content andcourses integrated into curricula that are already full. Attendance at the ICES conferencereinforced the need for us to work with other organizations to gain synergy of our efforts.Educational Measurement Kits. Hands-on experiments are a key activity that can be used in theclassroom to generate interest among students about measurements (and other STEM topics).The Outreach committee has been researching and reviewing possible measurement kits forNCSLI to purchase and share on a regional basis with our Outreach Ambassadors. An effectiveprogram of providing measurement-related activities and kits is already in place in the UnitedKingdom, sponsored by the National Physical Laboratory.Current Status and Insights: A review of possible kits
excited about the UX design processand develop a deeper understanding about user-centered design and its value in softwaredevelopment. Considering the significance of appreciating the value of learning tasks inincreasing motivation and consequently engagement in learning [30], we emphasizeadditional life-long skills like communication, collaboration, and creative thinking. Ourultimate learning goal is to create the type of significant learning [35] that produces creativeproblem solvers that can think in integrative ways for solving real-world challenges, workingeffectively in teams and applying HCI skills in a variety of contexts. An array of differentactive learning tasks, inside and outside of classroom, were designed to achieve the
slides on experimental principles and theory, (c) step-by-stepinstructions to use the equipment, (d) sample data and analysis, (e) a set of multiple-choicequestions, and (f) a student survey. At the beginning of each term, these instructional materialsare integrated into MyCourses, the online course management system developed by Desire 2Learn (www.desire2learn.com) for our institution. Thus, all lab instructors and students nowhave access to and use the same instructional materials.Assessment Rubrics and Design of Instructional MaterialsFor BSME curriculum to meet or exceed the accreditation criteria of the Accreditation Board ofEngineering and Technology (ABET), our department has developed a set of nine mechanicalengineering program outcomes
Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2010, American Society for Engineering Educationkey change needs to occur that allows you to view the proposal writing process as an iterativegame which in most cases yields stronger, better conceived, more scientifically solid researchideas. The whole process is a fun challenge that you sometimes win and when you lose, there isso much to learn from it – and after all, isn’t continual learning one of the attributes that drew usinto academia?Now, why do I feel qualified to write this paper 6 ½ years later? To be honest, I still battle thatimposter syndrome17. However, I earned tenure / promotion to Associate
high level ofmanufacturing automation and design of smart products.Our Manufacturing Engineering curriculum contains a control systems course, ME375“Manufacturing Control Systems,” with a weekly laboratory component. We have been offeringthis course in a traditional way where students are required to attend lab sessions to conductexperiments with hardware. However, given the multi-campus university setting, we sharecourses with other campuses of the university. Since mid 1980s the university has beenoperating an interactive TV system called WHETS. This system links all campuses andfacilitates real time, two-way audio/video interactivity among classrooms across campuses. It isextensively used for distance delivery of lecture format courses
Examiner, Setterfield balanced building code requirements with owner and contractor concerns. Setterfield teaches Autodesk Revit and its integration into analysis software, including Navisworks. Setterfield spearheaded a six-discipline IPD capstone resulting in student work that has been featured at various venues, including AU, the American Society for Engineering Educators and the League for Innovation in the Community College.Chad R. Bridgman, Sinclair Community College Chad currently serves as an Internship Coordinator for the Science, Mathematics, & Engineering Division at Sinclair Community College. Prior to managing the internship program he served as Aca- demic/Career Coach for Sinclair on a Department
creating restricted access for each team member’s allocatedfile system ‘by hand’ or through scripts run on the network server; the file server is run andmaintained independently from WebCT Vista. Again, a future goal is to integrate a group-orientedfilesystem capability in WebCT Vista, thus eliminating the need for managing separate networksystems for a single course.ConclusionsPresented was an overview of the management of a large-enrollment, robotics-oriented course at thesophomore level in engineering. Mindstorm kits and accessories are the basic kits used by thestudent teams, and nearly all informational materials are presented online through web-basedsystems. The management of these kits, the classroom facilities, and the web-based systems
