State University of New YorkJacqueline Handley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jacqueline Handley is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue. Her background is in Material Science and Engineering, with an emphasis on Biomaterials Design. She is interested in, broadly, how best bridge engineering prac ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #41430Dr. A Lynn Stephens, The Concord Consortium Lynn Stephens is a research scientist with the Concord Consortium. Among her interests is investigating how students respond to innovative technologies and
]. • Student interviews: Interviews are conducted with a sample of participating students to ob- tain additional qualitative assessment of their experience with the ISBL modules and level of choice. Interviews incorporate ethnographic methods and include six structured questions designed to fit into a twenty-minute interview format [32]. The questions cover what stu- dents like best about the ISBL modules and level of choice related to the simulated system, suggestions for improvement, navigation experience, impact on learning, recommendations for future users, and an “Anything else to add” question. Interview notes are analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques from Grounded Theory to produce a set of
decreasing rampup time. Proprietary research. Consulting services for universities providing information about the job readiness of their engineering graduates. Consulting services for industry providing assistance in improving their onboarding practices. Grant monies investigating new areas of interest.This business plan describes the initial set up and operation of the proposed coalition, whichwould occur over a time frame of 1 – 1.5 years.1 The authors are actively seeking other colleges of engineering who want to collaborate with Boise State University to set up the proposed coalition
, "Mission graduation: A student military and veteran organization," Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 920-922, 2010.[13] J. Summerlot, S. M. Green, and D. Parker, "Student veterans organizations," New Directions for Student Services, vol. 2009, no. 126, pp. 71-79, 2009.[14] W. G. Livingston, P. A. Havice, T. W. Cawthon, and D. S. Fleming, "Coming home: Student veterans' articulation of college re-enrollment," Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 315-331, 2011.[15] N. J. Osborne, "Student veteran discussion panels: Deconstructing the traumatized veteran stigma on campus," About Campus, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 24-29, 2014.[16] A. Dean et al
’ identities and motivations.” In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 2018. https://peer.asee.org/303193. Nunnally, B., Farkas, D., 2016, UX research: practical techniques for designing better products. Boston: O’Reilly Media, Inc.4. Choe, N., Borrego, M., 2019, “Prediction of engineering identity in engineering graduate students”. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 181-187. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/86670455. Bahnson, M., Perkins, H., Tsugawa, M., Satterfield, D., Parker, M., Cass, C., and Kirn, A., 2021, “Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures”. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 110 No. 4, pp. 949-976. https
, N. G. Lederman, and E. M Brey, "From the Undergraduate Student Perspective: The Role of Graduate Students in an Undergraduate Research Program," Proceeding of 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 6667, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013.17. C. Allendoerfer and J. M. Yellin, "Investigating Best Practices in the Research Mentoring of Underrepresented Minority Students in Engineering: The Impact Of Informal Interactions," Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 536, Vancouver, BC, June 26-29, 2011.18. J. Handelsman, S. M. Lauffer, C. M. Pribbenow, and C. Pfund, eds., Entering Mentoring: A Seminar to Train a New Generation of Scientists, Itchy Cat Press, 2009.19. P. S. Lukeman
graduate schooltraining, which socializes future faculty toward traditional definitions of scholarship that remaindeeply held: that scholars create new knowledge for academic communities and demonstratetheir expertise in writing; and that discovery research is harder and requires more expertise thanteaching or service [24] [37]. In a multi-institutional case study of reform institutions, O’Mearacharacterized a “culture war” around decisions about promotion to full professor, wrapped up ininstitutional self-image and values of prestige associated with traditional scholarship [24].Ratcheting up of research expectations to improve rankings has also been identified as asignificant barrier [37]. In addition, CAOs have reported difficulty in expanding
the state and regional level and an e-learning platformhosted by the College to provide dissemination of the resources for K-16 instructors and studentsboth statewide and nationally.B. Introduction:Each of the NSF-ATE projects at Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical College has worked closelywith other two-year colleges and with K-12 schools in the College’s service area along with K12systems throughout the state to develop and/or enhance the pipeline from K-12 into STEMprograms. The first project in this series of three (Diverse Engineering Pathways: CurriculumInnovation and Best Practice for Recruitment, Retention and Advancement of EngineeringTechnology Majors) was designed to promote access to STEM careers and provide courses forunder-prepared
