AC 2010-1300: DEVELOPMENT OF A WOMEN IN ENGINEERING PROGRAM:FROM RESEARCH TO IMPLEMENTATIONJudith Cordes, Michigan State University Judy Cordes has been working with women in engineering for over twenty years. Currently she is the Coordinator of the Women in Engineering Program at Michigan State University. She oversees recruitment and retention efforts for women engineering students and serves as the advisor for The Collegiate Section of the Society of Women Engineers. Judy also serves as an academic advisor for freshman engineering students.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University
Science, 198920 Norris, S. & Phillips, L., What is at stake in knowing the content and capabilities of children’s minds? Journal of Theory and Research in Education, 2(3), 283-308, 2004.21 Dewey, J., Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan, 1944.22 Otto, K. N. and Wood, K. L., Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design,and New Product Development, Prentice-Hall, NY, 2001. Page 15.366.2323 Hanson, J. and Sinclair, K., Social constructivist teaching methods in Australian universities- reported uptake and perceived learning effects: A
AC 2010-408: INTEGRATING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGIESINTO THE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJorge Valenzuela, Auburn University Jorge Valenzuela received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in the year 2000. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. His recent research involves stochastic models for the evaluation of production costs and optimization of electric power generation. He teaches courses on Operations Research and Information Technology.Jeffrey Smith, Auburn University Jeffrey S. Smith is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. Prior to
Technology Education. Accessed Jan 2008. 10. Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education. Accessed Jan 2008. 11. Doumont, JL. “Trees, Maps and Theorems: Effective Communication for Rational Minds”. Brussels, Belgium: Principiæ, 2009.12. Personal communication, Blakeslee, October 2009.13. Mullinix, B. "A Rubric for Rubrics: Reconstructing and Exploring Theoretical Frameworks". in Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network Conference. 2007. Pittsburgh, PA.14. Mullinix, B. "Rubrics". 2009, Accessed Jul 2009. 15. Meuller, J. "Authentic Assessment Toolbox". 2009, Accessed Jan 2009. 16. Bargainnier, S., "Fundamentals of Rubrics, in Faculty Guidebook - A Comprehensive Tool for Improving
AC 2010-1221: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE INNOVATIONCAPABILITIES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTSNicole Genco, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Nicole is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.Katja Holtta-Otto, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Katja is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin Page 15.151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of
AC 2010-136: AN AUTOMATED BOTTLE FILLING AND CAPPING PROJECTFOR FRESHMAN ENGINEERING STUDENTSKala Meah, York College of Pennsylvania Kala Meah received his B.Sc. from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1998, M.Sc. from South Dakota State University in 2003, and Ph.D. from the University of Wyoming in 2007, all in Electrical Engineering. Between 1998 and 2000 he worked for several power industries in Bangladesh. Dr. Meah is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Physical Science at York College of Pennsylvania. His research interest includes electrical power, HVDC transmission, renewable energy, power engineering education, and energy
AC 2010-780: INCREASING GIRLS' INTEREST IN ENGINEERING BY MAKINGIT FUNJeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology Jeanne Christman is an Assistant Professor of Computer Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her academic area of distinction is in Embedded Systems Design. Jeanne received a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Clarkson University and an M.S. in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Dallas. She worked in industry as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) designer prior to joining the faculty at RIT.Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth Dell is an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing &
Undergraduate Science Education, Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, National Research Council, 1999.16 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. L., (1999), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.17 Norbert J. Delatte, Paul A. Bosela, Rosemary Sutton, Joshua Bagaka’s, Implementing Forensics and Failures inthe Civil Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Forensic Engineering –From Failure to Understanding, London, UK, December 2, 2008.18 Frumkin, J. (2005). The wiki and the digital library. OCLC Systems & Services