course of the exercise, thestudents matured the model, increasing its detail and complexity through organic growth. Thefinal outcome was a respectable fraction of the size of large, professionally executed efforts(such as the 30 Meter Telescope model still under development).The significant advantages in clarity, consistency, and overall integrity of a model-drivensystems engineering effort will be highlighted; an emphasis will be placed on derived workproducts (tables, matrices, and derived properties) and their ability to provide relevant content tostakeholders.The MS in Product Development (MPD) Program at the University of Detroit MercyThe MPD Program at the University of Detroit Mercy began in the late 1990s (the seventeenthcohort completed
analysis.II.4. Co-op programs for studentsCooperative Education is an academic program that integrates classroom study with career-related work experiences. Co-op work experiences are paid, full-time, six-month positionsrelated to academic and career interests. Co-op is an optional and, in most cases, non-creditprogram. The CCSU program, the largest in Connecticut and one of the largest in New England,combines five months of on-campus study with six months of paid Co-op employment. Ourstudents gain the opportunity to apply textbook learning to on-the-job training. Throughparticipation in the Co-op program, students can graduate with up to two years of career-relatedwork experience and, possibly, with a job offer. Many Co-op students are offered
forth “linguistic intelligence,musical intelligence, logical-mathematical intelligence, spatial intelligence, and bodily-kinesthetic intelligence”3 to name a few. Gardener views intelligence as an individual’s abilityto solve problems or create products that are valued by society. The implication for teachingand learning is that instructors need to vary the inputs and have a repertoire of strategies forfacilitating learning. The more ways we find to process material, the stronger learningbecomes. We need to recognize there’s no “one best way.”Learning is enhanced in an enriched environment. The physical environment of the classroomis certainly important (aesthetics, climate, etc.), but so too is the learning environment that wecreate to get
required to integrate design throughout the entire curriculum. Design cannotbe made to fit neatly in a one-semester course at the end of an undergraduate education.There are also those that believe that design processes are particular to various industries andtherefore it would be overstepping boundaries to presume to teach such processes at theacademic level. While this may be true that at lower levels of abstraction where specificknowledge and details are important, at higher levels of abstraction it can be shown that the basicprocesses are quite similar across disciplines and domains.Others claim that engineering design processes are ad hoc and rely on creativity and experienceand thus should be addressed later during the student’s professional
working for Delphi. She completed her postdoctoral studies in engineering education at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Clark has published articles in the Journal of Engineering Education, Advances in Engineering Education, and Risk Analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Improving a Flipped Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseOur University’s Electrical and Computer Engineering Department has offered an electivecourse in Electric Machinery for decades. With increasing focus on renewable energy and powerelectronics in the curriculum, we felt the need to modernize this course so that it provides a betterlearning experience and appeals to more students. Over a period of two
23.1007.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Providing Learning Opportunities by Designing a Split Hopkinson Pressure BarSenior students are always challenged to apply their engineering knowledge and research skillsgained from an engineering curriculum toward design and implementation of challenging seniordesign projects. Split Hopkinson pressure bar is an apparatus that is used to study materialsbehavior under high speed deformation, where strain rate is very high. Hopkinson bars areusually custom made based on the needs of customers, who are mostly researchers in universitiesor research labs. In this work, the authors provided learning opportunities for
generally reflectsthe enrollments of the campus: 70% engineering/computer science and 9% science/mathematics,with the remaining 21% comprised of community college students with an expressed interest ina technical field. Thus, the program is seen as a way to inculcate the cultures of collaborationand of technical excellence to increase the overall retention, academic performance, andgraduation of historically under-represented students in SEM majors. Because theoverwhelming majority of students attending Cal Poly Pomona commute, the campus haschosen to invest in an active and directed residential program for Quest in order to submerge thestudents in a collaborative, academic community.The Curriculum and Program Impact Upon Faculty The primary goal
, Bulgaria, China, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. He has numerous publications in engineering and technology education.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Mentzer was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction. After graduation, he completed a one year appointment with the center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Kyungsuk Park, Utah