. Design activity engagement within thesocial context of capstone courses can be influenced by a student's identity, but little research hasbeen done on understanding this influence.Our investigation in the overarching study is informed by the concepts of situated cognition [1]and engagement within engineering practice [2], both accounting holistically for the contextwithin which design activities are performed. Additionally, we account for frameworks definingpersonal engagement as a state in which “people employ and express themselves physically,cognitively, emotionally, and mentally during role performances” [3, p. 694] to better understandstudent engagement through a specific role within a capstone team.In this paper, we provide a better
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Challenges and Successes of Creating a Living-Building Laboratory (Building as a Laboratory) For Use in the Engineering Technology CurriculumAbstractIn the fall of 2005 the Engineering & Design department at our institution moved into a newlyconstructed building. During the early design stages provisions were made to allow studentsaccess to various types of data used in the operation of the building. The desire was that thebuilding would be used by students as a Living Laboratory. Students would be able to see howthe theory that was taught in their classes was put into practical use throughout the building.Courses taught in the
(Software). Gilman has been active in various local, state, and national organi- zations including Rotary, Computer Cleanup Day, Leadership Brazos, B/CS Library Board, multiple IT groups, and the Software Engineering Task Force for the Texas Board of Professional Engineers.Dr. Mehmet Ayar, TUBITAK Dr. Mehmet Ayar is a scientific programs expert in the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK). He received his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with specialization in STEM education at Texas A&M University in 2012. His research is in ethnographic studies of science and engineering practice, curriculum development, design of learning environments, and robotics activities. Dr. Ayar worked for the
identity construction. Her current projects include a cross-national collaboration focused on supporting productive disciplinary engagement in complex STEM contexts (including engineering and environmental science): the Science Across Virtual Institutes (SAVI) collaboration with OSU and UTU reported here, sponsored by NSF, the Academy of Finland, and TEKES. Dr. Nolen is a member of the Knowledge-in-Action research group in the UW LIFE Center. In collab- oration with teachers and districts, the KIA group is developing engaging, rigorous, project-based AP courses for high school students using a design-based implementation research framework.Dr. Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University Debra Gilbuena is a postdoctoral
the K-12 framework for engineering This framework was created to meet the growing need for a clear definition of quality K-12 engineering education. It is the result of a research project focused on understanding and identifying the ways in which teachers and schools implement engineering and engineering design in their classrooms. The framework is designed to be used as a tool for evaluating the degree to which academic standards, curricula, and teaching practices address the important components of a quality K-12 engineering education. Additionally, this framework can be used to inform the development and structure of future K-12 engineering education standards and initiatives
implemented before the field trip and one is implemented after the field tripprogram. The lesson plans for school teachers to complete before and after the field trip include“educative” materials [4] to help teachers develop their capacity to introduce engineering in theirclassrooms. All activities are aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).The primary Research Practice Partnership (RPP) [5] is between MOXI, The Wolf Museum ofExploration + Innovation (MOXI), and researchers at University of California, Santa Barbara(UCSB). See [6] for an overview of the multiple interacting programs and related research thispartnership has produced. Our work follows a design-based implementation research model [7-9], which is “a systematic but
clearly. Senior researchers oftenfind that their reviewing skills improve and develop over time, but variations in reviewer startingpoints can have a negative impact on the value of reviews for their intended audiences ofprogram officers, who make funding recommendations, and principal investigators, who drivethe research or want to improve their proposals. Building on the journal review component of theEngineering Education Research Peer Review Training (EER PERT) project, which is designedto develop EER scholars’ peer review skills through mentored reviewing experiences, this paperdescribes a program designed to provide professional development for proposal reviewing andprovides initial evaluation results.Key words: Peer review, professional
