Conference Session

Works in Progress: Learning and Engagement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Justin Charles Major, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering Education.21. Huff, J. L., Smith, J. A., Jesiek, B. K., Zoltowski, C. B., Graziano, W. G., & Oakes, W. C. (2014). From methods to methodology: Reflection on keeping the philosophical commitments of interpretative phenomenological analysis. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.22. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Research, Practice. London: Sage.23. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2013). Understanding engineering identity through structural equation modeling. 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).24. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. (2010). Connecting high school physics

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Maeghan Marie Brundrett, Texas Tech University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

pursue engineering. Figure 4 details the responses students provided. Somestudents selected multiple categories, and Figure 4 depicts the percentage each category wasselected by 37 participants. Here, it is again clear that altruistic tendencies are a majorcontributing factor to the female students’ desire to pursue engineering, in agreement withprevious literature. It also appears that students’ interests played a major role in their decision topursue engineering. This finding may reflect students’ desire to choose careers that arepersonally meaningful, which has also been demonstrated in literature as a relevant factor infemale students’ career decisions.14 Figure 4: Percentage of participants’ motivation to become

Conference Session

Case and Scenario in Engineering Ethics Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edwin R. Schmeckpeper P.E., Norwich University; Michael B. Kelley P.E., Norwich University; Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University; Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow; Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.References 1. Schmeckpeper, E. R., & Ater Kranov, A., & Beyerlein, S. W., & Pedrow, P. D., & McCormack, J. P. (2015,June), Using the EPSA Rubric and EPSA Score to Evaluate Student Learning at the Course and Program Level,2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.2. Loendorf, W. (2009, June), The Case Study Approach to Engineering Ethics, 2009 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX.3. Davis, M., & Feinerman, A. (2012, June). Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics. Science &Engineering Ethics, Vol 18, Issue 2, pp 351-3674

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven J. Burian, University of Utah; Douglas Schmucker P.E., University of Utah; Joshua Lenart, University of Utah ; Hessam Tavakoldavani, University of Utah; Pedro Romero, University of Utah; Michael E. Barber, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

civilengineering profession. Creative learning activities are needed to translate outcomes frominternational learning experiences to serve the local professional market.A key broader impact of the project is the development, testing, and refinement of techniques toefficiently and effectively assess a broad definition of global learning in civil and environmentalengineering programs. The baseline study presented herein used three measures. Reflection onthe measures combined with reviewer comments indicates a direct measure of student learningremains a key missing component, but one that requires a much more significant effort.However, the use of the GCI and CQ survey has not been tested in the Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering at the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan W. Krauss, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville; Ryan Fries, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville; Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Davis. Using strengths of first-year engineering students to enhance teaching. In Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 2015. [7] Matthew Meyer and Sherry Marx. Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4):525–548, 2014. [8] Kerry L. Meyers, Stephen E. Silliman, Natalie L. Gedde, and Matthew W. Ohland. A comparison of engineering students’ reflections on their first-year experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2):169–178, 2010. [9] David E. Goldberg and Mark Somerville. The making of a whole new engineer: Four unexpected lessons for engineering educators and education researchers. Journal of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Matt Robert Bohm, University of Louisville; Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

metropolitan public university, designatedas High Doctoral Research by the Carnegie Foundation are also be participating. Studies at thissecond location are focusing on impact of teaching function on capstone design quality. Resultsof these studies are forthcoming.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation through grants 1525449, 1525170,and 1525284. Any  opinions,  findings,  and  conclusions  or  recommendations  expressed  in  this  material  are  those  of  the  authors  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  National  Science  Foundation.References1.   Pahl  G,  Beitz  W,  Feldhusen  J,  Grote  KH.  Engineering  Design:  A  Systematic  Approach.  3rd  ed:  Springer   Verlag;  2007.  2

Conference Session

Research Methods II: Meeting the Challenges of Engineering Education Research

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan E Canney, Seattle University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder; Greg Rulifson P.E., University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

provided strong evidence of validity for the EPRA tool from someof the interview cases examined.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1 ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluation During the 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle," ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, Baltimore, MD, 2014.2 L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre and J. McGourty, "The ABET "Professional Skills" - Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?," Journal of

Conference Session

Assessment & Accreditation in ECE

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karla Steinbrugge Fant, Portland State University; Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University; Phillip Wong, Portland State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

program,” in Proc. of the 3rd Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, 2002, vol. 4, pp. 53–58.[14] M. J. Scott and G. Ghinea, “Educating programmers: A reflection on barriers to deliberate practice,” in Proc. 2nd HEA Conf. on Learning and Teaching in STEM Disciplines, 2013, p. 028P.[15] zyBooks “Programming in MATLAB”, https://zybooks.zyante.com/#/catalog , accessed Jan. 30, 2016.[16] Learning Catalytics from Pearson, https://learningcatalytics.com/ , accessed Jan. 30, 2016.