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Engaging Engineering Students with Mobile Learning TechnologiesAbstractNew theories of education matched with new technologies have been rapidly transforming theway instructors teach and students learn. This paper documents one model an engineeringlibrarian has created to incorporate the ideas expressed in "connected learning pedagogy" and thetheory of constructivism (active, collaborative learning with the instructor as a guide andfacilitator) into instructional "one-shot" sessions designed to teach information literacy skills tocollege students at various stages of their careers. The sessions utilize electronic devices
assessments, teams met to develop a consensus evaluation of the workshop. Thisprovided an opportunity for the team to discuss their individual perspectives and develop aclearer understanding of the assessment dimensions. The average of all team’s consensusassessments determined the grade receive by the workshop presenters.The two exams in the course covered only material presented in the workshops (20% of semestergrade). Students took learning the workshop material seriously and performed well on the exams. Plan for Self-MasteryStudents developed their personal plan for developed from the compilation and integration ofwritings throughout the course. Each of these writings had been commented on and some sharedwith teammates. There were numerous
Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) more effectively.More specifically the integrated team more effectively address ABET student outcome (5) “anability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” and (6)“an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze, and interpret data, anduse engineering judgment to draw conclusions [1].” This paper addresses the benefits ofinterdisciplinary teams as evidenced by the United States Military Academy Steel Bridge Teamboth in terms of team performance and satisfaction of ABET student outcomes.THEORYThe driving factors which are required for a
welcomedstudents in 1984 and is now available on-line, and an Integrated Product DevelopmentProgram with both graduate and undergraduate sections.12,13Collaborative working in teams was a feature of the IBM Manufacturing TechnologyInstitute that was established in Manhattan in 1981 to revitalize the old-style IBMmanufacturing workforce.12 During the next decade teamwork started to become a featureof the K-12 curriculum and several competitions such as FIRST (For Inspiration andRecognition of Science and Technology) for 9-12 grades in 1992, and a Future CityProgram for 6-8 grades in 1993 were inspired.14 The imaginative and innovative skills thatare unleashed in contests of these types should not be suffocated (and destroyed) byexcessively prescriptive
bodily-kinesthetic intelligence”3 to name a few. Gardener views intelligence as an individual’s abilityto solve problems or create products that are valued by society. The implication for teaching andlearning is that instructors need to vary the inputs and have a repertoire of strategies forfacilitating learning. The more ways we find to process material, the stronger learning becomes.We need to recognize there’s no “one best way.”Learning is enhanced in an enriched environment. The physical environment of the classroom iscertainly important (aesthetics, climate, etc.), but so too is the learning environment that wecreate to get students to use their minds well. An enriched learning environment is a settingwhere students are actively engaged in
understand atomic structure. An example that may beused in a middle school physical science class is described in detail. In middle school physicalscience class, students may play a game that involves the entire class to demonstrate theirunderstanding of electrons, protons and neutrons in atomic models. The teacher must give priorknowledge of atomic structure and emphasize shortcomings of the model before the game beginssince the game emphasizes two-dimensional structures, electrons that are stationary in definedorbitals and atomic mass that is integral. The teacher uses squares of construction paper torepresent the three atomic particles. The symbol, name, atomic number and atomic mass areplaced on the squares of construction paper and posted on
program are either interested in engineering management careers, or areusing the degree as a foundation for careers other than engineering. Because of the diversestudent interests, the course is designed to allow the students to understand the pervasive role ofgovernment in the technical arena, and the need to use/manage technology within that context.The emphasis of the course material is on the federal level, however international, state, andlocal differences are included. This paper presents the curriculum for EP251 and discussesinstructor observations about how well the course works for sophomore engineering students.The instructor is interested in feedback about the need for such a curriculum.IntroductionLafayette College offers a sophomore
