, inclusive, and supportive academy.The main features of this NRT – the main goal of which is to generate an innovative model forSTEM graduate student training by identifying and implementing the most effective tools for thetraining of STEM professionals – have been described in a previous publication [1]. A morerecent manuscript has described the first three interventions within this NRT, namely, anonboarding and orientation event, a career exploration symposium, and a multidisciplinaryintroductory course, along with the assessment and outcomes of each of these interventions [2].In this and future contributions, we intend to continue showcasing data from the NRT, focusingon the evaluation of its constituent parts. Against this backdrop, this
sections (both in-person and online) of this course are taught per semester with an interdisciplinary instructional team comprised of CoE faculty including communication professor Dr. Burchfield and engineering professors from the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department. An adjunct instructor and graduate engineering students are hired as teaching assistants. In addition to flipped classroom and traditional lecture instructional methods, the course employs a project-based method where engineering students work in teams of up to six students. All students in all sections (both in-person and online) receive the same team assignments. For their projects, student teams are given the
questions about the student’s overall strengths and areas for improvement, seeAppendix C for the employer evaluation (our assessment tool). Supervisors receive the onlinesurvey tool via an email invitation during the last three weeks of the co-op experience, and if notcompleted receive reminders toward the final week of the co-op. Supervisors are encouraged tohave an individual meeting with the student before the end of the co-op period. The assessmenttool allows for a PDF printout to be discussed with and provided to the student. The programreceives the data from the online survey. At the end of the survey, supervisors are given anoption to request a meeting with a faculty member to discuss any issues that may have arisen,either with the student
equitable outcomes. On the day of the workshop, students were placedin six teams, each with roughly 8-10 students, ensuring that at least two members of every teamwere “experts” on each segment of the module. The workshop provided a space for students tograpple with the major themes from the module and learn from others’ personal lived experiencesand perspectives. Table 1 provides the breakdown of the different segments within the BEDPmodule and examples of the discussion questions students were asked to consider in the workshop.The teams had approximately ten minutes to discuss the questions in their small groups after whichthe entire class discussed each team's responses and extracted recurring themes. During the workshop, an online polling
has received numerous awards and honors including the Michigan ACE Network Distinguished Woman in Higher Education Leadership Award; the Geochemical Society Distinguished Service Award; the WMU Excellence in Diversity Rising Star Award; the WMU College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Achievement in Teaching Award; and the WMU Emerging Scholar Award. She was named a 2019 Crain’s Notable Women in STEM, and is the recipient of numerous grants from state and federal agencies such as the Department of Energy, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, the Office of Naval Research, and the National Science Foundation, including an NSF CAREER award.David W. Wahl David W. Wahl is a social psychologist currently working
by Vigeant and Golightly [12] recommends buildingcourse attributes to take advantage of intrinsic motivation including topics such as realproblems, topics focused on their career, and something that is personally meaningful.In order to leverage intrinsic motivation, the SafeChE initiative modules are built uponreal industrial incidents that were investigated by the CSB. The expectation of theSafeChE initiative is that these real-world case studies will show students howknowledge they are obtaining in their current class can be applied to safety within afuture career in industry. Also, since the CSB investigates incidents within the UnitedStates, some of our domestic students may study an incident that occurred “close tohome”.Another aspect
and consists of 40questions that are grouped in six factors related to computing attitudes: (1) problem solving -fixed mindset, (2) gender equity, (3) importance, (4) problem solving – strategies, (5) genderbias, and (6) personal interest. EPRA, in turn, consists of 50 items evaluated using a 7-pointLikert scale. ERPA is intended to assess the impact of curricular interventions aimed onstudents’ views of social responsibility.The instrument development included: (1) item selection and adaptation based on face validityamong the team of three faculty members (two civil engineering and one computer scienceprofessor) and one civil engineering undergraduate student; and (2) interviews and survey pilottesting with four civil engineering graduate
