Fig.14: Timer Control HMIIV. ResultsThis section summarizes results which demonstrate the functionality of the system and discussproject execution from a cost and schedule viewpoint.System PerformanceInitially, to test the integrity of the sensor, an RS232 terminal named Termite was utilized. Thisterminal allows the user to send and receive data from a sensor based upon written commands.When commands were sent to the sensor through the terminal, desired responses andmeasurements were received assuring that the sensor was in good working order and ready to beemployed. Further experimentation included the testing of the sensor in dry soil and wet soil toconfirm that the sensor’s measurement numbers are consistent and reflect nominal values
: built into the key program features were evaluation criteriathat efforts be “radically, suddenly, or completely new; producing fundamental, structuralchange; or going outside of or beyond existing norms and principles” [6]. With an innovativedepartment head or dean at the helm, change had to be rooted in engineering education research,a social science understanding of organizations, and a theoretical change framework that couldmove research to practice, with team composition reflecting this varied expertise. Facultydevelopment efforts, incorporation of professional practice, and a plan for scalability thatcountered anticipated obstacles had to be baked in to the original vision and project plan.With NSF investing relatively large amounts of
reflects less understanding thantalking about which first order pole is slowest.Question 2Question 2 is a bit of a philosophical one that probes the students understanding of the definitionof a transfer function. Students are given time domain expressions of the input and output of asystem and asked to find the transfer function. If students remember that a transfer function is theLaplace transform of the output divided by the Laplace transform of the input, this problemshould be fairly straight forward. Ideally, students will also remember the instructors’ preferencesthat a transfer function be given as a proper fraction with one polynomial of s in the numeratorand one polynomial in the denominator.Question 2 Problem Statement ∙ You are given a
, Engineering Education1. Introduction – Research to Practice PaperEngineering education, and especially computer science (CS) within that realm, is embeddedwithin science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), but K12 classroom practicesdo not often reflect CS content due in part to teacher skill levels and an efficacy gap. CS can takeon many meanings, but at its core, it is the science of problem solving in a computationalcontext, and CS as a skill is challenging (Burrows, Borowczak, Slater, & Haynes, 2012). MostCS university programs prepare software engineers, and as such the subjects are entwined. Thedistinction between engineering and CS can be blurry if only examining the theory of CS insteadof the practical applications. This
responses. The nature of quantitativeresults consist of probabilities that reflect the students’ technology preferences and the variationanalysis of the programming preferences across different research questions. The results presentedin this paper help to determine and understand engineering students’ technology choices forsolving different calculus problems based on their technology education. The participants of thisInstitutional Review Board (IRB) approved research completed the third calculus course of a four-course calculus sequence. This article is a continuation of another IRB approved research that wasconducted by the researcher at a large Midwest U.S. institution.Key Words: Computer programming preference; Undergraduate education
Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 355-360). ACM.15 Exter, M., & Turnage, N. (2012). Exploring experienced professionals’ reflections on computing education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(3), 12.16 Lethbridge, T. C. (2000). What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer, 33(5), 44-50.17 Andriole, S. J. and Roberts, E. (2008). Technology curriculum for the early 21st century. Retrieved from http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2008/7/5359-point-counterpoint- technology-curriculum-for-the-early-21st-century/fulltext 21Formal
& Lechuga, 2017; Trowler, 2014).Researching such learning communities involves a systematic exploration of many contextualaspects, including “the culture of the institution, the administrative hierarchy, students, faculty,and external constituencies” (Pasque & Lechuga, 2017, p. 2).The recent surge in ethnographic or participant-centered, qualitative research in higher educationaligns with an increased awareness that classrooms, programs, lectures, work sessions and thelike all operate within a system that is multilayered and often hierarchical (Bryk, Sebring,Allensworth, Easton, & Luppescu, 2010). As such, final scores or reflections may hint at thecomponents, activities, and resources most useful to, or constraining the
