conceptualized from a longitudinal study of a scholar’s program atthree different universities in the state of Nebraska. A department faculty member was part of amulti-year institutional professional learning community (PLC) that explored the scale-up andscale-out of this model. Based on their experience from the PLC, this model was used in thedevelopment of the department’s overall student services ethos and in the specificimplementation of two initiatives: 1) hybrid advising/mentoring model, and 2) peer-mentoringprogram. This practice paper provides an overview of the ecological validation model andpresents our approach to implementing these initiatives. We also reflect on challenges and futureopportunities including long-term sustainability and
ESS now pilot the "Cohort internship model" or "Cohort Pipeline to EngineeringWorkforce." Most interns received return offers while working towards associate and bachelor'sdegree completion. Most importantly, students who completed the ESS increased theirbelonging, self-efficacy to the engineering profession, and confidence in their goals.II. INTRODUCTIONRegardless of academic preparation, many students enroll in college without the strong skills andstrategies to navigate higher education effectively [1]. To streamline transitions and bridge theskills gap, first-year experience (FYE) courses, often referred to as college success seminars orfreshman seminars, are designed for first-year students in 2-year and 4-year institutions. First-year
(RAG) and model fine-tuning are part of this training, equippingstudents with the necessary skills to enter the final application stage. In this stage, studentsparticipate in designing and developing generative AI-based solutions to address real-worldproblems. Our partnerships extend to the law and social science faculties, where we buildcustomized chatbot solutions.The framework was implemented and evaluated at the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing(a.k.a. HKU Inno Wing) [1], a facility within the Faculty of Engineering at the University ofHong Kong dedicated to improving students' practical abilities. Students demonstrateincreased awareness of ethical, responsible, and lawful practices in generative AItechnologies under the careful guidance of
highlights the curriculum's adaptability to various educational contexts and forstudents with diverse backgrounds and educational needs. However, challenges such as ensuringclarity of complex concepts and evaluating long-term behavioral change are acknowledged.Continuous refinement, based on stakeholder feedback, is essential for long-term success. Thestudy underscores the curriculum's role as a catalyst for change in combating antimicrobialresistance, emphasizing the importance of embedding sustainability planning and adopting adynamic, evidence-based approach for maximizing student engagement and impact.IntroductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to global health, necessitating creativesolutions to lessen its effects [1]. In
implications of the mini-courseapproach are discussed.Literature ReviewThis paper touches on two themes that have received considerable attention in the literature:redesign of the first-year engineering experience and student success/retention within engineeringmajors. The literature presents various motivations and methodologies for redesigning thefirst-year engineering experience. The goals of a first-year engineering experience are typicallymultifaceted and vary based on context. There is value in helping students understand whatengineering is – exposing them to the breadth of majors available – and what it takes to besuccessful in the rigorous engineering coursework [1, 2]. It is not clear to what extent prospectivestudents come in knowing which
incorporating materials thatencourage students to gain confidence and understanding in sustainable energy-related topics. Atthe conclusion of the project, the materials that were developed were placed in STEM lendinglibraries maintained at the two universities so that the materials will be accessible to futuregenerations of middle and high school students. Any educational organization in the state mayborrow the classroom sets of lab activities at no cost. The goals of the project were: 1) Through their engagement in the project, the fourundergraduate students will gain an improved understanding of energy topics, allowing them tomatriculate into STEM and sustainable energy-related career fields, as well as gaining anappreciation for how access to
answer four research questions to help guidestakeholders: 1) To what extent do current research articles address the spectrum of AI literacy,and how thoroughly do they cover the AI4K12 concepts? 2) What ethical considerations areaddressed? 3) How inclusive is the current body of research concerning all stakeholders involvedin developing, implementing, conducting, and evaluating AI education? 4) What arestakeholders’ perceptions toward AI?The preference for hands-on learning in AI education suggests an impactful approach toengaging students. Integrating such methodologies into instructional design can significantlyenhance student interaction and comprehension of AI concepts. For stakeholders, this implies aneed to develop curricular resources
