for women in science expanded but gendersegregation still existed. In the nineteenth century, women participated in aspects of science butmainly engaged in data-gathering rather than idea-creation [26] and were largely invisible andconcentrated in nurturing career tracks [39]. Prior to the 20th century and beyond, womensupported science but not pioneers in the field; reflective of the patriarchal society they lived in.Commonly known as biological determinism, the physical, psychological, and intellectual natureof women prohibited them from producing great science [38]. The Nineteenth and earlyTwentieth centuries posited if women were incorporated into scientific employment, they weresegregated in it with stereotypes of appropriate sex roles
-term goals in their professional career. This tool has been adapted for use in the educationalsetting in a faculty mentoring capacity. The ET program advisors assign the freshman or transferS-STEM student scholars with faculty mentors to match their area of research interest. Thefaculty mentors meet with the students a minimum of three to four times a year to review theirIDP, make suggestions, and provide input for reaching their goals. The goals of the IDP processare to; develop a deeper more meaningful relationship between advisor and student, reflect anddevelop a strategy for the scholar’s educational and career, and manage expectations and identifyopportunities. In the initial meeting there are several prompts for the student to write
an Assistant Professor and started the Systems Mechanobiology Lab. The lab’s expertise is matrix systems mechanobiology, focusing on the use of in silico systems models to identify cell and matrix processes dominating collagen structure regulation, conducted alongside in vitro cell-stretching experiments to test model predictions and engineer designs for fibrotic control in vivo. He has received several honors including the Richard Skalak Best Paper Award from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the University of Arkansas College of Engineering Early Career Award. Dr. Richardson loves exploring the wonders of nature outside the lab as well, especially hiking and camping with his wife and children
questions. In all cases thedifference is small and, in most cases, not significant, but trends can be identified. In each of thetables a “+” indicates the project-based learning had a higher average score, “-“ indicates thatproject-based learning had a lower average score by the amount indicated. Question Difference Can master courses this semester -0.1 Good Grades in Engineering Courses 0 Can master challenging courses +0.1 Courses are boring +0.1 Curriculum is preparing for career +0.1Table 3. Questions about Course Confidence Question Difference Excellent Job on Tasks
Electrical/Electronic Engineering majoring in Telecommuni- cations. She gained an MSc. in Mobile and Satellite Communication from the University of Surrey, Guildford, UK and her Doctorate in Cybernetics at the University of Reading, UK . She has been inter- nationally recognized for her contributions towards youth empowerment and campaigning for equity for African Americans and Females in STEM education and Career. She has research interests in the Internet of Things, Wireless Sensor Networks, Sustainable Energy and Appropriate Technologies for Emerging Economies and bridging gender and race divides in STEM education and careers. Rose-Margaret has implemented various initiatives to increase access and retention of
to emphasize the differences between the academicand professional worlds, allowing students to be more prepared for life after graduation [21].One approach to combatting the negative impact of workplace culture is through mentorship.Professional engineer Kim Parker Brown has said that “One cannot overestimate the importanceof having someone who believes in you and is willing to act as a mentor” [9, p. 49]. Mentors canhelp a mentee transition into the professional workforce by providing guidance and alleviatingstress, especially in the beginnings of a career [10]. For women in STEM, having a mentor of thesame gender has been found to be particularly effective [8]. Hernandez [8] concluded that havinga mentor of the same gender makes it more
. In addition, we gatheredqualitative data to ascertain the successful delivery of the value propositions. Recent lab alumniand industry partners were surveyed to determine whether they received the value that waspromised and expected, as well as to discover why the lab was important to them, and what theyvalued most. We invited feedback from representatives of the university and school corporateand external relations programs, as well as the members of its advisory board to learn more aboutthe overall value the Lab brings to the university and its stakeholders.1. IntroductionEngineering students interested in pursuing careers in the healthcare industry are in want ofexperiential learning opportunities that allow them to test the waters and
Paper ID #35106STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES): A reimagining of an onsiteNASA/TSGC/UTCSR high school internship programMrs. Celena Miller, University of Texas Austin - Center for Space Research Celena Miller is the Senior Outreach Program Coordinator for the Texas Space Grant Consortium in Austin, Texas. She has worked for over twelve years in education. During that time, Celena has worked in the Texas public school system, promoting earth and space education to students, teachers and the community through curriculum, professional development, science nights, and career exploration. Celena has been recognized for
Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Assistant Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering stu- dent career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in Cambridge, MA. She earned a bachelor’s degree in biological engineering from Cornell University and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the
learned on the joband are specific to each work setting," while soft skills are defined as "the cluster of personalitytraits, social graces, language skills, friendliness, and optimism that mark each one of us tovarying degrees" (7,8). Student engagement activities consist of a wide variety of classroom andoff campus work (5, 10) to develop both hard and soft skills required to have a successful career. At UW-Platteville, the Pioneer Academic Center for Community Engagement (PACCE)was established in fall 2008 to nurture a campus environment to support student engagementthrough service learning, active learning and other community-based projects. It providesfinancial support to students under faculty direction to pay the costs of travel