,” Academic Exchange Quarterly, 2007. 3. http://idea.ed.gov/explore 4. The State of Learning Disabilities, 3rd edition, 2013, National Center for Learning Disabilities. 5. “Academic accommodations for students with learning disabilities,” Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology (DO-IT), University of Washington, 2012. 6. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2016. 7. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2011, Table 4. 8. “For your consideration… suggestions and reflections on teaching and learning,” University of North Carolina Center for Faculty Excellence, Nov. 2009. 9. Lyman, F. T. (1992). Think-Pair
towards interdisciplinary cooperation in the next phase, which isa long way from the initial state three years ago when we were not quite familiar with oneanother’s areas of expertise, it would be worthwhile to share our reflections on the journeywith other teachers.Context Over the course of 3-year-cooperation (from December 2013 to November 2016), threecurricular experiments were conducted consecutively in the Spring Semesters (i.e., Februaryto June) from 2014 to 2016 at National Taiwan University (NTU) in Taiwan. The firstexperiment was meant to be an initial try-out, embedding two 8-hour sessions of futuresthinking curriculum in an existing selective advanced CE course, with the purpose offamiliarizing engineering teachers with futures
, as well as publishing papers in conference or in journals.In summary, as depicted by the testimonials, the results of assessing the peer mentoring,undergraduate research output, and post-graduation placement, our NSF STEM program,coupled with well-designed support services, helps students successfully complete theirundergraduate studies and secure a bright future for themselves. Further longitudinal assessmentsare forthcoming.References[1] S. Agili, A. Morales, L. Null, J. Smith, and S. Vidalis, “Reflections on Experiences of a Successful STEM Scholarship Program for Underrepresented Groups,” Proceedings of 2015 ASEE Conference, Seattle, Washington June 14-June 17, 2015.[2] P. Hubel, “Student Satisfaction: An Examination of
entity along the lines of a maker lab? In somecases, existing facilities are rebranded, but in other cases, brand new spaces are created.The “origin story” of SCU’s maker lab is that of a new space that grew out of a desire for anenhanced level of accessibility to a broad set of tools of making. SCU’s School of Engineeringhas a well-equipped, maintained and managed suite of standard fabrication/assembly/test labs.These shops have been developed, operated, and maintained by individual departments, withpolicies and use reflecting decades of practice. Traditional shop use typically serves students ina single department once students reach a specific point in their program. While these shopsserve their traditional purpose well, they are not at all
leadingthem to construct and organize patterns of ideas (logico-mathematical knowledge) and throughsocial experiences (social-conventional knowledge; Piaget, Henriques, & Ascher, 1992). Theactivities utilizing design in engineering education serve as a potential context for providing thekinds of experiences Piaget alluded to in his research, as these experiences allow the learner toactively engage in his or her own learning process, reflect on the use of existing structures ofknowledge, and benefit from scaffolded learning in an environment that values participation andinteraction among students, teachers, and other resources (deMiranda, 2004; Loewenberg Ball,2010).Engineering Problem Solving & Design as Context Curricular units and
aerospaceinfrastructure. These include the incorporation of multiple new UAS/aerospace academiccourses, implementation of several research projects for undergraduate and graduate students,and creating a new aerospace engineering minor (beginning AY2015-2016). Each of theseefforts has proven popular with students and has brought positive awareness to UAF programs.MotivationAs is broadly reflected in societal trends, UAF is also experiencing a huge increase in demandfor UAS-related courses, training, and activities. UAS are currently in demand within virtuallyall sectors of society – federal, state, and local agencies, industry, small business, andentrepreneurs – all have growing interest in the application of UAS to their missions. Forstudents and our education
interdisciplinary model for engineering education in ZJU is reflected in ACEE (Advanced HonorClass of Engineering Education. Through integrating interdisciplinary general education,professional education, and comprehensive innovation education, ACEE prepares professionallycompetent engineering leaders who are capable of organizing and leading projects in key areas ofengineering and technological innovations, and has been recognized as a national “ExperimentalZone for Paradigm Innovation in Educating Comprehensive Engineering Talents.” ACEE emphaseson “fundamentals, design, and creation,” aiming to educate comprehensive engineering talents whoare solidly grounded in the natural sciences, have strong ethical principles, and display command ofengineering
