out of male-dominated occupations? In Eds. H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles, Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.16. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.17. Brown, P., & Matusovich, H. (2013). Unlocking student motivation: Development of an engineering motivation survey. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26.18. Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure
argument. New York, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.24. Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann,M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research anddevelopment. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SagePublications, Inc.26. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
revolution, continued: Librarians lead the way with open educational resources. Library Issues. 35(5):1-4.11. Jensen K, West Q. 2015. Open educational resources and the higher education environment A leadership opportunity for libraries. College & Research Libraries News. 76(4):215-218.12. Mitchell C, Chu M. 2014. Open education resources: The new paradigm in academic libraries. Journal of Library Innovation. 5(1):13-29.13. Okamoto K. 2013. Making higher education more affordable, one course reading at a time: Academic libraries as key advocates for open access textbooks and educational resources. Public Services Quarterly. 9(4):267-283.14. Pitcher K. 2014. Library publishing of open textbooks: The Open SUNY
, the quality of the analysisprocedures was not the focus of this study.After applying the designed criteria to the assigned game products, the two teams gave theirrecommendations to improve the products. Since both teams have a positive outcome in terms oflearning effectiveness (education perspective), neither of them recommended changes on thefundamental designs related to the education. For example, all the game products included somequiz questions for the end users to answer, but neither team actually made changes, such aschoosing different questions, to the Q&A section. One exception is that in the Avenger gameproduct from Case Study 1, the original game includes one-coin flipping section to help endusers understand the distribution
; Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437.McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R.A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, 149-203. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global Journal. of Engineering Education, 2(1), 65-75.Nurmi, N., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Sivunen, A., & Fruchter, R. (2009). Who shouts louder?: Exerting power across distance and culture. Proceedings
Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2), S. 329-344. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00074-2.Rüdig, W. (1991). Green party politics around the world. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 33(8), 6-31.Sarnoff, D. (1941, July). A new world? The Scientific Monthly, 53(1), p. 37.Sheng, H., Ricci, P., & Fang, Q. (2015). Legally binding precautionary and prevention principles: Aspects of epistemic undertain causation. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 185-198.Sociovision, S. (2010). Die Sinus-Milieus. Update. HeidelbergVDI [Verein Deutscher Ingenieure] (1991). Technikbewertung - Begriffe und Grundlagen (Richtlinie 3780
the team presentations, theinstructors controlled the Q&A sessions. Since they were in the front and facing the front, theyoften did not notice when people in the audience had their hands raised, which resulted in eitherthe question being ignored or forcing the presenting team to be brave enough to override theinstructors and call on audience members to ask their questions. This act, through a learningpartnership lens, is tantamount to taking the floor from an authority figure. In the course thishierarchical structure may have led to tighter teams in which students learned to self-author andindependently collaborate. However, this hierarchical obstacle also may have restricted theamount of co-learning that can happen between the different
. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., and Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 2. Zhu, Q. (2010). Engineering Ethics Studies in China: Dialogue between Traditionalism and Modernism. Engineering Studies, 2(2): 85-107. 3. lZahir, S. and Kombo, L. (2014). Towards a Global Code of Ethics for Engineers. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, Chicago, IL, May 23-24, 2014 4. WFEO. (2006). WFEO Model Code of Ethics. Paris, France: WFEO. Available at: http://www.wfeo.org/wp- content/uploads/code_of_ethics/WFEO_MODEL_CODE_OF_ETHICS.pdf 5. WFEO. (2008). Who We Are. Paris, France: WFEO. Available
.” Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology Vol. 14, No.1: 10-16.[16] Yi, Y. 2013. “College Students’ Engineering Ethics Education Survey Report.” The Guide of Scienceand Engineering January: 239-242.[17] Li, Z., Cong, H., and Wang, Q., 2016. Engineering Ethics [Gong Cheng Lun Li]. Tsinghua UniversityPress.[18] Alexander, Larry, and Michael Moore. 2015. “Deontological Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ethics-deontological/.[19] Davis, Michael. 1991. “Thinking Like an Engineer: The Place of a Code of Ethics in the Practice of aProfession.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 20 (2): 150–67.[20] Herkert, Joseph R. 2001. “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research
/group/design_education/cgi-bin/mediawiki/index.php/Engineering_Majors_Survey.Dungs, C.C. 2016. “Design Thinking and (Extra) Curricular Activities: A Way to FosterStudent’s Innovation Self-Effic’acy and Career Goals in Entrepreneurship andInnovation? (Master’s Thesis).” Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich.Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011a). The DNA of Disruptive Innovators:The five discovery skills that enable innovative leaders to "think different". In J. Dyer, H.Gregersen, & C. M. Christensen (Eds.), The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills ofDisruptive Innovation (pp. 1–28).Gilmartin, S.K., Chen, H.L., Schar, M.F., Jin, Q., Toye, G., Harris, A., Cao, E., Costache, E.,Reithmann, M., & Sheppard
Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Integrating technology into computer science education (ITiCSE '96). ACM, pp. 52-54, 1996.[6] Simon, B., J. Parris, and J. Spacco. How we teach impacts student learning: peer instruction vs. lecture in CS0. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2013.[7] Porter, L., D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, B. Simon. A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16), 2016.[8] Lyman, R.. Think-pair-share: An expanding teaching technique. Maa-Cie Cooperative News 1.1, pp. 1-2
problemsencountered in the class, as different techniques and mathematical approaches are needed fordifferent parts of the course. Flipped classroom technique seems to offer the opportunity toincrease the number of practice problems solved during lecture classes. In this study, the flippedclassroom technique has been implemented during four consecutive semesters in a FluidMechanics Class in an Engineering Technology Department. Lectures were recorded with theassistance of staff from the Center of Learning Technologies. The students were asked to watchrecorded lecture modules before the class time and classroom time was used for problem solving,discussions and Q/A sessions related to the material. Particular to this implementation was thatthe course was
, & Bloom, 2001).Table 2. Learning objectives and associated test questions for Fall 2014 and Spring 2016 (Ex=Exam, Q= question number). Topics Fall Spring 2014 2016CHAPTER 12: Kinetics of a Particle12.6 Projectile Motion EX1 EX 1LO 12.6 Analyze the free-flight motion of a projectile. Q1 Q112.9 Absolute Dependent Motion EX 1 EX 1LO 12.9 Relate the
creative solutions, but the rubrics didn’t encourage orvalue that creativity.Students were focused on points instead of learningAnalytic rubrics can lead students to focus more on their targeted score or grade and less onwhether their product is an effective example of what they were expected to produce (Panadero& Jonsson, 2013). It’s not surprising that our students are focused on their grades or that theycare about how their score on a particular assignment could have been higher; however, theassociation of points with the specific categories on the analytic rubric (e.g., 5pts for includingcenter of buoyancy and center of gravity calculations; 10pts for performance during the Q&A)seemed to lead students to focus too intently on the
communicatione-books online content alternatives support synchronous online timee-contact online homework with instructore-interaction online lectures teacher-led blogselectronic Q&A forms online technologies test solutionsexamples online tests user-friendly technologiesfree content online videos variety of technologiesguided hands-on work resource appsIn addition to these items suggested by students as desirable for courses, students
revolutionize 21st century (June 30, 2016)https://phys.org/news/2016-06-quantum-technologies-revolutionize-21st-century.html[5] Charles Q. Choi, Qubit Revolution, PRISM, January 2017.[6] Quantum Engineering Center for Doctoral Training, University of Bristol. See also MIT’sInterdisciplinary Quantum Information Science & Engineering (iQuiSE) program supported bythe National Science Foundation. iQuiSE is a pioneering doctoral program that is focused onproviding the comprehensive education-to-employment pathway for students in quantuminformation science and engineering.[7] http://www.bristol.ac.uk/quantum-engineering/about/[8] For instance, see Mark Beck, Quantum Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, CambridgeUniversity Press, 2012; and John S. Townsend