Conference Session

Assessment, Course, and Curricular Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quinn Langfitt, Washington State University; Liv Haselbach P.E., Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

accuracy. That is, the focus is on increasing familiarity with energy literacy bythe students examining energy concepts rather than deep and exact technical knowledge. Asimple example of this would be a high score for the technical dimension for a group proposing aperpetual motion machine (considered impossible under the current theories of physics), but whostill identify, discuss, and examine important concepts of energy and motion.Transitioning into rating, the session leader covered five posters from the 2014 ImagineTomorrow competition, by showing the posters to the raters and explaining what scores might begiven and why. These posters were chosen to reflect a range of quality. The session leader hadrated two sets of posters in the past and

Conference Session

CEED Paper Session 1: Using Co-Op and Internships to Improve Diversity, Retention, Learning, and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katelyn Elizabeth Gunderson, Rochester Institute of Technology; Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology ; Joseph A. Raelin, Northeastern University; Jamie Ladge; Robert Garrick, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

ways to prepare for obtaining acompetitive first co-op assignment. What experiences can a student engage in before obtainingthat first co-op that will begin to build work self-efficacy? The answer to this question couldalso benefit those at engineering schools with less developed co-op programs.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantGSE 0827490. The researchers wish to express their gratitude for the support of this project. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1 Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M. B., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L. K

Conference Session

Research on Design Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony F. Luscher, Ohio State University; Roger Forsgren, NASA Headquarters

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

focused on and explicit about the desired learningoutcome. For instance, such a case may present the scenario of a satellite antenna that did notdeploy properly due to a single technical flaw. The focus of this case narrowed and case may notlook beyond the lone conclusion related to the technical flaw. In contrast, an analysis of a casestudy about the Deepwater Horizon accident yields more insight into engineering design than asingle answer to why the failure occurred.The case study approach provides course participants with the opportunity to apply their criticalthinking skills to each scenario and exercise non-analytical insight as part of the design process.Ultimately, the methodology reinforces the practice of reflection upon past successes

Conference Session

Issues in Engineering Technology Education I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University; Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

waseither the same or even better compared to traditional and hybrid models. This fact almost lookslike a negative correlation between the students' feedback and their actual performance in theclass. During 2013-15 class offerings, there was more time devoted to the interactive activitiesbetween the faculty-students and students-students. This means that even less time was devotedto the theoretical material normally presented in the traditional lectures and students were"forced" to spend even more time studying. The reflection of this is the best students'performance - 83%/88%/80 average and 10%/8%/13.8% standard deviation in the final examsconducted during 2013-15 period. The grade distribution demonstrates that the number of A andAB students is

Conference Session

Classroom Practice III: Student-Centered Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hayden Fennell, Purdue University Polytechnic Institute; Camilo Vieira, Purdue University; Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; R. Edwin García, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

) between students’ use of representations in each stageand the respective scores. One exception was the configuration step, where the score was well correlatedwith the amount of representations used. The correlation resulted in a value of .52 (p-value = .002) for theconfiguration step. To evaluate the effects of each type of representation on this score, we performed amultiple linear regression. Equation (1) describes the model used to predict students’ score on theconfiguration step (SC) based on the numbers of images, plots, tables, equations, calculations, and charts.Results reveal a significant effect of the use of equations on this stage (p-value < 0.016). No other type ofrepresentation had significant effect. This fact could reflect the

Conference Session

Institutional Capacity and Supportive Structures in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois at Chicago; Fazle Shahnawaz Muhibul Karim, University of Illinois at Chicago; Samuel Thomas Harford, University of Illinois at Chicago; Elnaz Douzali, University of Illinois at Chicago; Peter C Nelson, University of Illinois, Chicago; Ashkan Sharabiani, Exelon Corporation

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Class by RaceDetermining New Admission RulesThe URS classes created in this study can be used to derive a new support system of admissionsat our University. Table 6 shows an example that illustrates how the URS classes can be used tosimulate the enrollment of underrepresented applicants. This example does not reflect ouruniversity’s standards or the ACT scores of our applicants and it is merely a hypotheticalscenario.Here we are assuming that our hypothetical university is currently using a minimum ACT of 27to admit all its applicants regardless of their URS classes. We would like to know how thisadmission policy can be modified based on the generated URS classes’ information. Table 6shows the modification process. First, for each URS class we