students’ difficulties. An effective practice is to rephrase andrepeat questions at the end of a lecture or the start of the next lecture. The technique of adaptivequestioning is effective at addressing common persistent misunderstandings. Examples of thesequence of questions are described. Student feedback shows the use of frequent and persistentquestions which focus on fundamental concepts are effective at improving student mastery offundamental concepts.IntroductionMany engineering students have difficulty explaining the fundamental concepts used in solvingengineering problems. They succeed at algorithmic problem solving but have difficulty explainingthe physical systems being described. This is reflected in low scores on concept inventoryexams
debate case study to reflect the increasing level of difficulty oftopics and the decreasing amount of information provided by the instructor. The students wereprovided with a scored points outline (see Appendix B) attached to their written research papersso they were aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their research and debate preparation foreach case study.Summary and Lessons LearnedThe legal course was taught two times with the same text book before introduction of debates inthe course. The reason for introduction of the debates was not to improve overall course grades,which were in the 83% to 85% overall for those two semesters, but in the hopes of improvingstudent participation, motivation for learning the materials, and understanding
semester, we believe there is great value in students working with the two new subjects(Capital Budgeting and VBA) over time and within the same context (the simulation).Development work is distributed throughout the first two-thirds of the semester to create a senseof flow in relation to the topics of the course. After development, students use the remainder ofthe semester to examine peer-reviewed literature in order to find other methods for ranking andselecting projects, to design new or novel approaches to project selection, and to modify thesimulation model to better reflect real-world operating environments. Students then use thesimulation model to perform experiments and test hypotheses related to research objectives theydefine.Of course
introduction to the instructors’view of WReSTT-CyLE, one (1) session on using DLOs in WReSTT-CyLE, two (2) sessions on de-signing and conducting a research study, and two (2) sessions on using software testing tools in theclassroom. Additional details of the workshops can be found at http://wrestt.cis.fiu.edu/events.On average for each WISTPC workshops held at FIU, there were 19 applications for the work-shops, 14 applicants attended the workshops, 27 total attendees (including PIs and students) at-tended the workshops, and 18 institutions were represented at the workshops. Based on the surveysconducted at the workshops the attendees found the workshops to be very helpful, relevant to theircourses and interesting. This was reflected in attendees
redesign. The practice of engineering requires the application of Apply Science, Engineering, science, mathematics, and engineering knowledge and Mathematics Knowledge engineering education at the K-12 level should emphasize (SEM) this interdisciplinary nature. Students should be independent and reflective thinkers Engineering Thinking capable of seeking out new knowledge and learning from
-engineering majors.This reflects the fact that the interdisciplinary disciplines are essential to develop recent cuttingedge technology. These results can be seen in Figure 9. 83% Engineering 62% No 38% Majors Experience Experience in MDP in MDP 17% Non-Engineering
resources, lab materials (questions templatesand manual), operating systems, software applications and programs are required at least everytwo years. Due to the continuous advancement of technology, the different resources, systems andtools used to implement the network security lab environment must be regularly reviewed to ensurethat the lab environment reflects the current technology used in industry.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In section two a background about the lab modelincluding lab structure, components, lab support system and the tools used are presented. Sectionthree demonstrates the evaluation methodology. Analysis of the student survey, and feed-backregarding their lab experience during the course and the lessons
engineeringundergraduates. To accomplish this, it has chosen a method which lies mid-way between the twoextremes found in typical engineering curricula, namely self-learning and explicit courseinstruction. In the selected model, the cost to a specific course, or academic term, is small, andthe distributed nature of the modules (once per term for the first three years of the program)enhances their impact by keeping teamwork always “front of mind” for students.Upon reflection, the success of the team’s initiative can be largely attributed to the team’scharacteristics as a well-functioning team, made up of people with complementary expertisewhich covers the broad spectrum required to teach teamwork skills to engineering students whilenavigating significant and varied