studentsurveys (an indirect measure) to determine the students’ opinions on their preparation for thecourse (Were prerequisites adequate?), their understanding of the material associated with thelearning objectives of the course, and their increased abilities in program outcomes which arespecifically addressed in the course. Example survey instruments and example compiled resultsare displayed and discussed. It is proposed that the results from such course level surveys can beuseful input to a comprehensive program assessment.IntroductionThe whole may be or may not be greater than the sum of its parts. However, when the whole isfound lacking, it may be difficult to identify the missing or faulty parts. So it may be with theassessment process associated
power, electronics thermal management, and manufacturing. He has authored more than 140 technical publications. His honors include SAE’s Teetor Award, Rosten Award for Thermal Analysis of Electronic Equipment, ASME Curriculum Inno- vation Award, and Fischer Engineering Teacher of the Year Award. He is an ASME Fellow and on the Board of Directors of ASEE’s Engineering Research Council.Dr. Joseph J. Helble, Dartmouth College Joseph J. Helble is Professor of Engineering, and Dean of the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, a position he has held since 2005. Prior to Dartmouth, Dr. Helble was the AAAS Revelle Fellow, spending a year on staff in the U.S. Senate with a focus on science policy. Previously, he
Paper ID #37180Call without Response: Faculty Perceptions about Diversity,Equity, and InclusionKaitlyn Anne Thomas (Student) Kaitlyn is an engineering education doctoral student at the University of Nevada, Reno. Her background is in civil engineering. Her research focus is women in engineering and mental health.Derrick Satterfield Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students' experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Jeanne Sanders Jeanne Sanders (she/her/hers) is a
University Ken Reid is the Director of Freshman Engineering and an Associate Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern University. He was the seventh person in the U.S. to receive a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. He is active in engineering within K-12, serving on the JETS Board of Directors and 10 years on the IEEE-USA Precollege Education Committee. He co-developed “The Tsunami Model Eliciting Activity” which was awarded Best Middle School Curriculum by the Engineering Education Service Center in 2009. His research interests include success in first-year engineering and engineering in K-12.Laurie Laird, Ohio Northern
Office of Diversity Programs and Student DevelopmentIn this slide, we will explain how our program is structured. The five pillars of our programpromote the holistic development of our students. Taking this approach, we want to giveour students an idea of the performance of engineers in labor work; therefore, they willstart to construct an identity and engage with engineering as a profession and our campus.We will discuss what integrates each core and the skills they will gain by participating in theprogram.Bridge Bonding: This pillar helps students relate to each other's experiences andchallenges, making it easier for them to empathize and offer support
, and applied ethics journals. Herkert previously served as Editor of IEEE Technology and Society Magazine and an Associate Editor of Engineering Studies. He is or has been an active leader in many professional or- ganizations including the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum, the Society on Social Implications of Technology (SSIT) of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), the National Insti- tute for Engineering Ethics, and the Engineering Ethics and Liberal Education/Engineering and Society (LEES) Divisions of the American Society for Engineering Education. In 2005 Herkert received the Ster- ling Olmsted Award, the highest honor bestowed by LEES, for ”making significant contributions in
understandings of ethics and morality, but yet were distinct.Norms/Traits. As with general ethics, honesty and integrity were cited by a number ofinterviewees as important characteristics for an engineer to possess. An example response isgiven by Beverly: “I think honesty is a big one. I think at any field, not just engineering, honesty is the best quality as they say. It's really important, because as engineers you're making all these decisions that impact not just you but thousands and millions of people. You have to make those honest decisions, because they could be the deal breaker or they could be that one thing that makes the bridge collapse or holds it up for a lifetime.”Other specific and general traits that were in
interest in engineering education. She develops materials and re- searches best practical classroom approaches for integrating computation and computational thinking in introductory CEE courses; and for promoting teamwork, communication and problem-solving in context, throughout the CEE curriculum.Dr. Ashlynn S. Stillwell, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Dr. Ashlynn S. Stillwell is an Associate Professor and the Elaine F. and William J. Hall Excellence Faculty Scholar in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on creating sustainable water and energy systems in a policy-relevant context. She earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the