- sity. Dr. Nagel joined James Madison University after completing his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. Nagel teaches and performs research related to engineering design. Specifically, through research, Nagel explores how design interventions commonly used to teach design influence stu- dent learning.Dr. Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Associate Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a
for enhancing corporate support for design courses, managing design and fabrication/prototyping facilities, coordinating the design competitions/expo, and teaching design courses, with a strong focus on creating and enabling multidisciplinary educational experiences. His research interests are in makerspaces, evidence-based de- sign education, and advanced additive manufacturing processes.Nicholas Greenfield, Georgia Institute of TechnologyEmily Orton, Georgia Institute of Technology Industrial Systems Engineering BS with a concentration in AnalyticsMr. Rohan Banerjee, Georgia Institute of Technology Candidate for B.S. in Mechanical Engineering concentrating in Automation & Robotics, with a Minor in
underrepresented students through expert teaching practices? For his efforts in examining science for the under-served, Dr. Yerrick has received numerous research and teaching awards including the Journal of Research in Science Teaching Outstanding Research Paper Award, Journal of Engineering Education ”Wickenden Best Paper Award” (Honorable Mention), the Most Outstanding College Science Teacher Award from the Science Teacher Association of New York State, the Teaching Innovation Award from The State University of New York, and The STAR Award for Outstanding Mentoring. He has held fellowships in several or- ganizations such as the National Partnership for Advanced Computational Infrastructure, the San Diego State Center for
the will share some key findings that we will take as we enter a newearly adopters of personal learning devices in our teaching phase of the pandemic with students returning to campus andlaboratories [1,2,3,4]. Our students purchase the Analog the lab (at least for now).Discovery Kit (ADK2) from Digilent as first year students anduse it throughout their engineering education. The ADK2, whenconnected to a computer, provides students with the equivalent II. COMPARING LABORATORY OUTCOMES USING PERSONALof a standard lab bench
education and engineering programs at Case Western Reserve University.Dr. Kenneth A. Loparo, Case Western Reserve University Kenneth A. Loparo is the Arthur L. Parker Professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering, holds academic appointments in the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the Case School of Engineering and the Faculty Director the Institute for Smart, Secure and Connected Systems. He has received numerous awards including the Sigma Xi Research Award for contributions to stochastic control, the John S. Diekoff Award for Distin- guished Graduate Teaching, the Tau Beta Pi Outstanding Engineering and Science Professor Award, the
: design, construction, and measurement [2]. Dedicatedlaboratory courses have been the successful vehicle to provide the hands-on experiences at someuniversities, such as the University of South Florida (USF) [3], with tremendous success. Whilethe idea of a dedicated laboratory course in microwave engineering is attractive, it is difficult tointegrate such a course into an emerging curriculum with limited resources. The BaylorElectrical and Computer Engineering Department is in a period of significant growth, but atpresent, the department faculty numbers a mere eleven, with only two members presentlyteaching RF/microwave and electromagnetics courses. A second issue that must be tackled ishow to teach both passive and active circuit design
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference An undergraduate experience for studying the diffusion of a solute in an aqueous solution Abner Peralta and Natacha Souto-Melgar University of Arkansas, Ralph E. Martin Chemical Engineering DepartmentKeywordsStudent extended abstract, laboratory, chemical engineering, diffusion, Fick’s law.Molecular diffusion driven by concentration gradients is the most common type of diffusion inchemical separation processes, such as liquid-liquid extraction, stripping, and adsorption. Tobetter understand molecular diffusion, a fundamental knowledge of Fick’s law of diffusion iscrucial. In the Spring 2021
toexplore the combination of Wireshark and Mininet in the online teaching mode for anintroductory computer network course. Moreover, we studied the effect of students’ priorperception of the online learning model on students’ perception of whether the combination of thetwo helped students overcome the online learning challenges.This paper describes our practical way of teaching the computer networking course usinghands-on activities with Wireshark and Mininet. Inspired by existing work in Wireshark andMininet in their use, we designed our novel combination of the two in 12 laboratories. Studentswould first observe specific protocols by packet capture in Wireshark and then emulatenetworking scenarios in Mininet for the same protocols. As such
teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy of engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For the technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for automotive, marine, and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with the focus of
on projects on their own schedule or with a teaching assistant during scheduledtimes. An initial pilot offering in the spring semester 2020 started out following this model butunfortunately had to change direction when the campus was shut down due to the Coronaviruspandemic.The mid-semester transition to remote learning was particularly difficult when students lostaccess to the laboratory equipment. Remote lectures were fine but student projects were greatlyhindered. For the remainder of the spring semester we sent custom hardware kits to studentscontaining a Raspberry Pi with an accelerometer add-on. With these kits students were able tocover much of the original course content but some of the key components (such as Linux buildsystems and
. McGraw Award; Purdue’s life-time Murphy Teaching Award for outstanding undergraduate teaching; induction into Purdue’s Book of Great Teachers (an honor reserved for only 267 faculty in the history of Purdue University at the time of his induction); Purdue Teaching Academy Fellow and Execu- tive Board (charter member); the Ronald Schmitz Award for Outstanding Service to FIE; the ASEE IL-IN Outstanding Campus Representative; the ASEE Hewlett Packard Award for Excellence in Laboratory In- struction; the ASEE IL-IN Outstanding Teaching Award; Marquis’ Who’s Who in the World, in America, in Engineering and Science, and in Education.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her
thestudents thought simulation laboratory exercises were excellent or very good.We also compared the percentage of students who performed at the A, A-, B+, B, and B- levelswith past records (while teaching was in-person), which turned out to be comparable and similar.This indicates the effectiveness of these simulation-based labs & projects, and their contributionin helping to maintain the course standard.IntroductionIn many institutions, undergraduate courses in Feedback and Control for engineering students areusually at the junior level. Such courses provide students an introduction to concepts andmethods related to modeling, analyses, and control of a physical system. Typical topics coveredinclude Laplace transform, modeling in the frequency
-record the lab procedures and provide datasets from previous years to the students wasquickly adopted as a contingency measure. However, it should be considered less effective inmeeting the objectives of these lab assignments as evidenced by our students' evaluations ofinstruction. The primary positive outcome of this approach- successfully covering all of thematerials originally planned for the semester- was possible due to the long history of thesecourses and data acquired from previous years’ teaching experiences, which allowed us to shareuniform and quality sample data for the “at-home” laboratory modules for all student groups. Aneutral outcome of this approach was the continued team-based approach. While most studentswere able to
established, known as the “a” through “k” outcomes. Evaluation of outcome“b”, “a graduating student should have an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well asto analyze and interpret data” was accomplished using a well-designed rubric, as is the subject ofthis paper. The rubric was established and administered in CEE-346L, Geotechnical EngineeringLaboratory. The means of assessment was a particular laboratory experiment, One DimensionalConsolidation Test. The rubric consisted of several indicators in each of the categories: “1” –Below Expectation, “2” – Meets Expectation, and “3” – Exceeds Expectations, with a desiredmetric threshold score of 2 or greater. The rubric was applied to the entire class for the selectedlaboratory exercise during
and results.One way in which to help streamline hands-on laboratory education in terms of objectives,equipment, and products is to make the lab activities as relevant as possible to their interests,goals and future careers. This involves giving the students ownership of their lab experience.The concept of student ownership has many facets, including letting students plan educationalobjectives and activities, select educational materials, teach other students, and reflect criticallyon their expectations and experiences (Fletcher 2008). One of the objectives of the civil and environmental curriculum at The University ofIowa is to produce graduates who have a strong foundation of scientific and technical knowledgeand are equipped with
obstacle is thatthe laboratory and shop base that are required for the constant troubleshooting process can causeboth a financial burden and a tremendous increase to the instructor’s teaching load. These obstaclesoften force engineering educators to make necessary compromises which oftentimes replacelaboratory experiments with virtual experiments and “black board” exercises.One way to reduce some of this burden is through the implementation of miniature mechanical toolswith prototyping sensors and measurement systems as a part of the laboratory class. The students canalso use a prototyping board to construct sensors and electronic transducers, which allows the class toget a better understanding of measurement systems. In order to do this, however