faculty) can provide specific details about classdynamics and instructional practices that student feedback is unable to provide. Peerobservations can be used both formatively and summatively; peer observations can provideformative feedback to improve teaching prior to more formal, summative reviews that aredocumented in personnel files, which allows for opportunities for improvement [7].This Toolkit is designed for instructors, researchers, support staff, or administrators who areinterested in doing systematic classroom observations but have limited experience withqualitative coding and observational research, to teach these methods to themselves and theirresearch assistants. This paper serves as an introduction and a user manual for the Toolkit
AC 2012-4038: APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR SUPERIOR ENGINEERINGEDUCATION EVALUATION - INSTRUMENT SHARING AND SCHOL-ARSHIP (ASSESS)Dr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Denny Davis is professor of chemical engineering and bioengineering at Washington State University. He launched and directed the Engineering Education Research Center between 2005 and 2011. His scholarly work addresses engineering design learning and assessment. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education.Prof. Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University Mike Trevisan is a professor of educational psychology at Washington State University and the Associate Dean for Research in the College of Education. For more than 17
EngineersIntroductionThis paper describes progress to date on a five-year National Science Foundation S-STEMproject entitled "Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers(CREATE)" being conducted at the University of Nevada, Reno, a large western land-grantuniversity. The objectives of CREATE are: (1) To implement a scholarship program built onevidence-based curricular and co-curricular best practices that supports low-income,academically talented students with demonstrated financial need through successful programcompletion; (2) To conduct a mixed-methods research study of the effect of the implementedevidence-based practices on the self-efficacy and engineering identity of the cohorts to contributeto the existing knowledge base on
Wilson International Center for Scholars studying the 2011 Arab Uprisings, and Brigham Young University’s Political Science Department study- ing marriage and family practices of the Middle East. She graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree in Middle Eastern Studies and Arabic from Brigham Young University where she received the Middle East Stud- ies/Arabic Student Research Award in April 2017.Andrew Coy, Digital Harbor Foundation Andrew is the founder and current Executive Director of the Digital Harbor Foundation. He also served as a senior advisor in the Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Obama administration and currently advises national technology education nonprofits including the Computer Science for
particular institutional programs; our project can inform best practices for engineeringeducation to translate ongoing ethical decision-making processes into practice6-9. The followingsections describe the frameworks from ethics, design, and communication that inform our study.Kohlberg’s Moral Development TheoryKohlberg’s moral development theory (and Neo-Kohlbergian revisions)10-11 have been widelyused to understand and assess moral reasoning in a variety of professional fields (e.g., science,engineering, medicine, and business) across cultures. From the perspective of moral cognition,Kohlberg’s theory attempts to understand how people reason morally and on what values theirreasoning processes are based.Neo-Kohlbergian scholars divide moral
background in infrastructure design and management, and project management. Her con- sulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a focus in Water Resources. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts target ways to support and encourage diversity among students and how to create an inclusive learning environment. Professional interests include undergraduate research opportunities, service learn- ing, STEM outreach, team
graduates prepared to engage in entrepreneurial and intrapreneurialactivities?The research team is pursuing these questions through a multi-method approach, includingqualitative and quantitative methods. The work meets the requirements of Design andDevelopment Research, as specified by the Common Guidelines for Educational Research in thatit contains: 1) Development of a solution based on a well-specified theory of action appropriateto a well-defined end user; 2) Creation of measures to assess the implementation of thesolution(s); 3) Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typicaldelivery settings by intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise ofgenerating the intended outcomes [22].Theory
collaborative projects, like the HBCU ECP project.The focus of the most recent activities of the center has been in the delivery of these workshops(goal 3) to spread the best practices of the early adopters of the MHOS pedagogy. We have beenhosting a series of online practitioners’ workshops rather than the usual physical face-to-faceworkshop, because of the potential for wider and longer-term impact. The Center for MobileHands-On STEM conducted a series of three virtual workshops for educators who already usehands-on learning, that is, the practitioners of the pedagogy. The expected outcomes of theworkshops were: 1) to share ideas, 2) examine challenges, 3) determine best practices, and 4)give feedback to NSF and to vendors who build the
