the capstone event of undergraduate education. Each project isdesigned to address several of the “a-k” ABET evaluation criteria for engineering programs(Table 2). The course outcomes are listed in Table
the program is to produce business-literateengineers and engineering-literate business people.Manufacturing Projects, the capstone course of the Manufacturing Engineering & ManagementProgram, is a master's-level course listed jointly in NMSU's business and engineering colleges.The intent of the course is to help students learn how to make positive contributions tointerdisciplinary work teams and manufacturing firms. In the course, business and engineeringstudents work together on teams to develop an appreciation for the interdependence of businessand engineering decisions.In preparation for Manufacturing Projects, business students take a course that introduces themto engineering concepts and engineering students take a course that
industry in the graduating students, along with the technologyrelated skills. As the students climb up the semester of the concerned program, the studentsgain ample confidence to undertake the more complex capstone project [1] of the last twosemesters intended to integrate several of the competencies related to the different courses.3. MICRO–PROJECT IN ‘COMPETENCY–FOCUSED OBC’"Students showed a higher level of satisfaction with this educational method (micro–project)in comparison to the traditional one" [Ceniceros, 2015]. The Association of AmericanColleges and Universities (AAC&U) and others are tuning the outcome attainment in acompetency model as part of the national focus’ [Carriveau, 2016]. World over, the call forcompetency measures
supported by classroominstruction. This structure is similar to senior design or a capstone project, but our program allowsstudents to have a different industry project each semester of their junior and senior year.The program emphasizes continuous improvement and the development of self-regulated learningabilities, professional skills, and technical engineering knowledge, which is acquired primarily inone-credit courses called ”competencies” [11]. Students learn in small groups (3 - 12 people)with academic staff facilitating the ”learning conversations.” These class meetings include somelecture but are primarily conversations between faculty and learners. Many learning conversationsare flipped, so students learn the material outside of class
: Alan H. Yorkdale Memorial Award, 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integration of Research Topics into Undergraduate Information Technology Courses and ProjectsIntroductionUndergraduate information technology, computer science and software engineering courses oftenrequire that software projects be completed in courses that allow students to gain experienceworking on real-world-like problems. Senior technology projects (Capstone projects) requirestudents to work on real-world projects that may require collaborating with companies. Research[1], [2], [3] has shown the advantages of using real-world-like projects in courses. Courseprojects, however, can also
interaction. He received his PhD from Rutgers University in 2001.Jennifer Dawson, York College of Pennsylvania Dr. Jennifer Bower Dawson is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at York College of Pennsylvania where she teaches courses in Machine Design, Controls, and Capstone Design. She earned her MS and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University where she worked on the design and testing of spacecraft hardware for Satellite Test of the Equivalence Principle. Her academic interests include robotics, sensor design, precision engineering, and service learning in engineering education.Barry McFarland, York College of Pennsylvania Barry McFarland received his BS
courses are taught this way and students feel that they can push the “resetbutton” after each class since they do not see the integration of all the material until late in theirundergraduate career through the capstone experience. This is too late for them to realize theimportance of earlier course material.A Dynamic Systems laboratory-based, hands-on project has been implemented which attempts toaddress many of the issues identified above. This series of projects is described in the following Page 9.486.3sections. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Page 24.740.2and collaboration ability that are crucial in our economy. Practical approach preferred byindustry and the more hands-on experience working collaboratively with others (includingindustry individuals) will benefit students in understanding project scheduling. Through theindustry project-based educational model, students spend their time learning material fromexperiential case studies brought to the class in small-size groups. After collecting and analyzingquantitative and qualitative data about real projects selected in the University’s region, they arepreparing the findings to be exposed in class through presentations and small hands-on demos.These accumulate into a capstone project with all knowledge gained for deeper
forces and stresses be determined for the structure, but it does not specify how thoseresults are to be presented. Students then ask for specific instructions: “Do you want a table?Graphs? How many? They are not comfortable when the instructor replies asking them toconsider why those results are important in the context of the entire project and to use that todetermine how to best present the information.CVEN 400 – CapstoneThis study was conducted in a senior capstone design class for civil engineering students. Selfselected groups of four or five students work in a largely self directed environment to design aproject. The project for the semester reported herein was to create a design for a neo-traditionalneighborhood on a 46 acre tract of land
, recruitment, and retention in K-12 and undergraduate engineering.Prof. Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder (CU) in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering. She has been at CU since 1996. During that time, she has taught Introduction to Civil Engineering to first-year students numerous times. She also teaches the senior capstone design course for environmental engineering, and this course has included service-learning projects for local or international communities since 2000. Bielefeldt has been researching teaching innovations
in computer science education, (2011), pp. 268-272.24. Stroulia, E., Bauer, K., Craig, M., Reid, K., and Wilson, G., “Teaching distributed software engineering withUCOSP: the undergraduate capstone open-source project,” Proceedings of the 2011 Community Building Workshopon Collaborative Teaching of Globally Distributed Software Development, (2011), pp. 20-25.25. Ellis, H.J.C., Morelli, R.A., de Lanerolle, T.R., Damon, J., and Raye, J., “Can Humanitarian Open-SourceSoftware Development Draw New Students to CS?” SIGCSE 2007, Technical Symposium on Computer ScienceEducation, (March 2007), pp. 551-555.26. Ellis, H.J.C., Morelli, R.A., and de Lanerolle, T., “Holistic Software Engineering Education Based on an OpenSource Project,” 20th Annual