undergraduate students [6-8, 12].A natural and efficient way of teaching renewable energy into curriculum is the project-basedapproach, shaping the course content to local industry fields. Course content and deliverymethods should be structured to meet the demands and challenges of such a dynamic,interdisciplinary and complex applied science field. Laboratory work is a critical component ofthe engineering education, and a core component of technical programs. Unfortunately, in therenewable energy case, the equipment is expensive, in terms of acquisition and maintenance,requiring adequate space and utility access. To cope with such challenges we are proposing inthe next academic year to develop a virtual renewable energy laboratory, consisting of
technologies have beenimplemented in the CME403 course and CME670 Construction Information Technologies forConstruction Managers and were welcomed by the students.Industry Training Standards and FacilityIn order for students to develop a sense of a real professional job, it is critical to establish anindustry-standard facility but not to focus on theory. For example, when teaching a CME453concrete course, the laboratory component follows the American Standards of Testing andMaterials (ASTM) cement, aggregate and concrete standards. The major experiments conductedare the tests specified in the American Concrete Institute field and laboratory testing certificationprogram, including: Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete, Making and Curing Concrete
project that we developed, student teams had the opportunity to betterengage in interlocking conceptual and material aspects of engineering practice. Finally, inKoretsky (2020), we show how one of the Interactive Virtual Laboratories that we use in studioallowed students to make meaning of the difference between reaction rate and equilibrium byexploring their dependence on temperature. We have also reported on the influence of COVIDnecessitated remote teaching on student learning practices in a studio course (Koretsky, 2020).We have also used activity theory to examine co-curricular engagement in engineering clubs(Hinkle and Koretsky, 2019). This interview-based study sought to characterize and compare theactivity systems of a domestic chemical
laboratory for a course in Instrumentation and Measurements.The course, designed for the undergraduate junior level, was a two-semester course for a total offour credits, and it took place in conjunction with a one-hour classroom lecture in mechanicalengineering. A modified version of this approach, however, can easily be used at all levels of themechanical engineering curriculum. This laboratory’s development process began by writing asuccessful proposal for outside funding in order to create a hands-on teaching laboratory. A two-semester long, open-ended project was utilized, a process which required the students to come upwith creative approaches to problem solving. Consequently, a full-cycle learning experience tookplace. The students began with
Conference, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.[7] Hsieh, S., "Development and Evaluation of Remote Virtual Teach Pendant for Industrial Robotics Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 35, No. 6(A), pp. 1816-1826, 2019.[8] X Chen, G Song, Y Zhang, “Virtual and remote laboratory development: A review,” Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 2010 (ASCE), pp 3843-3852.[9] Ming Teng, Hugh Considine, Zorica Nedic, Andrew Nafalski, “Current and Future Developments in Remote Laboratory NetLab,” Vol. 8, No. 8, 2016, pp 4-12.[10] Siew Wei Tho, Yau Yuen Yeung, Rui Wei, Ka Wing Chan1 and Winnie Wing-mui, “A Systematic Review of Remote Laboratory Work in Science
, S., "Current Trends in Remote Laboratories," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 4744-4756, Dec. 2009.[3] Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T.R. and Tekkaya, A.E., 2018. Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, pp.1349-1360, 2018.[4] Hsieh, S. “Design of Remotely Accessible Automated Systems to Enhance Industrial Automation Education,” ASEE 2017 Annual Conference, June 25 - 28, Columbus, Ohio.[5] Hsieh, S. “Development of Remote Virtual Teaching Pendant for Robot Programming: Lessons Learned,” ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.[6] Hsieh, S. “Lessons Learned from Remote
. “Developing Technical Writing Skills in the PhysicalChemistry Laboratory: A Progressive Approach Employing Peer Review,” Journal of ChemicalEducation, Vol. 87(1), pp 62-65., 2010.[9] R. M. Felder and R. Brent. Teaching and Learning STEM: a practical guide. John Wiley &Sons, Inc. 2016.[10] D. Kim and W. M. Olson. “Improving student lab report writing performances in materialsand manufacturing laboratory courses by implementing a rhetorical approach to writing,” Proc.122nd ASEE Annu. Conf. and Expo, 2015.[11] R. M. Felder, and R. Brent. "The intellectual development of science and engineeringstudents. Part 2: Teaching to promote growth." Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), pp.279-291, 2004.Appendix A: Questionnaire Survey and Results PlotsDear