. 31: p. 37-59. 16. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., and Brown, J. W. The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1976.T-SITE: A UMBC COMMUNITY OF TRANSFER SCHOLARS 11 17. Martin, S., Marshall, A., and Zhu, L., “S-STEM Programs for Computing and Engineering Majors.” Presentation at the 22nd National Conference on Students in Transition, October 19-21, 2015, Baltimore Maryland. 18. Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development. CyberMaryland. [Report] [cited 2014 July 7]; Available from: http://issuu.com/cybermaryland/docs/cyberreport#. 19. Maton, K., Hrabowski III, F
2011- Harper Collins India6. Alliance for Integrity -www.allianceforintegrity.org7. Tata LOG – Harish Bhat- Penguin Books India 20128. Business Ethics- Today & Tomorrow ISBN 978-81-927223-1-3Appendix-1 Questionnaire Form for 25 CEO's ( Year 2015) Q# Text of the Question 1 The present i.e Year 2015 Level of Ethics in India 1-poor to 7- Outstanding 2 Prediction /Estimation by Year 2020 1-poor to 7- Outstanding American Management Association identified reasons for Unethical behaviour among 3 the corporate. What's your rating A Pressure to meet unrealistic business objectives
). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 107-118.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.Reed, S. K. (1992). Cognition: Theory and Applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Stevens, R., Johri, A, & Connor, K. (2013). Chapter 7 - Professional Engineering Work. In A. Jorhi, & B. M. Olds (Eds.) Cambridge Book of Engineering Education Research. (pp.119-138), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Tjahjono, B., Ball, P., Vitanov, V .I. , Scorzafave, C., Nogueira, J. ., Calleja, J., Minguet, M., Narasimha, L
, distance is not considered and despite the visible dissimilarity between profiles on the right plot, entities would likely be assigned membership to the same cluster. 2) Euclidean distance. An intuitive measure for distance, Euclidean distance is the straight- line distance between two points in multidimensional space. It is calculated using 𝑑𝐸 (𝑝, 𝑞) = √(𝑝1 − 𝑞1 )2 + (𝑝2 − 𝑞2 )2 + ⋯ + (𝑝𝑛 − 𝑞𝑛 )2 where n represents the number of dimensions or variables being considered and p and q represent the respective measures of two points on each of the dimensions. A variation on this distance is the Squared Euclidean distance which eliminates the square root
0.40 0.59 (α = 0.86) involving technology (q) Identifying technical solutions that are as 0.40 0.50 simple as possible (s) Designing and conducting experiments to 0.55 0.55 test an idea (y) Searching for innovative ways to do things 0.38 0.50 (v) Improving a design to make it more efficient 0.46 0.47 (faster, better, cheaper) (z) Using technology to solve environmental 0.41 0.68 problems (aa) Creating prototypes to test an idea 0.78 0.36 (cc) Designing a system, a part/component of a 0.68
-44 0.000 Figure 4. Values of influence, Figure 3. SDGs influence (I) vs. dependence (D) diagram dependence, influence ratio, net influence, and priority index Figure 2 shows that the double causality table has a total of Q = n2 – n = 272 interactionswhere n = 17 (number of SDGs). The diagonal terms are assumed to be 0 since they represent agoal influencing itself, which mathematically
Press.National Survey of Student Engagement. (2016). About NSSE. Retrieved from nsse.indiana.eduPalmer, J. C., Birchler, K. D., Narusis, J. D., Kowalchuk, R. K., & DeRuntz, B. (2016). LEADing The Way: A Review of Engineering Leadership Development Programs. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://peer.asee.org/25525Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. Paper presented at the Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in
stresses p’, q and void ratio space, as embodied in the critical state soil mechanics framework [2]. Theoretically, geotechnical field problems may be involved in four or five dimensionsof space (x, y, z, t, gravity, passion/love or interest of the subjects) which may better prepare andhelp learners to see the truth out there. The interest, enjoyment or love of a subjects as mentionedin the blockbuster “Interstellar” is borrowed herein and adopted in the soil mechanics II coursesintroduction to help boost or pique students’ interest in studying the subject at a higher level ofunderstanding of soil mechanics theoretical subjects. The same general formula may be appliedto many other different art, science and engineering disciplines study as