the participants made a presentation at their ASCE StudentChapter Meeting, and are preparing papers for presentation at student paper competitions andseminars.It is well accepted that the capstone experience needs to allow for collaborative effort wheneverappropriate to the discipline, so that undergraduate students can be better prepared forparticipation in the team projects they will encounter in professional as well as private life. Itshould be conducted under the mentorship of a seasoned scholar-teacher who understands the joysand frustrations of a major project. It should allow the student to understand their potential for Page
othersupporting scientific articles. Students defined design requirements, generated evolutionarysolutions through multiple iterations, and demonstrated the utility of scientific literature byapplying knowledge to enhance their designs. This approach facilitated a deeper exploration ofbiomedical technology, involving critical analysis and improvement of materials, methods, andmanufacturing techniques.Seventeen students participated in the project, divided into six groups, each assigned specifictopics related to wearable and implanted technologies. Over 14 weeks, students followed astructured process, making presentations associated with three design iterations, showcasing theirprogress, and receiving feedback from a teaching team consisting of the
AC 2010-2201: EFFECTS OF STUDENT-CUSTOMER INTERACTION IN ACORNERSTONE DESIGN PROJECTChristopher Williams, Virginia Tech Christopher B. Williams is an Assistant Professor at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, where he directs the Design, Research, and Education for Additive Manufacturing Systems (DREAMS) Laboratory. His joint appointment in the Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Education departments reflects his diverse research interests which include layered manufacturing, design methodology, and design education. As a member of an instructional team that orchestrated a service-learning design project for the first-year engineering program, Professor
Technical State University. Dr. Ofori-Boadu has over twenty years of rele- vant occupational experience in construction technology/management (industry), teaching, research and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu has served in various capacities on research and service projects, including Principal Investigator for two most recent grants from the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF) and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). In 2017, Dr. Ofori-Boadu received both the College of Science and Technology (CoST) Rookie Research Excellence Award and the North Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Research Excellence Award. She also received the Teaching Excellence Award for the Department of Built Environment
Paper ID #38836Process Control Laboratory Projects: Technical Training, TeamDevelopment, and Global CollaborationDr. Joaquin Rodriguez, University of Pittsburgh 2018+ University of Pittsburgh. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department. Assistant Professor. Teaching track. 1999-2018. Universidad Monteavila (Caracas, Venezuela). Founder, Academic Coordinator (1999-2004), Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs (2004-2005), Chancellor (2005-20015), President of High Studies Center (2015-2017) 1983-1998. Petroleos de Venezuela. Research Center (Caracas, Venezuela). Professional Engineer (1983- 87). Project Leader
studentsreceive is that the majority of people who will be responsible for fabrication of the design on siteare not members of the class. Thus, the level of documentation and planning required issignificant, even when compared to a capstone design course, since the design team will not bepresent for the construction phase. Figure 5 shows that all students agreed that the class helpedtheir engineering and workplace skills. The overwhelming majority also said they wouldrecommend this class to their peers.Figure 5: Student responses to end-of-semester IDEA [24] survey supplemental questions: “(60)The critical reflection papers helped me to consider and understand the principles of CST. (61)The service-learning experience in this course (the design project
Projects as a Traditional Means to Teach Interdisciplinary Engineering.Aerospace engineering projects have long been used as a means of teaching interdisciplinary/systems engineering. Aerospace projects are, by their very nature, interdisciplinary, includingelements of astronautical and/or aeronautical engineering, mechanical engineering, electricalengineering, computer engineering, computer science, and often other disciplines (eg, physics,management). Universities with aerospace programs or offering elements of aerospace engineeringuse design projects in several capacities, including senior capstone undergraduate courses,graduate courses and individual projects, and student-led design teams. One well known exampleof this the American Institute
Paper ID #23915Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Interdisciplinary Senior Inter-disciplinary Project Educational ModelDr. Jinsung Cho, California State Polytechnic University Pomona My name is Jinsung Cho, an assistant professor of Civil Engineering Department in California State Poly- technic University Pomona. I have had more than 18 years in both academia and Civil and Construction Industry. My specialty is the behavior of underground infrastructure, Trenchless and Tunneling Technol- ogy, as well as 3D Virtual Construction Design & Management. I am a reviewer or member of several professional
Paper ID #26537gruepr: An Open Source Program for Creating Student Project TeamsDr. Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University Dr. Hertz earned a B.S. in Ceramic Engineering from Alfred University in 1999 and then a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006. Following this, he worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology as a National Research Council postdoctoral fellow. He joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware as an Assistant Professor in September 2008, leading a lab that researched the effects of composition
, and presentations by senior capstone design project students.Implementing these best practices not only increases first-year retention, but positively impactsretention in subsequent years, as well, since students carry forward their improved study habits,academic support network, and higher level of commitment to pursue engineering. A completemodel of the project inputs, activities and outcomes is shown in Figure 1. Page 23.551.3 Inputs Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes First-Year Interest Groups