). Advancing engineering education in the P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 369–87.4. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson, London, U.K.5. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: Worth.6. Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1992). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds). Context and Cognition. Ways of knowing and learning. (pp. 115-133). New York: Harvester.7. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking Transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.8. Broudy, H.S. (1977). Types of knowledge and purpose of
AC 2010-1972: METHODS FOR EXPLORING ENGINEERING DESIGNTHINKING IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT TEAMSCameron Denson, Utah State UniversityMatt Lammi, Utah State UniversityKyungsuk Park, Utah State UniversityElizabeth Dansie, Purdue University Page 15.869.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Methods for Exploring Engineering Design Thinking in High School Student Teams A better understanding of engineering and its relationship to society is critical for allAmericans even though few will pursue engineering as a career 1. At the heart of engineering isdesign and therefore developing an understanding of the engineering design process
AC 2010-1079: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AHIGH-SCHOOL TEACHER.Rod Paton, University of Auckland Rod Paton holds BSc and MSc degrees in physics from the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He has been teaching high-school science and physics since the start of 1994. For the past 12 years he has been Head of Physics at Westlake Boys’ High School, Auckland, New Zealand. Rod has integrated ICT into the school’s physics programs and developed problem-solving books and practical manuals to enhance the skills and abilities of all students. His main research interests are centred on implementing steps to improve the problem-solving and academic-writing abilities of high-school
jobs and the workthey performed. One new engineer at Small Computer Company cited a number of reasons forhis enjoying his job. One reason was the company’s positive work environment. According tothis new engineer, the company had a very relaxed atmosphere and it was very easy to makeacquaintances within the company due to the large number of young people there. Alsocontributing to the positive work environment was the variety of hands-on work that his joballowed him to do. Page 15.1150.15 Q: Was there something that kind of stuck in your mind, impressed you the most? A: I guess what impressed me the most is the variety that I knew I was going
AC 2010-447: MIDDLE-SCHOOL TEACHERS’ USE AND DEVELOPMENT OFENGINEERING SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGEMorgan Hynes, Tufts UniversityDavid Crismond, The City College of New YorkBarbara Brizuela, Tufts University Page 15.873.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Middle-School Teachers’ Use And Development Of Engineering Subject Matter Knowledge: Analysis of Three CasesAbstractThis paper reports on a portion of a study of three middle school teachers (twomathematics teachers and one science teacher) as they taught a unit of engineeringinstruction. The study investigated the subject matter and pedagogical contentknowledge these teachers used and developed as they taught
WOMEN ENGINEERING FACULTY ( “Navigating Your Journey on the Academic Sea”; NSF ADVANCE Conference, Over 60 URM Women Engineering Faculty @ Caltech Photo credit: B. Paz)AbstractAs they progress in their engineering faculty careers, Underrepresented Minority Women (URM)women are very familiar with unique issues at the intersection of race and gender (DeCuir-Gunby, Long-Mitchell, & Grant, 2009; Ranson, 2005; Ronen & Ronen, 2008). This familiarityresults from their own personal experiences in the Academy and provides a broad set ofresponses ranging from leaving the professoriate to a single-minded pursuit of success no matterwhat obstacles are presented (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of
was not TV. This was real. I felt grateful for when and where I was born. I have only known freedom, never known hunger, and always slept in a clean bed. But that was too often overshadowed by the realization of my remaining obligation to others less fortunate, especially the children of this world. Moreover, these years at Bell further solidified in my mind the importance of gaining an international perspective for the field of engineering. . . . It was then I experienced a real awareness that the science and engineering workforce needed to be regarded as more than a national resource. I now emphatically feel that global issues can only be solved by using global intellectual resources, and that the interdependency of