Belu is an assistant professor within the Engineering Technology program at Drexel Uni- versity in Philadelphia. He holds the second position as research assistant professor at Desert Research Institute–Renewable Energy Center at Reno, Nev. Before Drexel University, Dr. Belu held faculty and research positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and the United States. He also worked for several years as a project manager and senior consultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and graduate courses in electronics, power systems, control and power electronics, elec- tric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods and data analysis, space and atmosphere physics
. While the most frequent studentresponses to the four questions were skill in math, dedication, focus, and study groupsrespectively, the five emerging factors associated with greater student success were: (1)Participation in effective program components that provide practical engineering experience --project or problem-based courses, research experience, and industry internships; (2) A burningdesire to become an engineer and reap its economic benefits; (3) Taking advantage of allresources provided; (4) Combining motivation and dedication with effective time management;and (5) Involvement in MEP programs. The results are noteworthy in suggesting that the firstand foremost success factor for minorities in engineering is exposure to engineering
many invited talks, four best paper awards [2, 6, 7, 12] and the 2013 Women inEngineering Proactive Network (WEPAN) Betty Vetter Award for Research "for exceptionalresearch committed to understanding the intersectionality of race and gender" [17].Expanding ParticipationAlthough MIDFIELD has been used in high impact research using the student as the unit ofanalysis, its value as a predictive tool has been limited due to the small (eleven) number ofinstitutions included. The expansion funded by this current NSF grant enables studies using theinstitution as the level of analysis. This moves MIDFIELD toward being a national, longitudinalstudent unit-record database that enables study of engineering programs and benchmark metricsconsistently. This
University (Tech.) Dr. Radian Belu is an assistant professor within the Engineering Technology program at Drexel Uni- versity in Philadelphia. He holds the second position as research assistant professor at Desert Research Institute–Renewable Energy Center at Reno, Nev. Before Drexel University, Dr. Belu held faculty and research positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and the United States. He also worked for several years as a project manager and senior consultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and graduate courses in electronics, power systems, control and power electronics, elec- tric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods and data analysis
learning.Building upon these findings, the next step in our research program is to develop a model forconcept generation pedagogy that can be adopted by engineering instructors across the country.In this project, our central goal is to ensure the transferability and dissemination of ourinstructional materials and methods to a wide variety of engineering classrooms. Our projectutilizes best practices in pedagogical development and foundational research on implementingnew pedagogy in engineering.Project PlanProblem solving is generally regarded as the most important cognitive activity for engineers;Jonassen goes further to identify design as the most complex type of problem solving 39. Ourproject expands the Design Heuristics approach into a series of
on Lifelong STEM Learning Julie is the Associate Director of the the Oregon State University Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning. In this role she focuses on investigating and enhancing the quality of research impacts, working to redefine undergraduate success, and working across campus to support transformation of undergraduate STEM education practices. Julie brings experience working with research organizations at OSU including Oregon Sea Grant and the Institute for Natural Resources. Prior to her work as research administrator Julie spent many years working for non-profit organizations and as a U.S. Peace Corps Volunteer on marine conservation issues including state and regional research planning and
by instructors to meet their preferredobjectives. Therefore, while they may be prerequisites to second-year courses, first-yearengineering programs are not necessarily integrated into an engineering curriculum. Further,since they are often designed with little consideration for best practices in introductory coursedesign, overall outcomes and content vary widely. This leads to the issue of course developers“reinventing the wheel,” considering successful models are not adequately disseminated. Theproblem is further exacerbated by a lack of definition for first year models. Despite a developerknowing what they want in a course, he or she may not be able to find a course with similaroutcomes with nothing more than "first year engineering" as a