development (including nuclear energy) demonstrates that theprocess of designing, developing, and using energy technologies creates significant inequities –extractive and waste management facilities are typically sited around communities of color andlow-income communities whereas the power-producing facilities are sited around affluent(predominantly white) communities.[1] In neither case do communities actually have a say in thetype of facility being built in their community and seldom have a say in the decision to even sitethat facility. If we are to equitably develop our energy systems of the future, there is an urgentneed to reverse this worrying trend. To that end, we aspire to train future developers of nuclearenergy technologies – fission and
industry, like choosing the right product or process.Experienced teachers and students have tried this game and given their opinions. Based on theirfeedback, the game can be easily added to current teaching programs.Keywords: Virtual reality; Hydrogen; Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic evaluation;sustainability.1. Introduction Hydrogen holds immense promise as an energy carrier, offering diverse applications.Hydrogen’s unique properties, such as being colorless and odorless, coupled with itsenvironmentally friendly combustion byproduct (water vapor), make it an attractive option forvarious sectors. Figure 1 highlights some of the most notable hydrogen uses. However, about 96% of the hydrogen used today is
solutions, EES1.0 IntroductionEcological Engineering is relatively new field that has rapidly developed over the past 20 years.It applies fundamental knowledge gained in ecological science into engineering practice toperform a two-fold function: i) to restore already degraded ecosystems and ii) to design newecosystems to provide ecological services and support sustainability [1], [2]. As fossil fuel-basedenergy sources deplete, environmental problems increase and the need for nature’s ecosystemservices increases. Ecological engineering is the key to solving these pollution issues, reduceresource problems, assist recovery from disturbance, and benefit humankind without destroyingecosystems [2]. Ecological engineering finds a “generic approach that
science education nonprofits.Emily L. Atieh, Stevens Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Graduate student perceptions of community building as a precursor to active learningAbstract:Active learning is widely understood to improve student outcomes, yet many active learningimplementation efforts are focused only on undergraduate courses [1], [2], [3]. Factors that mayinhibit active learning implementation in graduate courses include the belief that “rigor” andlecturing should go hand-in-hand in higher level courses, or a lack of community building morecommonly seen in undergraduate programs. Here, we present an exploratory study that uses
, aiming for a UTA-to-student ratio of 1 to 20 in CS1, where students experience faculty lectures followed by practicalexercises.The authors of this paper created a study to determine if UTAs would be a critical componentthat increases the quality and inclusiveness of education for CS students. This study wasconducted at a public research institution and Hispanic serving institution (HSI) in theSoutheastern US region. The study included hiring UTAs and recruiting faculty to participate inthe project. During this process, the faculty and coordinator were focused on UTAs beingapproachable, patient, and willing to engage in a diverse learning community. The long-termobjective is to address the crucial need for computer science classes that maintain
2022) were modeled onmale bodies[1]; facial-recognition technologies frequently misidentify Black individuals[2]; soapdispensers fail to operate for dark-skinned people (only recognizing light skin tones); the healtheffects of radiation are characterized for ‘reference man’ (170 cm tall, 20-30-year-old Caucasianmale, weighing 70kg). Engineer-designers, implicitly or explicitly, assume a ‘reference man’.Most of us are not reference man, and if ever, will only be reference man for a brief period in ourlives. In this way, we engineers effectively design technologies that serve but a few well andpoorly serve others, if at all.The problem becomes even thornier for complex sociotechnical systems –including most energytechnologies, especially nuclear
original version of the course are surveyed to gain insights on the topics they perceive wouldbe beneficial in the redesigned course which will contribute to the ongoing improvements to thenew course. This paper will also provide details on the course structure and topics along withlessons learned from the initial implementation.IntroductionIt is known that graduate school can be difficult and isolating, and dropout rates are high. As of2008, the Council of Graduate Schools found in their study that after 10 years only 65% of malesand 56% of females had completed their engineering doctoral program [1]. At the NationalConference on Graduate Student Leadership 2003, the report on “Bringing a Sense ofCommunity to Grad Student Life” stressed the