AC 2010-1868: IMPLEMENTING AN INVERTED CLASSROOM MODEL INENGINEERING STATICS: INITIAL RESULTSChristopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Christopher Papadopoulos is a faculty member in the Department of General Engineerng at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, where he coordinates the Engineering Mechanics Committee. His research interests include nonlinear structural mechanics, biomechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics, and he serves as secretary of the ASEE Mechanics Division. He holds BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He was
values. This might be due tothe fact that students had little to no knowledge of what engineering was at the beginning ofStudio STEM; therefore, they had the most to learn about it. Nonetheless, we were encouragedthat their new found values were in the positive direction.Beliefs about Studio STEMStudents were interested in and enjoyed participating in Studio STEM, put a lot of effort into it,and felt supported by their Studio STEM instructors (see Table 2). Students also felt supportedby their peers during the project, but to a lesser extent than they felt supported by theirinstructors. Given the importance of caring interpersonal relationships 28,29 and our attempt todesign Studio STEM with that component in mind, the results support the fact
AC 2010-1846: WHO NEEDS ANOTHER APPLIED MATHEMATICS COURSE?John Heublein, Kansas State University, SalinaKenneth Barnard, Kansas State University, Salina Page 15.1373.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Who Needs Another Applied Mathematics Course?ABSTRACTAviation mathematics has been used for years and hence is not a new topic for discussion. In thedigital-age and with millennial students it is time to revisit the methods of pedagogy. Becausestudents have always had different learning styles this paper outlines an instructional approachthat addresses the declining mathematical skill level of the entering freshman students. Ourhypothesis states
AC 2010-778: TWO LEGACY CYCLE MODULES IN MATH AND CHEMISTRYFOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS BASED ON FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGYMohamed Abdelrahman, Tennessee Technological UniversityCynthia Rice-York, Tennessee Tech UniversityDalton York, Tennessee Tech UniversityCynthia Stowers, Clark Range High SchoolRobert Sircy, Tennessee Tech University Page 15.1282.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Two Legacy Cycle modules in Math and Chemistry for High School Students based on Fuel Cell TechnologyAbstractThe current paper is focused on relaying the experience of two high school teachers thatparticipated in a research experience for teachers (RETainUS
AC 2010-1352: WHAT DO EMPLOYERS WANT IN TERMS OF EMPLOYEEKNOWLEDGE OF TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND THE PROCESS OFSTANDARDIZATION?Bruce Harding, Purdue UniversityPaul McPherson, Purdue University Page 15.1364.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 WHAT DO EMPLOYERS WANT IN TERMS OF EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE OF TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND THE PROCESS OF STANDARDIZATION?AbstractProducts and processes considered everyday conveniences would not be possible withoutstandardization. That standardization making today’s technology possible was developed overthe last few decades by practitioners, many of whom are on the brink of retirement.Consequently, a growing concern
AC 2010-1148: CODING PRACTICES FOR EMBEDDED SYSTEMSMichael Pook, Boise State UniversitySin Ming Loo, Boise State UniversityArlen Planting, Boise State UniversityJosh Kiepert, Boise State UniversityDerek Klein, Boise State University Page 15.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Coding Practices for Embedded Systems Abstract Far too often, students focus on creating a working project without any regard for thequality, readability, and maintainability of their code. Students are not usually made to realizehow learning and applying good coding practices can improve the success of their projects andmake
and underrepresented minority students and faculty in their program. Page 15.568.4The leaver’s interviews include some of the same questions as the climate interviews such asinterest in and decision to major in engineering, the experiences in engineering, supportstructures and mentoring. In addition, the leaver’s interviews ask about the decision to changemajors including what factors were involved, who they spoke to about their decision, and ifanything could have changed their mind. All interviewees were asked for basic demographicinformation including sex, age, race/ethnicity, year in school and engineering major. In addition,leavers were
. Albuquerque, NM.29. Trevisan, M., et al. "A Review of Literature on Assessment Practices in Capstone Engineering Design Courses: Implications for Formative Assessment." in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2006. Chicago, IL.30. Dreyfus, H.L. and S.E. Dreyfus, Mind over machine. 1986, New York: Free Press.31. Fennema, E., "Teachers’ knowledge and its impact," in Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching, D.A. Grouws, Editor. 1992, NCTM: Reston, VA. p. 147-164.32. Nespor, J., "The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching." Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1987. 19(4): p. 317- 328.33. Leinhardt, G., "Weaving instructional explanations in history." British Journal of Educational Psychology