of this class is to teach students about various types of infrastructurematerials. This class is designed to help students gain knowledge on following topics related toinfrastructure materials: Selection criteria and considerations; Behavior of materials for different types of loading and boundary conditions; Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conference Fundamental and engineering properties of interest and their evaluation through laboratory testing; Design of construction materials (Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete); Specifications for acceptance of materials; and Insight on sustainability of infrastructure materials.In order to achieve the
, 2021 ANCHORING STUDENT INTEREST IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING EXPERIMENTAL LEARNING Albert Lozano-Nieto The Pennsylvania State University Electrical Engineering Technology Wilkes-Barre Campus Dallas, PA 18612AbstractThe traditional approach to the laboratory component in the first electrical engineering (EE) orelectrical engineering technology (EET) course has been based on students learning the use ofbasic electronic instrumentation, mainly a digital multimeter (DMM) and an Oscilloscope.Through his experience of more than 25 years teaching EET, the author has realized
Room IS 105Worcester Polytechnic InstituteTeaching laboratories is an essential component of chemical engineering education. They are designed to help students think criticallyabout chemical engineering principles and practices by planning and execution of experimental work followed by reflection, analysis, andinterpretation of data. However, operating teaching laboratories with social distancing measures poses significant logistical and safetychallenges, and alternative modes of delivery could be a realistic way forward in adapting engineering curricula to the post COVID-19world. This paper is aimed at identifying common approaches and strategies implemented in transforming hands-on labs into hybrid, virtualor remote operation to achieve
many educators feel that the effectivenessof scenes/sources instructor can switch of remote learning is hampered because ofbetween seamlessly via custom transitions that. There are many barriers to studentallows for a learning experience like that of engagement including, but not limited to,a regular classroom experience. The scenes financial challenges [8], students dealingwere broadcasted via Zoom to teach ECE with stress and trauma [9], lack of support2010, a laboratory-based engineering and structure at both the technology andcourse, and summer pre-college programs course design level [10], and teachingat WPI, and the feedback from students was practices that simply don’t work
wireless sensor networks, intelligent agents, agent-based manufacturing scheduling, systems control and automation, distributed control of holonic systems and integrated manufacturing, agile manufacturing, virtual reality and remote laboratory applications in edu- cation. He has authored or co-authored various journal and conference publications in these areas. Mert Bal is currently the Chair and Associate Professor at the Miami University, Department of Engineering Technology, Ohio, United States of America. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing Robotics Engineering Technology Program to Address the Workforce Skills Gaps in
thesoftware remotely, one positive outcome of this experience is incorporating Multisim in severalexperiments in a very meaningful way. When teaching the course in-person in the future, Multisimwould be further integrated into the course with additional improvements. Experiments would berevised to include two phases: (1) Completing a pre-lab that involves theoretical analysis and softwaresimulation, and 2) Building and testing the circuit on a breadboard.Laboratory ExperimentsThroughout the semester, students completed a total of 9 experiments in addition to a finalproject. The experiments were designed to complement the material covered in the lecture part ofthe course [11]. Three experiments were completed in the laboratory on campus and
Surveying LabAbstractIn 2020, the COVID pandemic forced educators to pivot to an online teaching modality in themiddle of spring semester. In preparation for a summer offering of a surveying and geomaticsclass, faculty chose to develop a virtual laboratory that could provide a quality, virtual learningexperience for students that would fully meet the course learning outcomes. The resulting virtuallaboratory centered on a series of videos that put the student in a second-person perspective of anote-taker on a survey crew. The modules built around these videos not only allowed for a fullyvirtual delivery of the laboratory, with students participating from as far away as Saudi Arabia,they also ensured full participation of every student, something