a chemical engineer, it is$106,260 [1]. This 30% difference in yearly income holds more significant implications overone's lifetime. This marked difference in earning potential serves as a key factor influencing ashift in career trajectory, occurring either before or after undergraduate studies. Unfortunately,many students overlook crucial aspects such as job salary and availability when selecting theirundergraduate major. While personal interest often guides this choice, studies reveal that familialand peer pressure also plays a substantial role [2,3], leading students to pursue majors that maynot align with their passion or offer favorable job prospects and income. While more than 30%of undergraduate students regret their initial major
solicitation of the College of Engineering in 2020 and a three-yearredesign was undertaken and completed in Fall 2023 with its third iteration.This paper assesses how the redesign achieved the initial goals and how its delivery reflects thedesired characteristics. Four course outcomes were adopted: 1) Develop creative solutions byapplying engineering design, math, science, and data analysis, 2) Construct an effectiveprototype or model using technology and tools, 3) Demonstrate improved power skills(communication, teamwork, information literacy, professionalism), and 4) Employ NSPE Codeof Ethics to examine case studies and extrapolate for other situations. In terms of the courseoutcomes, this paper describes how students self-assessed their achievement
Department of Computer Science within the School of Engineering at Tufts University. Having received his graduate degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from Tufts University, he continues research in the design, implementation, and evaluation of different educational technologies. With particular attention to engaging students in the STEAM content areas, he focuses his investigations on enhancing creativity and innovation, supporting better documentation, and encouraging collaborative learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Catalyzing Sociotechnical Thinking
often considered the most critical factors influencing students' decision to study engineering. In many engineering programs, students need to start their undergraduate education in Calculus 1 to be on track in the major. In 2023, student readiness is significantly different because the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted math and science achievement. More incoming engineering students than ever placed below Calculus 1 and are navigating the impact this has on their engineering major and coursework trajectory. Even with the added barrier of being categorized as pre-math-ready or beginning in Pre-Calculus in their first semester, students continue to pursue engineering. What
Hillary Tanner, Principal Lecturer Alison Banka, Ph.D., Lecturer 1 Camp Inspiration and Development • In 2022, the College of Engineering received funding from the NCR Foundation to support two week-long residential summer camps • These camps are aimed at supporting broadening participation in engineering through • Improving racial diversity and • Gender diversity • On average, week-long residential camps hosted by the Georgia Center @ UGA cost ~$3000 USD • Cost is ~$1,100 per student (Cost CoE ~$25,000 per camp) • Cost covers camp materials, room, board, and extracurricular activities • Our camps are free for
networked communities needed to build aninclusive infrastructure that will drive and sustain the systemic change needed tomarkedly increase the diversity of engineering students enrolled and graduatingacross the country. The goal is for three to five Engineering PLUS hubs tocollaborate with the Urban Massachusetts LSAMP (UMLSAMP), the NortheastLSAMP (NELSAMP), the Louis Stokes Midwest Regional Center of Excellence(LSMRCE) and other LSAMP alliances and non-LSAMP institutions as new regionalhubs are formed.The QR code links to https://tinyurl.com/MAPstEmPEERacademy, a Google DataStudio dashboard (now called Looker Data Studio) with a map on page 1 of thedashboard and a list of current stEm PEER Fellows, titles, institutions, ADRP status,and their hub
include informationonBlackviolence. Youare empoweredto pause, leave, andre-regulate at anytime duringthis presentation, accordingto yourownpersonal needs. February2023 CoNECD Conference 4Breakout questions 1 What didyourlearnabout yourselfduringthe 2016election? 2 What didyoulearnabout yourselfduringthe COVID-19 pandemic? 3 What brings youhere
of STEM majorsfrom community colleges through relevant initiatives. Such initiatives offer advanced scientificknowledge, and laboratory experiences, and inspire aspirations for graduate school, therebyenabling these graduates to pursue a comprehensive education that opens up numerous careeroptions. However, the review also highlighted the challenges faced by community collegestudents and faculty in participating in these initiatives[1].It was reported that effective transfer strategies were developed to customize researchexperiences for community colleges and establish long-term partnerships with four-yearinstitutions, to improve accessibility and tackle obstacles [2]. These initiatives aim to expandopportunities for community college