AC 2010-846: “THE IMAGE OF A WOMAN ENGINEER:” WOMEN’SIDENTITIES AS ENGINEERS AS PORTRAYED BY HISTORICAL NEWSPAPERSAND MAGAZINES, 1930-1970Alice Pawley, Purdue University Alice Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. Dr. Pawley has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is co-PI on Purdue University’s ADVANCE initiative, through which she is incorporating her work on metaphors into better understanding current models of women’s
written in the tactile and kinesthetic language of manipulation, and was compared with information coming from the visual system, as part of a process through which the brain creates visuospatial images.”17This suggests a strong correlation between the manipulation of objects by hand and physicalunderstanding of objects and materials. Wilson further indicates that intelligence is bestcultivated using methods which employ both mind and body.Why do we need to do it?Over the last 10-20 years, senior capstone projects that often include a hands-on component havebecome popular in engineering curricula. More recently, a significant number of engineeringeducators have begun to include hands-on work at the freshman level as well. As an
AC 2010-936: TWO-YEAR COLLEGES AND THE ALLURE OF "NANO":UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL ENTHUSIASMSAmy Slaton, Drexel University Amy E. Slaton is an associate professor of history at Drexel University in Philadelphia, and director of Drexel's Master's Program in Science, Technology and Society. She holds a PhD in the History and Sociology of Science from the University of Pennsylvania, and has written on social aspects of standards and instrumentation in American engineering, construction and manufacturing occupations. Her most recent book is _Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line_ (Harvard University Press, 2010).Mary Ebeling, Drexel University
AC 2010-724: ENGINEERING 'MANPOWER' SHORTAGES, REGIONALECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND THE 1960 CALIFORNIA MASTER PLANFOR HIGHER EDUCATION: HISTORICAL LESSONS ON ENGINEERINGWORKFORCE DEVELOPMENTAtsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Director, First Year Studies & Associate Professor, Department of Science and Technology Studies. Page 15.474.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Engineering ‘Manpower’ Shortages, Regional Economic Development, and the 1960 California Master Plan for Higher Education: Historical Lessons on Engineering Workforce
mathematical phenomena.Engineering: Ability to keep in mind parameters of the project while creating a solution.UnderstandingConstraintsEngineering: Generate an idea for testing based on knowledge of what might work (from math orCreating physics, for example, or even other things that exist - a bridge in your neighborhood,Hypotheses something found in nature or even experience).Engineering: Figure out what must be done at certain time points in order to meet a deadline.ProjectManagementEngineering: Use Use of computer aided tools for creating and modeling the project.of Software forDesignExplicit Integration of Concepts and SkillsWe applied an additional code to any video clip coded for math
AC 2010-91: A PILOT VALIDATION STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICALBELIEFS ASSESSMENT FOR ENGINEERING (EBAE): FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENT BELIEFSAdam Carberry, Tufts University Adam R. Carberry is a Doctoral Candidate in Engineering Education in the Tufts University Math, Science, Technology, and Engineering Education program. He holds an M.S. in Chemistry from Tufts University and a B.S. in Material Science Engineering from Alfred University. He is currently working at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach as a research assistant and manager of the Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program (STOMP).Matthew Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is an Associate Professor in
responsibility of the team leader to insure that all team membersunderstand the goals for the project and their contribution to achieving them. Motivating others to workwith you is crucial to the success of a project. It is a critical skill that the effective engineer-leader mustdevelop.Counseling In order to properly motivate members of team, the team leader must be mindful thatcounseling of individual team members may be required. Engineers are highly trained and self-motivated.However, a team member may not clearly understand his or her role on the project. The effectiveengineer-leader must insure that each member of the team is aware of the project goals and that success isdependent on the important contributions of each team member