about the status ofindividuals who identify as queer in sexual/romantic orientation or gender, but availableinformation suggests they are also likely to be marginalized and experience discrimination 18,19, 55]. The lack of societal representation among engineering degree holders, the discriminationexperienced within engineering workplaces, and the implications of a lack of diversity andinclusion in engineering design are another set of questions involving the interaction of equityand ethics facing the engineering profession.We argue that engineering professional societies have an important role to play in helping theirprofessions and members (including student members) address the need for DEIJ in engineeringand work toward design and decision
stakeholders.Proposed experiences are vetted by a coordinating faculty member both before and after theindividual field experiences and students are assigned a presentation, reflection, and essay. Theseassignments are designed to be equivalent to assignments that students complete who travel withthe class. Students who choose the individual field experience option still participate in the otheraspects of the class, including the class design project. Between five and ten percent of thestudents choose this option. Most students who choose this option do so due to conflicts with theclass trip travel dates, though some students choose this option because they prefer to takeadvantage of the opportunity to explore a different culture.It is unique that our global
, both from Purdue University. Her research program investigates how model-based cognition in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) can be better supported by means of expert tools and disciplinary practices such as data science computation, modeling, and simulation. In 2015 Dr. Magana received the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award to investigate modeling and simulation practices in undergraduate engineering education. In 2016 she was conferred the status of Purdue Faculty Scholar for being on an accelerated path toward academic distinction. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
for many years. The introductory ethics lecture explaining the major western ethicalphilosophies [6] has long included a discussion of the ideas of John Rawls and his argument thatany just decision requires the decision-maker to adopt a “veil of ignorance” in order to morefairly distribute the benefits and burdens of our choices. The recommended accompanyingmaterials feature an Oxford lecture by Michael Sandel [7], star philosophy professor of HarvardUniversity’s immensely popular “Justice” course [8] and author of the book Justice: What’s theRight Thing to Do? [9] However, despite the strong personal and professional commitments ofour faculty to social justice and to diversity and inclusion efforts, the standardized NHVmaterials had
effective articulation of the benefits to students andfaculty members are essential to getting faculty members to engage in multidisciplinarycollaboration [8]. Without these, faculty members may likely remain in their silos [8]. Therefore,experiences gained from multidisciplinary collaborations such as the Stitt Scholars Program mustbe shared among the broader academic community. The following section presents the maincomponents of the Stitt Scholars Program at the University of Dayton.3. The Stitt Scholars ProgramThe Stitt Scholars Program at the University of Dayton was instituted with a generous donationfrom an engineering technology alumnus who wanted students from the School of Engineering(SoE) to deeply engage with students from different
skills necessary for “career-ready” graduates [2] [3] [4], they areincreasingly including more than just technical know-how, with emphases on critical thinking,problem solving, collaboration, and communication among others. In addition to providingstudents a strong technical foundation, the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Waterloohas taken a two-pronged approach to providing students this important training: mandatory co-operative work terms, which have been present since the University’s inception; and morerecently, using industry-driven design problems as a base to provide students with formativepractice of these skills in the Engineering Ideas Clinic, which will be the focus of this paper.Jonassen, in his typology of problems [5
meeting in anopen engineering graduate space, “a faculty member confronted [her] twice, threatening to callsecurity the second time because he felt like [she] was loitering and did not belong”. “Feelinguncomfortable and unsafe”, Marvilous reluctantly left the open space. And her luck with herlabmates was no better. While working on a paper with two white womxn, she asked them aquestion about the coding process after noticing some discrepancies in the data. Shocked thatMarvilous, a Black womxn, had asked them about the coding process, they started crying andtold her research advisor. Marvilous, sharing this story with a friend, said: “I guess one of them coded some data a certain way and named it. I can't even remember what the name
asbeing for people who are “clever, bright, reserved, socially clumsy” or unlike ordinary people[1], and incompatible with non-masculine identities [1]. Undergraduate students without muchexposure to alternatives to these stereotypes may not envision themselves as being able to orwanting to do research. At the same time, research experiences may be the most accessibleduring an undergraduate degree at a research institution. Explicitly exposing students to research,especially students who feel they do not fit the cultural stereotype, may be a step to ultimatelyincrease diversity among graduate students and faculty members in engineering. In addition,many positions in industry require research thinking – exposing students to research maystrengthen