students 20 15 AE-RO Score 10 5 AE-RO 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 -5 -10 Student # Figure 6. AE-RO score of Engineering studentsRogers and Ohrn (2007) stated that Construction Management students tend to bevisually-oriented and critical thinkers rather than analytical thinkers. This personalitydifference could play a significant role in career choice and
), and HBCUs (Gasmanand Nguyen, 2014, Toldson 2018, and Toldson, 2019) represent a unique venue through which toreach a large population of such students. This research focused on increasing retention rates andimproving academic and career success in the STEM disciplines at an open-enrollment HBCUthrough a hands-on and mentorship-focused research program. We have utilized the “ScientificVillage” model, where students interacted as peers assisting, encouraging, holding each otheraccountable, and interacted with faculty mentors. Incorporating hands-on research furtherstimulated and engaged students to enhance interest in STEM curriculum and careers. This was avoluntary, three-year, mixed-method, hands-on research program that tracked a cohort of
Paper ID #32484CS@Mines: PATH Ambassadors to High Success, A Successful S-STEMScholarship ProgramDr. Tracy Camp, Colorado School of Mines Tracy Camp is a Full Professor and Head of the Department of Computer Science at the Colorado School of Mines. She is the Founder and Director of the Toilers (http://toilers.mines.edu), an active ad hoc networks research group. Her current research interests include the credibility of ad hoc network simulation studies and the use of wireless sensor networks in geosystems. Dr. Camp has received over 20 grants from the National Science Foundation, including a prestigious NSF CAREER
Paper ID #32843S-STEM: Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically TalentedEngineersDr. Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno Indira Chatterjee received her M.S. in Physics from Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio in 1977 and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah in 1981. Indira is Associate Dean of Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno. As Associate Dean she oversees undergraduate and graduate education in the college including recruitment, retention, advising, and career placement. She
barriers to the success of CC students and CC transfers; changes infaculty and staff perceptions regarding CC transfers; and the effects of the program on CCstudent matriculation and completion of Lipscomb’s engineering program are presented.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) created the Scholarships in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program to enable low-income, talented domesticstudents to pursue successful careers in STEM fields and contribute to the American innovationeconomy with their knowledge [1]. The NSF provides support to institutes of higher educationin a competitive grant process to develop S-STEM programs and encourages four yearinstitutions to collaborate and encourage students to complete 4
(for engineering context) 8-item, validated instrument focused on longer-term,maintained interest. The methods that follow were developed to explore a multi-subfactordepiction(s) (from literature) of maintained interest, including conceptualizing and analyzingstudent responses. Two associated research questions thusly addressed in this study are: 1) whatis the strongest factor structure for measuring the construct of first-year engineering students’long-term, stable maintained interest in the choice of pursuing an engineering career?; and 2)how strong is the fit of theoretically-grounded structural models of the construct of first-yearengineering students’ maintained interest in engineering careers? Results show significantempirical support in
forms of knowledge and information regardinginternship/employment resources, departmental and research opportunities, curriculumalternatives, exposure to graduate school, and professional experiences that may result favorablein future career aspirations. A fundamental component to facilitating successful student careerpaths is correlated to an authentic form of mentorship, which exposes students to a plethora ofcareer opportunities and prepares them to navigate postgraduate experiences. The proposed model,which was implemented over a span of four years with a total of sixteen engineering studentsconducting undergraduate research, identifies four key elements in the transformative process: 1)develop student-faculty relationship; 2) faculty
betweenstudents' interest and performance in engineering design. Moreover, students with high interestalso have a high performance and high self-recognition in engineering design and vice versa.Keywords: Engineering Identity, Interest, Performance, Self-recognitionIntroductionThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS 2018) projects employment growth for engineers over the2016 - 2026 decade [1]. However, some new studies show declining interest among students inthe U.S. to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) related field[2]. Therefore, it is vital to encourage students' engineering identity development from an earlyage to explore their interest in engineering to guide them to pursue careers in engineering. Oneway to increase
. The program was designed to enable participants to build a supportive, professional network, creating cohorts that would continue well after the summer.3. The program was designed to build and assess participant gains not only in research experience but also in their professional development, mentor/cohort relationships, and plans for their career.4. The program was designed to have broad reach in who was impacted, with cascading impact because of the participants selected.The CISTAR REM program speaks to how we should be designing summer programs and isconsistent with the growing body of evidence, captured well in the following quote: “Empiricaldata suggest that, although students from underrepresented racial minority backgrounds
the Professoriate (AGEP) Alliance for Diversity and Strengths of STEM Faculty: A Culturally-Informed Strengths-Based Approach to Advance Early-Career Faculty Success. Dr. Almeida is also Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (S-STEM) grant, Engineering Neighbors: Gaining Access Growing Engineers (ENGAGE). Dr. Almeida’s graduate training is in Urban Education Policy – Higher Education from the University of Southern California.Dr. John Y. Oliver, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Oliver is a professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo. His field of expertise is in computer