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne Dudek Ronan P.E., New York University; Jack Bringardner, New York University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

majoruniversities are lower: 20% at Ohio State,3 27% at UT Austin,4 24% at NYU,5 26% at UCBerkeley,6 and 28% at Georgia Tech.7 It is suspected that the low enrollment numbers are aresult of social issues and curricular policies. While social change is outside the scope of highereducation faculty control, curriculum changes can be used to encourage women as well as retainthem in engineering programs.There is evidence that certain curriculum practices are more enticing to women and motivatethem to stay in engineering. Strategies to attract women to engineering have included teamwork,service projects, and social impacts of engineering projects. These strategies reflect the higherpercent of degrees awarded to women in areas like environmental and biomedical

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

,identifying design requirements and functions for the expected solution, developing andevaluating design concepts, developing a baseline solution and project plan, and meeting theirproject plan milestones. Table 1 lists all the projects titles student teams pursued as part of thesecond project. They represent a wide range of applications, which reflect different studentinterests. Table 1. Project Titles Interactive Maps Bike Rack Drip Irrigation Automated Animal Feeder SeKure Bike Bust Stop Awning Smart Lifejacket F.L.O.P. Board-Based Transportation Lock Methane Collection Box

Conference Session

Developing Infrastructure Professionals

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W Roberts, Southern Utah University; Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. The authors also wish to thank the reviewers for their comments,which were helpful in improving the final version of the paper.Bibliography[1] P. J. Parker, M. W. Roberts and M. K. Thompson, "Work in progress — Assessment and pilot delivery of an introduction to infrastructure course," in Proceedings of the 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC, 2010.[2] M. W. Roberts, P. J. Parker, M. K. Thompson and B. A. Barnet, "Development of an Introduction to Infrastructure Course," in Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 2011.[3] M. R. Penn, P. J

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Evaluation: Exploring the Impact of Summer Programs on K-12 Youth (Part 1)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of St. Thomas; Olivia Lang, University of St. Thomas ; AnnMarie Polsenberg Thomas, University of St. Thomas; Debra Monson, University of St. Thomas; Deborah Besser P.E., University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

their experience.Summary and “Next STEPS”The reconstruction of the STEPS program was essential to recruit underrepresented students. Thenew format was well received and shows great promise. Key lessons learned in delivering thenew curriculum and key lessons learned in extending the population participating in the informalengineering outreach program will be incorporated in successive offerings of the program. Therevamped 2015 STEPS offering follows a 2014 STEPS offering in which the content anddelivery of STEPS was significantly updated to reflect current pre-college science andengineering education research. Specifically, engineering design, engineering practices,engineering habits of mind, and best practices for engineering career exploration

Conference Session

Flipped Classrooms in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

engineering at ASU. Her interests include innovative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student motivation, innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, as well as structured reflective practices throughout the engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Flipped Solid Mechanics Course Designed Based-on the Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) FrameworkIntroductionAccording to Lage et al., “Inverting the classroom means that events that have traditionally takenplace inside the classroom now take place outside the classroom and vice versa”1. The wordflipped sometimes is also used for a classroom environment like this. A flipped (or

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Design and Design Chanllenges

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

designs and teaches courses in mechanical engineering at ASU. Her interests include innovative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student motivation, innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, as well as structured reflective practices throughout the engineering curriculum.Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University Amy Trowbridge is a Lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU), focused primarily on freshmen engineering. She is also Director of the Grand Challenge Scholars Program at ASU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing the Impact of Incorporating the NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering as a

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Komarek, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

was administered todetermine skills gains and team accomplishments and to reflect on the participants’ experience inthe program. An alumni survey was administered six months after the conclusion of the summerprogram to check in on Catalyze teams.Survey questions were rated on a one-to-five Likert type scale with a 70% cutoff (a rating of3.5/5) to help evaluate effective program components. Surveys also included open-endedquestions to gather verbal responses to support numerical ratings. Numerical results wereevaluated against a 70% cutoff (3.50/5.00) with activities and ratings above 3.50 considered asevidence of program success for the evaluation of results. Results were presented by theassessment specialist and evaluated at a programmatic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Warren, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference Session

Technology-Related Educational Research

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Barry McPherson, The Boeing Company