-centric interdisciplinary courses, UAFis positioning itself to attract new instructors and researchers to its fledgling aerospace engineering program.UAF currently has an Aerospace Engineering Minor and has just recently added graduate certificates inAerospace Engineering and Systems Engineering/Program Management. In addition, UAF is developing a UASOperations Certificate and Occupational Endorsement Program (OEP). By providing opportunities forinstructors to teach in these new areas, UAF is strengthening its faculty bench in the aerospace field so thatother opportunities may be provided for our student population. It is expected that the increased educationaland research opportunities and their popularity will result in the realization of an
learners are more likely to become teachers themselves by creating new content for others (such as YouTube videos) ● Minecraft paradigmatically shows a progression beyond one-time play to progressive learning though mutual content creationThe next section describes specifically how we “recreated” and carried out a skyscraper-likeactivity in the virtual Minecraft Education Edition environment for hundreds of students workingconcurrently in teams with industry mentors.Virtual design build exercise In the design of this virtual design build exercise (as an alternative to the in-person skyscraper exercise) several key decisions were made after extensive consultation with the instructional team and some of the students who
moralimagination through service learning, “dramatic rehearsals,” and alternative job fairs. [8, p. 243].Zhu and Jesiek argue that engineering ethics needs to focus more on the pragmatic than theidealistic, especially because engineering is such a global enterprise. They argue that the maintrends in engineering ethics education “decontextualizes ethics practice from the situatedcontexts in which ethical theories are to be ‘applied,’ the sociotechnical realities of real-worldwork environments, and the broader social and political contexts of engineering practice” [9, p.667]. They emphasize the relational and communicative components of dynamic decision-making involving stakeholders that students need to understand to be successful in their careers[9]. In a
cultures in this inequality. Second, Cech examines how cultural definitions of “good work” and “good workers” can anchor inequality in the workforce. For example, she examines the role of the “passion principle” in the reproduction of occupational inequalities: how seemingly voluntary and self-expressive career decisions help reproduce processes like occupational sex segregation. Finally, she studies how cultural understandings of the extent and origin of inequality help to uphold unequal social structures. Cech’s research is funded by multiple grants from the National Science Foundation. She is a member of the editorial board of the American Journal of Sociology and her research has been cited in The New York Times
Management Systems Engineering (IDMS) faculty regularly teach the course, withthree assigned to teach sections each semester. Graduate students are assigned as instructors inthe course in the Summer and sometimes in Fall. Each faculty member has their own approach tothe course, based on years of teaching the material. Thus, the new material has had to fit intodifferent course structures and teaching approaches. Another complicating factor is studentnumbers: 400 take the course each Spring and Fall, and 150 students take the course in thesummer term. The large numbers of students present a significant challenge in providingmeaningful feedback.Where We StartedTo gain approval of the course as an information and data literacy offering in the
• Initiated by a Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering faculty member as part of her Higher Education Research Services (HERS) Institute experience • Supported through funding from the Chancellor's Commission for Women, Tickle College of Engineering, College of Arts and Sciences, and private donations • Hosts social and development programming • Build community among women in STEM fields • Prepare students for success through their graduate studies and into their careers • WiSTAR3 mentoring program works with STEM professionals from UTK, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Y-12 National Security Complex, and area companies to provide professional and career development
appliance industry for two years. Kelley is also a Graduate Facilitator with the Center for Socially Engaged Design and a Graduate Academic Liaison with the Ginsberg Center for Community Service and Learning.Shanna Daly Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. In her work, she characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum, develops empirically-based tools to support design best practices, and studies the impact of front- end design tools on design success