of Peer Designed Instruction? 2. Does Peer Designed Instruction increase student motivation when compared to other courses students have taken at the University of Texas at El Paso? 3. Does motivation in this context change based on gender? 4. Does motivation in this context change based on the student having been a Student Instructor?To answer these questions, a mixed-methods approach was used to collect student feedback via athree-part survey. In the first part, a series of multiple choice and open-ended questions wereincluded to allow students the opportunity to reflect on their experience. Questions one throughten are a set of introductory open-ended questions related to the
communicate their role as co-learners, or stifle both. It suggests that today’sstudents are interested in small group workspaces, access to tutors and faculty, table space thatsupports a variety of learning tools (books, laptops, projects), integrated lab facilities, ITintegrated into learning spaces, availability of labs/equipment, accessible facilities, sharedcommunication spaces, and workgroup facilitation. Moreover, research on learning theorysuggests that supportive spaces should reflect flexibility, comfort, sensory stimulation,technology support and decenteredness.4 There are numerous initiatives which have restructuredclassroom spaces to support active learning. Some programs have also used a studio design toteach courses with some lab
. For many, the ambassador rolebegins during a large, multi-institution workshop. Post-event surveys reveal high levels ofability, confidence, and preparedness to create and deliver outreach presentations. Post-workshopinterviews reveal that the training offers a platform for role identity development. Theambassador role aligns career-related motivations, resonance with messages contained in theNational Academy of Engineering’s Changing the Conversation report, beliefs about the missionof the EAN, and plans for fulfilling the Network’s mission. After the initial training, students’role identities reflect an integration of their undergraduate engineering student role with the newrole of ambassador, with the intermediary role of an effective
, a student will typicallyexperience a new project and team although occasionally, projects and teams may be continuedfrom a previous semester. In design, students are assessed on their ability to complete the designprocess and develop a solution that meets specifications. In addition to three design credits,students enroll in three professionalism credits. In professionalism, students are assessed on allthe aspects of the design project that are not design (e.g., communicating with the client,conducting a personal review, reflecting on the design process, working in teams, andunderstanding engineering ethics). Furthermore, each student enrolls in a one-credit seminarcourse where they learn and practice design and professionalism
professional relationshipsamong engineers who are actively building the infrastructure that makes possible modernhuman civilization (i.e., engineering for diplomacy). Oerther elaborated on the value ofintegrating engineering and diplomacy in his reflection on the 70th anniversary of theFulbright program.10 Because engineers are required to employ a systems orientation andthe recognition of design constraints, engineering for diplomacy can focus upon therealities needed to address the fourteen grand challenges facing global humanity – fromadvanced personal learning to engineering the tools of scientific discovery.11By establishing partnerships between the DoS and U.S. colleges and universities, DipLabprovides students with a mechanism to participate in
State University’s 2000-2005 Strategic Plan, which reflected an expanded mission with a focus on research. From itsinitial founding, the ECE department had significant collaborations with local industry and inparticular from two major technology corporations that surrounded it. As the program grew andexpanded, the need for a doctoral program was seen as a natural next step in the progress of theuniversity and critical to serving the needs of local industry.Since this would be the first doctoral program in engineering and only the third at the university,several challenges existed. The first was the high cost associated with such a program, thesecond was resistance to the university in moving from a comprehensive institution to a
traditional gasoline or as its own alternative fuel in newer technologyvehicles. The Gracilaria grown in the IMTA tank is commonly referred to as a nuisance alga sinceit readily forms pervasive blooms around the Mid-Atlantic region. .Fortunately, from a biofuelsperspective, the seaweed is comprised of quantities of easily fermentable sugars. It is this sugarthat the participants made use of in this lab, by simply macerating the alga and then treating it withbasic baker’s yeast and allowing the medium to culture over a 24- hour period. Thereafter, themedium was filtered of solids and distilled to reveal the small amount of crude ethanol liberatedby the process. In a retrospective discussion, participants were given the opportunity to reflect onthe