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

learners work hand-in-hand withindustry experts, academic researchers, and data scientists to elicit the type of design behaviorsthat reflect real world engineering practice in the aerospace industry. This allows us to develop,test, and refine the instrumentation methodology, data architectures, analytics, and visualizationapproaches before interfering with the day-to-day work within an organization. In the context ofour work, a program called AerosPACE was developed not only as a senior capstone course, butalso to serve as a test bed.AerosPACE is an engineering education program developed by a large US aerospace company.The primary goal of this program is to bridge the gap between theory and application, (and tohelp students understand the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Johnson-Glauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

ofIllinois or to the topic of state machines in digital logic. Interviews with instructors of digitallogic courses are ongoing. Comparisons between the reasoning and problem solving approachesof students and instructors will be compared in future studies to enable comparisons betweenexperts and novices.6. AcknowledgmentsThanks to Lance Pittman for his help with collecting data and supporting analysis. This projectwas supported by the National Science Foundation under grant EEC 1429348. The opinions,findings, and conclusions presented in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation or the authors’ institution.References1  Juhl, J. & Lindegaard, H. Representations and visual synthesis in engineering design

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Fleming Ph.D., National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

). Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE'04. Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on (pp. 271-280). IEEE.38. Martınez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., & De La Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353-368.39. Mawdesley, M., Long, G., Al-Jibouri, S., & Scott, D. (2011). The enhancement of simulation based learning exercises through formalized reflection, focus groups and group presentation. Computers & Education, 56(1), 44-52.40. Natishan, M. E

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel J. Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

thatisolated student performance on the specified outcomes. The rubrics used in the assessment ofoutcomes and corresponding evaluation results are independent from student grades. For thefirst assessment, the students’ ability to design an Internet-of-Things solution to a real worldproblem was measured. In the second assessment, the students’ level of attainment of ABEToutcome (h), the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions ina global, economic, environmental and societal context, was measured. The final assessmentpresented is an indirect measure, student surveys that reflect their opinions on the course andtheir learning.4.1 Assessment of Student Ability to Design an Internet-of-Things SolutionFor this first

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4A: Retention Programs and Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan McSpedon, Rice University; Ann Saterbak, Rice University; Michael Wolf, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, only 5% of B.S. engineering graduates have been AfricanAmerican and only 7-8% have been Hispanic.2Shoring up the leaky STEM pipeline, particularly for underrepresented groups, is of nationalimportance. The first two years of college are particularly important for STEM retention.1 Onestrategy employed by some universities to remedy the gap in retention rates is the creation ofsummer bridge programs.3. Research BackgroundResearch suggests this achievement gap does not reflect a difference in student ability but ratherstructural inequalities in K-12 educational experiences between students from high-performing,well-resourced schools and students from under-performing, low-resource schools.4 Studiesshow abilities, attitudes, and college

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division: Sustainability and Hands-On Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paula Alvarez Pino, UAB Sustainable Smart Cities Research Center; Andrew J. Sullivan; Fouad H. Fouad, University of Alabama - Birmingham

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

. Principles of Sustainable Development 2. Introduction to Sustainable Smart Cities 3. Low Carbon and Renewable Energy Systems 4. Managing Natural Resources and Sustainable Smart Cities 5. Green Infrastructure and Transportation 6. Green Buildings 7. Health & Livability 8. Smart Technologies for Cities & Buildings 9. Big Data & Smart Cities 10. Research Methods & Project PlanningCapstone Research Project– during the capstone research project the students will design andimplement a piece of research that will enable them to reflect on the knowledge and skillswhich they have learned during the taught modules and apply them to a real world problem orissue. This research may

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Carpenter Ed.D., CCD - Custom Curriculum Design; Logan Edward Micher, Florida Polytechnic University; Chris Yakymyshyn; Jorge Vargas, Florida Polytechnic University; Christina Drake, Florida Polytechnic University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

tracking device, water transport and filtration device, educational toy or exhibit) had anegative impact on student interest in the engineering program. Another important considerationis the need to keep the attention of students from different engineering concentrations, as well as(in our case) a significant population of students enrolled in the College of Information &Technology. The latter group of students may have minimal interest or curiosity regardingengineering, and represent a challenge to win over their engagement in the class.There needs to be a balance between narrowing the scope of the assigned problem sufficiently toavoid students being unable to find a way forward, but having a sufficiently open-ended naturethat it reflects a

Conference Session

ECE-related Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Ganago, University of Michigan; Hyunsoo Julian Kim, University of Michigan; Joshua Adam Kotrba, University of Michigan; Mohammad Rasouli, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

versa [1]The multitude of specific recipes for how to flip a class reflects the diversity of education: even abrief search through ASEE publications with the keyword ‘flipped’ yields more than a thousandpapers describing various flipped courses. Not surprisingly, a recent survey admits that There is a lack of consensus on what exactly the flipped classroom is. [1]Flipping a course requires at least 3 actions, which can be seen as disruptive innovations: (1) Decide which “events that have traditionally taken place inside the classroom” will be moved outside the classroom, and explain to students how they benefit from this move (2) Create the new teaching events outside the classroom to ensure that the student learning