ComputationalThinking and related STEM skills and careers before, and after, a thirteen-week project-basedintervention. More specifically, we followed the experience of students as they engaged inapplying acquired knowledge to design, build, and automate a model clubhouse. This work inprogress emphasizes the qualitative and quantitative findings of one student’s perceptions beforeand after the thirteen-week project-based program.MethodsThe project-based intervention, referred to as The SMART Clubhouse Unit, was implementedwithin a multi-age 4 and 5 grade classroom of a public elementary school (grades K-5; ages 5- th th12) located in the XXXX, USA. The class consisted of 24 students (14 males and 10 females),ages 9-11. The research team
. Additionally, Dr. Dare has a passion for working with K-12 students to understand how changes in classroom instruction towards these integrated STEM approaches impact their attitudes towards and beliefs about STEM fields. In particular, she examines methods that positively impact girls, which may increase the number of women pursuing careers in STEM-related fields where they are currently underrepresented.Mr. Benny Mart Reblando Hiwatig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Benny is a PhD candidate in the STEM Education program at the University of Minnesota. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Secondary Education and took master’s coursework in Chemistry Education in the Philippines, where he also taught high school
by others [10]. Thereverse belongingness is alienation, social isolation, or rejection, leading to depression in thelong term [11]. Among factors that influence the sense of belonging of women to a major areidentity or being valued [12]; stereotype-free educational environment [13]; formal and informalstudent organizations supporting female students [12]; family, faculty and peer support [7]. Onthe other hand, and specific to the construction industry, many prior studies indicate thatpresence of gender stereotyping, low sense of belonging, lack of support system, and lack offemale role models factor to women opting out of construction-related studies and careers [14],[15], [16].Previous research on sense of belonging found that only when an
balancingwork and family [2], [8].To date, little research has examined messages present in outreach and media to understand howorganizations attempt to appeal to young women and encourage them to enter engineering giventhese gendered barriers. This article attempts to redress this omission by analyzing profiles offemale engineers from the website, Engineer Girl [4]. Engineer Girl is designed and maintainedby the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) to inspire young women to become engineers.The main research questions I deal with in this paper are: 1. How do female engineers on the website describe challenges they face as engineers to potential newcomers? 2. What types of advice and career guidance do female engineers provide to young women
organizational and individual career development, and adult learning, training design, and evaluation. In addition to 33 years teaching at the graduate level and serving as associate dean of the School of Education at two different times, founded and managed the university’s Career & Personal Counseling Center and related services, codesigned master’s degrees in Human Resource Development, and Learning Technology, and a doctorate in Organization Development. In addition, served as a career development consultant to several regional engineering firms, to American Express Corp, the State of Minnesota Department of Economic Security, the U.S. Department of Labor, and USAID.Dr. Elaine R. Millam, WorkWise Coaching & Consulting
Paper ID #32286Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Entrepreneurship: A QualitativeExaminationMs. Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology Heydi Dominguez is a fourth-year undergraduate student pursuing her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and minoring in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. Her career interests include conducting research in the field of engineering education, particularly focused on en- trepreneurship and design education for engineering undergraduates. At NJIT, she is actively engaged in the Society of Women Engineers and Society of Hispanic
on enhancing the role of women in the workplace and working on policiestoward the empowerment of women, our exploratory research study examines how attractive theengineering profession is for women in Qatar. The current paper focuses specifically on challengesthat women face during the very first step in their careers—the recruitment and hiring process.The paper employs a multi-method approach, gathering and analyzing data obtained via a surveyand interviews with engineering program alumnae who graduated from 2009 to 2020 in Qatar.When examining the challenges female participants faced during the recruitment and hiringprocess for engineering jobs in Qatar, the findings revealed that many women did not feelparticularly welcomed while trying
,educators and students alike--especially in the wake of an unprecedented shift to remote workduring the COVID-19 pandemic. This literature review is a first step to understand and improvevirtual internship experiences for engineering students. It aims to establish a context for furtherresearch to understand how virtual engineering internships can best achieve their intended goals,both in terms of advancing individual student careers and learning as well as supportinginstitutional goals of access and equity in engineering education. The institutional focus emergeswithin the literature and represents a fundamental commitment, as universities may considercoordination of internships for students a key “structure of opportunity” for retention and access
research and instructional Interests include programming languages, computer ethics and student success and development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Uneven Playing Field: Examining Preparation for Technical Interviews in Computing and the Role of Cultural ExperiencesAbstractWhile starting a career may be challenging in any field, in computing the process tends to beaggravated by requirements of digital portfolios and technical interviews that necessitate codingextemporaneously. During the programming components, candidates are expected to offer asolution, while also giving consideration to the choice of algorithm and its time complexity.Although
Advisors Dr. Gretchen Fougere is an inventor, technology leader, and educator. Her broad, interdisciplinary train- ing prepared her well to have a successful career in industry-based technology development as well as education. Dr. Fougere has spent her career engaging people of all backgrounds to understand how engi- neering and design can enhance their lives. A significant fraction of her effort has focused on expanding STEM reach and impact through partners in industry, universities, and nonprofit entities. Her firm, STEM Leadership Advisors, is proud to have collaborated with WPI for this NSF-funded project and she also serves as Vice Chair of the Science Club for Girls. Dr. Fougere has had dual careers in