family members to check in with one another andshare important news that builds capital between members. Social capital is thought of as thecommunity resources and networks that individuals access from their communities or networks.An example of this might be the professional networks that people engage in and may leverageto identify career opportunities or other supportive resources. Navigational capital may manifestas someone having the proficiency and resources to maneuver effectively through society. Forexample, graduate students may receive advice or assistance from postdoctoral fellows aboutnavigating the job market. Aspirational capital encapsulates the dreams, goals, and vision of thepeople to whom you belong. An example of this could be
, understand different perspectives,assess decisions and consequences, and revise plans, actions, and options as required [5]. In itsmost recent revision, EAC/ABET now requires that students must demonstrate “an ability torecognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informedjudgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic,environmental, and societal contexts” [6]. This requirement aims to prepare the students for real-life ethical dilemmas. However, the multifaceted, complex nature of this outcome--requiringstudents to consider “global, economic, environmental, and societal” attention with ethicalresponsibilities--means that programs must carefully consider their
began working as Co-PI on another NSF-funded study to reduce barriers in the hiring of underrepresented racial minority faculty in data science and data engineering fields.Dr. Tammy Michelle McCoy, Georgia Institute of Technology Tammy M. McCoy is the TA Development and Future Faculty Specialist for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this capacity, she works closely with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars interested in pursuing careers in college teaching through teaching assistant (TA) training and support, academic career development programs, and training and certification in college teaching. Specifically, she teaches courses and facilitates workshops to
difficulty in ordering parts from many vendors limited the scope of some projects that studentscould pursue.For obvious reasons, the final IoT Project showcase could not be held in person during thetransitional semester or the following pandemic semester. Students used a template to createcustom websites during these semesters and used videos to demonstrate their projects. These wereposted online for students, faculty, family, and friends to view athttp://yellowstone.ece.umn.edu/~orser/EE1301_Fal2020_Showcase/ andhttp://yellowstone.ece.umn.edu/~orser/EE1301_Spr2020_Showcase/ . While exciting at the time,these alternatives did not measure up to an in-person show. Since the showcase was held on thelast day of class, it occurred after the student
finalstep is optional but very useful to understand the pitfalls and roadblocks that may be encounteredby future undergraduate students, particularly as it relates to scaffolding. Finally, many studentsmay encounter design paralysis whereby they are unable to decide on an assumption or way tomodel a component in fear of losing points. Providing rubrics to the students and graders can bevery helpful to alleviate some of this anxiety, as can reminding students verbally that the goal isto make and justify decisions, not necessarily to arrive at a “correct” solution. 4Examples of Two OEMPs Two faculty members at two public universities created OEMPs to
contingencies andconsequences of personal decision making andto promote strategic problem solving, with theultimate goal of helping students develop skills for navigating the power dynamics of theworkplace.NAVIGATE Case StudiesTo date, ten cases (listed with titles and descriptions below) have been fully developed by TheNAVIGATE Project team. They are available for free download to be used in trainings for seniorundergraduate, graduate, or early-career women in STEM. Each case has a comprehensive 2Teaching Guide, allowing any interested party to facilitate the training. Each case study trainingis designed to be completed in a 1 hour 45 minutes (105
also suggestive of the scale of employment, range of educationalrequirements and relevant skills. At the base, the large employment pool of low technical skillworkers includes high school graduates with some post-secondary education. The top levelemployment ranks are relatively sparse. In the geospatial workforce in particular, the sparsenessis related to the low number of education programs at university, low enrollment in existinguniversity programs, and poor marketing and career pathway exposure to entry-level workersand college-bound STEM students. The triangular schema hovers above a rectangular basewhich represents foundation skills of personal effectiveness and general workplacecompetencies. This simplified representation of the GTCM
support of their career readiness. He has helped to lead research funded by NSF (award # 2024973) to examine the potential benefit of using critical narratives as a pedagogical tool in the professional formation of engineers.Aishwary Pawar Aishwary Pawar is a doctoral candidate in Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. His main research interest centers on investigating the factors that influence undergraduate enrollment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his master’s thesis, Aishwary researched how student demographics and background characteristics lead to a more comprehensive understanding of a student’s enrolment and retention at an undergraduate college. For his Ph.D