have significant implications for future strategies andresearch initiatives to improve transfer student support and success across different regions.1. INTRODUCTIONOver the past few decades, researchers and policymakers have outlined the critical need to broadenparticipation in engineering in order to meet the growing demand for engineering graduates in theengineering workforce [1], [2], [3]. Diversifying the engineering workforce is essential forfostering equity, innovation, and competition in the global market [4]. The National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) has recently emphasized the urgent need to increase the participation ofunderrepresented groups, particularly women and racially minoritized individuals [5]. In highereducation, vertical
PolyPomona). Identifying the CSFs is essential as sociocultural, academic, and environmental factorssignificantly affect transfer students' academic performance. The author composed a series ofquestions that fall into sociocultural, academic, and environmental factors (this survey wasapproved by the CPP IRB 23-003). A total of 41 transfer students responded to the survey, andthe author identified CSFs for transfer students as 1) a sense of belonging, 2) networking withfaculty, staff, and peers, and 3) advising for career development and available resources from theuniversity. The identified factors should be addressed when the university develops a newprogram for transfer students.IntroductionThe State of California, which has the most extensive
from the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEMEquity (CERSE, pronounced like the words “SIR”-”see”). We are here with CERSE Director Dr.Liz Litzler, Associate Director Dr. Erin Carll, and thank our collaborator Senior ResearchScientist Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran who is not able to be here today.40 minutes totalSlide 1-5: 4 minutesSlide 6: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlides 7-11: 4 minutesSlide 12: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlide 13-14: (Audience Engagement) 10 minutes DIYSlide 15: Takeaways – 1-2 minutesSlide 16: 10 minutes final Q&A 1 Topics for Today Why use logic models? What are the components of a
, BakersfieldAisha Farra ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Examining how Graduate Advisors in STEM Support Mental Health among Black and Latinx Graduate Women Kerrie Wilkins-Yel1, Stephanie Marando-Blanck1, Angela Wang1, Aisha Farra1, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj2, and Aishwarya Shridhar1 1 University of Massachusetts Boston 2 California State University BakersfieldIntroduction It is well known that Women of Color (WOC) navigate an onslaught of
academic disciplines. This understanding is critical to ensuring that students from allbackgrounds are appropriately supported in pursuing their degrees and faculty are equipped todiscuss these topics with their students. In this pilot project, researchers from RowanUniversity’s College of Engineering and College of Education who were interested in exploringDEIJ implementation in the classroom in a cross-collaborative manner explored the followingresearch questions: (1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part oftheir degree program curriculum? and (2) How do faculty members’ conceptions of DEIJcompare across disciplines?There is scant literature on faculty members' conceptions of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, andJustice
Draw an Engineer Assessment in Context Paper presented at 22011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--17489The mere existence of a stereotype is enough to cause negative outcomes. • Studies demonstrate that the effort of trying to disconfirm a stereotype of about your group affects performance. • In particular, Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous students (BLI) students often experience chilly or hostile climates • Two salient mechanisms link environments to experiences to performance – Stereotype threat – Lack of social belongingAppel, M., Kronberger, N., & Aronson, J. (2011
University was re-classified as a R1 Research University • Historically a PWI and undergraduate serving institution. • CECAS is the largest of the 8 colleges which comprise Clemson University; and 1 of 3 of which are STEM focused colleges.Presenters will introduce Clemson University with a brief introduction and helpparticipants make connections or parallels between their own institutions and thecontext and factors at play at Clemson University which impact STEM BIPOC andwomen graduate students
CONCLUSIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS EXPRESSED IN THISMATERIAL ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILYREFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NATIONAL PRIORITY INCREASE GRADUATES BROADEN PARTICIPATION President’s Council of Advisors on Underrepresented groups in engineering Science and Technology estimated that are also the fastest growing segment of the United States will need 1 million the general population, and so it is also additional STEM professionals. important that the field similarly reflect the population it serves.Among the national priorities are increasing graduates in STEM and